You are on page 1of 5

Nitric Acid Processing Copper Concentrates

911metallurgist.com/nitric-acid-processing-copper-concentrates/

Jorge April 25, 2019

The process parameters for effective utilization of nitric acid as an oxidant for copper-
iron sulfides have been developed. Leaching variables found to be important were acid
concentration, temperature, time, atmosphere, pressure, mineral type, particle size, and
percent solids. Particular attention was devoted to analysis and control of fumes evolved
during the oxidation.

Numerous references have cited the effectiveness of HNO3 in oxidizing copper sulfides.
The gaseous reaction products reported were NO and NO2).

3CuS + 2HNO3 + 3H2SO4 → 3CuSO4 + 3S° + 2NO↑ + 4H2O

CuS + 2HNO3 + H2SO4 → CuSO4 + S° + 2NO2↑ + 2H2O

Experimental Technique
Most of the leaching experiments were performed in a one-liter glass reaction kettle
equipped with condenser, cooling coil, agitator, pH probe, heating mantle,
thermometer, acid burette, and sampling tube. The sulfide, Concentrate “A”, used for
the experiments assayed 28 percent Cu, 25 percent Fe, 31 percent S, 0.29 percent Mo,
3.5 oz Ag/ton, and 0.4 oz Au/ton. The major mineral constituents were chalcopyrite (60
percent), bornite (10 percent), gangue (14 percent), and pyrite (10 percent). When pure
mineral sulfides were employed, they were natural specimens ground and sized to meet
experimental requirements.

Elemental sulfur was extracted from leach residues with carbon di-sulfide prior to
flotation. The residue was then ground in the presence of sufficient lime to give a pH of
8. 0 to 8. 5 during the subsequent flotation treatment. Reagents employed during the 8-
minute float were xanthate Z-6 collector (0. 2 lb/ton) and MIBC frother (0.3 lb/ton).
The type and quantity of reagents used during flotation were not optimized.

The Leach Step


Four responses were used as criteria for optimization of the leaching step: (1) metal
extraction, (2) elemental sulfur yield, (3) iron rejection, and (4) reagent consumption.
Preliminary experiments showed that these responses were dependent upon the
variables of acid concentration, temperature, time, percent solids, mineral type, particle
size, atmosphere, and pressure; agitation rate was not a significant variable. For most
of the experiments, mineral type, particle size, and pressure were held constant by
leaching the sulfide concentrate defined above at atmospheric pressure with oxygen

1/5
absent. Both full and fractional factorial designs were used to study the effects of HNO3
concentration (10 to 60 percent), H2SO4 concentration (0 to 2 M ), temperature (75° to
95°C), time (30 to 240 minutes), and percent solids (15 to 33 percent).

A primary goal of most metallurgical processes is high extraction of the metal values
from the feed material. In the HNO3 leaching system, acid concentration, mineral type,
particle size, temperature, and time were all important factors in achieving this goal.

A problem common to most processes recovering copper from sulfide ores is the
rejection of iron. Previous investigators of the nitric acid system utilized iron hydroxide
precipitation to accomplish this end; however, this precipitate is difficult to filter and
causes sliming problems during flotation.

Pressure Leaching Attractive


Autoclaving is not necessary to successfully leach with HNO3. Pressure does, however,
have a number of attractions:

1. Increased pressure accelerates the regeneration of HNO3 within the leach tank.
2. Evolution of NOx gases already under pressure eliminates the need for off-gas
heating, compression, and cooling in preparation for absorption.
3. The higher leach temperatures attainable under pressure maximize S° formation,
favor hydrogen jarosite formation, and minimize residual nitrate concentration.

The chemistry learned at atmospheric pressure is presently being applied in a


pressurized system.

Process Development
An ideal leach would extract all of the copper, precipitate all of the iron, convert all the
sulfide to S°, and consume all of the nitrate added. Unfortunately, the chemistry of the
HNO3 leach system does not appear to simultaneously offer these ideals. The conditions
chosen which would most nearly meet these ends were the addition of oxygen and a
deficiency of HNO3 to a slurry of copper concentrate at 90°C. Present in the slurry were
fresh concentrate, recycled leach residue, and a solvent extraction raffinate. Over a 1.5-
hour period, 1.6 pounds of HNO3 were added for each pound of copper to be oxidized.
The continuous addition of HNO3 as a 50 percent solution avoids excessive acid
concentration at any time during the leach. One-half hour after completing this
addition, the slurry temperature was raised to the incipient boiling point and the
oxidation allowed to continue for the next 2 hours.

The gas evolved from the leach as described under “Optimum Leach Conditions” is
almost entirely NO and water vapor; the NO2 content averages 2 percent and the N2O 1
percent. The N02 content increases as injected oxygen reacts with the NO. Traces of N2
were detected, but these were probably contaminants from air. Hydrogen sulfide
appears only when pyrrhotite is treated, and then only when copper is absent.
2/5
Six cycles according to the flow sheet were completed. In each cycle, 80 percent of the
copper and iron fed to the leach was solubilized. Ninety percent of the solubilized iron
subsequently precipitated into the leach residue as hydrogen jarosite. Sixty percent of
the sulfide sulfur oxidized during the leach was converted to S°. Two-thirds of the
remaining sulfur precipitated with the iron as hydrogen jarosite, and one-third was
precipitated from the solvent extraction raffinate with lime. The HNO3 leach residue
assayed 5.6 percent Cu, 25 percent Fe, and 14 percent S°.

3/5
4/5
5/5

You might also like