Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION:
The following points are what Berta Bobath identified as unique assumptions
about atypical movement, which outlined the basic principles of the Bobath Concept:
1. Muscle weakness or tightness in hemiplegia and cerebral palsy was a direct result of
lesions or damage to the central nervous system (CNS).
2. Individuals with cerebral palsy and hemiplegia had a disorder of posture AND
movement
3 Atypical movement as a result of damage to the CNS had the potential to recover.
PRINCIPLE OF NDT:
NDT is based on the premise that the presence of normal postural reflex
mechanisms is fundamental to a motor skill's performance. The normal postural reflex
mechanisms consist of righting and equilibrium reactions, reciprocal innervation, and
coordination patterns. The release of abnormal tone and tonic reflexes seen in CP
interfered with the development of righting and equilibrium reactions. It is an interactive
problem-solving approach that focuses on continuing reassessment with attention to
individual goals, developing working hypotheses, treatment plans, and relevant objective
measures to evaluate interventions.
Regardless of severity, individuals of any age with damage to their CNS can be
handled with this approach.
It lays emphasis on following interdependent aspects important for optimizing
motor recovery:
HYPOTHESIS:
The therapist needs to develop a set of clinical hypotheses to guide the intervention
process. A hypothesis is “a tentative explanation for an observation, phenomenon, or
scientific problem that can be tested by further investigation.” Hypotheses can help to direct
both assessment and intervention.
The therapist who uses the NDT Practice Model to develop a plan of care (POC) could
hypothesize that one person’s inability to stoop down to pick up a box is primarily due to
musculoskeletal impairments like decreased Range of Movements (ROM) and weakness. In
another case the same activity limitation may be due to decreased somatosensory awareness
on the right side. Testing the hypotheses determines the effective POC as well as the choice
of intervention strategies for each patient. The ongoing formulation and testing of hypotheses
are key elements in NDT practice that are uniquely applied in the individual patient’s
evaluation and intervention process.
THEORY:
A theory is a collection of hypotheses that have stood the test of time. A theory emerges
when the same predictions of phenomena are consistently observed across time. Theories can
inform a planner’s thinking during all stages and offer insights to translate into better
intervention. A theory can be explanatory, describing why a problem exists, or it can be
a change theory, guiding the development of health interventions.
ASSUMPTION:
Within broad theories the therapist makes assumptions that guide or frame the entire
evaluation, intervention planning, and implementation process. Assumptions can be explicit
and clearly articulated by the practitioner, or they can be implicit and not even consciously
acknowledged by the therapist. Explicit assumptions can be made specific enough to be
clinically tested, and, based on the findings, the overall theory can be modified.
For example a clinician may begin every assessment by asking the family about the
activity limitations that most restrict the individual’s participation. Hidden in this practice is
the assumption that intervention is most effective when focused on a functional outcome that
the patient values. If the clinician holds these assumptions as valid, sessions would be
organized around the valued functional outcomes rather than being focused solely on
increasing range of motion, strengthening a muscle, or striving to improve a posture, such as
developing head control.
PRINCIPLE:
The therapist then generates principles to guide the intervention process and aid in
forming a practice model. A principle is “an accepted or professed rule of action or conduct.”
Principles can be general; for example, effective treatment should include active work by the
patient, to far more specific; for example, during intervention for a client with neuromuscular
impairment, the clinician should address the patient’s inability to recruit specific postural
motor units by facilitating sustained isometric contractions of the desired postural muscles in
the shortened range of those. The NDT Practice Model then is framed by our assumptions
and guided by our practice theory, and reflects the collective body of principles.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK:
INTERVENTION STRATEGIES:
Intervention consists of therapeutic handling, facilitation, and activation of key points of
control.
Therapeutic handling is used in order to influence the quality of the patients' movements
and incorporates both facilitation and inhibition.
Facilitation is a key technique used by Bobath practitioners to promote motor learning. It
is the use of sensory information (tactile cue through manual contacts, verbal directions) to
reinforce weak movement patterns and to discourage overactive ones. The appropriate
provision of facilitation during the motor task is regulated in time, modality, intensity and
withdrawal, all of which affects the outcome of motor learning.
Inhibition can be described as reducing parts of movement/posture that are abnormal and
interfere with normal performance.
Key points of control generally refers to parts of the body that are advantageous when
facilitating or inhibiting movement/posture.
Closed vs. open environment, simple vs. complex, part vs. whole,
Motor Learning
practice and feedback/ knowledge of results
Therapists must be able to observe and distinguish normal from abnormal alignment
and movement patterns.
Therapists must be able to make the functional retraining activities meaningful to the
patient; task specific.
Therapists must be able to select the optimal practice method, feedback, and
environment for maximum function and independence.
Therapists must have stable footwear, good flexibility in lumbar spine and lower
extremities for optimal body mechanics during mat activities.
MOTOR CONTROL:
. Bobath Concept concerns sensory, perception and adaptive behaviour along with the
motor problem that involves the whole patient. It is a goal-orientated and task-specific
approach, aiming to organise the internal (proprioceptive) and external (exteroceptive)
environment of the nervous system for efficient functioning of the individual. It is an
interactive process between patients and therapists.
• Neuro-muscular system, spinal cord and higher centres to change motor performance,
• Neuroplasticity, an interactive nervous system, and individual expression of
movement.
• Overcoming weakness of neural drive after a UMN lesion through selective activation
of cutaneous and muscle receptors.
Therapists work on tone to improve movement, not to normalise tone. Tone can be reduced
by:
MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM :
The Bobath approach addresses the problems that occur as a result of impairment of the
developing CNS that affect the individual's sensory - motor, cognitive, perceptual, social and
emotional development
• It recognises the need for thorough analysis of each patient's functional skills and
need for the person's own activity
• It is an important approach to the rehabilitation of patients with neurological injuries.
• It is based on the brain's ability to reorganise (neuroplasticity).
• It is a multidisciplinary approach, involving physiotherapists, occupational therapists
and speech and language therapists.
• Individuals with CNS pathophysiology have dysfunction in posture and movement
and subsequent functional activity limitations.
• This therapy uses guided or facilitated movements as a treatment strategy to ensure
correlation of input from tactile, vestibular, and somatosensory receptors within the body.
1. Head control;
2. Rolling (supine<->sidelying<-> prone);
3. Crawling;
4. Sitting unsupported;
5. Functional reaching of the arm;
6. Quadruped positioning;
7. Kneeling;
8. Standing unsupported;
9. Side-lying to sitting;
10. Sit-to-stand transfers;
11. Stand pivot transfers;
12. Ambulating;
13. Jumping;
14. Running.
NDT has been proven effective for cerebral palsy and hemiplegia. Nowadays NDT has
been tried in various conditions like
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Spinal cord injury (SCI)
- Brain tumor
- Dementia
- Multiple sclerosis (MS)
- Parkinson’s disease (PD)
- Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
- Infection-related encephalitis
CONCLUSION:
Cerebral palsy is long-life, but improves with adequate intervention. NDT is in practice a
successful approach but we should not think that we can cure a brain lesion or cerebral
palsy, or that we can change all cases to only “minimal”cerebral palsy. If the treatment is
started before abnormal patterns of movement have become established, we can help the
child to organise his potential abilities in what for him is the most normal way.