Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AR TI CLE I NF O AB S T R A CT
Keywords: We examined whether the presence of fatigue induced by prolonged running influenced the time
Intermittent contractions courses of force generating capacities throughout a series of intermittent rapid contractions.
Neuromuscular fatigue Thirteen male amateur runners performed a set of 15 intermittent isometric rapid contractions of
Multichannel electromyography the knee extensor muscles, (3 s/5 s on/off) the day before (PRE) and immediately after (POST) a
half marathon. The maximal voluntary contraction force, rate of force development (RFDpeak),
and their ratio (relative RFDpeak) were calculated. At POST, considering the first (out of 15) re-
petition, the maximal force and RFDpeak decreased (p < 0.0001) at the same extent (by
22 ± 6% and 24 ± 22%, respectively), resulting in unchanged relative RFDpeak (p = 0.6).
Conversely, the decline of RFDpeak throughout the repetitions was more pronounced at POST
(p = 0.02), thus the decline of relative RFDpeak was more pronounced (p = 0.007) at POST
(−25 ± 13%) than at PRE (−3 ± 13%). The main finding of this study was that the fatigue
induced by a half-marathon caused a more pronounced impairment of rapid compared to max-
imal force in the subsequent intermittent protocol. Thus, the fatigue-induced impairment in rapid
muscle contractions may have a greater effect on repeated, rather than on single, attempts of
maximal force production.
1. Introduction
Repeated high-force contractions of skeletal muscles cause a decline in force-generating capacity, referred to as muscle fatigue
(Bigland-Ritchie & Woods, 1984). During exercise of maximal intensity, fatigue result into a decline of force (Bigland-
Ritchie & Woods, 1984) or power (Cheng & Rice, 2005). Research investigating the influence of an exercise-induced fatigue on the
neuromuscular function focused mainly on the decline in maximal voluntary contraction force. However, the effect of fatigue on the
ability to produce force rapidly, also referred to as explosive strength (Maffiuletti et al., 2016), has received less attention despite its
Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; ARV, average rectified value; CV, muscle fiber conduction velocity; EMG, electromyography; MVC, maximal voluntary
contraction; RFD, rate of force development
⁎
Corresponding author at: NeuroMuscularFunction Research Group, School of Exercise & Sport Sciences, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 12,
P.za Bernini, 10143 Turin, Italy.
E-mail address: gennaro.boccia@unito.it (G. Boccia).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.05.016
Received 29 November 2016; Received in revised form 23 May 2017; Accepted 31 May 2017
0167-9457/ © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
G. Boccia et al. Human Movement Science 54 (2017) 267–275
importance for the production of many movements. Particularly, the rate of force development (RFD) is functionally more in-
formative than maximal force when considering sports in which rapid movements are important, such as running, jumping, or
kicking (Aagaard, Simonsen, Andersen, Magnusson, & Dyhre-Poulsen, 2002; de Ruiter, Van Leeuwen, Heijblom, Bobbert, & de Haan,
2006). Muscle fatigue can impair the explosive strength (Buckthorpe, Pain, & Folland, 2014) which in turn can negatively influence
explosive sport activities (Krustrup et al., 2006; Mohr, Krustrup, & Bangsbo, 2003; Zoppirolli, Pellegrini, Bortolan, & Schena, 2016).
Moreover, maintaining the ability to produce high RFD values is important to limit the risks of injury (Minshull, Gleeson, Walters
Edwards, Eston, & Rees, 2007). Therefore, an understanding of how fatigue affects rapid force production would seem important in
understanding its influence on athletic performance and injury risk.
Maximal force and RFD should not be used as interchangeable indices when assessing high-intensity muscle fatigue. Indeed, it has
recently been demonstrated a more pronounced drop in rapid compared with maximal force production during fatiguing protocols
constituted by intermittent explosive isometric contraction (Buckthorpe et al., 2014). Similar disproportionate drop in explosive than
maximal torque was recently found also using dynamic contractions (Morel et al., 2015). Particularly, these studies, which was
constituted by high-force fatiguing protocols, showed that the early phase (0–50 ms) of explosive muscle contraction seemed to be the
most susceptible to muscle fatigue (Buckthorpe et al., 2014; Morel et al., 2015). The relationship between maximal force and RFD
decrements also varied among muscles when used to assess muscle fatigue induced by prolonged cross-country skiing (Boccia et al.,
2016).
Given the different influence of muscle fatigue on rapid and maximal force production we aimed to determine the influence of
muscle conditions at the beginning of the intermittent protocol on the time course of force generating capacities. We compared the
time course of maximal force and RFD across a set of 15 intermittent rapid isometric contractions executed in two conditions: before,
i.e. fresh condition, and after a half-marathon run (21.097 m), i.e. fatigued condition. We hypothesized that the ratio between the time
course of maximal force and RFD would change in fatigued condition.
2. Methods
2.1. Participants
For this specific study 14 amateur male runners were recruited (age 36 ± 8, body weight 74 ± 10 kg, height 173 ± 8 cm) who
successfully concluded a half-marathon run (21.097 km). All participants were habitually involved in amateur running with a mean
training regimen of 220 min/week. None of them had clinical evidences of cardiovascular, neuromuscular, or joint diseases.
Participants were instructed to refrain from performing strenuous physical activity in the 24 h before the first experimental session.
All participants provided their written informed consent before participation in the investigation. The study was approved by the
local Ethical Committee (Department of Neurological and Movement Sciences, University of Verona) and performed in accordance
with the Helsinki Declaration.
The study was performed during a specific event called “Run For Science”, held in Verona (Italy) in April 2016. Participants were
involved in two measurement sessions: the first was performed the day before the race (PRE), and the second immediately after the
race (POST). The neuromuscular test consisted in a set of isometric explosive maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of the knee
extensors. Force and electromyographic (EMG) measurements were obtained from the rapid (rising) and maximal (plateau) phases of
the MVCs. During the PRE session, participants were familiarized with the procedures. For that purpose, they repeated a number of
trials of the test procedures until they were able to produce consistent results. In the PRE session participants performed 15-min of a
standardised warm-up (details are given below) before neuromuscular testing. In the POST session the neuromuscular assessment
started within 10 min after the race. A researcher was positioned at the finishing line to conduct the runners to the testing site, which
was located about 50 m from the finishing line. The testing session at POST lasted 3–4 min.
2.3. Procedure
2.3.1. Warm-up
The warm-up at PRE consisted of 15-min of outdoor running at an incremental intensity from 75% to 90% of the maximal heart
rate previously determined by an incremental test. The duration of the warm-up was chosen based on previous studies showing that
muscle temperature rises rapidly after 5 min and reaches an equilibrium after 15 min (Bishop, 2003).
268
G. Boccia et al. Human Movement Science 54 (2017) 267–275
The intermittent protocol comprised 15 explosive maximal voluntary contractions each lasting 3 s, and interspersed by 5 s of rest.
In response to an audio and visual signal, participants were instructed to push as fast and as hard as they can and to maintain this
throughout the contraction for 3 s (Aagaard et al., 2002). During the protocol, participants received a visual feedback of exerted
torque and strong verbal encouragements were provided by two operators to reach his/her highest level in each contraction. Fol-
lowing each explosive MVC, they were instructed to relax quickly in order to return to the resting baseline force. The total duration of
the intermittent protocol was 2 min, with 45 s of maximal voluntary effort.
The time course of force and EMG parameters was analyzed by applying linear or exponential regression analysis (on the base of
best fitting) to the data calculated across the 15 repetitions. The first and last value of each variable was calculated as the intercept of
the regression line in the first and the last contraction, respectively. The decline of force and EMG variables across the 15 contractions
was calculated as the percent ratio between the last and first contraction (expressed as %). Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test was
used to assess distributions normality. If the data were not normally distributed were log-transformed before statistical analysis and
back-transformed to obtain descriptive statistics. Paired Student’s t tests were then used to compare the maximal force, RFD, and EMG
values between PRE and POST sessions. Threshold for statistical significance was set to p < 0.05. Statistical analyses were per-
formed with SPSS statistics (version 20.0, IBM Corporation, Somers, NY). Data are all expressed as mean ± SD. The magnitude of the
difference was calculated as Cohen’s d effect size. Threshold values for effect size statistics were: < 0.2, trivial; > 0.2, small; > 0.6,
moderate; > 1.2 large; > 2.0, very large (Batterham & Hopkins, 2006).
269
G. Boccia et al. Human Movement Science 54 (2017) 267–275
Fig. 1. Representative example of the time course of force (left panel) and rate of force development (right panel) of 15 intermittent explosive contractions lasting 3 s,
and separated by 5 s of rest, at PRE session. It is evident the decline of both maximal force exerted in each contraction as well as the decline in the rate of force
developed in the raising phase of contraction.
3. Results
Out of the 14 initially recruited participants, one did not perform the POST session because he dropped out of the race. Thus, data
are reported for 13 participants which completed the 21.097 km race in a time ranged from 1 h 25 min to 1 h 50 min.
Maximal force and RFDpeak data across the 15 contractions was analyzed with exponential and linear fitting. While at PRE
maximal force was better fitted by exponential than linear regression (exponential r2 = 0.79 ± 0.18; linear r2 = 0.75 ± 0.17;
p = 0.002), at POST exponential and linear fitting showed similar goodness (exponential r2 = 0.49 ± 0.36; linear
r2 = 0.48 ± 0.37; p = 0.196) (Fig. 2). RFDpeak data did not show goodness differences between exponential and linear fitting both
at PRE (exponential r2 = 0.47 ± 0.30; linear r2 = 0.46 ± 0.30; p > 0.578) and POST (exponential r2 = 0.42 ± 0.28; linear
r2 = 0.42 ± 0.27; p > 0.731) (Fig. 2).
The maximal force decreased by 22 ± 6% (p < 0.0001) and similarly RFDpeak decreased by 24 ± 22% (p < 0.0001) from
PRE to POST. RFD calculated in all time intervals showed large to very large decrease (all p values < 0.0001), see Table 1 for details.
Small to large decrease in EMG amplitude was recorded in correspondence of maximal force (ARVmax −26%, p = 0.023) and RFD
(ranged −21% to −30%), see Table 1 for details. No differences were detected in muscle fiber CV in correspondence of maximal
force (CVmax p = 0.188) and during the first 150 ms of contraction (CV150 p = 0.370), see Table 1.
Fig. 2. Time courses (mean ± SD) of peak force (black) and peak of rate of force development (RFD, white) normalized with respect to the first contraction performed
at PRE session. PRE session was performed the day before, and POST session was performed after (with 10 min of recovery) a 21-km running time trial. At PRE the
decline of maximal force and rate of force development was similar, whereas at POST the decline of rate of force development was more pronounced than maximal
force.
270
G. Boccia et al. Human Movement Science 54 (2017) 267–275
Table 1
Decrements (PRE vs POST) of mechanical and electromyographic values calculated in the first contraction of the intermittent protocol.
Max. force (N) 257 ± 51 193 ± 47 −24 ± 15 < 0.0001 −1.30 (very large)
RFDpeak (N/s) 1522 ± 305 1130 ± 300 −392 ± 221 < 0.0001 −1.30 (very large)
RFD50 (N/s) 844 ± 356 539 ± 240 −291 ± 226 < 0.0001 −1.04 (large)
RFD100 (N/s) 1292 ± 321 907 ± 292 −391 ± 276 < 0.0001 −1.21 (large)
RFD150 (N/s) 1172 ± 235 854 ± 243 −315 ± 170 < 0.0001 −1.32 (very large)
EMG
ARVmax (μV) 259 ± 106 190 ± 66 −69 ± 85 0.023 −0.78 (medium)
CVmax (m/s) 4.3 ± 0.5 4.0 ± 0.5 −0.3 ± 0.7 0.188 −0.66 (medium)
ARV50 (μV) 224 ± 125 177 ± 80 −47 ± 87 0.071 −0.44 (small)
ARV100 (μV) 257 ± 118 184 ± 65 −73 ± 97 0.019 −0.76 (medium)
ARV150 (μV) 272 ± 117 193 ± 63 −78 ± 104 0.019 −0.84 (large)
CV150 (m/s) 3.9 ± 0.5 3.7 ± 0.5 0.2 ± 0.7 0.370 −0.39 (small)
4. Discussion
We examined whether the fatigue induced by a half-marathon run influenced the capacities to generate force across 15 inter-
mittent explosive contractions. The main findings of this study were that the prolonged run resulted in 1) a decline of maximal force
and RFD by similar amounts when measured on single maximal contraction attempt 2) a more pronounced decrement of RFD
compared to maximal force when measured across the intermittent protocol composed by 15 repetitions.
After the half-marathon run the maximal force and rapid force production decreased substantially (maximal force: −22 ± 6%
and RFDpeak: −24 ± 22%), confirming that the knee extensor muscles were in fatigued condition at the beginning of POST session
(Fig. 1). The relative peak of RFD did not change after the run (Table 1), this is an original result demonstrating that rapid and
maximal force production were equally affected by fatigue induced by prolonged run. Considering the impairment in maximal force,
Ross and colleagues (Ross, Goodall, Stevens, & Harris, 2010) reported a less pronounced decrease of 15% in knee extensors strength
(accompanied by a decrease of 20% in EMG amplitude) after 20 km laboratory time trial. Peterson and colleagues (Petersen, Hansen,
Aagaard, & Madsen, 2007) found a knee extensors strength loss similar to our study, but they tested a group of athletes after an
official marathon race (42.192 km), i.e. a trial twofold the length of the one herein adopted. Thus, our results showed a slightly more
pronounced strength loss with respect to the expected results. This is likely to be caused by two reasons. Firstly, we used the same
contraction (i.e. the first of the 15 repetitions) to determine the maximal force and RFD. In all repetitions participants was encouraged
to contract “as fast and as hard as possible” with the emphasis on the “fast/explosive/rising” phase of contraction (Maffiuletti et al.,
2016). Thus, even if participants were encouraged to achieve high peak forces, the maximal force obtained in the first contraction
might be possibly lower than that obtained when attempting to achieve only maximal force, without emphasis on explosive phase
(Maffiuletti et al., 2016). Secondly, even if the request for maximal force production should not allow for pacing strategies, knowing
271
G. Boccia et al. Human Movement Science 54 (2017) 267–275
Fig. 3. The percent decline (mean ± SD) (last vs first contraction) of PRE (white) and POST (grey) sessions are reported for the relative rate of force development
(RFD), that is RFD normalized to maximal voluntary contraction force (MVCF). The values are reported for four overlapping time intervals (0–50 ms, 0–100 ms, and
0–150 ms). The decline of relative RFD was more pronounced at POST than at PRE, highlighting the rate of force development decrease more than maximal force.
Differences PRE vs POST are reported as *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001. Statistically significant difference from 0 (indicating a decline across the 15 contractions) are
reported as #p < 0.05; ##p < 0.01.
the number of maximal contractions requested could induce to utilize a pacing strategy (Halperin, Aboodarda, Basset, Byrne, & Behm,
2014). In turn this pacing strategy might produce in the firsts contractions less force and EMG than a couple of maximal contraction
usually adopted to test fatigue after endurance events. However, we put great attention to motivate participants to exerted their
maximal effort. Indeed, participants received a visual feedback of exerted torque and strong verbal encouragements were provided by
272
G. Boccia et al. Human Movement Science 54 (2017) 267–275
Table 2
Decline (last vs first contraction) of mechanical and electromyographic values (%).
EMG
ARVmax −14 ± 22 −13 ± 25 −1 ± 30 0.973 0.04 (trivial)
CVmax −9 ± 19 −3 ± 11 −6 ± 21 0.340 0.38 (small)
ARV50 −31 ± 47 −41 ± 43 10 ± 43 0.430 −0.22 (small)
ARV100 −24 ± 38 −46 ± 27 22 ± 37 0.046 −0.66 (medium)
ARV150 −26 ± 29 −44 ± 27 18 ± 30 0.044 −0.64 (medium)
CV150 −7 ± 22 −1 ± 9 6 ± 25 0.405 0.35 (small)
two operators to reach their highest maximal and explosive force in each contraction.
Our findings showed that the time course of maximal and rapid force capacities was dissociated in the presence of fatigue. Our
protocol allowed to detect that rapid force production was more influenced by fatigue than maximal force, when monitored over
repeated rapid contractions. During the PRE session, undertaken with quadriceps muscle in fresh condition, the time course of
maximal force and RFD showed similar rate of change during the intermittent protocol (maximal force declined by 19 ± 5%,
RFDpeak declined by 20 ± 13%, Fig. 2A). This was underlined by the time course of relative RFDpeak (normalized to maximal force)
which remained, on average, constant throughout the intermittent protocol at PRE. During the intermittent protocol executed at
POST, with the muscle in fatigued condition, the decline of peak of RFD was more pronounced (−35 ± 14%), whereas the decline of
maximal force showed a less pronounced trend (−10 ± 15%) than at PRE (Fig. 2B). Thus at POST, the time course of relative peak of
RFD (normalized to maximal force) resulted in a substantial decrease (−25 ± 13%) throughout the contractions. Importantly, the
fatigue-induced changes in RFD after the prolonged run was not evident in the firsts contractions, but only at the end of the 15
contractions (as stated above) of POST session. Thus, one can argue that the fatigue-induced impairment in rapid force capacity may
have a stronger effect on multiple rather than on single attempts of maximal voluntary contraction.
The herein finding is in line with the study of Buckthorpe et al. (2014) which reported that fatigue exerted a more rapid reduction
of RFD than maximal force during 160 intermittent isometric explosive contractions. However, the present study demonstrate that in
fatigued state the dissociation between RFD and maximal force occurs in as few as 15 contractions, which are much less than the 160
adopted in the study of Buckthorpe et al. (2014). Overall, these studies suggested that the effects of fatigue on maximal and explosive
phase of muscle contraction is likely to be different. Also the mechanisms underpinning the fatigue-induced changes in maximal and
explosive force were potentially different (Andersen & Aagaard, 2006).
The more pronounced decline of RFD at POST, was accompanied by a more pronounced decline of EMG activity during the same
time intervals (Table 2). Thus, these findings suggest that the central motor command in the early phase of muscle contraction might
have a role in the more pronounced decline of RFD in fatigued condition. This is in accordance with previous study reporting a
substantial impairment of explosive neural drive during intermittent explosive contractions (Buckthorpe et al., 2014). Although the
amplitude of the surface EMG increases with neural drive, there are several cofounding factors that prevent to directly associate a
change in EMG amplitude with a change in neural drive, especially during fatiguing contractions (Farina, Merletti, & Enoka, 2004).
Thus, since we did not adopt electrically evoked contraction, which would be essential to distinguish the origins of fatigue, we can
only speculate this finding on the base of EMG amplitude. Noteworthy, contractile mechanisms cannot be excluded on the base of
EMG results, since changes in muscle excitability might have affected EMG amplitude.
In this study, participants were not requested to exert pure short fast contractions, but rather fast and maximal contractions. This
type of precedure is largely adopted in the literature (Aagaard et al., 2002; Buckthorpe et al., 2014) and allows the continuous
monitoring of both explosive and maximal strength during a series of contractions. We cannot directly speculate that the results
would be the same if we would have adopted short fast contractions. However, it is unlikely that the main results of the study, i.e. the
more pronounced decrements of explosive than maximal strength, would differ.
The inability to distinguish between central and peripheral fatigue is a major limitation of this study. Due to the ecological nature
273
G. Boccia et al. Human Movement Science 54 (2017) 267–275
of the study, we could not apply the electrically evoked contraction that would be necessary to elucidate the origin of muscle fatigue.
Since we collected these data in a real race situation, the timing for measurements of each athletes at the end of the race was
dramatically short, about 3–4 min. As stated before, on the base of the EMG results it is possible to suppose that central fatigue might
have an important role on the decay of explosive force after the race, muscle contractile impairments cannot however be excluded.
In this study, we recruited a group of amateur runners, which training programs in the past years were mainly focused on
endurance and aerobic metabolism. However, the sample chosen for the study may have affected the results. Indeed, has been
demonstrated that power athletes, i.e. those who undertake sport training to compete in strength and power disciplines, compared to
endurance athletes, showed higher rate of mechanical fatigue during intermittent dynamic contractions (Rainoldi, Gazzoni,
Merletti, & Minetto, 2008). Thus, one can expect that the relationship between rate of force development and maximal force may be
different in strength/power trained participants.
Multichannel surface EMG allows the estimation of muscle fiber conduction velocity, which seems to be the most affordable
variable to relate the modifications in EMG signals with the recruited motor units pool (Farina et al., 2004). Despite we previously
demonstrated that the changes in muscle fiber conduction velocity was correlated to the changes in muscle force after a prolonged
run (Boccia et al., 2017), in the present study the vastus lateralis did not show any muscle fiber conduction velocity changes. The use
of multichannel EMG to non-invasively characterise muscle fatigue cannot thus be recommended on the base of the herein findings.
Indeed, it did not provide sensitive measurements to deepen the understanding of the origin of fatigue. However, beyond estimating
muscle fiber conduction velocity, multichannel EMG allowed to analyze EMG signals from the best muscle location (Beretta Piccoli
et al., 2014) and to average the estimates of the EMG amplitude across multiple channels, thus providing more consistent results with
respect to the bipolar montage (Farina et al., 2004).
5. Conclusions
We monitored the time course of maximal and explosive force capacities during the execution of 15 intermittent explosive
contractions of the knee extensors, before and after a half-marathon run. Our results revealed that fatigue induced by prolonged run
1) equally affected rapid and maximal force production when measured on single attempt 2) caused a more pronounced decrements
of rapid compared to maximal force when measured across repeated muscle contraction. This indicate that fatigue influences dif-
ferently the maximal and explosive force, and that these two capacities should not be used as interchangeable indices to determine
the effects of fatigue.
Conflict of interest
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank all the athletes who participated to the study. We know that it was not easy and comfortable to take
part in POST session. We also thank Lorenzo Bortolan for his precious help with technical issues, and Luna Bonatti, Luca Di Nubila,
Luca Ferrari, and Giacomo Faraci for their valuable help in data collection.
References
Aagaard, P., Simonsen, E. B., Andersen, J. L., Magnusson, P., & Dyhre-Poulsen, P. (2002). Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal
muscle following resistance training. Journal of Applied Physiology, 1985(93), 1318–1326.
Andersen, L. L., & Aagaard, P. (2006). Influence of maximal muscle strength and intrinsic muscle contractile properties on contractile rate of force development.
European Journal of Applied Physiology, 96, 46–52.
Batterham, A. M., & Hopkins, W. G. (2006). Making Meaningful Inferences About Magnitudes. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 1, 50–57.
Beretta Piccoli, M., Rainoldi, A., Heitz, C., Wuthrich, M., Boccia, G., Tomasoni, E., ... Barbero, M. (2014). Innervation zone locations in 43 superficial muscles: Toward
a standardization of electrode positioning. Muscle and Nerve, 49, 413–421.
Bigland-Ritchie, B., & Woods, J. J. (1984). Changes in muscle contractile properties and neural control during human muscular fatigue. Muscle and Nerve, 7, 691–699.
Bishop, D. (2003). Warm up I: Potential mechanisms and the effects of passive warm up on exercise performance. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N. Z.), 33, 439–454.
Boccia, G., Dardanello, D., Tarperi, C., Rosso, V., Festa, L., La Torre, A., ... Rainoldi, A. (2017). Decrease of muscle fiber conduction velocity correlates with strength
loss after an endurance run. Physiological Measurement, 38, 233–240.
Boccia, G., Dardanello, D., Zoppirolli, C., Bortolan, L., Cescon, C., Schneebeli, A., ... Pellegrini, B. (2016). Central and peripheral fatigue in knee and elbow extensor
muscles after a long-distance cross-country ski race. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports.
Buckthorpe, M., Pain, M. T., & Folland, J. P. (2014). Central fatigue contributes to the greater reductions in explosive than maximal strength with high-intensity
fatigue. Experimental Physiology, 99, 964–973.
Cheng, A. J., & Rice, C. L. (2005). Fatigue and recovery of power and isometric torque following isotonic knee extensions. Journal of Applied Physiology, 1985(99),
1446–1452.
de Ruiter, C. J., Van Leeuwen, D., Heijblom, A., Bobbert, M. F., & de Haan, A. (2006). Fast unilateral isometric knee extension torque development and bilateral jump
height. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 38, 1843–1852.
Farina, D., Merletti, R., & Enoka, R. M. (2004). The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. Journal of Applied Physiology, 96, 1486–1495.
Halperin, I., Aboodarda, S. J., Basset, F. A., Byrne, J. M., & Behm, D. G. (2014). Pacing strategies during repeated maximal voluntary contractions. European Journal of
Applied Physiology, 114, 1413–1420.
Hermens, H. J., Freriks, B., Disselhorst-Klug, C., & Rau, G. (2000). Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. Journal of
Electromyography and Kinesiology, 10, 361–374.
Krustrup, P., Mohr, M., Steensberg, A., Bencke, J., Kjaer, M., & Bangsbo, J. (2006). Muscle and blood metabolites during a soccer game: Implications for sprint
274
G. Boccia et al. Human Movement Science 54 (2017) 267–275
275