You are on page 1of 3

20  Developmental Approaches to Treatment of Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder 411

activities (reporting on average 16 hours per capacities (motor, cognitive, language, spatial,
week). The control group reported receiving and sensory) to carry out emotionally meaning-
an average of 9.1 hours per week of individual ful goals (Greenspan and Wieder 2007). The six
therapy and an average of 9.3 hours per week FEDLs, from simplest to most complex, are as
of group intervention (e.g., inclusive preschool follows: (1) sharing attention and regulation; (2)
programs). At the end of the 2-year period, chil- engagement and relating; (3) two-way intentional
dren in the ESDM group showed significant affective signaling and communication; (4) long
improvements in IQ, language, and adaptive chains of co-regulated emotional signaling and
behavior when compared to children who had shared social problem solving; (5) creating repre-
received treatment from the community, even sentations or ideas; and (6) building bridges be-
though the groups differed little on the average tween ideas, including logical thinking (Greens-
number of hours of intervention received over pan and Wieder 2006).
the 2-year period. Additionally, children who The cornerstone of the DIR intervention is
received ESDM were significantly more likely Floortime sessions, which are unstructured play
to have improved diagnostic status than the chil- sessions in which the adult (therapist, educator,
dren in the community treatment group. or parent) follows the child’s lead in interactions
with the goal of building warm, trusting relation-
ships that encourage shared attention, interaction,
Developmental Individual-Differences, and communication; these relationships become
Relationship-Based (DIR/Floortime) the context for the child to progress through the
Model six FEDLs. Oftentimes, the therapist works with
the child’s parents and educators to help them to
The Developmental Individual-Difference, Rela- develop the skills to facilitate Floortime play ses-
tionship-Based (DIR/Floortime) Model, created sions. Comprehensive DIR/Floortime interven-
by Greenspan and Wieder (Wieder and Greens- tions include additional activities and therapies
pan 2001), is a comprehensive intervention for (e.g., speech, sensory integration, occupational
infants, toddlers, and preschoolers with ASD. or physical therapies, peer play dates, biomedical
This developmental intervention aims to “rees- interventions, nutritional counseling, and family
tablish the developmental sequence that went consultation or counseling), which are selected to
awry” (Greenspan and Wieder 2007, p. 189). meet each child’s developmental profile and each
It considers each child’s current developmen- family’s needs.
tal level of emotional functioning, biologically The DIR/Floortime Model contains all five
based individual differences in sensory process- components of a developmental approach to
ing, relationships with parents and caregivers, as treating young children with autism. The DIR/
well as the child’s context of family and culture. Floortime model focuses on the development of
The primary goal of this approach is to facilitate social and emotional functioning in the context
a child’s sense of self as an intentional being of close relationships. Although this approach
in the context of relationships and to build the focuses on social-emotional development, this
child’s cognitive, language, and social capaci- method was designed to be comprehensive, as it
ties. This model includes a nine-step formal as- also aims to increase the integration of a child’s
sessment process, including consultation with a motor, cognitive, language, spatial, and sensory
multidisciplinary team and the child’s parents, to capacities. Therapists work together with par-
determine how biological, maturational, environ- ents either in the clinic, at home, or in the child’s
mental, and social factors contribute to a child’s educational setting so that parents and teachers
competencies and symptoms. In particular, the learn strategies to help the child function at his/
DIR/Floortime model is designed to help a child her highest developmental level.
progress through six functional emotional devel- Three studies on the efficacy of the DIR/
opmental levels (FEDLs). A child’s FEDL refers Floortime Model are described in Table 20.2. The
to how he/she is able to integrate all of his/her first study reviewed included a unique design by
412 A. L. Wagner et al.

Hilton and Seal (2007) in which 2-year-old twin time interventions demonstrated significant gains
brothers with ASD were each randomly assigned over the children who did not receive this added
to DIR treatment or ABA treatment. After ap- component. Because this is a Type 1 study, the
proximately 17 sessions, the behavioral data evidence of treatment efficacy for the DIR/Floor-
coded with the Communication and Symbolic time Model demonstrated by this study is stron-
Behavior Scales (CSBS) revealed that there were ger than the previous two studies reviewed. Ad-
increases in the number and duration of crying ditional randomized control trials that compare
episodes in the ABA child but not in the DIR the DIR/Floortime Model to other developmental
child. There was also a slight gain in communica- treatment models would strengthen the evidence
tion composite score for the ABA child and slight base for this approach.
loss for the DIR child. This study is considered a
Type 3 study (Nathan and Gorman 2002, 2007).
The second DIR/Floortime Model efficacy Hanen’s More than Words
study was conducted by Solomon et al. (2007).
This study examined the efficacy of the PLAY Hanen’s More than Words is a parent training
Project Home Consultation Project, in which program that is designed to teach parents strat-
the parents of the 68 subjects (ranging from 18 egies to increase children’s communication via
months to 6 years of age at the time of their di- enhancing parents’ responsivity to children’s
agnosis) were trained with the DIR/Floortime attention and communication attempts. These
Model. Parents were asked to implement the strategies are designed to be used during every-
model for 15 hours per week for 1 year. Pre- and day routines with young children diagnosed with
post parent–child interactions were videotaped autism, and are focused on helping children reach
and coded by blind raters using the Functional four goals: improved two-way interaction, more
Emotional Assessment Scale (FEAS). Although mature and conventional ways of communicat-
parents’ ratings did not change from pre to post, ing, better skills in communicating for social pur-
approximately 45 % of the children made “good” poses, and improved understanding of language.
to “very good” functional developmental prog- Intervention is aimed at improving parent–child
ress, as defined by the FEAS. Although the re- interaction, and focuses on teaching parents how
sults of this pilot study are promising, this study to structure everyday routines in a manner that
did not include a control group and had signifi- is sensitive to the child’s developmental level,
cant methodological limitations, so it is rated in how to provide appropriate verbal and nonverbal
this review as a Type 3 study (Nathan and Gor- responses to children’s communication, and how
man 2002, 2007). to provide multiple opportunities for children to
The third study reviewed on the efficacy of the respond. The intervention involves eight group
DIR/Floortime Model is a Type 1 study of a ran- sessions with parents only, as well as three in-
domized control trial of 32 subjects from 2 to 6 home sessions with parents and children (Carter
years of age (Pajareya and Nopmaneejumruslers et al. 2011; Sussman 1999).
2011). Children were randomly assigned to a pre- More than Words contains all five of the com-
school as usual group or to a group receiving both ponents of a developmental approach to treating
preschool and a home-based intervention based children with ASD. It takes children’s develop-
on the DIR/Floortime Model. Parents who re- mental level and principles of developmental sci-
ceived the DIR/Floortime home-based interven- ence into account and is relationship based, child-
tion implemented this model for an average of centered, and play based. It is targeted, focusing
15.2 hour per week for 3 months. After 3 months, on communication and social interaction, and is
children were assessed with the FEAS, the Child- carried out by parents in naturalistic settings.
hood Autism Rating Scale, and the Functional There are three studies investigating More
Emotional Questionnaires. Overall, children who than Words described in Table 20.2, two of which
received the additional home-based DIR/Floor- are rated as Type 2 studies and one which is rated
20  Developmental Approaches to Treatment of Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder 413

as a Type 1 study (Nathan and Gorman 2002, Mediated Learning (JAML) and Joint Atten-
2007). Overall, studies show mixed results in tion Symbolic Play Engagement and Regulation
terms of child outcome due to the intervention. (JASPER, see next section), since deficits in joint
For example, Carter et al. (2011) conducted a attention are unique to autism. Both of these in-
randomized control trial investigating More than terventions target building this skill, as joint at-
Words in a sample of 62 children with autism, tention is a developmental precursor to social
aged 15–24 months. Children were assigned to learning, and therefore has a cascading effect on
either the experimental treatment or to a control many areas of a child’s development (Schertz
group consisting of community treatment. Re- and Odom 2007).
searchers found no main effects of More than JAML (Schertz 2005), is a manualized treat-
Words on parents’ responsivity several months ment approach focused on the developmental
after enrollment, as measured by a partial interval foundations of joint attention. The five parent-
coding system of parent–child free play videos, mediated learning principles include: (1) focus-
although they did find medium effect sizes. In ad- ing—helping the child to learn by focusing his/
dition, there were no main effects of treatment on her attention; (2) giving meaning—helping the
children’s communication. The intervention did, child to understand the meaning of objects or
however, facilitate communication in children activities by expressing emotion; (3) expand-
who had exhibited low levels of object interest at ing—helping the child expand his/her under-
the beginning of treatment. Similarly, in a single- standing by labeling, pointing out salient features
subject design conducted by Prelock et al. (2011) or events, and making connections; (4) encour-
involving four participants aged 37–69 months, aging—encouraging the child’s learning by cre-
three of the four children showed improvements ating optimal and achievable challenges and by
in social and symbolic communicative acts and acknowledging his/her success; (5) organizing
vocabulary, but not on a standardized develop- and planning —helping the child learn by struc-
mental test (Mullen Scales of Early Learning; turing activities and daily routines into predict-
Mullen 1989). McConachie et al. (2005) carried able sequences of events. In addition, JAML
out a randomized control trial in which 51 sub- suggests strategies for parents to use to help their
jects received a 3-month course of weekly More children develop social-communication skills in
than Words sessions along with three home visits. four areas: (1) focusing on faces, (2) turn-taking,
The treatment group was compared to a wait-list (3) responding to joint attention, and (4) initiat-
control group. Children who received the More ing joint attention.
than Words treatment demonstrated significantly JAML meets all five requirements of a devel-
larger vocabulary sizes than those in the wait-list opmental approach to treating young children
control, even when considering the child’s scores with ASD. The developmental sequence of joint
at time of recruitment, the diagnostic group, attention is based on typical development and is
and the interval between assessments. Further supported by developmental theory and research.
research investigating More than Words may It is relationship based, as it is a model that fo-
help to clarify the mixed outcome results found cuses on learning in the context of the parent–
thus far. child relationship. Likewise, it is child-centered
and play based, as parents are coached to follow
their child’s lead in play activities by joining
Joint Attention Mediated Learning their child’s play instead of introducing a parent-
(JAML) initiated play theme for the child to follow. As
mentioned earlier, JAML is a targeted approach
There are two “branded” developmental inter- focused on increasing the child’s joint attention
ventions for autism in young children that target abilities, which have a cascading effect on social
improvement of a child’s skills in initiating and learning in all other domains. The JAML ap-
responding to joint attention—Joint Attention proach is primarily a parent-coaching model and

You might also like