The Republic filed a complaint to revert a parcel of land to the state's favor based on a DENR Final Report and NAMRIA certifications stating the land had been reclassified as forest land since 1949. However, both the RTC and CA dismissed the complaint, holding that the Republic failed to show a positive government act evidencing the reclassification of the land from alienable and disposable to forest land. The Supreme Court affirmed, finding that a positive government act is necessary to prove reversion of A&D land to forest land, as the power to classify and reclassify land lies solely with the Executive Department. Since the alleged reclassification was done without any directive from the President and did not state the authority,
The Republic filed a complaint to revert a parcel of land to the state's favor based on a DENR Final Report and NAMRIA certifications stating the land had been reclassified as forest land since 1949. However, both the RTC and CA dismissed the complaint, holding that the Republic failed to show a positive government act evidencing the reclassification of the land from alienable and disposable to forest land. The Supreme Court affirmed, finding that a positive government act is necessary to prove reversion of A&D land to forest land, as the power to classify and reclassify land lies solely with the Executive Department. Since the alleged reclassification was done without any directive from the President and did not state the authority,
The Republic filed a complaint to revert a parcel of land to the state's favor based on a DENR Final Report and NAMRIA certifications stating the land had been reclassified as forest land since 1949. However, both the RTC and CA dismissed the complaint, holding that the Republic failed to show a positive government act evidencing the reclassification of the land from alienable and disposable to forest land. The Supreme Court affirmed, finding that a positive government act is necessary to prove reversion of A&D land to forest land, as the power to classify and reclassify land lies solely with the Executive Department. Since the alleged reclassification was done without any directive from the President and did not state the authority,
Heirs of Cabrera G.R. No. 218418 2017 November 08 Second Division, Caguioa
In 1971, Meynardo obtained an OCT over a parcel of land based on a
Free Patent issued to him by the BOL. A portion of the land was sold to Consolacion and consequently, a TCT covering said portion was issued. Learning upon the issuance of TCT, the De Castros filed a petition before the DENR to conduct an investigation to determine the land’s classification status. The DENR issued a Final Report declaring that the land form part of the public domain. The Republic then filed a Complaint praying for the reversion of the land in the State’s favor. The Republic based its claim on the DENR Final Report and NAMRIA certifications all stating that the land had been reclassified as forest land since 1949. Both RTC and CA dismissed the complaint and held that the Republic failed to show a positive government act evincing the reclassification of the land from alienable and disposable to forest. Is a positive government act necessary to prove the reversion of A&D land to Forest land? YES. Sections 6&7 of the Public Land Act are clear that the power to classify and reclassify land lies solely with the Executive Department, exercised through the President or other persons authorized to act on his behalf. Any such act effected without executive authority is void. A reversion proceeding is the manner through which the State seeks to revert land to the mass of the public domain. Since a complaint for reversion can upset the stability of registered titles, the State bears the burden of proving that the land was reclassified as Forest land at the time the cadastal decree was issued. Here, the alleged reclassification is bereft of basis as it was done without any prior directive from the President and does not even state upon whose authority the alleged reclassification was made.
Cessions of Land by Indian Tribes to the United States: Illustrated by Those in the State of Indiana
First Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1879-80, Government Printing Office, Washington, 1881, pages 247-262