Professional Documents
Culture Documents
17-28
Affidah Morni
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi Mara. Sarawak
email: affidah75@sarawak.uitm.edu.my
Abstract: The challenges of reading are indeed apparent in most teaching and learning
processes in ESL classrooms. As a result, this study is conducted to resolve the issues of
students who seem to find reading to be unbearable. Many of them have limited ability
to read well and hence, possess insufficient reading habits to become competent readers,
particularly out-of-school context. Besides, poor home literacy environments also
contribute to their shortcomings in reading. The main objectives of this study are to
identify the students’ reasons for reading as well as to find out their home reading
environments (reading backgrounds and habits; reading attitudes and motivation;
reading exposure and supports). To identify these, questionnaires were distributed to
120 secondary school students (Form 4: 16 years old) from one of the urban schools in
Sarawak, Malaysia. The findings indicate that the students read to gain information and
knowledge though many chose reading as a hobby as their last choice in explaining their
motives of reading. Besides, they preferred non-academic reading materials, mainly
lighter forms reading materials such as comics, story books and magazines. Though the
students acknowledged the importance of reading in their daily lives, their average
reading habits, attitude, motivation, exposure and support within the home domain had
suggested otherwise. They mainly read for instrumental purposes while reading for
pleasure seemed not to be given priority. Besides, the respondents acknowledge that
their parents and themselves did not read much at home. As an implication, it is vital for
students to improve their reading perceptions, abilities and practices to achieve
personal, societal and national progress. On a final note, parents’ early and continuous
efforts to be involved in their children’s literacy events in an out-of-school context are
believed to be vital to inculcate positive reading environments, habits and culture.
17
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 3 No. 1, July 2013, pp. 17-28
18
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 3 No. 1, July 2013, pp. 17-28
19
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 3 No. 1, July 2013, pp. 17-28
20
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 3 No. 1, July 2013, pp. 17-28
Ong’s Reading Habits and Interests 20%. This reflects an overall pattern in the
Questionnaire (2005). The data derived population of the study. As for ethnicity, by
from the questionnaires was analysed using far, the largest group of respondents was
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Chinese (67%), followed by the Malay
(Version 17) where descriptive and inferen- (21%). The minorities were the Bidayuhs,
tial statistics were utilized. Indians, Ibans and Melanaus. Generally, it
is observed that this particular school is
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION mostly populated by Chinese compared to
Demographic Data other races. The location of the school is
The research finding indicates that 60% of believed to be situated in a catchment area
the respondents were girls and they that is heavily populated by Chinese.
outnumbered the boys by a percentage of
21
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 3 No. 1, July 2013, pp. 17-28
percentage for first ranking) as well as 20% grades (15%). In a similar line, such
and 21.7% for the second and the third purposes are relevant in their daily lives as
rankings. This is encouraging to note that students who are required to read in school
many respondents want to educate as parts of lessons or to prepare for exams.
themselves by reading. On average, the These findings confirm the observation by
respondents to a certain extent were also Harmer (2004) that reading for utilitarian
aware of the importance of reading. or instrumental purpose is viewed as the
Reading enables them to do their main reason on why people actually read.
schoolwork (10%) and to obtain good
22
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 3 No. 1, July 2013, pp. 17-28
at home (‘sometimes’: 46.7%). Obviously, the library. They might have some amount
the children could not practise healthy of reading materials at home and they may
reading habits if their parents do not not have a pressing need to go to the public
practise similar habits themselves. As library. Noting the options ‘always’ with
affirmed by Fauziah (2002): “You can’t 13.3% and ‘frequently’ with 16.6% for
catch it from someone who hasn’t got it”. ‘family collects reading materials’, the
As for contradicting the statement that results are rather discouraging as most
‘Reading is not fun’ (57.8% for ‘never’ and respondents generally did not have big
‘seldom’), the idea of fun reading is collections of reading materials at home
possibly due to the availability of a variety because their families are not avid
of reading materials sold in the market as collectors of printed materials. To sum, the
well as the ones downloaded from the overall results disclose the reasons why
internet. In contrast, the amount of time many respondents were average readers
spent at the library is not impressive with whereby they had average reading habits,
24.2% of the respondents choosing ‘never’ average quality reading time at home and
and 42.5% with ‘seldom’. This means that were infrequent users of the libraries.
the students rarely spent their free time at
It is evident from Table 2 that 44.2% important’ hence, verified that most were
of the respondents agreed that “Reading is conscious about the necessity to learn to
not a waste of time” while 58.3% found read properly and effectively. These results
that ‘Reading is fun’. On the other hand, are encouraging to observe as some of the
56.7% of the respondents strongly dis- respondents illustrated positive reading
agreed to the statement ‘Learning how to attitude and motivation. Therefore, there
read properly and effectively is not seems to be some degree of intrinsic
23
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 3 No. 1, July 2013, pp. 17-28
motivation which if nurtured, could be were not sure whether ‘They always make
developed into good reading habits. time for reading at home’. These suggested
Notably, these results supported the that they acknowledged the significance of
findings illustrated by Thadphoothon reading but more reading were done at
(2006) where her respondents were not school compared to at home because many
only aware of the significance of reading to did not have sufficient reading time at
improve their academic achievement, but home. This result is parallel to the study
also the importance of correct their reading conducted by Kaur and Thiyagarajah
skills to improve their quality of life. (1999), where many of the students were
Other outstanding indicators from the found to read very little at home (except for
table above shows that most respondents some who read the daily newspapers) and
(47.5%) strongly disagreed that ‘Reading seemed perturbed when asked about their
is not really important’ while 32.8% were reading interests, giving the typical reasons
‘undecided’ and 31.9% ‘agreed’ to the of the lack of time and access to reading
statement: ‘They learn to read more at materials to explain the lack of time used
school than at home’. In addition, 48.3% of for reading.
the respondents also revealed that they
Subsequently, only 35.8% ‘agreed’ and tively average motivation towards reading,
27.5% ‘strongly agreed’ that ‘their family hence may influence students to actually
motivates them to read’. This phenomenon obtain some positive reading attitude.
suggests that more than half of the respon-
dents were from families who gave rela-
24
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 3 No. 1, July 2013, pp. 17-28
Subsequently, it is interesting to note add, more than half of the respondents also
the responses for the statement: ‘They are disagreed that ‘Reading is not part of their
not good in reading because their families family culture’ with 26.1% opted ‘strongly
do not provide reading support at home’ agree’ and 41.2% chose ‘agree’. These
where most respondents strongly disagreed indicate that to a certain extent, the
and disagreed. The result suggests that respondents had some support in reading as
most of the students did not completely it was not regarded as uncommon daily
blame their parents in explaining their practices, especially in the home domain.
shortcomings and limitations in reading. To
25
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 3 No. 1, July 2013, pp. 17-28
26
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 3 No. 1, July 2013, pp. 17-28
De Temple, J. (2001) Parents and children Harmer, J. (2004) The practice of English
reading books together. In Dickinson, language teaching. Harlow: Longman.
D. & Tabors, P. (Eds.), Beginning Hartley, R E., Frank, L., & Goldenson, R.
literacy with language, pp. 31-51 M. (1957). The complete book of
Baltimore: Brooks children's play. New York: Crowell.
Dicker, C. (2004) Habits of reading. In Hedge, T. (2006) Teaching and learning
Reading connections. Sasbadi-MELTA the language classrooms. Oxford:
ELT Series. Petaling Jaya: Sasbadi. Oxford University Press.
Dupuy, B., Tse, L. & Cook, T. (1996) International Reading Association (2005)
Bringing books into the classroom: Individual, home and community
first steps in turning college-level ESL factors. Retrieved: April, 22, 2007
students into readers. TESOL Journal, from http:// www. reading. org.
5, pp.10-15. Kaur, S. & Thiyagarajah, R. (1999) The
Farstrup, A. E. & Samuels, S. J. (2002) English reading habits of ESL students
What research has to say about in University Science Malaysia in the
reading instruction. USA: 6th Inter Literary and Education
International Reading Association. Research Network Conferences on
Fauziah, H. (2002) Developing competent Learning. Penang.
readers. In Developing Reading Skills. Kim, H. & Krashen, S. (1997) Why don’t
Petaling Jaya: Sasbadi Melta Series. language acquirers take advantage of
Gan, S. E. (2002) Reading habits of the power of reading? TESOL Journal,
English optionists of Maktab 6, pp. 26-29.
Perguruan Teknik. Kuala Lumpur. Krashen, S. (2004) The power of reading.
Retrieved: October, 7, 2006 from Englewood: Libraries Unlimited.
http://mptkl.tripod.com/rnd/gan_02.ht Lynch, J. (2007) Learning about literary:
ml. social factors and reading acquisition
Gee, R. W. (1999) Encouraging ESL on Canadian language and literary
students to read. TESOL Journal, 8, research network. Retrieved: July, 27,
pp. 3-7. 2007 from http:// literary encyclopedia.
Gest, S. D., Freeman, N. R., Domitrovich, Ca/pdfs/ learning-about. Literary.
C. E. & Welsh, J. A. (2004) Shared Malaysian National Library (2006)
book reading and children’s Reading survey. Retrieved: July, 14,
comprehensive skills: the moderating 2007 from http:// i.baca.pmm.my/
role of parental discipline practices. kajian/ kajian 2_en.asp.
Early Childhood Research Quarterly, Mielke, A.R. (2011) Comprehension
19, pp. 319-336. support for English language learners
Gove, A. & Cvelich, P. (2010) Early using the read naturally
reading: Igniting education for all. a strategy.Retrieved: May, 20,2012 from
report by the early grade learning http://www.readnaturally.com/pdf/com
community of practice. Retrieved on prehension-support-for-ELLs.pdf
March,12,2012 from Morrow, C.M. (1985) Developing young
http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/ voluntary readers: the home-the child-
Documents/early-reading- the school. Reading Research and
report_gove_cvelich.pdf Instruction, 25, pp.1-8.
Greaney, V. & Hegarty, M. (1987). Mullis, R.L., Mullis, A.K., Cornille, T.A.,
Correlates of leisure-time reading. Ritchson, A.D. & Sullender, M.S.
Journal of Research in Reading, 10, (2004) Early literacy outcomes and
pp. 3-27. parental involvement. Tallahassee:
Florida State University
27
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 3 No. 1, July 2013, pp. 17-28
28