Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lect12 304 MagmaGenesisEvol PDF
Lect12 304 MagmaGenesisEvol PDF
Magma Genesis
• Classification
& Evolution –Many igneous rocks types
–Why?
Why aren t all igneous • Melting
rocks the same? • Evolution
8/25/19 8/25/19
8/25/19 8/25/19
8/25/19 8/25/19
1
Primitive Magmas Genesis - Primitive Magmas
• Partial Melting
• If the two rock that undergo
– Composition of the liquid generated by
melting generally not the same as the melting, and they are identical
composition of the rock that is melted (composition), will the melt that
• Different rock compositions is generate always have the
– will produce different magma same composition?
compositions – Why or why not?
8/25/19 8/25/19
Degree of Melting
Generate Primitive Magmas
8/25/19 8/25/19
composition Solid
– Therefore, igneous rock type Liquid
• Low degree of melting P1
– More felsic or more mafic (as compared to higher
degrees)
2
Pressure and Melting Pressure and Melting
Increased pressure moves the
ternary eutectic (first melt) from
Ne
silica-saturated to highly undersat.
Volatile-free alkaline basalts
3GPa
2GPa
1GPa
Highly undesaturated Ab
(nepheline-bearing)
alkali olivine 1atm
basalts
d Oversaturated
a te s
tu r a lt (quartz-bearing)
rs a a s
n d e itic b tholeiitic basalts
U le i
th o
Fo En SiO2
8/25/19 8/25/19
8/25/19 8/25/19
8/25/19 8/25/19
3
Crystal Fractionation Gravity settling
–The differential motion of
• Dominant mechanism by crystals and liquid
which most magmas, once
• under the influence of gravity
formed, differentiate?
• differences in density
8/25/19 8/25/19
Gravity settling
Crystal
– Cool point a ® olivine layer at base of
pluton if first olivine sinks
Fractionation
– Next get ol+cpx layer
Cumulate texture:
Mutually touching
phenocrysts with
interstitial crystallized
residual melt
8/25/19 8/25/19
8/25/19 8/25/19
4
Models of Magmatic Evolution Harker diagram
– Smooth trends
Table 8-5. Chemical analyses (wt. %) of a – Model with 3 assumptions:
hypothetical set of related volcanics.
1 Rocks are related by FX
Oxide B BA A D RD R 2 Trends = liquid line of
SiO 2 50.2 54.3 60.1 64.9 66.2 71.5
descent
TiO 2 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3
Al2O3 14.9 15.7 16.1 16.4 15.3 14.1 3 The basalt is the parent
Fe2O3* 10.4 9.2 6.9 5.1 5.1 2.8 magma from which the
MgO 7.4 3.7 2.8 1.7 0.9 0.5 others are derived
CaO 10.0 8.2 5.9 3.6 3.5 1.1
Na 2O 2.6 3.2 3.8 3.6 3.9 3.4
K 2O 1.0 2.1 2.5 2.5 3.1 4.1
LOI 1.9 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.2 1.4
Total 99.5 99.2 100.6 100.0 99.7 99.2
B = basalt, BA = basaltic andesite, A = andesite, D = dacite,
8/25/19 8/25/19
RD = rhyo-dacite, R = rhyolite. Data from Ragland (1989)
Assimilation
• Incorporation of
wall rocks
Assimilation
• diffusion • Incorporation of wall rocks
• Xenoliths
• Increase
(diffusion, xenoliths)
surface area • Assimilation by melting is limited by
• Reaction the heat available in the magma
• Magma comp
trends toward
wall-rock comp. Isotopic
• Wall-rock (xeno) Evidence for
comp. trends
toward xeno Assimilation
8/25/19 8/25/19
5
Magma Mixing Magma Mixing - Evidence
• Mixing of magmas with different
compositions • Variation on Harker-type diagrams
should lie on a straight line between the
– Mix two magmas get various rock
two most extreme compositions
types that lie between these end-
members
8/25/19 8/25/19
Comingled basalt-Rhyolite
Mt. McLoughlin, Oregon
Basalt pillows
accumulating at the bottom
of a in granitic magma
chamber, Vinalhaven
8/25/19 8/25/19 Island, Maine
8/25/19 8/25/19
6
Some Examples Tests for immiscible origin of
• Late silica-rich immiscible droplets in Fe- associated rock pairs
rich tholeiitic basalts (as in Roedder) • Must be immiscible when heated
• Sulfide-silicate immiscibility (massive experimentally, or must plot on the
sulfide deposits) boundaries of a known immiscibility gap
• Carbonatite-nephelinite systems • Immiscible liquids are in equilibrium with
each other, and thus they must be in
equilibrium with the same minerals
8/25/19 8/25/19
8/25/19 8/25/19