Siason, a purchasing officer for CABI, was confronted about a machine delivery that benefited the company but violated rules. She later received a letter from her supervisor Chan informing her of various purchasing violations over 12 months and that she must resign or be terminated. The next day, Siason received a letter from CABI's legal officer about Chan's letter and resigned. Siason filed a complaint alleging constructive dismissal but the court found no constructive dismissal occurred as Chan gave her the option to resign gracefully given her tenure rather than face an administrative investigation, and Siason chose to resign to avoid issues with her employment record.
Siason, a purchasing officer for CABI, was confronted about a machine delivery that benefited the company but violated rules. She later received a letter from her supervisor Chan informing her of various purchasing violations over 12 months and that she must resign or be terminated. The next day, Siason received a letter from CABI's legal officer about Chan's letter and resigned. Siason filed a complaint alleging constructive dismissal but the court found no constructive dismissal occurred as Chan gave her the option to resign gracefully given her tenure rather than face an administrative investigation, and Siason chose to resign to avoid issues with her employment record.
Siason, a purchasing officer for CABI, was confronted about a machine delivery that benefited the company but violated rules. She later received a letter from her supervisor Chan informing her of various purchasing violations over 12 months and that she must resign or be terminated. The next day, Siason received a letter from CABI's legal officer about Chan's letter and resigned. Siason filed a complaint alleging constructive dismissal but the court found no constructive dismissal occurred as Chan gave her the option to resign gracefully given her tenure rather than face an administrative investigation, and Siason chose to resign to avoid issues with her employment record.
Siason G.R. No. 215555 2015 July 29 First Division, Perlas-Bernabe
Siason, the purchasing officer of CABI, was confronted by Chan on the
propriety of the delivery of a machine. She explained that such delivery benefited the company, but the latter considered the same as a big infraction of their company rules. Later that day, Siason received a letter from Chan informing her that she had been committing various purchasing policy violations for the past 12 months and the company could no longer turn a blind eye; as such, she should tender her immediate resignation rather than "to force his hand". The following day, Siason received another letter from CABI's legal officer regarding Chan's letter. Consequently, Siason tendered her resignation letter. Siason then filed a complaint for illegal dismissal against Petitioners alleging that she was forced to resign, thus, she was constructively dismissed. Petitioners contend that there is no constructive dismissal to speak of given that they merely afforded Siason the option to have a "graceful exit" taking into consideration her long tenure and close relationship with Chan. Was there constructive dismissal? No. Chan's letter should be construed as Chan telling Siason to resign or be faced with an administrative complaint. The company's legal officer sent Siason another letter, essentially confirming if the latter was going to resign or if she is subjecting herself to an administrative investigation. Ultimately, Siason chose to tender her resignation to save herself from the trouble of besmirching her employment record. It is settled that there is nothing reprehensible or illegal to give an employee a chance to resign and save face rather than smear the latter’s employment record. In sum, petitioners did not constructively dismiss Siason; but rather, the latter voluntarily resigned in order to avoid a full-blown administrative trial regarding her misdeeds, which could potentially result in her termination for just cause.