Professional Documents
Culture Documents
" #$
Islamic Azad University
South Tehran Branch
Abstract (%&'
he present research studied the effects of collabora- 01 % / + ,-# . )* )!" # $% &' (
T tive learning on critical thinking. An experimental and 1 =6< ; # 7,8# ,9 . : 56 # 4 ( . 3 . 2,
a witness group, each composed of 30 female mathemati- 01 7 ' 1, > * * 1 =6 *
cs students, were administered Critical Thinking Test (OCR, # @ A' 3 8 > ?666 $OCR< # . 2,
2000). Next, the experimental group was taught a course B )8 7 * *# ,-# )8 7 *#
using the method of collaborative learning. The witness 7- . JH, I A # - G)DE F , 3 8 C
group was taught the same course using the method of lec- )8 # 8 # J,L $. 2, G)DE < . 2, 01 K# 7
turing. The results of MANCOVA showed that the experimen- )!" I3 * * %) * # >. 2,
tal group outperformed the witness group in three subscales 3 M+ * # N OE # . 2, 01 . # ,-# . )*
of critical thinking namely, critical analysis, credibility of
1. feedback 4. credibility of evidence 7. Oxford, Cambridge and RSA (Royal Society of Arts)
2. collaborative learning 5. critical evaluation Examinations
3. critical analysis 6. quasi experiment
?6
K# P # 8 * * 7 4 # ƒ A' G)DE . $.# e* Y . Y # n 7- M
3 - Q YL 9 # - # # 4 # K P $M2+ )8 # . 5 8 # J,L . $^6 . 2,
M-# . 3M+ MR M-# u) ( 7 .# e* Y 3M 8 # 4 ), ^^ . 2,
7 S# . . Y $ 7 * $ , ) 3 )* K# P )D- 1,
*. # , 8 B, n - # * M)U R+ >?66i< $/U [ # J,L
?
# 3 )* # N 4 Q J OE # n - # : ( 3 8 # 6•q € J - . 1U k a
. xY . J n# DP . ,E ' # 4 7 . # })Eb $7Y A'
# . , # 3 8 ())R : D- . 4 7`2 : =6 # = # # J,L 2 #
. |L 9 # # 8 7, 9 : ) 1)U - . 2, 01 ,XJY 8
G)Y0 n# [ # -e W + 3 - K |N 9 * u ; 3M # ()J 7- M 7 6•55i
M-# Y xY n n# tY '# 7 6•5^ % &' ( # € J - . 1U
3 8 ())R . + Y : 3 >?66i< /U K RU ` GP F ,
G R ,-# A # )8 )!" „RU ` # 4 7 . )*& . J $A # C # . # 4 7
A # - G)DE $ %)' n A' . Y G)0 . 1 ^ . )* . * $ ,-# . )*
3M+# # - 7 ^. )H, I - . ,)U R+ 7 Y P # q6 $ # # 8
3M+ ~ b,9 Q XY) ' E, Y 7 P# =6
#-1 W: I7) # : $. )* 7XD #
GJN : . 2, 01 }` () ) . 7,+ ~ b,9 K‚ 8 Y # ,)U R+
# 2 ( 3 > 66 < ?=•q % &' . ' # 3 8 ())R .# 8 . J V)D0
# J,L . $^6 . 2, G)DE . GP . 7,+ 8 7, 9 : V)D0
^^ 5•i . 2, )8 # . 5 5•i 8 @ . ,8 3 - M8 # * #-
3> Q < 8 G E *7 # . *
!( /0 1
2 3 " 45 0 6 0 7 8 6 6 9: 0;<
3# # R ,9 * # . 2, 01 . %)' 7X 2
F= •5?< X # - Y 7; 1 # * . Y () ) () 7- *
1. reliability 3. validity
2. Cronbach’s alpha 4. Multivariate Analysis of Covariance ( MANCOVA)
?6
# R # . 2, 01 . # ,-# . )* I A # - G)DE # - # J,L >P†6• =q
# 8 G R . ) ) # Y 3>? Q < 3 - ) " # . )H,
3M 8 G08 ! . )H, I A # - G)DE GP F ,
!% /0 1
6 6 =0 9 > ?@ A 0 BCD
30E 60
P F K ))H xJ
. 2, G)DE %)'
6•if 6•=6 . 2, G)DE
6•ff= 6•6?? 8 # J,L
6•q=i 6• 5 . 2, )8 #
8 # J,L %)'
6•f== 6•6^i . 2, G)DE
6•666 ii•f6? 8 # J,L
6•?i^ •== . 2, )8 #
. 2, )8 # %)'
6•5?^ 6•?^= . 2, G)DE
6•6^q ^• ?q 8 # J,L
6•666 ^•65 . 2, )8 #
,-# . )*
6•6^5 ^•?6 . 2, G)DE
6•666 ^6•6i 8 # J,L
6•66 q• ^ i . 2, )8 #
3M >P< 6 •66 < i •ii )' . )H, IFo7
23
/
^6
.# )X XY ; % &' GP . 7,+ =i
G - @ m?66i $ # YR . I $ X9 m?66i ?i
?6
# - m?66? $M)Y M)Y $ ,)' m?66i $ *
i
$ XD m?66 $ ' _ $A # + m?665 $
6
01 ,-# . )* ! >?66q $ # m ^ i
3 - )" # . # . 2, 6
8 23 6 6 0 2 3 6? < F !(
R $ L Y, . D R $7j J $7DgX G . ,)U R+ E0 7
?6=
. )* # 1, # . ‰ 7,+# # - 7 $ 0 2 MP + K 1, . 4 # ƒ $x
$ ) 1)U - . 2, 01 . Qj L 7 < )H, ,-# . `)E . G L 7DY
W D . 72Ja $# $G - $ * X K L a Q 2, , . )* . `)E 7 MJX
3 - # 8 >7,9 k2E . 7- M ,)D N 7)0 3 8 B C#k a
% &' F , $. 2, 01 . # 7` # # $ 9. &' ˆ , ())J # $ &' .# )X
. # 7)D- # ,-# . )* ! /) ; . 8 # ( !w 0 L 7 # ,-# . )*
)8 # 8 # J,L $. 2, G)DE GY, # %2 7,X 01 . # ‰ M 2
3 ,X XY . &' 7- $ - ) " . 2, 0 $ X < - M Y . )* #
[)E 7I 7- M1* D- . xY @ # m?66= $# 8 # ' - m 6 $( m f6 $ X
() G R % /+ . K ) X : 4 . )* $p U $p m?665 $F # ' /,D $ Y
. )* x 7 , /) - M- 8 + ?66f n Y $?66^ $( Y U # $( # m ?66i
. . , ) MP + $ 8 { ‰ , $ K 1, . 7,+ # >?665< . * 7I * 3>?665 $# X)0
# 8 c + 4 # 0+ # 2 4 * . * () 9 % & '
. 2, 01 }` % /+ . . u ,X M 0 )' # R K 1 . 2, #
# 47 , # ( # 3 8 9c + : # ,-# . )* ! /) % &' . 7,+
. )* [)E 7X 2 # ,-# . )* [)E 3 - )S" . 2, 01 . #
01 . # % /+ . . , ) . ,)D N . + . &' Y Š J 2 $ ; % &' F , XY
3M # # 9 . 2, 01 & 7 # : % # # 8W :
$. 2, 01 # ,-# . )* ! ) " c{#7 A# C #7 - # 08 $K 1, }`
7 - ,9 7,X # 7,0 ( % &' ( . 7,+ u $ B , C # 7X 2 # ,-#
3 # # N ()S ' # : . 2, 01 . Y 01 . )* . # . T }` 7 ),
66 ?= # . 2, 01 . Y () ) &' 9 7- - a9 ex $ 8
3M G- Y W# I @ ,Y- /) ( 7- / $A) # T $> f5< n * * $> ff< n #
# : . 2, 01 . # }` ()S ' > q< + 8 G 0 - $> ^< ) A ) # T
thinking skills and disposition toward critical thin- 9 D 7 E $( ? B=C 9A 7 %!" 7 9 6 7 7 9 0 7 3@ ? >
king. Environmental Education Research, 12 (34), E !2 9 , ?H N FS 0 9; 58
429-443. !2 L, M E< 0 9,
Facione, P. A. (1990). The California Critical Thin- Atkinson, D. (1997). A critical approach to critical
king Skills Test-college level. technical report#2. thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 31 (1),
Factors predictive of CT skills. Millbrae, CA: 71-94.
?6i
trative and Policy Studies School of Education. Inventory: CCTDI Inventory Manual. Millbrae,
Retrieved on Jan.14 2008 from http:// etd.library. CA: California Academic Press.
pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-04182007-205440/un- Forbes, H., Duke, M., & Prosser, M. (2001). Stu-
critical thinking skills to enhance learning. Bos- Greek children: Problem-solving effectiveness and
ton: Allyn and Bacon. group interactions. Journal of Social Psychology,
Johnson, D. W., Skon, L., & Johnson, R. T. (1980). 126, 227-236.
Effects of cooperative, competitive, and indivi- Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhan-
dualistic conditions on children’s problem-sol- ces critical thinking. Journal of Technology Edu-
ving performance. American Educational Rese- cation, 7 (1). Retrieved on Jan 14, 2008 from
arch Journal, 17, 83-93. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v7n1/pdf/g
Jones, A. (2005). Culture and context: Critical thin- okhale.pdf.
king and student learning in introductory macro- Gray, R. J. (2006). Improving critical reading and
economics. Studies in Higher Education, 30 (3), critical thinking skills: What is Effective Pedagogy
339-354. in a College Learning Environment? Estrella Moun-
Khosravani, S., Manoochehri, H., & Memarian, tain Community College. Retrieved on Jan 14,
R. (2005). Developing critical thinking skills in 2008 from http://www.mcli.dist.Maricopa.edu/ mil/
nursing students by group dynamics. The Internet fcontent/2005-2006/gray_rpt.pdf.
Journal of Advanced Nursing Practice, 7 (2). Re- Herriman, J., Willetts, J. R., & Partridge, E. Y.
?6
affects students: Findings and insights from tw- courses. Journal of Education for Business, 72,
enty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jos- 197-200.
sey Bass. Lancaster, K., & Strand, C. (2001). Using the
Paul, R. (2005). The state of critical thinking today. team-learning model in a managerial accounting
New directions for community colleges, 130, 27- class: An experiment in cooperative learning.
40. Issues in Accounting Education, 16, 549-567.
Peters, M. W., Smith, M. F., & Smith, G. W. Lazarowitz, R., Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Baird, J.
(2002). Use of critical interactive thinking exer- H. (1994). Learning science in a cooperative set-
cises in teaching reproductive physiology to un- tling: Academic achievement and affective out-
dergraduate students. Journal of Animal Science, come. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
80 (3), 862-865. 31 (10), 1121-1131.
Ricketts, J., & Rudd, R. (2002). Critical thinking: Lewittes, H. (2007). Collaborative learning for cri-
A literature review. Florida, University of Florida. tical thinking. State University of N. Y, College
Retrieved on Jan 14, 2008 from http://step.ufl. at Old Westbury. Retrieved on Jan 14, 2008 from
edu/resources/critical_thinking/critical_litreview. http://www.aacu.org/meetings/generaleducation/
pdf. documents/Lewittes.pdf.
Ross, J. A. (1988). Improving social-environmental Lipman, M. (1988). Critical thinking: What it can
studies problem solving through cooperative be? Educational Leadership, 46 (1), 38-43.
learning. American Educational Research Jour- McConnell, D. A., Steer, D. N., Owens, K. D., &
nal, 25 (4), 573-591. Knight, C. C. (2005). How students think: Impli-
Rudd, R. M., Baker, D., & Hoover, T. (2000). Under- cations for learning in introductory geoscience cour-
graduate agriculture student learning styles and ses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53 (4), 462-
critical thinking abilities: Is there a relationship? 470.
Journal of Agricultural Education, 41 (3), 2-12. Nelson, C. (1994). Critical thinking and collabora-
Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, tive learning. In K. Bosworth & S. J. Hamilton
research and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. (Eds.), Collaborative learning : Underlying pro-
Tama, C. (1989). Critical thinking has a place in eve- cesses and effective techniques (pp. 45-58). San
/
?6q
Wells, J., Burton, A., & Burton, E. (2005). The OCR 46-54.
as level examination as a means of assessing the Van Delinder, J. L., & Weinberger, S. (2005). Using
critical thinking skills of undergraduate students : team-based Learning to teach teaching critical
A pilot study. Psychology learning and teaching thinking in undergraduate courses. Paper presen-
5 (1), 32-36. ted at the annual meeting of the American Socio-
Wiersema, N. (2000). How does collaborative lear- logical Association, Marriott Hotel, Loews Phila-
ning actually work in a classroom and how do stu- delphia Hotel, Philadelphia.
dents react to it? A Brief Reflection. Retrieved on Van Gelder, T. J. (2005). Teaching critical thinking:
Jan. 4, 2008 from http://www.city. londonmet.ac. Some lessons from cognitive science. College
k/deliberations/collab.learning/wiersema.html . Teaching, 45, 1-6.
?6