Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mesoporous chromium oxide (Cr2O3) nanocrystals were first synthesized by the thermal decomposition reaction
of Cr(NO3)3‚9H2O using citric acid monohydrate (CA) as the mesoporous template agent. The texture and
chemistry of chromium oxide nanocrystals were characterized by N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms, FTIR,
X-ray diffraction (XRD), UV-vis, and thermoanalytical methods. It was shown that the hydrate water and
CA are the crucial factors in influencing the formation of mesoporous Cr2O3 nanocrystals in the mixture
system. The decomposition of CA results in the formation of a mesoporous structure with wormlike pores.
The hydrate water of the mixture provides surface hydroxyls that act as binders, making the nanocrystals
aggregate. The pore structures and phases of chromium oxide are affected by the ratio of precursor-to-CA,
thermal temperature, and time.
Figure 3. SEM photographs and TEM image of the γ-Cr2O3 nanocrystal. (a) SEM image (× 30 000), (b) SEM image (× 100 000), and (c) TEM
image.
Figure 7. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms at 77 K and mesoporous size distributions for the Cr2O3 samples at different thermal
decomposition temperatures when the ratio of Cr(NO3)3‚9H2O-to-CA is 1 (+, 130 °C; O, 140 °C; ×, 160 °C; ∆, 180 °C).
Figure 8. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms at 77 K and mesopore distributions for the Cr2O3 samples at 140 °C for different thermal
decomposition times when the ratio of Cr(NO3)3‚9H2O-to-CA is 1 (+, 9 h; O, 12 h; ×, 36 h; ∆, 72 h).
TABLE 1: Surface Area, Pore Volume, and Diameter of As-Synthesized Cr2O3 at Different Temperatures with the Cr
(NO3)3‚9H2O and CA Molar Ratio of 1:1
SA SA PV PD PD
SAa MSb MIc PVd MSe PV MIf PDg MSh MIi
sample (m2/g) (m2/g) (m2/g) (cm3/g) (cm3/g) (cm3/g) (nm) (nm) (nm)
Cr2O3-130 141.4 103.6 29.0 0.171 0.156 0.0135 4.83 6.04 0.64
Cr2O3-140 207.2 139.0 52.2 0.185 0.150 0.0657 3.34 4.31 0.70
Cr2O3-160 222.0 140.7 60.5 0.220 0.192 0.0628 4.24 5.46 0.60
Cr2O3-180 334.0 235.9 13.4 0.212 0.174 0.0843 2.54 2.95 0.71
a
BET surface area. b Surface area of mesopore. c Surface area of micropore. d Total pore volume. e Pore volume of mesopore. f Pore volume of
micropore. g Average pore diameter. h Average pore diameter of mesopore. i Average pore diameter of micropore.
TABLE 2: Surface Area, Pore Volume and Diameter of As-synthesized Cr2O3 at 140 °C for Different Crystallization Times
When the Ratio of Cr(NO3)3 and CA is 1:1
SAa SA MSb SA MIc PVd PV MSe PV MIf PDg PD MSh PD MIi
sample (m2/g) (m2/g) (m2/g) (cm3/g) (cm3/g) (cm3/g) (nm) (nm) (nm)
Cr2O3-9 h 160.3 121.3 22.6 0.180 0.160 0.0102 4.48 5.54 0.61
Cr2O3-12 h 194.1 109.6 56.6 0.191 0.156 0.0273 3.94 5.70 0.62
Cr2O3-24 h 207.2 139.0 52.2 0.185 0.150 0.0657 3.34 4.31 0.70
Cr2O3-72 h 211.5 141.1 37.7 0.222 0.196 0.0172 4.19 5.57 0.63
a
BET surface area. b Surface area of mesopore. c Surface area of micropore. d Total pore volume. e Pore volume of mesopore. f Pore volume of
micropore. g Average pore diameter. h Average pore diameter of mesopore. i Average pore diameter of micropore.
nanocrystals and nanocrystal aggregates, the nuclei aggregation aggregation process by controlling the water present in the
will further increase to form nanoparticles. The N2 isotherms system. The larger the surface hydroxyl density, the larger the
and pore distribution of Cr2O3 samples obtained at different particles that form. Meanwhile, the addition of citric acid
thermal decomposition times are shown in Figure 8. It has been monohydrate hinders the continuous growth of grain through
seen from Figure 8 and Table 2 that the pore structure and shape aggregation of the nanocrystals to form larger particles.
have no change but only the size distribution of the samples According to the above analyses, the thermal decomposition
becomes broader, that is, the particle size of aggregates process of Cr(NO3)3‚9H2O through the addition of citric acid
increases. In the solid thermal decomposition reaction herein, monohydrate as the mesoporous template agent results in Cr2O3
the hydrate water of the mixture provides surface hydroxyls nanocrystals as the building blocks to form a mesoporous
that act as binders, making the nanocrystals aggregate. The wormlike structure of nanoparticles. The formation mechanism
aggregation process is slow in the solid reaction. It is easy and of mesoporous Cr2O3 nanocrystals is proposed as follows,
effective to control the particle size and distribution during the illustrated in Figure 11. After uniformly mixing with CA,
182 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 110, No. 1, 2006 Li et al.
Conclusions
In summary, mesoporous R-Cr2O3 nanocrystals are prepared
by a solid thermal decomposition of chromium nitrate with CA
as the mesoporous template agent. The as-prepared particles
are formed through the aggregation of the primary 3-4 nm
nanocrystals and possess mesoporous structure. The XRD, N2
isotherms, and TEM results suggest that CA has an important
effect on the mesopore formation of Cr2O3 nanocrystals and
acts as a template. The size and pore structure can be tuned by
the synthesis conditions, which is achieved by the amount of
hydrate water and the addition of citric acid in the mixture
system. The binder effect of surface hydroxyl groups is
emphasized on the controlled aggregation of metal oxide
nanocrystals because only the vicinity of particles can aggregate
Figure 9. XRD patterns of the mesoporous Cr2O3 in the different ratios
at 140 °C for 24 h: (a) 1:3, (b) 1:2, (c) 1:1, (d) 1:0.5, and (e) 1:0.3. through surface hydroxyls to form Cr2O3 aggregates. The
thermal decomposition of citric acid organic molecules makes
the space occupied with CA as pores. In addition, such
mesoporous Cr2O3 nanocrystals will have potential applications
in heterogeneous catalysis and we will further investigate the
relationships between crystal structure, surface morphology, and
catalytic activity.
(26) Hou, B.; Ji, X.; Xie, Y.; Li, J.; Shen, B.; Qian, Y. Nanostruct. Mater. (31) Malecki, A.; Gajerski, R.; Labus, S.; et al. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim.
1995, 5, 599. 2000, 60, 17.
(27) Carlson, E. J.; Armor, J. N.; Cunningham, W. J.; Smith, A. M. (32) McMurdie, H. F.; Morris, M. C.; Evans, E. H.; Paretzkon, B.;
U.S. Patent 4828818, 1989. Wong-Ng, W.; Zhang, Y.; Hubbard, C. R. Powder Diffr. 1987, 2, 45.
(33) Vayssieres, L.; Manthiram, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 2623.
(28) Hyeon, T.; Lee, S. S.; Park, J.; Chang, Y.; Na, H. B. J. Am. Chem.
(34) Liu, G.; Jia, M. J.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, W. X.; Wu, T. H.; Jiang, D.
Soc. 2001, 123, 12798.
Z. Chem. Comm. 2004, 14, 1660.
(29) Yin, M.; O’Brien, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10180. (35) Takahashi, R.; Sato, S.; Sodesawa, T.; Kawakita, M.; Ogura, M. J.
(30) Jana, N. R.; Chen, Y. F.; Peng, X. G. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 3931. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 12184.