Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SYSTEM
MODEL NO:(PEC - 00CE)
User Manual
Version 2.0
A Description of PEC-00CE
A. DESCRIPTION OF PEC-00CE:
1. Regulated DC Power supplies to supply to the control circuits and to the power amplifier
- the chopper.
2. MOSFET based single quadrant chopper (PWM Power Converter), through which the
armature voltage is controlled.
3. Proximity Sensor and Speed feedback circuitry for measurement of speed and closed loop
control of the motor.
5. Speed controller - Either proportional (P) or Proportional + Integral (PI) Controller can
be selected
6. DC Servo motor fixed on a separate frame. A tacho generator disk is fixed at one end
of DC Servo motor
All the control elements are fixed in a sleek box and the mimic diagram is screen printed
on the Front plate.
A.3 SPECIFICATIONS
1. Input to the DC servo motor control unit is 230V ±10%, 50Hz, AC, single phase.
2. DC Power supply to the motor is 12V, by a PWM power converter.
3. DC Motor: 12V, Permanent Magnet DC motor
Max. Current : 1.5Amp.
Max Torque : 1.5 Kg-cm
Max Speed : 1500 rpm at rated voltage (12V) and current (1.5A)
4. One 3½ Digit display of set speed / actual speed:
4. Switch:
5. Potentiometer-1:
6. Connectors:
2 connectors available at the front panel. One is connected to the ground and 2nd is
connected to the reference voltage Vr to facilitate for measurement of various voltage by
a multimeter.
7. Connector point :
8. SPDT Switch
9. Connectors:
This is to patch the two connectors available on the front panel for open loop or closed
loop.
CHAPTER - 1
CONTROL SYSTEM COMPONENTS
1.1. INTRODUCTION:
In general a system is defined as the one which gives an output signal in response to an input
signal, as shown in fig.1.1.
Fig.1.1. System
Systems are classified based on their characteristics, as linear system, Non-linear system, casual
system, time-invariant system, memory systems, Memory less systems etc. Here we consider
only the class of systems that are linear. A linear system obeys the superposition and
homogeneity (scaling) principle.
The behaviour of a linear system can be described by linear differential equations, relating the
input and the output variables. This gives a mathematical model for the system concerned.
When the mathematical model of the system is solved for various input conditions, the result
represents the dynamic response of the system.
A system can be purely mechanical, comprising mass, spring and dashpot, or it can be purely
electrical comprising Resistance, inductances and capacitances or a combination of mechanical
and electrical components such as DC/AC motor. All these systems can be described by linear
differential equations, making relevant simplifying assumptions.
The differential equations describing a linear time invariant system can be reshaped into different
forms for the convenience of analysis. For example, the transfer function representation forms
a useful model for transient response analysis of single-input-single output linear systems.
The transfer function of a linear time invariant system is defined to be the ratio of the
Laplace Transform of the output variable to the Laplace transform of the input variable
under the assumption that all initial conditions are zero.
An open-loop system is represented by the block diagram of fig.1.2. The system is controlled
or activated by a single signal at the input for a single input - single output system. There is no
provisions within the system for supervision of the output and no mechanism is provided to
correct the system behaviour for any lack of proper performance of the system due to change in
environment or loading conditions.
A closed loop system (feedback system) is represented by the block diagram of fig.1.3. It is
driven by two signals (more signals can also used), one the input signal and the other or feedback
signal derived from the output of the system. The feedback signal gives the system the capability
to act as the self correcting mechanism through the controller.
i) error amplifier,
ii) controller
iii) power amplifier
iv) the feedback element
i) ERROR AMPLIFIER:
Which compares the reference signal Vr with the feedback signal Vf The output is a
voltage proportional to the difference between the two signals.
ii) CONTROLLER:
The controller processes the error signal and gives an output voltage signal VC known as
the control voltage. This suggests the necessary corrective measures required in the
actuating signal Va to be applied to the system.
Which takes the input as the control voltage signal VC from the controller and produces
the necessary actuating input signal to be applied to the system to achieve the desired
output.
iv) FEEDBACK:
This constitutes the tacho generator and the associated amplifier. The feedback signal
Vf is a voltage proportional to the output variable of the system.
For the study of the closed loop control system, a DC motor is used as the system to be
controlled. The DC motor can be modelled as a linear system, if the magnetic saturation is
neglected and the field flux is assumed to be constant. For this purpose, a permanent magnet DC
motor is used. Here the flux is produced by the permanent magnets which is constant.
The DC motor can be represented by the equivalent circuit of fig.1.4. The armature resistance
and inductance are represented as lumped parameters as Ra and La. The field current is assumed
to be constant. This sets the constant flux in the machine.
The equations governing the behaviour of the motor are given below.
(1.1)
(1.2)
when
(1.3)
(1.4)
(1.5)
The differential equation governing the mechanical system comprising armature and load is
(1.6)
Taking Laplace transform, assuming zero initial condition for equations (1.2), (1.4), (1.5) and
(1.6)
(1.7)
(1.8)
(1.9)
(1.10)
(1.11)
(1.12)
Using equations (1.11) and (1.12) the DC motor with constant flux, can be represented by the
block diagram of fig.1.5.
The transfer function between the output variable - the speed (s) and the input variable Va(s)
is obtained by setting TL(s) - the load torque to zero. The simplified block diagram is shown in
fig.1.6.
(1.13)
(1.14)
Generally the armature electrical time constant is much smaller than the mechanical time
constant is
(1.15)
(1.16)
where
(1.17)
(1.18)
Usually Ra and B are very small and hence RaB << kbkt
(1.19)
and
(1.20)
In a similar way one can derive the transfer function between the torque (s) and TL(s) and is
given by
(1.21)
The above transfer functions of the motor are used to study the closed control system. The closed
loop transfer function between the reference input and the speed is derived in the following
chapters.
1.6. CONCLUSION:
The general closed loop control system is described in this chapter. The various control system
components and their functions are explained. The transfer function of the DC motor is derived
systematically.
The DC motor offers itself as a linear system, when certain simplifying assumptions are made.
The system is of first order and types zero. Therefore it makes it convenient to study the closed
loop control system.
CHAPTER - 2
TRANSFER FUNCTION OF
CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEM
2.1. INTRODUCTION:
The closed loop transfer function of the system is derived systematically in this chapter. The
system / plant to be controlled is the DC motor. The objective is to vary the speed through a
reference setting. The simplest control system is represented as shown in fig.2.1
The reference speed is compared with the actual speed of the motor sensed through a optical
speed sensor. The error is processed through the speed controller. The speed controller sets the
required voltage to be applied to the motor. Although the system would achieve the desired
speed, it has a drawback. The armature of the motor presents a very low impedence to the
applied voltage. Under steady state condition most of the applied voltage is balanced by the back
emf and only the remainder drives the armature circuit. However during the transient, there is
a mismatch between the applied voltage and the back emf as the speed changes slowly.
Therefore excessive current may be drawn from the converter.
2.2 Closed Loop Control of the DC motor with proportional speed controller:
The closed loop control of the DC motor, using the speed controller is shown in fig.2.1. The
system consists of
i) An Error Amplifier Which compares the reference speed (set speed /speed
command), with the actual speed. The output is a voltage
proportional to the differences between the set speed and
the actual speed.
iii) A PWM Power Controller Which takes the input as the control voltage signal V c
from the controller and produce the required voltage to be
applied to the motor.
iv) Speed Feedback Circuit This constitutes the speed sensor and the associated
amplifier. The speed sensor can be a Proximity sensor,
which can produce a voltage proportional to the speed of
the motor. The speed signal is processed through a
feedback circuit and applied to the error amplifier.
The control elements together with the motor can be represented as a feedback control system
as shown in the block diagrams of fig.2.2. In the block diagram, the controller, the power
amplifier, and the feedback circuit are represented as gains and the motor is represented by its
transfer function. The various gains in the block diagram of fig.2.2 is explained below.
kp - The gain of the proportional controller. The error signal when it passed through
the controller is amplified by kp. The gain kp can be varied to achieve optimum
performance. The steady state error can be reduced by increasing the gain kp. If
a proportional plus an integral (P.I) controller is used, it can be replaced by its
transfer function, given by
(2.1)
(2.2)
where, Vpst - Peak value of the ramp used for pwm control.
k - The speed feedback gain. This gain translates the speed signal into a voltage
signal whose level is compatible with speed reference signal. It is defined as
(2.3)
(2.4)
In order to derive the closed loop transfer function between the speed (s) and the reference
input Vr(s), the block diagram of fig.2.2 can be reduced as shown in fig.2.3, in which the gain of
the controller kp and that of the power amplifier G are combined into a single gain kA = kpG. The
disturbance input, the load torque, TL is set to zero. The closed loop transfer function is given
by
(2.5)
(2.6)
The closed loop transfer function is same as that of a first order type zero system. The steady
state and transient performance of the system can be easily studied from the transfer function of
equation (2.6).
When the motor is running at a steady speed, the application of load would reduce the speed. In
a closed loop control system, effect of load torque on the change in speed will be less. This is
because the change in speed, due to load torque, will either increase or decrease the error. The
controller would then respond to the new error signal and set a new control voltage VC which in
turn, change the output voltage of the power amplifier. The motor speed will therefore track the
reference speed.
The closed loop transfer function between the speed and the load torque can be derived by setting
the reference input to zero. The block diagram fig.2.2 can then be reduced as shown in fig.2.4.
(2.7)
(2.8)
i) Transient Performance:
For a step input of Vr(t) = VR, the speed (s) from equation (6) can be obtained as
(2.9)
(2.10)
(2.11)
(2.12)
Equation (10) shows that the speed increases slowly depending on the time constant 1/a, as
shown in fig.2.5. The steady state speed is proportional to VR, the set reference (command)
speed.
From the transfer function of equation (2.6), the steady state error can be deduced. Under steady
state condition, s=0, and the steady state speed is given by
(2.13)
Equation (2.13) shows that actual speed is less than the command value. The steady error is
given by
(2.14)
The quantity
(2.15)
Therefore
(2.16)
Equation (2.16) shows that the steady state error can be reduced by increasing the gain kA = kPG
i.e. by increasing the gain of the proportional controller.
From the transfer function of equation (2.8) for a step input of load torque TL,
(2.17)
(2.18)
Equation (2.18) indicates that the steady state speed will be less by an amount given by equation
(2.18) when compared to the no load steady state speed given by equation (2.13).
Equation (2.18) also indicates that the change in speed can be reduced by increasing the gain kA,
i.e. by increasing the proportional gain of the controller, kP as KA = kPG
(2.19)
The motor gain constant km can be obtaianed by measuring the motor back emf constant, kb. The
measurement of kb is explained in the experimental work 1. Armature resistance of the motor
can be measured using a multimeter.
For small motor, measurement of moment of inertia is little difficult and is therefore obtained
from the manufacturer. Knowing the value of J, the motor time constant can be calculated as
given by equation (2.19).
From the closed loop transfer function of equation (2.6) the effective time constant is given by
(2.20)
Knowing the values of , kA, km and k, e can be calculated. Hence the transient response of the
motor for a step input in reference can be obtained from equation (2.20).
The proportional controller can work only with a certain steady state error. The error can be
reduced by increasing the gain of the proportional controller. However, the gain is increased the
performance of closed loop system becomes more oscillatory and takes longer time to reach the
steady state.
The steady state error can be reduced by using a PI controller. The equation describing the PI
controller is
(2.21)
(2.22)
From equation (2.21) it is seen that the PI controller has two adjustable or tuning parameters kp
and TI. The integral or reset action of the PI controller removes the steady state error. However,
the integral mode of control has a considerable destabilising effect which in most of the situations
can be compensated by adjusting the gain kp,
Figure 2.6 below shows the block diagram of the speed control loop with PI controller
From the block diagram, setting TL=0, we can derive the transfer function for speed as follows.
(2.24)
(2.23)
(2.25)
Equation (2.25) shows that the steady state error with PI controller is zero.
2.9 CONCLUSION:
The transfer function of the closed loop system with P, PI controllers are derived systematically.
It is shown that the steady state error depends on the proportional gain kp. With PI controller
the steady state error is Zero. The dynamic response of the system for a step input will be faster
with P controller. The transfer function of the closed loop system with the disturbance input
( In this case the load torque) is derived. Experimental studies on the control system both on
open loop and closed loop are described in the following chapters.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
EXPERIMENT - 1
AIM :
APPARATUS REQUIRED
PROCEDURE
4. Vary the input speed and note down the values as per the tabulation.
TABULATION
RESULT
EXPERIMENT - 2
AIM
APPARATUS REQUIRED
PROCEDURE
4. Vary the input speed and note down the values as per the tabulation.
TABULATION
RESULT
EXPERIMENT - 3
AIM
To study the characteristics of armature voltage Vs set speed in open loop and closed loop
system.
APPARATUS REQUIRED
PROCEDURE
5. Measure the armature voltage of the motor across A - AA in open loop / closed
loop mode.
TABULATION
RESULT
Thus the characteristics of armature voltage Vs set speed in open loop and closed loop system
was studied.
EXPERIMENT - 4
AIM
To study the characteristics of speed sensor output Vs set speed in open loop and closed loop
system.
APPARATUS REQUIRED
PROCEDURE
5. Measure the speed sensor of the motor. Across F - GND in open loop / closed
loop mode.
6. Note down the speed sensor output for different set speed.
TABULATION
RESULT
Thus the characteristics of frequency output Vs set speed in open loop and closed loop system
was studied.
EXPERIMENT - 5
AIM
To study the characteristics of signal conditioner output Vs set speed in open loop and closed
loop system.
APPARATUS REQUIRED
PROCEDURE
5. Measure the speed sensor of the motor. Across PV- GND in open loop / closed
loop mode.
6. Note down the signal conditioner output for different set speed.
TABULATION
RESULT
Thus the characteristics of signal conditioner output Vs set speed in open loop and closed loop
system was studied.