IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science

PAPER • OPEN ACCESS

Stress analysis on the frame of peanut skin peeler using autodesk

inventor software
To cite this article: Cipto et al 2019 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 343 012164

View the article online for updates and enhancements.

This content was downloaded from IP address 182.1.199.55 on 20/12/2019 at 05:53

ICROEST IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 343 (2019) 012164 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012164

Stress analysis on the frame of peanut skin peeler using

autodesk inventor software

Cipto1, K A Rahangmetan1, F Sariman1, Hariyanto1, S B Bahar2 and M T Sapsal3

1
Departemen of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Universitas
Musamus, Merauke, Indonesia
2
Civil Engineering Study Program, Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, Indonesia
3
Department of Agricultural Technology, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia

E-mail: cipto@unmus.ac.id

Abstract. The framework of the peanut shelling machine functions as a supporting structure
for the components of the peanut shelling machine, namely the top funnel, funnel retaining
frame, the lid on the peeler shaft, pulley, sieve shaft, sieve, engine body. Frame material is
mild steel equal leg angles size 45 x 45 x 5, yield strength is 3,002E + 04 psi and tensile
strength is 5.004E + 04 psi. Skeletal strength analysis was carried out using the autodesk
inventor professional 2015 software. The engine frame was given axial loading of 500 N, 600
N, 700 N, 800 N, 900 N, and 1000 N. The analysis results of the maximum stress occur at 1000
N loading, amount to 16.85 Mpy, and the maximum deformation occurs at 1000 N loading,
amounting to 0.07727 mm.

1. Introduction
Frame or frame is one of the main components in engine construction. Frame functions as a structure
that supports all engine components. Analysis of frame construction design needs to be done to
determine the quality of the frame that is designed so that it can know the material compatibility,
construction model, type of connection to the loading. Analysis of frame construction design can be
done manually or through program simulations. In this study the frame of the peanut peeler is
designed to be able to withstand the load sourced from the raw material, namely the weight of the
peanut and the load of the engine component, namely, the top funnel, the lid on the grinding shaft,
grinding shaft, pulley, fan shaft, fan, engine body plate. The analysis of the design of the peanut peeler
frame construction was carried out using the 2015 auto desk inventor professional software.
The purpose of this study was to design a frame of a peanut skin peeler machine at the same time
and carry out the strength analysis of its construction using the parameters of stress distribution,
displacement, and safety figures using the 2015 autodesk inventor professional software.
Mechanical strength analysis of a material or construction is carried out by loading, loading can be
in the form of axial loading, loading with bending moment (bending moment), and loading with torque
[1]. Stress and Strain Analysis is important in measuring strength and rigidity. Both are consequences
that cannot be separated from the workings of a load on a structural material.
Stress is an energy that holds load and Strain is a measure of deformation that occurs due to stress.
The stress in a structural element is the internal force divided by the cross-sectional area where the
force works. The strength of a structural element is measured by the force in the maximum it can hold.
This depends on the strength of the constituent material and the size and shape of the cross-section.

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
ICROEST IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 343 (2019) 012164 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012164

Material strength problems has been explained by the results of relevant research[2–4]. The peak
strength of the element is achieved when the stress exceeds the collapsing stress of the material [5].
Autodesk Inventor has complete features so that it can be used as a simulation tool for calculations;
stress, deflection, and motion simulation that allows engineers to optimize and validate digital
prototypes before the product is made. Simulation is carried out based on real-world constraints.[6]

1 Top funnel
2 Retaining frame
3 Cover the peeler shaft
4 Pully
5 Fan shaft
6 Sieve shaft
7 Out channel (whole
bean)
8 Out channel (broken
beans)
9 Peanut inlet control
lever
Figure 1. Nut skin peeling machine

Figure 2.Nut skin peeling machine frame

2. Methods
The research was carried out in the Computer Laboratory and Design of the Mechanical Engineering
Department of Musamus University. The research method used was an experimental method
(computer simulation). The strength of construction with varied loads using the 2015 Autodesk
inventor professional software.

2
ICROEST IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 343 (2019) 012164 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012164

Free variables: a load of raw materials (nuts) and machine components.

Non-independent variables : main stress distribution, displacement, and safety factor.
Table 1. Material
Name Steel-Mild
Description Metal structural asset
Keywords Structural, metal
Type Metal
Young Modulus 3.191E+07 psi
Poisson’s Ratio 0.28
Shear Modulus 1.185E+07 psi
Density 0.284 pound per cubic inch
Yield Strength 3.002E+04 psi = 207,14 Mpa
Tensile Strength 5.004E+04 psi

Figure 3. Frame modeling uses 2015 Autodesk inventor professional software.

To determine the strength of frame construction loading is given on the Y-axis of 500 N, 600 N,
700 N, 800 N, 900 N, and 1000 N
Table 2. Load 1st
Load Type Force
Magnitude 500 N
Vector X 0N
Vector Y 500 N
Vector Z 0N
Table 3. Load 2nd
Load Type Force
Magnitude 600 N
Vector X 0N
Vector Y 600 N
Vector Z 0N

3
ICROEST IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 343 (2019) 012164 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012164

Table 4. Load 3rd

Load Type Force
Magnitude 700 N
Vector X 0N
Vector Y 700 N
Vector Z 0N
Table 5. Load 4th
Load Type Force
Magnitude 800 N
Vector X 0N
Vector Y 800 N
Vector Z 0N
Table 6. Load 5th
Load Type Force
Magnitude 900 N
Vector X 0N
Vector Y 900 N
Vector Z 0N
Table 7. Load 6th
Load Type Force
Magnitude 1000 N
Vector X 0N
Vector Y 1000 N
Vector Z 0N

3. Results and Discussion

The analysis results from the simulation using Autodesk inventor software are in the form of von
mises stress, 1st principal stress, 3rd principal stress, discipline, and safety factor.
The material received from the Von Mises stress compilation begins to reach the critical value
obtained by Strength Yield [6,7]. Maximum Main Stress which shows the tensest specific part, red is
the most tense part [8]. Minimum Principal Stress which shows the most relaxed specific parts, yellow
is the most relaxed part [9]. Safety factors that indicate the safe part of the style, the safest part is the
dark blue colored part [10]. Safety factor (Fd or Sf must be valued above 1).
Table 8. Simulation results of frame construction analysis with the loading of 500 N, 600 N, 700 N
Loading 500 N 600N 700 N
Von misses Max 9.182 Mpa Max 10.62 Mpa Max 13.3 Mpa
Min 0.005 Mpa Min 0.01 Mpa Min 0.01 Mpa
Displacement Max 0.04306 mm Max 0.05139 mm Max 0.05983 mm
Min 0.00164 mm Min 0.00191 mm Min 0.00215 mm
1st Principal Stress Max 6.124 Mpa Max 7.256 Mpa Max 9.582 Mpa
Min -3.421 Mpa Min -3.942 Mpa Min -4.82 Mpa
3rd Principal Stress Max 1.608 Mpa Max 1.87 Mpa Max 2.54 Mpa
Min -9.27 Mpa Min -10.72 Mpa Min -13.13 Mpa

4
ICROEST IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 343 (2019) 012164 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012164

Safety factor Max 15 ul Max 15 ul Max 15 ul

Min 15 ul Min 15 ul Min 15 ul
Table 9. Simulation results of frame construction analysis with the loading of 800 N, 900 N, 1000 N
Loading 800 N 900N 1000 N
Von misses Max 13.49 Mpa Max 16.85 Mpa Max 16.32 Mpa
Min 0 Mpa Min 0 Mpa Min 0.01 Mpa
Displacement Max 0.06804 mm Max 0.07727 mm Max 0.08466 mm
Min 0.00248 mm Min 0.00292 mm Min 0.00321 mm
1st Principal Stress Max 9.628 Mpa Max 12.44 Mpa Max 11.99 Mpa
Min -5.022 Mpa Min -5.64 Mpa Min -6.05 Mpa
3rd Principal Stress Max 2.4 Mpa Max 3.12 Mpa Max 2.93 Mpa
Min -13.68 Mpa Min -15.11 Mpa Min -16.55 Mpa
Safety factor Max 15 ul Max 15 ul Max 15 ul
Min 15 ul Min 12.28 ul Min 12.68 ul

In Table 8 and 9 shows the simulation results with different loading styles to find out the maximum
strength. The results of the analysis include von stresses, deflections and safety factors. the higher the
loading force the higher the von mises stress and the greater the deflection.

3.1. Von misses

Tegangan ekivalen yang digunakan metode Von-Mises. Berikut ini ilustrasi hasil analisis equivalent
stressTegangan ekivalen maksimum terjadi di bagian las rangka bagian depan sebesar 16.32 MPa,
kemudian tegangan ekivalen minimum sebesar 0.01 MPa.

Figure 4. Von mises stress

3.2. Displacement
The biggest total deformation is in the red top frame of 0.07727 mm, and the smallest total
deformation is 0.00292 mm. The following is an illustration of total deformation.

Figure 5. Displacement

5
ICROEST IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 343 (2019) 012164 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012164

3.3. Safety factor

Frame with a maximum load of 1000 N maximum, Safety factors 15 ul and minimum 12.28 ul. The
following is an illustration of Safety factors

Figure 6. Safety factor

In tables 3 and 4, Figure 11 accepts the greater the force applied (axial loading), the greater the von
mises stress, the greater the deflection so that the safety factor gets smaller. Based on the results of
simulation analysis using the inventor Autodesk software, the values ranging from loading to
maximum 1000 N, amounting to 16.32 MPa while the Results Strength of 207.14 Mpa.

4. Conclusion
Based on the simulation results of the analysis of the construction strength of the frame of the peeler
using the Autodesk inventor professional software 2015, it can be concluded that;
1) the construction of the machine can withstand a load of 100 kg.
2) The maximum stress occurs at 1000 N loading, amounting to 16.85 Mpa
3) Maximum deformation occurs at 1000 N loading, amounting to 0.07727 mm

Reference
[1] Ashby M F and Cebon D 1993 Materials selection in mechanical design Le J. Phys. IV 3 C7-1
[2] Rahangmetan K A, Sariman F and Parenden D 2019 The Effect of Riser Use in the Quality of
Casting Al 7075 for Ship Propeller Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol.
[3] Sariman F, Bayuseno A P and Muryanto S 2018 Crystallization of Barium Sulfate (BaSO 4 ) in
a Flowing System: Influence of malic acid on Induction Time and Crystal Phase
Transformation MATEC Web Conf.
[4] Parenden D and Cipto 2019 Estimation of emissions for petrol vehicles in some roads in
Merauke city Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol.
[5] Macdonald and Angus J 2002 Struktur dan Arsitektur (Jakarta: Erlangga)
[6] Liu, G.R and S.S Q 2003 Finite Element Method:A Practical Course. (Butterworth-Heinemann.
Jordan Hill)
[7] Huke and Baker 1999 ASM Specialty Handbook: Magnesium and Magnesium Alloys (ASM
International. Handbook Committee)
[8] B.C P D 2002 Mechanics of Materials (An Imprint of Laxmi Publications Pvt. Ltd)
[9] Gere and James 2011 Mechanics of Materials (USA: Cengage Learning)
[10] Rao D . 2002 Introduction to Strength of Materials (India: Universities Press)