Professional Documents
Culture Documents
production enhancement and sand management solutions. Issue price (RM) 0.41
Oversubscription rate N/A
Estimated free float (%)
Figure 1: Revenue Breakdown by Service (FY19)
17%
Ratio & Analysis
NTA per share (post IPO) (sen) 14.0
20% Price to NTA (x) 3.0
Proforma Gearing (x) 0.1
Well Perforation Well Leak Repair
Well Testing Wash & Cement Utilisation of Proceeds RM(mn) %
Wireline Services O&G Production Enhanacement
10.0 42.7
Purchase of Well Testing Equipment
Source: Prospectus Working Capital 4.9 21.0
Repayment of Bank Borrowings 5.0 21.3
IPO Statistic Listing Expenses 3.5 14.9
This IPO entails a public issue of 57.13mn new ordinary shares, and an offer TOTAL 23.4 100.0
for sale of 31mn shares at an IPO price of RM0.41/share (Figure 2). The
promoter’s entire shareholdings will remain under moratorium for 6 months
after IPO. The promoters comprise of RL Holdings, Dato’ Wan Hassan, Mad
Haimi, and Thien Chiet Chai with collective shareholding of 57.1% post-IPO
(Appendix 3). Thereafter, shareholdings amounting to 45% of enlarged share
cap will remain under moratorium for an additional 6 months. Following
expiry of the second 6-month period, the promoters may sell up to a
maximum of 1/3 annually (on straight line basis).
Page 1 of 8
30-Jun-20
Competitive Advantages
1. Decent track record in Well Perforation (since 2009)
Key Risks
1. Lack of revenue visibility and earnings volatility.
2. Weak O&G Industry Prospects
Business Overview
The bulk (FY19: 96.54%) of the Group’s revenue emanate from Malaysia.
Additionally, the Group has some exposure in Mauritania (FY19: 3.5%). RLE’s
main customers comprise of Production Sharing Contract (PSC) operators
(FY19 revenue contribution: 77%). Additionally, the Group also has dealings with
main contractors to PSC operators. RLE is heavily reliant on major client
Petronas (60% of FY19 sales). Other significant clients include Archer Malaysia
(8%), ExxonMobil E&P Malaysia (6%) and Roc Oil Sarawak (5%). RLE has 2
service centres in Kemaman, Terengganu and Labuan, Sabah. The latter is to
service the Kemaman Supply Base and Asian Supply Base respectively.
Page 2 of 8
30-Jun-20
Utilisation of Proceeds
Estimated IPO gross proceeds of RM23.4mn is expected to be utilised as per
Figure 4. RLE intends to purchase well testing equipment to reduce reliance
on partner, Petrotechnical. Additionally, this will enable the Group to be a full
service provider for well testing. The total cost of the well equipment
(RM17.3mn) will be funded via a combination of IPO proceeds (RM10mn),
internal funds, and bank borrowings. To recap, back in Oct 2017, RLE and
Petrotechnical jointly secured an Umbrella contract awarded by Petronas for
well testing services. RLE currently pays Petrotechnical to partially supply
equipment and personnel needed to execute its portion of the contract.
Amount Timeframe
Utilisation of Proceeds
(RM mn) % (mths)
Purchase of Well Testing Equipment 10.0 42.7 24
Working Capital 4.9 21.0 12
Repayment of Bank Borrowings 5.0 21.3 6
Listing Expenses 3.5 14.9 Immediate
TOTAL 23.4 100.0
Competitive Advantages
1) Decent Track Record
RLE has a decent operating track record since 2009, comprising: (1) well
perforation: 11 years, and (2) well services (i.e. wireline, perforation, leak repair,
testing, wash & cement): 3 years. The Group has 7 and 5 years of working
relationship with major clients Petronas and Roc Oil Sarawak.
(1) reduced activity, (2) new project delays, and (3) greater cost control.
Reduction in capex spend will result in lack of new projects and contract
awards. Therefore, this would lead to intense competition in an oversupplied
market. Against this gloomy backdrop, upstream service providers are at a
precarious situation. This is due to: (1) lack of orderbook replenishment, (2)
margin compression, and (3) low asset utilization.
3) Earnings Volatility
A smallish earnings base renders RLE vulnerable of slipping into losses if work
orders dry up. Conversely, when contract flows improve, profits could also
surge from a small base. Therefore, this results in erratic and volatile earnings
swings. This was reflected accordingly in the trough-to-peak oil price cycle in
2016-19. During this period, earnings turned around from FY16 losses to peak
profits in FY19 (Figure 5). Therefore, we are now wary that RLE is unable to
sustain its earnings momentum. This given the ongoing oil price slump in 2020
that would derail contract flows.
Earnings Forecast
Weaker FY20 earnings forecasts (Figure 6) are attributed to the Covid-19
pandemic which resulted in: (1) Malaysia: delay in two contracts, and (2)
Mauritania: suspension of Perforate, Wash & Cement contract from end-April
until further notice. Nevertheless, for the latter suspension, the earnings
impact is partially offset by compensation in the form of: (i) net upfront
payment of USD2.1mn, and (ii) monthly facilities rental reimbursement of
RM10k. Additionally, we also expect weaker work orders on the back of
slower domestic O&G activity. This is driven by Petronas’ announced 2020
capex cuts.
Flattish profit forecast in FY21 is mainly driven by subdued work orders from
RLE’s umbrella and call-out contracts. This is in-line with our expectations of
sustained capex cuts by Petronas in-lieu of sluggish oil price. Additionally,
bottomline decline is weighed by higher depreciation costs following the
planned purchase of well testing equipment. On the flipside, the latter is
expected to lead to margin improvement as RLE will no longer outsource
personnel and equipment from Petrotechnical. Lastly, for FY22, we anticipate a
recovery in contract awards. This is premised on expectations that the
industry down cycle would reverse its trajectory.
Page 4 of 8
30-Jun-20
Valuation
RLE’s nearest comparable listed peers comprise of Uzma Bhd (SELL, TP: RM:
0.55) and Deleum Bhd (Not Rated). However, we understand that both players
are not involved in well perforation services. Recall that the latter comprises
RLE’s largest revenue contributor (FY19: 38%). At IPO price of RM0.41/share,
RLE is priced at CY21 P/E of 12.4x. This translates to more than double the
average CY21 peers’ valuation of 6.1x for Uzma (6.3x) and Deleum (5.9x).
We ascribe valuation of 8x CY21 P/E to arrive at a target price of RM0.27.
We believe the premium versus its competitors is justified by: (1) CY21 net
cash position, (2) superior average PAT margins of 12% in FY18-20E (peers:
4%-6%), and (3) impressive 3-year earnings CAGR of 224% in FY18-20E.
We are cautious of earnings risks for RLE stemming from: (1) orderbook
uncertainty as a large chunk of revenue is derived from umbrella and call-out
contracts, (2) weak outlook for contract awards on the back of Petronas’
capex and opex cuts and (3) earnings volatility and lack of revenue visibility
due to orderbook risks. RLE is Not Rated under our coverage.
Page 5 of 8
30-Jun-20
Source: Prospectus
[ TH E RE M A ININ G OF T H IS P A GE IS IN TE N TI O NA L L Y L E F T BL AN K]
Page 6 of 8
30-Jun-20
Source: Prospectus
Page 7 of 8
30-Jun-20
Disclaimer
The information in this report has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Its accuracy and/ or completeness is not guaranteed and opinions are subject to change without
notice. This report is for information only and not to be construed as a solicitation for contracts. We accept no liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from the use of this
document. We, our associates, directors, employees may have an interest in the securities and/or companies mentioned herein.
As of Tuesday, June 30, 2020, the analyst, Wilson Loo, who prepared this report, has interest in the following securities covered in this report:
(a) nil
Page 8 of 8