Report on

Decision making process on transportation

Subject: MGT210
Submitted by
Md. Kader Newaj sazid 1521610630
Maria Al Kibtia 1612686630
Shakil Mahmud 1520329031
K.M. Jahin Hasnat 1430959030
Md. Anowarul Islam 1510340630
Maliha bintea kabir 1611330630
Sakib Mahmud 1512117630
Submitted to
Nafis Sarwar Islam ( NFS)
Due date: 02/08/2016
Acknowledgement
Firstly I would like to thank Nafish Sarwar Islam (NFS) sir without whose support this project
could not be completed. Next we would like to thank all the people, who gave their valuable time
and feedback to this report.
Let me also use this opportunity to thank our team members who have contribute to this report
with their invaluable opinions and suggestions. Especially thank our honorable teacher once
again for giving us this opportunity to work in a team to prepare this report.
Identifying the problem:

INTRODUCTION:
Transportation is an extremely important policy issue for those with disabilities. People with
disabilities have consistently described how transportation barriers affect their lives in important
ways. Over the last two decades the National Organization on Disability (NOD) has sponsored
three successive Harris polls with people with disabilities, and respondents in each survey have
reported that transportation issues are a crucial concern. In the last survey, undertaken in 2004,
just under a third of those with disabilities reported that inadequate transportation was a problem
for them; of those individuals, over half said it was a major problem. The more severe the
disability of the respondent was, the more serious were the reported transportation problems.

Garment industry is a main source of foreign exchange of Bangladesh. It has been the key export
division for the last 25 years. Garment factories provide employment to 40 percent of total
industrial workers of Bangladesh. So garment industry are the source of employment in
Bangladesh. But without the proper laws the worker are demanding their various wants and as a
result conflict is began with the industry. This report made for identify Problems of Garments
Industry in Bangladesh and how to recover this problem.
Types of the problems:
 Come from different types of place.
 Safety and security.
 Comfort.
 Time maintain
 Sexual harassment in transport
Identifying Decision Criteria:

Decision criteria are factors that are important to solve the problem. The factors in which we are
going to concentrate are given following:

1. Price: Here, we 1st analyses the price of our product that which product we can afford by price
& highest weight.
2. Mileage: In this we analyses the mileage of our product which can give us the highest
mileage.
3. Capacity: Capacity is most important part of our product. In this part we choose the product
which capacity is more flexible then other product.
4. Service: It is also one of the most important part of our analyzing product. If we provide low
quality service then it’s hard to hold our business aim. So, here we see which product can give us
a best quality service to our customer.
5. Engine quality: Our main focus is transportation .So, Engine quality of our product have to
must better, long lasting & also have to concern about our environment.

Allocating weights to the criteria

The criteria are not all inessential. A.B.M Garments LTD has to choose what the most essential
criteria to choose carrying service are. A.B.M Garments LTD must weigh the criteria in order to
give them the actual priority in the arrangement. The weight width is 1-10. A value near 10
denote that the law is more important and the criteria has value near 1 is less important.

Criterion Weight

Price 10
Mileage 08
Capacity 06
Servicing 04
Engine Quality 02

Developing alternative:
Top level manager Price in Mid and first level Price in Non-managerial Price in
BDT manager BDT employee BDT

Toyota primo 2016 3700000 Toyota Hiace 2003 960000 Mitsubishi minibus 500000
4DR/5

Toyota Allion G 2016 4000000 Toyota X Noah 1156000 Nissan minibus 800000
1993

Nissan bluebird 2350000 Hiace GL, microbus 890000 Tata 407 turbo 750000
longbody minibus

Mitsubishi Lancer EX 2250000 Toyota hiace super 1350000 Isuzu DBR 700000
2015 Gl 2004

Analyzing alternatives:
Top manager
Brand name price mileage capacity service Engine quality

Toyota primo 06 08 06 10 08
2016

Toyota Allion G 04 06 06 08 10
2016

Nissan bluebird 08 05 06 06 06

Mitsubishi Lancer 10 04 06 08 06
EX 2015

Middle and first line manager

Brand name Price mileage Capacity Service Engine
quality

Toyota Hiace 2003 08 06 08 09 06

Toyota X Noah 06 08 06 10 06

Hiace GL, microbus 10 04 08 08 04

longbody

Toyota hiace super 04 10 08 08 06

Gl 2004

Non managerial employee

Brand name price mileage Capacity service Engine quality

Mitsubishi 10 04 04 06 06
minibus
4DR/5
Nissan 04 06 06 06 08
minibus 1993
Tata 407 turbo 06 08 08 04 08
minibus
Isuzu DBR 08 04 10 06 06

Selecting alternative:
 Top manager
Brand name Price mileage capacity service Engine
quality Total

Toyota primo 60 64 36 40 12 212

2016

Toyota Allion G 40 48 36 32 12 168

2016

Nissan bluebird 80 40 36 24 08 188

Mitsubishi 100 32 36 32 10 210

Lancer EX 2015

Top managre
250

200

150

100

50

0
price mileage capacity service engine quality Total

Toyota primo 2016 Toyota allion G 2016

Nissan blue bird Mitsubishi Lancer Ex 2015

Middle and first line manager

Brand name price mileage Capacity service Engine Total
quality
Toyota Hiace 80 48 48 32 12 220
2003

Toyota X Noah 60 64 36 40 12 212

Hiace GL, 100 32 48 32 16 228

microbus
longbody

Toyota hiace 40 80 48 32 12 212

super Gl 2004

Middle and First level manager

250

200

150

100

50

0
Price Mileage Capacity Service Engine quality Total

Toyota hiace 2003 Toyota X Noah

Hiace GL microbus longbody Toyota hiace super GL 2004

Non-managerial employee
 Brand name price mileage Capacity service Engine Total
quality
Mitsubishi 100 32 24 24 12 192
minibus
4DR/5
Nissan 40 48 36 24 16 164
minibus
1993
Tata 407 60 64 48 16 16 204
turbo
minibus
Isuzu DBR 80 32 80 24 12 228

Non-managerial employee
250

200

150

100

50

0
Price Mileage Capacity Service Engine quality Total

Mitsubishi minibus 4DR/5 Nissan minibus 1993

Tata 407 turbo minibus Isuzu DBR

Implementing the Alternative:

In our garment factory we have Top level managers, Middle or first level managers and Non-
managerial Employees. And we have selected Toyota Premio 2016 for our Top level managers,
Hiace GL microbus for our Middle or first-level managers and Isuzu DBR for our Non-
managerial Employees.
A chart showing the total number of cars needed for each level of managers and employee with
the total budget is given below:
 Designation Selected cars No.of cars needed Price
Top level Manager Toyota premio 2016 1 3700000
Middle or first-level Hiace GL microbus 5 4450000
manager

Non-managerial Isuzu DBR 10 7000000

employees

Evaluating the Decision’s Effectiveness:

In this step the outcome of the decision has been evaluated by using two tools. This are- SWOT
and PESTLE analysis.

SWOT

 Strengths :
 This decision will save the transportation cost and valuable time of managers and
employees.
 As these buses will pick managers and employees from their houses, everyone
will be on time in the workplace.
 The quality of these buses is so good. These can provide service for a long time
without any need for reparation.
 This transportation service can work as a motivation for the employees. They will
feel more interested to come to the workplace.
 Weaknesses :
 As these are mini buses, not all employees can travel at a time.
 The appearance of these buses is very poor.
 Bearing extra cost for buying these buses will decrease company’s fund.

 Opportunities :
  Because of this transportation facility, company can prove to other people that
how much it care for its employees. As a result, many job seekers will be
interested to work in this company.
 This decision will attract even the employees from the other organizations.
 By highlighting this in media and putting logo on these buses, our company can
promote itself.
 Threats :
 Uncertain political situation can be a threat for these buses.
 By seeing us, other companies will also provide mini bus for their employees.

PESTLE

 Political :
 The result of political instability can eventually be perilous for these buses.
 Economic :
 The tax on vehicles is very high. That means company will have to bear a huge
cost for these buses.
 Social :
 By providing transportation service, company can conform to its core ethics,
which include ensuring benefit for its employees.
 Technological :

 Legal :
 This decision can ensure safety standards, which are imposed by the law,for the
employees.
 Environmental :
 These buses are not eco-friendly. The toxic smoke of these can be harmful for
environment and the health of the employees.
Conclusion: We have done 8 step decision making process to solve our company’s problem. After
identifying the problem we have analyzed the alternatives and selected _ as the solution for the problem.

Then we have implemented it and evaluated the effectiveness of our decision. By doing that we have
solved our company’s problem quite effectively. This decision will surely benefit our company and we
can resolve any kind of problem by following these steps in future.