Professional Documents
Culture Documents
✦ Introduction
✦ Leadership in Action
✦ Transactional & Transformational Leadership
✦ Situational or Contingency Theory
✦ Leader-Member Exchange Theory
✦ Servant Leadership
✦ Conclusion
2
INTRODUCTION
3
INTRODUCTION
4
INTRODUCTION
5
TRANSACTIONAL
✦ Leadership actions that focus on accomplishing the
tasks at hand and on maintaining good working
relationships by exchanging promises of rewards for
performance.
✦ Motivates followers by appealing to their own self-
interest
✦ Leaders exchange status and wages for effort
✦ This exchange process does not bind leader and followers
in mutual and continuing pursuit of a higher purpose
✦ Typically the relationship is short term, focuses on results,
and getting the job done
6
TRANSACTIONAL
✦ Transactional leadership can be broken down into
three types of exchange relationships
✦ Contingent Reward: Contracts exchange of rewards for
effort, promises rewards for good performance, recognizes
accomplishments
✦ Management by Exception (active): Watches and searches
for deviations from rules and standards, takes corrective
action
✦ Management by Exception (passive): Intervenes only if
standards are not met
✦ Laissez-Faire: Abdicates responsibilities, avoids making
decisions
7
TRANSACTIONAL
✦ These exchange relationships can reinforce an autocratic or
directive leadership style, i.e. retaining power and all decision-
making authority
✦ These exchange relationships can also become bureaucratic,
i.e. lead “by the book”
✦ Typically appropriate for:
✦ Performing routine tasks (i.e. need for standards/procedures)
✦ New, untrained employees
✦ Employees who are already motivated
✦ Limited time for decision making
8
TRANSFORMATIONAL
✦ Leadership actions that involve influencing major
changes in the attitudes and assumptions of
organization members and building commitment for
the organization’s mission, objectives, and strategies.
✦ Aim is to elevate followers to higher levels of performance
(Burns and Bass)
✦ They have a vision of what a new society or organization could
be.
✦ Strong bonds are cultivated between leader and
subordinates. Followers willingly subordinate themselves.
✦ Strong emotional bonds develop over time.
9
TRANSFORMATIONAL
10
TRANSFORMATIONAL
Why Transformational Leadership?
✦ It works
✦ Unequivocal support in a variety of environments (Judge &
Piccolo)
✦ Increased employee job satisfaction, organizational
commitment, retention, information sharing, innovation,
individual and unit bottom line performance
✦ It can be taught
✦ Improved organizational and individual performance after
training (Barling, Weber & Kelloway)
11
FULL-RANGE LEADERSHIP
Transformational
Effective
Idealized Influence
(Charisma)
Intellectual Stimulation
Individualized
CR Consideration
MBE-A
Passive Active
MBE-P
LF
Transactional
Ineffective
12
SITUATIONAL OR CONTINGENCY THEORY
13
CONTINGENCY APPROACH: HERSEY AND
BLANCHARD SITUATIONAL MODEL
✦ Considers Leader Behaviors (Task and Relationship)
✦ Assumes leaders can change their behaviors
✦ Considers Followers as the Situation
✦ Follower task maturity (ability and experience)
✦ Follower psychological maturity (willingness to take
responsibility)
14
APPLYING THE HERSEY AND BLANCHARD
SITUATIONAL MODEL
15
PATH–GOAL LEADERSHIP THEORY (HOUSE)
16
FITTING THE STYLE TO THE SITUATION WITH PATH-
GOAL THEORY
17
DIRECTIVE VS EMPOWERING LEADERSHIP
18
LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE THEORY
19
LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE THEORY
20
LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE THEORY
✦ Two kinds of relationships that each follower falls into
based on how well they work with the leader and how
well the leader works with them. Personality and other
personal characteristics are also related to this
process.
✦ In groups – based on expanded and negotiated role
responsibilities. Followers go far beyond their formal job
description, and the leader in turn does more for these
followers.
✦ Out group – based on the formal employment contract.
Followers are not interested in taking on new and different
job responsibilities.
21
LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE THEORY
S In-Group - more information,
S influence, confidence &
Out-Group concern from Leader more
In-Group dependable, highly involved
& communicative than out-
Leader S group
S
S Out-Group - less
S S compatible with
S S Leader usually just
S
come to work, do
S their job & go home
S
S Subordinate
22
LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE THEORY
✦ Researchers found that high quality leader member
exchanges produced less employee turnover, more
positive performance evaluations, higher frequency of
promotions, greater organizational commitment, more
desirable work assignments, better job attitudes, more
attention and support from the leader, greater
participation, and faster career progress over 25 years.
✦ When leaders and followers have good exchanges,
they feel better, accomplish more, and the
organization prospers.
23
LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE THEORY
24
LEADER MEMBER EXCHANGE
Strengths
✦ It makes sense by describing work in terms of those who
contribute more and those who do the bare minimum.
✦ Unique because it is the only theory to identify the dyadic
relationship. Effective leader member exchanges are
important
✦ Notes the importance of communication in leadership
✦ Reminds leaders to be fair about who they let into the in
group – this is based on work performance not race, sex,
ethnicity, religion, etc
✦ Large amount of research supports this theory
25
LEADER MEMBER EXCHANGE
Weakness
✦ On the surface this theory doesn’t seem “fair” because
it does not treat everyone equally. Also can support
the development of privileged groups in the work
place.
✦ The basic ideas of the theory are not fully developed.
Fails to explain how high quality exchanges are
created.
✦ No part of the research uses dyadic measures to
analyze the LMX process
26
SERVANT LEADERSHIP
27
SERVANT LEADERSHIP
28
CONCLUSIONS
✦ Most leaders demonstrate a mix of behaviours and styles
that cross over the boundaries of various theories.
✦ Contingency/situational theory – establish which
leadership behaviours succeeded in specific situations
✦ Increasing emphasis on leadership through the eyes of
followers.
✦ Helps you to analyze your own and others leadership
behaviors.
✦ These theories are all disputable, they are not laws.
29
THANK YOU!
J.W.SANDERS@HW.AC.UK