Close Reader

SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 422

Information | Reference
Copy Selection
Case Title: Select some text within a
HEIRS OF TRINIDAD DE LEON paragraph and click here to
VDA. DE ROXAS, petitioners, vs. copy the selected text. Citation
COURT OF APPEALS and included.
MAGUESUN MANAGEMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
respondents.
VOL. 422, FEBRUARY 1
Citation: 422 SCRA 101 5, 2004
More... Heirs of Trinidad De Leon
Vda. de Roxas vs. Court o
Search Result Appeals

1. administration of justice. G.R. No. 138660. *Februa

[10See Pacquing v. Court of
Appeals, 200 Phil. 516; 115 5, 2004.
SCRA 117 (1982).] Well-settled
is the rule that when a court of
competent jurisdiction has tried HEIRS OF TRINIDAD D
and decided a right or fact, so LEON VDA. DE ROXA
long as the decision remains
unreversed, it is conclusive on
petitioners, vs. COURT
the parties and those in privity APPEALS and MAGUESU
with them. [11Fulgencio v.
National Labor Relations
MANAGEMENT AN
Commission (First Division) and DEVELOPMENT
Raycor Aircontrol Systems, Inc., CORPORATION,
G.R. No. 141600, 12 September
2003, 411 SCRA 69; Bardillon v. respondents.
Barangay Masili of Calamba,
Laguna, G.R. No. 146886, 30
April, 2003, 402 SCRA 440; Courts; Contempt; Actio
Oropeza ...] More so where the
Supreme Court has already A party’s defiance of
decided the issue since the Court Supreme Court’s Decision a
is the final arbiter of all
justiciable controversies
Resolution by filing an act
for reconveyance, quieting
2. a corporation is in effect a title and damages involving
command to the officers.” [2417 same parcels of land which
C.J.S. Contempt § 34 (1963).]
Thus, for improper conduct Court already decided w
tending to impede the orderly finality constitutes indir
administration of justice,
Meycauayan Executive Vice
contempt.—Meycauayan’s
President Juan M. Lamson, Jr. obstinate refusal to abide by
should be fined ten thousand
Court’s Decision in G.R.
pesos (P10,000). [25In Ang
Bagong Bayani-OFW Labor Party 118436 has no basis in view
v. Commission on Elections (G.R. this Court’s cl
Nos. 147589 147613, 18
February 2003), the Court found pronouncement to the contra
the COMELEC members guilty of The fact that this Co
contempt for (1) issuing three
Resolutions which are outside the
specifically ordered
jurisdiction of the COMELEC, ...] cancellation of Meycauaya
Direct Contempt Meycauayan’s
titles to the disputed parcels
act of filing a Complaint for
Reconveyance, Quieting of Title land in the Resolution dated
and Damages raising the same July 1998 should have laid
issues in its Petition for
Intervention rest the issue of whether
Decision and Resolution in G
© Copyright 2020 Central Book Supply, Inc. All rights