Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Key Words: Formalin fixation; Antigen retrieval; Amino acid; Phage display; Immunohistochemistry; Peptide
DOI: 10.1309/BRN7CTX1E84NWWPL
60
1, antigen retrieval did not affect the immunoreactivity of the
peptides in the absence of fixation. 50
Formalin fixation did not cause a loss of immunoreac-
tivity for the group 2 peptide (ER, recognized by the 1D5 40
Spot Intensity
antibody). As shown in Image 1, middle column, the ER
30
peptide was recognized by antibody, resulting in a colored
spot, even after formalin fixation. However, this pattern of 20
reactivity can be changed. If certain other proteins were
coimmobilized to the glass microscope slide along with the 10
ER peptide (ER + protein mix), the ER peptide was suscep-
0
tible to formalin. Formalin fixation of the combination
Fixation: – + + –
caused changes in the ER peptide that abrogated the recogni-
80
Unfixed Fixed
70 PR
60
PR-BGG
50
Spot Intensity
PR-BSA
40
Slide Treatment
described peptides, we also included an additional ER
❚Figure 3❚ Group 3 peptide (progesterone receptor [PR], black
peptide (ER 1D5 #6) and the Ki-67 peptide, recognized by
bars) is not susceptible to formalin fixation, regardless of
the MIB-1 antibody. The ER 1D5 #6 peptide demonstrated
whether other proteins are mixed in (white bars). The error
comparable susceptibility to formalin as the previously
bars represent the mean ± SE of the color intensity after
described ER peptide (ER 1D5 #3; data not shown). The Ki-
immunostaining with the PR 636 monoclonal antibody.
67 peptide behaved in a manner similar to that of the PR
Control treatments are shown at the far left (no treatment)
peptide (data not shown), in that it was not affected by
and far right (unfixed and antigen retrieved). For product
formalin.
information, see the “Peptides, Proteins, and Antibody
It is important to note that the sequences do not
Reagents” section.
include any lysines. We purposely engineered a single
lysine in each peptide, appended to the right side of each
sequence, beyond the positions shown. The epsilon amino
Depending on the group, the peptides required between 6 group of that lysine was the target for immobilization of the
and 16 hours for complete fixation and loss of immunoreac- peptide through the isocyanate coupling chemistry. By
tivity. The fixative did not penetrate to any depth, since the placing a lysine there, the peptide was oriented on the glass
peptides were on a molecular layer on the glass microscope slide so that the antibody-binding site was relatively distant
slide. Consequently, the time was solely a reflection of the from the glass surface and freely available to bind to anti-
kinetics of a chemical reaction at room temperature. We also body. This was done purposely, to minimize steric interfer-
studied whether the presence of adjacent proteins (such as ence between the antibody and the glass surface. In addition,
for group 2 peptides) affected the kinetics of fixation, by the amino terminus of each peptide was acetylated, elimi-
adding proteins adjacent to the p53 peptide. The p53 peptide, nating the possibility that the amino terminus (far left on
as part of group 1, did not require adjacent proteins to be each peptide) would react with formaldehyde. The carboxyl
susceptible to formalin fixation. The presence of adjacent terminus of each peptide (far right) was amidated, also
proteins did not alter the kinetics of fixation (data not blocking the reactivity of that group. As a result, the only
shown). ❚Figure 5❚ shows the time course for antigen possible reactions are with the side chains of the amino
retrieval of p53 peptide–spotted slides, fixed for 6 or 16 acids shown in Figure 6.
hours. The peptides were retrieved optimally by boiling in a Among these 6 peptides, a pattern emerged. Namely,
pressure cooker (approximately 120°C) for 15 to 30 minutes. group 1 peptides have a tyrosine at the antibody-binding site
These kinetics seem to approximate those for cell lines (data and an arginine elsewhere. Group 2 peptides have a tyrosine
not shown) and tissue biopsy specimens.14-16 but no arginine. Group 3 peptides do not have a tyrosine.
These findings suggest that the loss of immunoreactivity
Amino Acid Sequence Analysis associated with formalin fixation is due to a cross-link at the
To gain insight into the mechanism of fixation and antibody-binding site. Moreover, the pattern suggests that the
antigen retrieval, we compiled the amino acid sequences of Mannich reaction is responsible, at least in this model
the peptides ❚Figure 6❚ . In addition to the previously system, for the susceptibility to formalin fixation.
50 50
40
40
Spot Intensity
30
Spot Intensity
30
20
20
10
10
Analyte Controls
40
Spot Intensity
30
20
Tissue Controls
❚Figure 7❚ Formalin fixation proceeds faster at 42°C
compared with room temperature. The p53 peptide–coupled
slides were fixed for 1, 6, and 16 hours (overnight), at room
temperature (black bars) or at 42°C (white bars). The slides
then were immunostained for p53 (DO-7 antibody). The color
intensity of the peptide spot was quantified in duplicate.
Error bars represent the mean ± SE. The 3 groups on the ❚Image 3❚ Comparison of fixed controls for immunohisto-
right side of the figure demonstrate recovery of chemical analysis. The lack of antigen retrieval causes no color
immunostaining after antigen retrieval. For product to appear in the peptide spots, cell line controls, and tissue
information, see the “Peptides, Proteins, and Antibody controls. When the specimens are subjected to antigen
Reagents” section. retrieval, each of the control specimens can be immunostained,
resulting in the colored signal that is shown. The inset is a
higher magnification of the cluster of cells (circled).
controls (MCF-7, for ER, middle row), and tissue controls amino acids comprising the antibody-binding site are
(bottom row). The left column was not antigen retrieved. brought into juxtaposition through the normal folding of a
The right column was optimally retrieved, as described in native protein. Therefore, for most proteins, it is not possible
the “Materials and Methods” section. As Image 3 illustrates, to clearly identify the antibody-binding site. Our model
the type of signal seems different, but the information each addresses this problem. Amino acids in the native protein
conveys is similar; each control developed a comparable that might not be adjacent in the linear sequence are brought
color after antigen retrieval and immunostaining. The together in a small peptide. By identifying consensus
analyte controls have the additional advantage of potentially sequences during the phage-screening process, it is possible
distinguishing preanalytic variability (ie, antigen retrieval) to determine the antibody-binding region.10
from analytic variability, depending on whether the peptides The use of phage display to identify antibody-binding
are fixed. sites is not new. What is new, however, is the finding that
such short peptides can be susceptible to formalin fixation.
We found that the peptides segregated into 3 groups based on
their sensitivity to formalin fixation. Group 1 was sensitive
Discussion
to fixation, in that it was no longer recognized by antibody.
We present a new in vitro model of formalin fixation. Antigen retrieval reversed the effect. Group 3 peptides were
Studying formalin fixation on native proteins is complicated not susceptible to formalin fixation. Group 2 peptides, both
by the fact that the majority of epitopes are conformational, of them specific for the ER 1D5 monoclonal antibody,
not linear. Antibodies generally bind to amino acids that are became susceptible to formalin fixation only when neigh-
not adjacent to each other in the linear sequence. Rather, the boring proteins were coimmobilized adjacent to the peptide.
We initially speculated that the neighboring proteins in phenylalanine or tryptophan in our selected random peptide.
the group 2 scenario might be sterically blocking access to In aggregate, these findings are highly consistent with the
the peptide. However, once we analyzed the peptide conclusion that the Mannich reaction is an important chem-
sequences, it became apparent that the adjacent protein ical reaction in the context of antibodies suitable for antigen
might be doing something quite distinct: we now believe it retrieval.
most likely that the adjacent proteins contributed an arginine It is possible that our formalin-fixation model did not
residue for the Mannich reaction. Such a contribution was accurately represent the chemistry occurring in the native
not necessary for group 1 peptides, since group 1 peptides protein. To further evaluate that possibility, we examined the
have both tyrosine and arginine. The Mannich reaction, kinetics of fixation and antigen retrieval. We found that the
along with other potential formaldehyde reactions with time course was similar to that commonly observed for
proteins, is summarized in a recent review by Shi et al.6 tissue sections. Despite the fact that the formalin did not
Briefly, formaldehyde reacts with an amine (such as on an need to penetrate even 1 µm deep into the glass surface, it
Therefore, it will be sensitive to variability in the analytic immunohistochemical tests require accurate and repro-
components of an immunostain (reagents, procedure) and ducible quantitative data. To the extent that formalin fixation
antigen retrieval. This capability is unique to analyte controls complicates and confounds assay reproducibility and stan-
using peptides. dardization, a better understanding of formalin fixation
An additional potential advantage of using analyte might be helpful.
controls as an immunohistochemical quality control is that
the controls can be manufactured in a highly reproducible From 1the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine,
form, for mass production. By contrast, standardized manu- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; and 2Medical
Discovery Partners LLC, Boston.
facture of controls using cell lines is not a trivial endeavor,
because the level of expression for any particular protein Supported by grants 1R43CA/AI94557 and 1R44CA81950
varies from cell to cell (in a population) and over time, (Dr Bogen) from the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda. MD.
Address reprint requests to Dr Sompuram: Medical
during passage of a cell line. Moreover, the use of biologic
Discovery Partners, LLC, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA 02118.
13. Al Saati T, Clamens S, Cohen-Knafo E, et al. Production of 17. Ni C, Chang T, Searl S, et al. Rapid paraffin fixation for use
monoclonal antibodies to human estrogen-receptor protein in histologic examinations. Ophthalmology. 1981;88:1372-
(ER) using recombinant ER. Int J Cancer. 1993;55:651-654. 1376.
14. Rhodes A, Jasani B, Balaton A, et al. Immunohistochemical 18. Durgun-Yucel B, Dere F, Yucel A, et al. Rapid fixation of
demonstration of oestrogen and progesterone receptors: whole organ specimens and attendant problems. Acta Med
correlation of standards achieved on in house tumours with Okayama. 1992;46:75-81.
that achieved on external quality assessment material in over 19. Helander K. Kinetic studies of formaldehyde binding in tissue.
150 laboratories from 26 countries. J Clin Pathol. 2000;53:292- Biotech Histochem. 1994;69:177-179.
301.
20. Hua C, Langlet C, Buferne M, et al. Selective destruction by
15. von Wasielewski R, Mengel M, Wiese B, et al. Tissue array formaldehyde fixation of an H-2Kb serological determinant
technology for testing interlaboratory and interobserver involving lysine 89 without loss of T-cell reactivity.
reproducibility of immunohistochemical estrogen receptor Immunogenetics. 1985;21:227-234.
analysis in a large multicenter trial. Am J Clin Pathol.
2002;118:675-682.
16. Lee H, Douglas-Jones A, Morgan J, et al. The effect of