Designation: F 2023 – 00
Standard Test Method for
Evaluating the Oxidative Resistance of Crosslinked
Polyethylene (PEX) Tubing and Systems to Hot Chlorinated
Water1
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F 2023; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
1.1 This test method describes the general requirements for
evaluating the long-term, chlorinated water, oxidative resis-
tance of cross-linked polyethylene (PEX) tubing produced in
accordance with Specification F 876 or PEX tubing/fitting
systems in accordance with Specification F 877 used in hot-
and-cold water distribution systems by exposure to hot, chlo-
rinated water. This test method outlines the requirements of a
pressurized flow-through test system, typical test pressures,
test-fluid characteristics, failure type, and data analysis.
NOTE 1—Other known disinfecting systems (chlorine dioxide, ozone,
and chloramine) are currently used for protection of potable water;
however, free-chlorine is by far the most common system in use today.
Disinfecting systems other than chlorine have not been evaluated by this
method.
1.2 Guidelines and requirements for test temperatures, test
hoop stresses, and other test criteria have been established by
prior testing of PEX tubing produced by the three most
common commercial methods of cross-linking: silane, perox-
ide, and electron-beam (see Note 2). Other related system
components that typically appear in a PEX hot-and-cold water
distribution system can be evaluated with the PEX tubing.
When testing PEX tubing and fittings as a system, it is
recommended that the anticipated end-use fitting type(s) and
material(s) be included in the test circuit since it is known that
some fitting types and materials can impact failure times.
Specimens used shall be representative of the piping product(s)
and material(s) under investigation.
NOTE 2—The procedures described in this test method (with some
modifications of test temperatures or stresses, or both) have been used to
evaluate pipes manufactured from polybutylene (PB), polyethylene (PE),
polypropylene (PP), multilayer (polymer-metal composite), copper, and
stainless steel.
1.3 This test method is applicable to PEX tubing and
systems used for transport of potable water containing free-
chlorine for disinfecting purposes. The oxidizing potential of
the test-fluid specified in this test method exceeds that typically
found in potable water systems across the United States.
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F17 on Plastic
Piping Systems and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F17.40 on Test
Methods.
Current edition approved June 10, 2000. Published September 2000.
Copyright © ASTM, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1
An American National Standard
1.4 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded
as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for
information purposes.
1.5 The following precautionary caveat pertains only to the
test method portion, Section 12, of this specification.This
standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns,
if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user
of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health
practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limita-
tions prior to use.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D 1600 Terminology for Abbreviated Terms Relating to
Plastics2
D 2122 Test Method for Determining Dimensions of Ther-
moplastic Pipe and Fittings3
E 177 Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in
ASTM Test Methods4
F 412 Terminology Relating to Plastic Piping Systems3
F 876 Specification for Cross-linked Polyethylene (PEX)
Tubing3
F 877 Specification for Cross-linked Polyethylene (PEX)
Plastic Hot- and Cold-Water Distribution Systems3
F 948 Test Method for Time-to-Failure of Plastic Piping
Systems and Components Under Constant Internal Pres-
sure With Flow3
2.2 ISO Standards:
ISO 9080 Thermoplastic Pipe for Transport of Fluids—
Methods of Extrapolation of Hydrostatic Stress Rupture
Data to Determine the Long Term Strength of Thermo-
plastic Pipe5
ISO 13760 Plastic Pipe for the Conveyance of Fluids Under
Pressure—Miners Rule—Calculation Method for Cumu-
lative Damage5
2.3 Plastics Pipe Institute (PPI) Document:
TN-16 Rate Process Method for Projecting Performance of
2
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 08.01.
3
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 08.04.
4
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 14.02.
5
Available from the American National Standards Institute, 11 W. 42nd St., 13th
Floor, New York, NY 10036.
 F 2023
Polyethylene Piping Components6
2.4 American Water Works Association (AWWA) Docu-
ment:
1996 WATER:\STATS Survey7
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions—Definitions are in accordance with Termi-
nology F 412 and abbreviations are in accordance with Termi-
nology D 1600, unless otherwise indicated.
3.1.1 brittle failure (Stage II), n—failure in the tubing wall
that is characterized by little or no material deformation in the
failure area and is the result of a single crack emanating from
the interior of the tubing to the outside surface typically
resulting in a pinhole leak, see Fig. 1. Brittle failures produced
with this test method shall not be used for data analysis.
3.1.2 ductile failure (Stage I), n—failure in the tubing wall
that is characterized by obvious localized deformation of the
material visible with the unaided eye, see Fig. 1. Ductile
failures produced with this test method shall not be used for
data analysis.
3.1.3 environmental or oxidative failure (Stage III),
n—failure in the tubing wall characterized by a large number
of cracks emanating from the interior surface of the tubing
wall, see Fig. 1.
3.1.3.1 Discussion—Stage III failures may also be identified
by a color shift in the failure area (typically brown or
reddish-brown). Identification of oxidative failure, when not
obvious by inspection with the unaided eye, can be performed
with a 25X microscope or other similar device yielding the
same level of magnification. Only Stage III environmental
failures shall be used for data analysis.
3.1.4 hot-and-cold water distribution system, n—a combi-
nation of components such as tubing, fittings, valves, and so
forth, that when installed as a complete system, make up the
interior water supply system of a commercial or residential
structure.
3.1.5 long-term oxidative resistance, n—the extrapolated
time-to-failure prediction as determined by analysis of time-
6
Available from the Plastics Pipe Institute,
7
Available from the American Water Works Assn.,
FIG. 1 Pictorial Illustration of Failure Types
2
to-failure test data by multiple linear regression utilizing the
rate process method of PPI TN-16 or Model Q of ISO 9080.
Where applicable, application of Miners Rule in accordance
with ISO 13760 can be used to estimate time-to-failure at
several differing conditions of temperature or stress, or both.
3.1.6 multiple linear regression, n—a three or four coeffi-
cient mathematical model used to analyze time-to-failure data
from different temperatures and stresses to extrapolate pro-
jected time-to-failure at selected temperatures or stresses.
3.1.7 Miners Rule, n—a mathematical method for estimat-
ing the cumulative, irreversible damage that results from
exposure to each of several differing conditions of stress or
temperature, or both.
3.1.8 oxidation reduction potential (ORP), n—a measure of
the total oxidizing power of a solution by means of a
platinum-redox electrode. For a further explanation of ORP see
Appendix X2.
3.1.9 unaided eye, n—observable without visual enhance-
ment beyond correction for normal vision.
4. Summary of Test Method
4.1 The PEX tubing or tubing/fitting assemblies are exposed
to pressurized test-fluid until failure. All time-to-fail data used
for analysis shall be the result of oxidative degradation (Stage
III). A minimum number of test temperature and hoop stress
conditions are required to allow accurate data analysis and
time-to-failure extrapolations.
5. Significance and Use
5.1 Environment or oxidative time-to-fail data derived from
this test method, analyzed in accordance with Section 13, are
suitable for extrapolation to typical end-use temperatures and
hoop stresses. The extrapolated value(s) provides a relative
indication of the resistance of the tested PEX tubing or system
to the oxidative effects of hot, chlorinated water for conditions
equivalent to those conditions under which the test data were
obtained. The performance of a material or piping product
under actual conditions of installation and use is dependent
upon a number of factors including installation methods, use
patterns, water quality, nature and magnitude of localized
stresses, and other variables of an actual, operating hot-and-
cold water distribution system that are not addressed in this test
method. As such, the extrapolated values do not constitute a
representation that a PEX tube or system with a given
extrapolated time-to-failure value will perform for that period
of time under actual use conditions.
6. Apparatus
6.1 Pressurized Flow-Through Test System—A system com-
prised of the necessary pump(s), fittings, piping, heaters,
sensors, and meters that is capable of maintaining the required
test pressures within the tolerance specified in 9.1.4, the
required test temperatures within the tolerance of 9.1.3, and
flow the test-fluid through the specimens continually at a flow
rate within the tolerance specified in 9.1.5. Cyclic pressure
variations, such as those produced by some pumping systems,
shall not produce pressure excursions that exceed the tolerance
stated in 9.1.4.
6.1.1 Recirculating Test System—A flow-through test sys-
tem that repeatedly reconditions the test-fluid and passes it
 F 2023
through the specimens. For purposes of this test method, the
test-fluid shall be monitored at a sufficient frequency to ensure
that it continuously meets the test-fluid parameters and water
quality criteria. A portion of the total system volume shall be
purged and replaced with fresh test-fluid continually.
6.1.2 Single-Pass Test System—A flow-through test system
that passes the test-fluid through the specimens only once and
is discarded.
6.2 Specimen Holders—Test specimens shall be supported
to minimize or eliminate externally induced stresses. Speci-
mens shall be allowed to freely expand bi-directionally
7. Sampling, Test Specimens, and Test Units
7.1 Sampling—Select at random, a sufficient amount of
tubing to satisfy the specimen requirements of this test method.
When testing as a system, randomly select a sufficient quantity
of fittings.
7.2 Test Specimen Size—The PEX tubing specimens shall
be 12 to 18 in. (300 to 460 mm) in length between fitting
closures or between fitting joints.
7.2.1 Dimensions Measurement—Measure and record the
critical dimensions for tubing and fittings. For tubing, measure
the average outside diameter and wall-thickness in accordance
with Test Method D 2122. For fittings, measure those dimen-
sions critical to the function of the joint, as well as minimum
body wall thickness.
7.3 Testing as a System—When testing PEX tubing and
related system components (such as fittings) as a system, the
other components shall be attached to the PEX tubing in the
same manner as in actual service. For fittings, the particular
fitting style shall be installed in accordance with the manufac-
turer’s instructions or the ASTM specification when applicable.
7.4 Minimum Required Test Units—A minimum of six test
units is required. A test unit is comprised of two or more
individual time-to-failure data points at the same temperature
and hoop stress condition. Statistical reliability of the analysis
of the resultant data will be benefited by obtaining additional
data points at each temperature/hoop stress condition.
7.4.1 Test Unit Distribution—Time-to-failure data points
shall be obtained at 2 test hoop stresses at each of a minimum
of 3 test temperatures for a minimum of 12 data points. As an
alternate, obtain time-to-failure data for the temperature/hoop
stress combinations of the three-temperature matrix of PPI
TN-16, see Note 3. Hoop stresses shall be separated by a least
80 psi (0.55 MPa).
NOTE 3—When using the PPI TN-16 matrix, Temperature T3, which
requires testing at only one stress, refers to the lowest test temperature.
7.4.2 Test Temperature Selection—Temperatures of 239°F
(115°C), 221°F (105°C), and 203°F (95°C) have been utilized
in prior testing of PEX, see Note 4. Adjacent test temperatures
shall be separated by at least 18°F (10°C). Other test tempera-
tures may be used, but the maximum test temperature shall not
exceed 239°F (115°C).
NOTE 4—Prior testing indicates that for the test temperatures stated in
7.4.2, hoop stresses to yield Stage III failures within reasonable testing
times are between 160 psi (1.10 MPa) and 400 psi (2.76 MPa). For a true
SDR9 tube, those hoop stresses correspond to test pressures of 40 psig
(275.9 kPa) to 100 psig (689.7 kPa). If a selected test hoop stress produces
Stage I or Stage II failures, the stress will need to be reduced to produce
3
Stage III failures at all temperatures.
7.4.2.1 Relationship of Internal Pressure to Hoop Stress—
The hoop stress in the tubing wall is calculated by the
following expression, commonly known as the ISO equation:
2S/P 5 DR 2 1 (1)
or
2S/P 5 ~Do/t! 2 1 (2)
where:
S = stress in the circumferential or hoop direction, psi
(MPa),
P = internal pressure, psig (kPa),
t = minimum wall thickness, in. (mm),
DR = dimension ratio, DR, and
Do = average outside diameter, in. (mm).
8. Calibration and Standardization
8.1 Measuring Equipment—All measuring and testing
equipment having an effect on the accuracy or validity of the
calibrations or tests shall be calibrated or verified, or both,
before being put into service.
9. Test Fluid
9.1 Internal Test Fluid—The test fluid shall be reverse
osmosis (RO) or deionized (DI) water prepared in accordance
with 9.1.1, or potable water (tap water) prepared in accordance
with 9.1.2.
9.1.1 RO or DI Water Test-Fluid Preparation—Test fluid
prepared from RO or DI water shall have a pH in the range
from 6.5 to 8.0 and contain 2.5 ppm to 5 ppm (milligrams per
litre) of free-chlorine. The chosen pH shall be maintained to
60.2 and the chosen free-chlorine concentration shall be
maintained to 60.2 ppm. The pH and free-chlorine concentra-
tion combination shall yield a minimum ORP of 825 mV for
the test fluid, see Note 5.
9.1.2 Tap Water Test Fluid Preparation—Tap water shall
have a pH in the range from 6.5 to 8.0 and contain the
necessary free-chlorine to maintain an ORP of 825 6 30 mV,
see Note 5.
NOTE 5—At the time this test method was originally approved, several
test laboratories had existing experimental data developed under varying
test conditions, not necessarily in strict accordance with this test method.
It is suggested that future testing be conducted at conditions that are as
aggressive, or more aggressive than plumbing piping might encounter in
actual service; specifically, with a test fluid having a pH of 7 or lower and
a free-chlorine concentration of 3 PPM or higher. Test data developed with
a less aggressive test fluid having a pH higher than 7 or free-chlorine
content less than 3 PPM, or both, or prepared from locally available
tap-water, may provide higher extrapolated values. However, such higher
values may not necessarily be representative of better performance. It is
important to be aware of and consider the specific test conditions when
comparing data from different materials or laboratories.
Prior data obtained with test-fluid having an ORP of 750 mV or higher
still provides a conservative extrapolation for potable-water conditions
found in most areas of the United States.
It is anticipated that use of RO or DI water may improve interlaboratory
reproducibility; however, RO or DI water does not generally exist in real
service. Since tap water (locally available potable water) quality can vary
from location to location, and considering the international application of
this test method, it seems prudent to utilize RO or DI water to minimize

possible disparities of results obtained from laboratories in different
geographical locations.
9.1.3 Test Fluid Temperature Control—The test fluid enter-
ing each specimen shall be maintained to6 1.8°F (61°C) of
the test temperature.
9.1.4 Pressure Control—The pressure of the test fluid shall
be maintained to 63 psig (620.69 kPa).
9.1.5 Test Fluid Flow Rate—The flow rate of the test fluid
shall yield a minimum velocity of 0.12 fps (0.04 mps). For the
nominal size 1⁄2in., SDR9 tubing, this corresponds to a flow rate
of 0.06 gpm (0.23 LPM). The formula used to calculate the
flow rates for other sizes and DRs is as follows:
p~id/2!2 * FPS * 720
231 5 gpm
where:
id = measured inside diameter of the tubing, in.
9.2 Test Fluid Instrument Accuracy:
9.2.1 pH—The pH measurement and control instruments
shall have an accuracy of 0.1 pH or better.
9.2.2 Free-Chlorine—Free-chlorine content measurement
and control instruments shall have an accuracy of 0.1 ppm or
better.
9.2.3 ORP—The ORP measurement and control instru-
ments shall have an accuracy of 610 mV or better.
10. External Environment
10.1 The exterior environment shall be air and shall be
maintained at the target temperature of the test fluid tempera-
ture 64.5°F (62.5°C). Direct, forced-air heating of the speci-
mens shall not be used.
11. Specimen Positioning
11.1 The specimens can be positioned vertically or horizon-
tally. Horizontal positioning requires special attention to insure
that all entrapped air has been removed prior to starting the
test. For vertically positioned specimens, the test fluid shall
flow into the specimens from the lower end.
12. Procedure
12.1 Perform the test procedure in accordance with 12.2-
12.4 for the test units specified in 7.4 with a test fluid as
specified in Section 9.
12.2 After connecting the specimens to the flow-through
apparatus, purge the specimens of all entrapped gas and start
the flow of the test-fluid through the specimens at a tempera-
ture or pressure, or both, 40 to 50 % less than the test condition.
Over the next 1 to 3 h, gradually increase the temperature and
pressure of the test fluid to the test condition. When the test
fluid reaches the test condition temperature, pressure, and flow
rate, and the external environment has reached the test tem-
perature in accordance with Section 10, register the start time.
12.3 Maintain the test condition until all of the specimens
have failed. Any loss of fluid through the wall of the tubing or
assembly constitutes a failure. Record the time-to-failure for
each failed specimen within 61 % of the test time for the
specimen. When multiple specimens are connected end-to-end,
remove each failed specimen and continue the test until all
remaining specimens at the conditions have failed.
F 2023
12.4 Record the time in hours and a description for each
failure. The description of each failure shall include: linear
location from flow inlet, circumferential position, and initiation
point (inside or outside of tube). For accurate test life extrapo-
lation, all of the failures must be the same type. Mixed mode
failures and failures initiated from the outside of the tube shall
not be used for data analysis, see Note 6.
NOTE 6—Numerous failures occurring predominantly in approximately
the same position on the tube circumference should be examined carefully.
When there is an indication that the failures are attributable to the design
or operation of the test, these values should be discarded unless it can be
demonstrated that the testing provided a more conservative estimate of the
oxidative resistance.
(3) 13. Calculation
13.1 Regression Analysis—Perform a multiple linear regres-
sion on the time-to-failure data in accordance with the rate
process method PPI-TN-16 or Model Q of ISO 9080. The
correlation coefficient (R2 value) of the data shall be greater
than 0.9 to ensure accuracy of the time-to-failure extrapola-
tions. If it can be demonstrated that the four-coefficient
regression equation in Model Q of ISO 9080 provides a better
fit to the data set, then the coefficients, correlation (R2 value),
and extrapolated times-to-failure from that model shall be used
and reported.
13.2 Time-to-Failure Extrapolations—Using the coeffi-
cients from 13.1, calculate the estimated time-to-failure at a
hoop stress corresponding to a sustained internal pressure of 80
psig (551.7 kPa) for the DR of the tested specimens at
temperatures of 180°F (82°C), 140°F (60°C), and 73°F (23°C).
NOTE 7—It may be convenient to also report the extrapolated time-to-
failure in years by dividing hours by 8760.
13.3 Application of Miner’s Rule—Calculate the estimated
time to-failure for a hoop stress corresponding to a sustained
internal pressure of 80 psig (551.7 kPa) for the DR of the tested
specimens at temperature exposure conditions of 25 % of the
total time at 140°F (60°C) and 75°F (23°C) in accordance with
ISO 13760. An example is shown in X1.2.
14. Report
14.1 Report Content—Report the minimum information as
required in 14.2-14.9.
14.2 Laboratory name and location and starting and ending
dates of the test.
14.3 Chlorine source (that is, chlorine gas, hypochlorite,
and so forth)
14.4 Identification of the PEX tubing in the report shall
include: tubing nominal size and DR or wall thickness speci-
fication; average outside diameter and minimum wall thickness
of each specimen; tubing manufacturer’s name, trade designa-
tion and tubing lot number (if applicable); resin manufacturer’s
name, compound designation, and lot designation (for in-plant
compounded materials, resin manufacturer’s name may be
omitted); cross-linking process; and gel count.
14.5 Identification of fitting(s) tested with the PEX tubing
(if applicable) shall include: manufacturer’s name and model
or designation, fitting type, material, and ASTM standard
designation (if applicable).
14.6 All test conditions, including: test fluid temperature/
4
 F 2023
internal pressure combinations; specimen external air tempera-
ture; test fluid free-chlorine concentration and pH; test fluid
ORP; water type (tap, RO or DI); flow rate; and specimen
position (horizontal or vertical). Where applicable, report the
minimum, maximum, and average values for each parameter.
14.7 A table of the test temperatures, hoop stresses, and
failure times for all specimens tested.
14.8 A description of each failure in accordance with 12.4.
14.9 A summary of the regression analysis including: coef-
ficients; correlation coefficient (R2 value); estimated time-to-
failure at 140°F (60°C); estimated time-to-failure at conditions
of 25 % at 140°F (60°C) and 75 % at 73.4°F (23°C); estimated
time-to-failure at 180°F (82°C).
15. Precision and Bias
15.1 Precision—For a single laboratory, the intra-laboratory
standard deviation reproducibility from 23 test runs having 2 to
4 specimens per run, at temperatures of 95°C, 105°C and
APPENDIXES
(Nonmandatory Information)
X1. SUMMARY OF FORMULAS
X1.1 Multiple Linear Regression—The three-parameter,
rate process equation from PPI TN-16 and ISO 9080 is
expressed as follows:
Log10 ft 5 A 1 B/T 1 C~Log10S!/T (X1.1)
where:
ft = time to failure, h,
T = absolute temperature K°,
S = hoop stress, psi (MPa), and
A, B, and C = coefficients derived from a particular data
set.
X1.1.1 The four-parameter, multiple linear regression equa-
tion from ISO 9080 is expressed as follows:
Log10ft 5 c1 1 c2/T 1 c3Log10S 1 c4~Log10S!/T 1 e (X1.2)
where:
c1– c4 = coefficients derived from a particular data set, and
e = an error variable, having a Laplace-Gauss distri-
bution with zero mean and constant variance.
X2. OXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIAL (ORP)
X2.1 ORP Background—ORP is a monitoring/control
method that provides a measurement of the total oxidizing
potential of a solution. For chlorinated water, ORP provides a
measurement of the equilibrium of the free-chlorine as a
function of pH. It is widely used as a disinfection control in
effluent treatment, and DIN standards 19643 and 19644 specify
a minimum ORP level of 750 mV for pools and spas. In 1972,
the World Health Organization recognized that an ORP of 650
5
115°C, and covering 14 grades of polyolefin materials were:
65% for 50% of test runs
610% for 70% of test runs, and
615% for 90% of test runs.
The inter-laboratory precision of this test method is being
determined and will be available on or before January, 2005. It
is not feasible to specify the inter-laboratory precision at this
time because available data produced at different laboratories
was done under varied test conditions, not necessarily in strict
accordance with this test method. A primary purpose of this test
method is to harmonize future testing. Due to the limited
number of test laboratories and test stations within each
laboratory, additional time is required to produce sufficient
duplicate data to calculate precision.
15.2 Bias—No information can be presented on the bias of
this test method because no material having an accepted
reference value is available.
X1.2 Miner’s Rule Calculations—The Miner’s Rule equa-
tions are expressed as follows:
TDY 5 %a/ta 1 %b/tb 1 . . . %x/tx (X1.3)
and
ts 5 100/TDY (X1.4)
where:
TDY = total damage per year,
ta, tb. . . tx = time-to-failure at different conditions, a,
b, and so forth, years,
%a, %b. . . %x = percentage of time at each condition, a,
b, and so forth. (Total of percentages
must equal 100), and
ts = time-to-failure prediction from cumula-
tive damage, years.
mV provides disinfection and viral inactivation almost instan-
taneously. For reference, pure water has an ORP of about 200
mV and typical tap water rarely, if ever, exceeds 850 mV.
X2.2 ORP Instrument—The measuring instrument re-
sembles a pH probe except that electron transfer from the
solution to a platinum band is compared to an internal
silver/silver-chloride reference electrode. The output of the
 F 2023
probe is measured in millivolts. A higher millivolt reading (OCl) that form equilibrium in solution and is pH dependent.
indicates a greater oxidizing potential of the solution. Fig. X2.1 shows the relationship between pH/free-chlorine and
X2.3 ORP Relationship to pH—Free-chlorine is defined as ORP in a deionized water solution. Table X2.1 is the same
both the hypochlorous acid (HClO) and hypochlorite ions information presented in tabular form.

FIG. X2.1 Relationship of pH/Free-Chlorine to ORP in Deionized Water

6
 TABLE X2.1 Tabular Representation of Fig. X2.1
PPM 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 6 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 7 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 8 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 8.8 8.9 9
0.1 770 749 728 706 683 659 634 608 581 554 525 495 464 432 400 366 331 296 259 222 183 144 103 62 19
0.2 800 782 764 745 724 703 681 658 634 609 584 557 530 501 472 442 411 379 346 312 277 242 205 168 130 90
0.3 816 802 787 771 755 737 719 700 681 660 639 617 594 570 546 521 494 468 440 411 382 352 321 289 257 223
0.4 819 809 798 787 775 763 750 736 721 706 690 673 656 638 619 600 580 559 538 516 493 470 446 421 396 370
0.5 824 819 813 806 799 792 784 775 766 756 746 735 724 712 699 686 673 659 644 629 613 596 579 562 544 525 506
0.6 830 828 824 820 816 811 805 799 793 785 778 770 761 752 742 732 722 710 699 686 674 661 647 632 618 602 587 570 553
0.7 817 820 824 826 829 831 832 833 833 833 832 831 830 828 825 822 819 815 810 805 800 794 787 780 773 765 757 748 738 729 718 707 696 684 672 659 646 632 618 603 588
0.8 824 828 831 834 837 839 841 842 842 843 842 841 840 838 836 833 830 827 822 818 813 807 801 794 787 780 772 763 754 745 735 725 714 702 690 678 665 652 638 624 609
0.9 826 830 834 837 840 842 844 846 847 847 847 846 845 844 842 839 836 833 829 825 820 815 809 803 796 789 781 773 764 755 745 735 725 714 702 690 678 665 651 638 623
1 831 836 840 843 846 848 850 851 852 853 853 852 851 850 848 846 843 839 835 831 826 821 815 809 802 795 787 779 771 761 752 742 731 720 709 697 684 671 658 644 630
1.1 843 846 849 852 854 856 857 857 858 857 856 855 853 850 847 844 840 835 830 825 819 812 805 798 790 781 772 762 752 741 730 719 706 694 680 667 653 638 623 607 590
1.2 844 848 852 854 857 858 860 860 861 860 860 858 857 854 851 848 844 840 835 830 824 818 811 803 795 787 778 769 759 748 737 726 714 701 689 675 661 647 632 616 600
1.3 846 850 854 857 859 861 862 863 864 863 863 862 860 858 855 852 848 844 840 834 829 822 816 809 801 793 784 775 765 755 744 733 721 709 696 683 669 655 640 625 609
1.4 848 852 856 859 861 863 865 866 866 866 866 865 863 861 859 856 852 848 844 839 833 827 820 813 806 798 789 780 771 761 750 739 728 715 703 690 676 662 648 633 617
1.5 837 842 846 850 853 856 858 860 862 863 863 864 863 862 861 859 857 854 851 847 843 839 834 828 822 816 809 801 794 785 777 767 758 747 737 726 714 702 690 677 663
1.6 848 852 856 859 862 864 866 867 868 868 868 868 866 865 863 860 857 853 849 844 839 834 828 821 814 806 798 790 780 771 761 750 739 728 716 703 690 677 663 648 633
1.7 849 854 858 861 864 866 868 869 870 871 871 870 869 867 865 863 860 856 852 848 843 837 831 825 818 810 803 794 785 776 766 755 745 733 721 709 696 683 669 655 640
1.8 851 855 859 863 865 868 870 871 872 873 873 872 871 870 868 866 863 859 855 851 846 841 835 829 822 815 807 798 790 780 771 760 750 738 727 715 702 689 675 661 646
1.9 852 856 860 864 867 870 872 873 874 875 875 875 874 872 871 868 865 862 858 854 849 844 838 832 825 818 811 802 794 785 775 765 754 743 732 720 707 694 681 667 652
2 847 851 856 860 863 866 869 871 872 873 874 874 874 873 872 870 868 865 862 858 854 850 845 839 833 827 820 813 805 797 788 779 769 759 748 737 725 713 701 688 674
2.1 857 862 866 870 873 876 878 879 881 881 882 881 881 879 878 875 873 869 866 862 857 852 846 840 833 826 819 811 802 793 784 774 763 752 741 729 716 703 690 676 662
2.2 859 863 867 871 874 877 879 881 882 883 883 883 883 881 880 878 875 872 868 864 860 855 849 843 837 830 822 814 806 797 787 778 767 756 745 733 721 708 695 681 667
2.3 860 864 869 872 876 878 881 882 884 885 885 885 884 883 882 880 877 874 871 867 862 857 852 846 840 833 825 817 809 800 791 781 771 760 749 737 725 712 699 686 672
2.4 861 865 870 873 877 880 882 884 885 886 887 887 886 885 884 882 879 876 873 869 865 860 855 849 842 836 828 821 812 804 795 785 775 764 753 741 729 717 704 690 676
2.5 862 866 871 875 878 881 883 885 887 888 888 888 888 887 886 884 881 879 875 871 867 862 857 851 845 839 831 824 816 807 798 788 778 768 757 745 733 721 708 695 681
2.6 862 867 872 876 879 882 885 887 888 889 890 890 890 889 887 886 883 881 877 874 869 865 860 854 848 841 834 827 819 810 801 792 782 771 760 749 737 725 712 699 685

7
2.7 863 868 873 877 880 883 886 888 890 891 891 892 891 891 889 888 885 883 880 876 872 867 862 857 851 844 837 830 822 813 804 795 785 775 764 753 741 729 716 703 688
2.8 864 869 874 878 881 884 887 889 891 892 893 893 893 892 891 889 887 885 881 878 874 869 864 859 853 847 840 832 824 816 807 798 788 778 767 756 745 732 720 707 693
2.9 865 870 875 879 882 885 888 890 892 893 894 894 894 894 893 891 889 886 883 880 876 871 867 861 855 849 842 835 827 819 810 801 791 781 771 760 748 736 723 710 697
F 2023

3 852 857 862 866 870 873 876 878 880 881 882 882 882 882 881 879 877 875 872 869 865 860 856 851 845 839 832 825 818 810 801 792 783 773 763 752 741 729 717 704 691
5 871 876 881 885 889 892 895 897 899 901 902 902 902 901 900 899 897 895 892 888 885 880 875 870 864 858 852 844 837 829 820 811 801 791 781 770 759 747 734 721 708
 F 2023

X3. AWWA SURVEY

X3.1 The 1996 WATER:\STATS Survey conducted by the
American Water Works Association (AWWA) of 3200 water
purveyors across the United States indicates that 98.2 % of
responding utilities reported pH and free-chlorine conditions
that correspond to a DI-water ORP value of 825 mV or less. It
has been previously demonstrated that at the ORP specified in
this test method, typical tap water (due to the presence of
various salts and other elements) prepared to a specific pH and
free-chlorine has an ORP about 4 % less than the value attained
with DI water prepared to the same pH and free-chlorine
conditions.

The American Society for Testing and Materials takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection
with any item mentioned in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such
patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.

This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible
technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should make your
views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.

This standard is copyrighted by ASTM, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above address or at
610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website (www.astm.org).