Non-obstante clause- notwithstanding anything contained/ in opposition
to/ in spite of/ what has been stated/ is to be stated or admitted.
It is a Latin word meaning “Notwithstanding”. Words anciently
used in public and private instruments, intended to preclude, in advance, any interpretation contrary to certain declared objects or purposes. [Black’s Law Dictionary]
Background- A clause in old English statutes and letters patent,
importing a license from the Crown to do a thing notwithstanding any statute to the contrary. This dispensing power was abolished by the Bill of Rights.
The notwithstanding clause in a statute makes the provision independent
of other provisions contained in the law, even if the other provisions provide to the contrary. The Supreme Court of India in Brij Rai Krishna v. S.K. Shaw and Brothers (AIR 1951 SC 115) has held that the expression "Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law" prevents reliance on any other law to the contrary.
“A non obstante clause is usually used in a provision to indicate
that that provision should prevail despite anything to the contrary in the provision mentioned in such non obstante clause. In case there is any inconsistency or a departure between the non obstante clause and another provision one of the objects of such a clause is to indicate that it is the non obstante clause which would prevail over the other clause” [K. Parasuramaiah vs. Pokurl Lakshmamma; (AIR 1965 AP 220)].