Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ibe, J.Q., Lagman, J.P., Sugay, Ana M.T., & Tayag, K.C. The study has sought to describe the self- The participants, who were chosen The sample were taken from Holy The results of the study revealed that the respondents
(2013). SELF-EFFICACY OF THIRD YEAR BSED-ENGLISH efficacy of the respondents in terms of oral through purposive sampling method were Angel University. manifest a strong belief in their capabilities in
STUDENTS OF HOLY ANGEL UNIVERSITY TOWARDS communication and to reveal their overall the third year English students. performing activities involving oral communication
ORAL COMMUNICATION IN CLASSROOM SETTING oral communication self-efficacy profile. using English language.
McDowell, E. E., & McDowell, C. E. (1998). An This study aimed to examined the differences The researchers used Talkaholic Scale The sample were taken from the 125 Males were found to have a more dominant
Exploratory Study To Determine Differences between between gender groups in different age and Communication Style Instrument. oral communication students of communication style, are more contentious, use more
Gender Groups, among Age Groups, and among groups and their relationships between Midwestern University. hostile verbs, are more assertive than females, and
Talkaholic Groups in Rating Talkativeness and talkaholic scores and communication styles. are more precise as they focus on instrumental,
Communication Style Variables. objective, analytical, and problematic aspects.
Females, in contrast, use open, friendly, animated,
and attentive styles, show greater social sensitivity,
and use a wider range of nonverbal expressions of
emotions. Significant differences also occurred