You can write only in the green fields. For each task a score between 0-100 is applied.
It is then converted into a mark out of 6.7
Relevant skill levels for the reading assignments (on Moodle you will find examples of good assignments)
Relates to Learning
Excellent (71-100) Score
Outcome
Very well written, no spelling and
Overall assignment Professionalism
grammar issues
Sources of information are properly
cited All sources of information are
Citations / in-text clearly identified and reported using
Professionalism
referencing appropriate citation format. In-text
referencing is done when required and
in the correct way
Assignment is well organized,
Presentation of structured and looks neat; the three
Professionalism
assignment different parts are clearly highlighted
through own paragraphs and headlines
summary concentrates on major issues
the text takes up, all main ideas are
Summary Critical Thinking
easily identified and highlighted to the
point.
The issues asked for in question No. 2
are correctly depicted in the
Critical Thinking /
Question 2 assignment and nicely elaborated.
Communication
Provides insights that go beyond the
wording of the reading.
Discussion / examples are very
Question 3: Pacific Consciousness
specific for the country
Discussion / examples are very
Critical thinking relevant to reflect nicely on the topic
of the paper
Skillfully evaluates information
gathered from observation,
Critical thinking
experience, reflection, and / or
reasoning
Final score (x/10) 5.0
Acceptable (50-70)
50 well written, a few spelling and
grammar issues
Most sources of information use pro-
50 per format, sources are documented to
make it possible to check on the
accuracy of information.
Organization of assignment is ok, but
50 could be better; the three different parts
are clearly highlighted, but miss own
paragraphs / headlines.
summary is not to the point, but issues
50 are correct, some main ideas easily
identified and highlighted
The issues asked for in question No. 2
50 are understood, but there are challenges
to bring them to the point. Concentrates
too much on the reading
Discussion / examples remain rather
50 general and unspecific; examples are
correct, but could be valid for any
country
Discussion / examples somehow relate
50 to topic of the paper, but there are better
examples….
Adequately demonstrates the ideas of
50 the text and shows own reflection and
reasoning.
400
Below Average, fail
score score
(0-49)
not well written, many spelling and
grammar issues
Information provided does not use proper
citation format.
No good organization of assignment,
does not look neat, and lack of clear
structure of the three different parts
Summary is arbitrary in the sense that
anything is taken up, whether it is
important or not, Not able to distinguish
between main ideas and lesser important
content
The issues asked for in question No. 2
are not correctly reflected in the
assignment
No discussion / examples and / or very
weak discussion / examples which
indicate that issues are not well
understood.
Discussion / examples selected and
presented show that the issues are not
well understood
Simplistic analysis of complex issue;
limited clarity and complexion of
thought.
0 0