COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS

SCHOOL OF COMMERCE
GRADUATE PROGRAM IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
SUPPORTED DISTANCE LEARNING PROGRAM
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT AND PROJECTS
Tutor Marked Assignment (TMA) 1

Date of Submission: Lead Tutor: Solomon Markos (PhD)

Time of Submission: Working hours Place of Submission: Distance coordination office

General Directions:
 Please don’t forget to write your name and your instructors name;
 Deadline is to be highly respected.
 Address each question by providing relevant and accurate answers.
 Consult reliable sources and provide full information of the sources you have used to deal
each question. Use proper citation for books, articles, Internet, and company manual
sources.
 Produce your answer using Microsoft Word, Times New Roman font style, 12 font size,
double spacing, 1.5 inch right and left margins and 1 inch top and bottom margins.
 Leave ample spaces for general tutor comments at the end of each question.
 Check for spelling and grammar before you submit.
 The assignment is article review assignment. Please read the guideline carefully before
your review the two articles given to you (The underlying theory of project management
is obsolete; New Possibilities for Project Management Theory: A Critical Engagement)
 This is individual assignment. Therefore, work independently. Although discussing on
the items with classmates is highly appreciated, it is strictly forbidden to provide the
same answers. Submitting the same TMA responses with different names is violation of
the School’s practices. Thus, they are graded zero.

Instruction: Read the following article review guideline and critically review the articles
given to you.

Article Review Guideline

Your review should show that you can recognize arguments and engage in critical thinking
about the course content. Keep questions like these in mind as you read, make notes, and then
write the review or critique.

1. What is the specific topic of the article? What overall purpose does it seem to have? For what
readership is it written? (Look in the acknowledgements, reference list, and index for clues
about where and how the piece was originally published, and about the author's background
and position).

2. Does the author clearly state an explicit thesis? Does the author have a specific point of view?
Is the article “persuasive”? If so, please explain.
3. What exactly does the work contribute and relate to the overall topic of your course and/or
assignment? What general problems and concepts in your discipline and course does it
engage with?

4. What kinds of material does the work present (e.g. primary documents or secondary material,
personal observations, literary analysis, quantitative data, biographical or historical
accounts)?

5. How is this material used to demonstrate and argue the thesis? (As well as indicating the
overall argumentative structure of the work, your review could quote or summarize specific
passages to describe the author's presentation, including writing style and tone).

6. What theoretical, ethical issues, and topics for further discussion does the work raise?

7. What are your own reactions and considered opinions regarding the work?
Note: Article review is not answering to the above questions. Rather, the above questions should
be used just as a guideline.

STYLE: The review must be 1-3 pages for each article; typed in 10 or 12 point font; double-
spaced with 1-inch margins on all sides; page numbers in upper right corner; printed in black ink
on white paper. Attach a cover sheet that includes: your name, the course name / number and
your program, and the title of the review article. Don’t use spiral binding-just staple all your
work.