Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Michael Sanches
Signature Assignment
Marxist film theory focuses on language and how film and language work together. Each
shot has significance and meaning, like a word. The shots are compiled to create a deeper
meaning which is why editing is of vital importance in the Marxist film theory. To my surprise,
Marxist film theory is not about class struggles or the Marxist theory and instead focuses on the
techniques of filmmakers of the Marxist era. This paper will largely not focus on Marxist film
theory but on the Marxist theory and how it applies to Parasite, though some comments are
made concerning Marxist film theory. The Marxist theory, or Marxist philosophy, focuses on
materialism and class struggles in society. “The theory is also about the hustles of the proletariat
Parasite is a film directed by Bong Joon-ho and was a wild commercial and critical
success as it won various accolades, including the Academy Award for Best Picture. I believe
that the film was a success because of the major plotline of inequality and class struggles in the
modern age. The film is encoded to make subtle and major references to the class separation of
the Kims and the Parks. The divisions between the wealthy Park family and the indigent Kims
are highlighted throughout the film which this paper will explain further.
Class divisions are emphasized throughout the film as the characters frequently reference
“the line” which is not to be crossed. In one scene Mr. Park states that he hates “people who
cross the line” and respects Mr. Kim as he is careful to not cross the line. The director of the film
said of the film, “Mr. Park says in the film, is they [draw] a line over their sophisticated world
and they don’t let anyone cross it. They’re not interested in the outside world, the subway, and
people who might perhaps smell. They want to push everyone outside of that line and they want
to remain safe behind it,” (Paiella, 2019). The Parks are insistent upon not crossing the line and
this is apparent as they feed their dogs expensive lobster meat and they must justify enjoying
cheap noodles by adding expensive steak. The Parks lead a lavish life with a large modern home,
employ the labor of the Kims, and celebrate with impromptu camping trips and parties. On the
contrary, the Kims are desperate to cross this line and rise in the class structure. Unlike the Parks,
they live in a semi-basement, celebrate by eating at a bus driver’s buffet, and are figuratively and
literally peed on. The Kims weasel their way into the lives of the Parks in an attempt to raise
One significant cinematic feature in the film is the idea of levels that portray social status.
On one side are the Kims, who live practically underground in a semi-basement, and on the other
side are the Parks who live on a hill with multiple levels in the home, the lowest level being the
residence of a squatter (the husband of their maid). This separation of levels is highlighted when
the Kims run down from the hill back to their home by the
semi-overground”(Vanity Fair, 2019). This shows that there is some hope as they can see the
light and are not completely submerged under, unlike Moon-Gwang’s husband who lives in the
secret basement of the Parks and is completely deprived of sunlight and hope.
The representation of the different families is very significant in portraying the classes in
the Marxist philosophy. The Kims, who represent the lower class, are portrayed as cockroaches
in this film. From the very beginning of the film, we see the Kims allow their home to be
fumigated to get rid of the pests whilst they sit on the floor amongst these so-called pests which
draw a similarity between them. As they infiltrate the Park’s home they act as parasites who
leech off of the wealth and luxuries. When the Parks leave for their camping trip, they creep out,
like cockroaches in the dark, and feast upon the Park’s food. When the Parks return
unexpectedly, and “turn on the light”, they scurry into the “the gutters”. This parallel between the
poor and cockroaches is demeaning and may represent a view of the poor as insects that
scavenge for the scraps of the rich, and in this case, it is the dogfood of the Parks.
In contrast, the Parks, who represent the rich, are portrayed as ignorant and selfish. In one
way they are ignorant as they are manipulated by the Kims to believe that Ki-woo is a college
graduate, Ki-jung is an art tutor, etc. They are also ignorant of the way that the proletariat live
and they do not wish to discover this. After the storm, Mrs. Park says that the storm was a
blessing and they were able to trade a camping trip for a party because of the clear skies. She is
ignorant of the suffering that the poor experienced because of the storm, claiming it as a blessing
whilst people were displaced from their homes and lost most of their possessions. Likewise, the
storm was significant because all of the waste flowed down from the rich to the poor and they
had to deal with the consequences of the rich’s problems. The Parks were selfish as they did not
wish to help the poor and they were only there for convenience. When their maid was allegedly
sick, they did not hesitate to fire her although she had been so faithful. At Da-song’s birthday
party, Mr. Kim wished to leave but he was forced to stay to appease Mr. Park, although it was
not a part of his job. Mr. Kim explains this selfishness and ignorance as he says that “rich people
are naive. No resentments. No creases on them.” which his wife replies with “It all gets ironed
out. Money is an iron. Those creases all get smoothed out”. This explains that they maintain their
ignorance because they have money. The portrayal of the rich as ignorant and selfish can be seen
in real life as many rich people turn a blind eye to the problems caused by inequality, lack of
access to education, healthcare, jobs, and opportunity. The Parks prefer to be ignorant about the
There are ideas of Marxist film theory in this film as the plot is not driven by an
individual or protagonist but, it instead focuses on a group(s). The Kims work together to
infiltrate the home of the Parks starting with Ki-woo and following with the rest of the family.
Another aspect of the Marxist film theory is portrayed in one of the final scenes of the film when
Mr. Park is killed. “Deep focus” cinematography is used allowing the audience to focus on
different aspects of the shot. In this shot in particular we see the pinnacle of the film in which all
on a meager living by working jobs like folding pizza boxes. The Kims get by with their
resourcefulness and are able to steal wifi from a neighboring coffee shop and free fumigation in
their homes as they leave their windows open. They work hard and resent the Parks because of
Overall, I believe that this film had a lot of symbolism and parallel to the underlying class
structure in real life. Even the title relates to this relationship between the poor and the rich
which is parasitic as they use each other to uphold this system. I think the Marxist theory directly
applies to this film and we see the hustles of the poor, in an attempt to raise social status, and
their resentment of the rich. Perhaps a reason for its commercial and critical success is the
encoding and decoding of this film is so complex. Most people in society, rich or poor, recognize
there are massive degrees of inequality in society; the wealth gap is growing larger and larger.
Through the complex and layered encoding and decoding process, viewers are able to both see
something that they know exists while remaining aloof and indifferent to their own role they play
in it. Perhaps the greatest irony of all is when a bunch of very wealthy bourgeoisie spends
tremendous amounts of money and effort to hold a magnificent awards ceremony to award the
Academy Award to a movie that is highlighting issues of those in power keeping those of the
lowest social class down. As the director accepts the well-deserved Academy Award for his
movie Parasite, literally yards away in Hollywood are countless numbers of homeless and
working poor who are feeding off the scraps and mess left behind from this great party.
Bibliography:
Marxist philosophy. (2020, July 26). Retrieved August 05, 2020, from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxist_philosophy
Paiella, G. (2019, October 08). 'Parasite' Director Bong Joon-ho on the Art of Class
https://www.gq.com/story/parasite-director-bong-joon-ho-interview
'Parasite' Director Bong Joon-ho Breaks Down the Opening Scene. (2019, November 12).
https://www.vanityfair.com/video/watch/notes-on-a-scene-parasite-director-bong-joon-ho-
breaks-down-a-scene