You are on page 1of 94

INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,

MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INSTITUTE OF NURSING EDUCATION,
MUMBAI.
NURSING RESEARCH

CRETIQUING

SUBMITTED TO, SUBMITTED TO,


Dr. Aparna Sankhe Madam Mr. Sagar Suresh Adhao
Institute Of Nursing Education, Msc Nursing, First Year
Mumbai. 08 Institute Of Nursing Education,
Mumbai
INDEX
Sr. Content Page no Remark
no
1

5
1. Problem statement -
Breastfeeding technique and associated factors among breastfeeding mothers in Harar city, Eastern Ethiopia
Objectives –
To assess breastfeeding technique and associated factors among breastfeeding mothers.
Title-
Author(year)- Getahun Tiruye , Firehiwot Mesfin , Biftu Geda and Kasiye Shiferaw (2018)
Full reference - Getahun Tiruye at el. Breastfeeding technique and associated factors among breastfeeding mothers in Harar city,
Eastern Ethiopia. International Breastfeeding Journal.2018.(14:34)
Purpose of study- Assessing breastfeeding technique and associated factors among breastfeeding mothers.
Method of study-quantitative study
Type of study –descriptive study
Research design -cross-sectional study
Research setting - Harar city, Eastern Ethiopia
Sample size -422 study participants
Sample technique- Systematic random sampling technique
Methods of data collection - using observation checklist and interviewer administered questionnaire
Data analysis –Descriptive, bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was done to identify independent predictors of BFT
after controlling for confounding variables.
Main finding-The proportion of mothers practicing an effective breastfeeding technique was 43.4% (179/412). Effective
breastfeeding technique was 2.3 times more common among 4
mothers with at least secondary school educational status compared to mothers with no formal education (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR]
2.3; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.1, 3.9). The practice of effective breastfeeding technique was significantly associated with
mothers
who had immediate breastfeeding technique counseling after birth (AOR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1, 2.8) and at least two postnatal visits (AOR
5.9; 95% CI 2.1, 15.9) compared to one visit. Absence of breast problems and having previous breastfeeding experience were also
associated with the likelihood of effective breastfeeding technique practice (AOR 4.0; 95% CI 1.4, 10.9) and (AOR 3.3; 95% CI 1.1,
10.7) respectively

CRETIQUE 1. Breastfeeding technique and associated factors among breastfeeding mothers in Harar city, Eastern Ethiopia

Sr. Component Criteria Content Evaluation analysis Comment for


No Strength Weakness improvement

Breastfeeding Title of the study Has to explain in Can do


Title of the study What is the title of
1 technique and is based an detail about the disseminated
the study?
associated factors current scenario different study it will be
among breastfeeding based on need of techniques and more helpful for
mothers in Harar city, the lay person associated factors society.
Eastern Ethiopia among
breastfeeding
What does the title To assess Good choice of
lead you to explore breastfeeding topic by
the article/ eye technique and researcher to do
catching. associated factors comparative
Is the title based on among breastfeeding study.
current scenario? mothers.
Is the title is precise Took efforts for It is precise Should be
yet comprehensive doing research on generalize the
various aspects of title
breastfeeding
techniques
Does the article Yes this article covers Keenly observed
cover the topic the topic the different
comprehensively, comprehensively breastfeeding
partially, or is it techniques and
overview? associated factors
among
breastfeeding
mothers.
2. Abstract Is the abstract Yes the abstract is He has not Can include the
understandable? understandable, explain about the details of
researcher is going validity and selection of
to do the To reliability of the sample
assess instruments &
breastfeeding topic
technique and
associated factors
among
breastfeeding
mothers.
Is it reflecting the Yes it is Can include more
overview of the overviewed the detail in abstract
study? study as it is about selection
descriptive study and data
collection
3 Research question Question the study 1.What is the study Not framed the Can also not find
designed is to be design questions which is ask WS questions
answer? 2.What are the related to the
variables topic
3.What is the
methodology and
methods used
Is the research He has not
question frame framed research
correctly? question
4 Objectives What is the purpose Researcher wants To May be little bit
of the research? assess breastfeeding difficult to handle
technique and the 2 different
associated factors device and to
among breastfeeding remember the
mothers. variations
between them
Is the objective Yes he stated the
stated clearly? objectives
properly
Does the author Not clearly
define the research mentioned in the
problem. researcher
statement
5 Literature review What is already Good
known about this
area of the
knowledge?
Does the literature Not clearly He revived only 5
revive provide the understand the literatures, if he
rationale and rationale because would referred
direction he used very few more references
references can make more
clearly the topic .
Is the literature Yes it is arranged
review organizing to properly from the
demonstrate the introduction ,body
progressive and then
development of ideas conclusion
through previous
research?
6 Ethical consideration Is the research study Yes it is approved
approved by the by ethical
ethical committee committee
Is the study is not No it is not harmful Good study can be
harmful to the to subject as the helpful
subject procedure is non
invasive
Is name of the Not disclosed the
subjects are not name of subjects
disclosed.
7 Theoretical framework Is the framework Not framed Not framed
present with clarity theoretical
Is the framework framework
most appropriate in
the present context?
8 Methodology Is the study design it is appropriate Would have use Can do
was appropriate? can also use other the disseminated comparative
methodology method for study study
can be more
effective
Is the hypothesis Not framed
linked dependent
and independent
variable?
Is the dependent and
independent
hypothesis stated
clearly.
How the study Study sample is It should be state
sample is selected selected properly in the
and is the sample Systematic abstract can help
size was random sampling to understand
representative? technique properly
How the sample size He took 422 study
was calculated? participants
Is the research tool Yes he use the
was selected observation
appropriate? checklist and
interviewer
administered
questionnaire
Is the tool was Yes the methods
validated and the for measuring
reliability was results
established? appropriate and
clearly explained
9 Pilot study Does the pilot study Not mentioned
explores and test the
practicability and
feasibility of the main
study?
Does the figures
were interrupted
10 Main study data Does the data Yes
collection collection was Yes he stick to the
appropriate time data collection
period schedule
Does the researcher
was stick to the data
collection schedule
Does the appropriate
sample size was
accomplished?
11 Finding interpretation What are the Yes
and conclusion author’s major
findings and
conclusions?
Have these been Yes
supported by the
authors analyses,
argument finding or
evidence?
Have s/he Yes he overlooked
overlooked anything? that effective
breastfeeding
techniques
Does the author Yes
accomplish his / her
objectives?
12 Sources of data Is the article Yes he referred
collection supported with lost of references
authentic
references?
Are there i-text
citations (or
footnotes) and
references?
Are the references
recent or
significance?
13 Language Is the language Language can be
appropriate for its more clearly
intendment reader? mentioned so as
Is the definition clear understand the
and useful? topic more
Is the choice of precisely
words based in any
ways ?
14 Illustration Is illustration, table Yes it is use full for
or graph useful? illustration the
Do they complement readings
the text?
Are they the best
method to present
data or are they
unnecessary?
15 Discussion What does the He told that the
researcher say about 10Absence of
the results ? breast problems
and having
previous
breastfeeding
experience were
also associated
with the likelihood
of effective
breastfeeding
technique practice
(AOR 4.0; 95% CI
1.4, 10.9) and
(AOR 3.3; 95% CI
1.1, 10.7)
respectively
16 Organization of the Is the material Can be more
content organized and organize the
focused? topic it will be
Is the argument or more clear to
presentation understand
understandable ?
Is this original
research, a review of
previous research or
an informative piece?
Is the sequence is Yes it is
logical appropriate
Does the appropriate
format was used for
preparation of the
data sheet
17 Bibliography Does a bibliography Yes bibliography
exist? exist
Is the bibliography Short
short or long bibliography
Is the bibliography is Selective
selective or
comprehensive?
Is the references are Secondary
primary sources sources are used
journal article)or only like books
secondary sources publishedand
(ex. Encyclopaedia unpublished
articles
Is the recourses are Clear and citations
contemporary to the are relevant
article or much order according to the
and chronological
Us the citation style order
is clear and
consistent.
18 Usefulness Does Yes he add the
Add the body of body of
knowledge to the knowledge to the
nursing profession? nursing profession
Useful for which is useful for
community? community
Help in planning and Yes going to
implementation of implement in
the health services? health services
19 Authority Is the author an Yes he is an Not mentioned
expert in this field ? neonatologist
Where the author
employed ?
Where else has
he/she won awards
or honours?
20 Citation Does the citation was Yes it is
appropriate? appropriate
according to
chronological
manner
2. Ameta G1, etal. Conducted study on
Role of gastric lavage in vigorous neonates born with meconium stained amniotic fluid.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To compare reduction in incidence of feed intolerance in neonates born with meconium stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) by use of
gastric lavage to those who did not receive lavage.
METHODS:
This Randomized controlled trial was conducted in all vigorous newborns delivered through MSAF, with birth weight ≥1800 g and
gestation ≥34 wk. In the lavage group, gastric lavage with 10 ml/kg of normal saline was done.
RESULTS:
Twelve neonates in the lavage group (n = 124) developed feed intolerance compared to 16 neonates in control group (n = 120), (p = .
309; OR 0.69; 95%CI 0.27-1.58). No difference in any other morbidity was noted.
CONCLUSIONS:
Gastric lavage in neonates with MSAF does not reduce feed intolerance, irrespective of thickness of MSAF and it confers no
advantages.
• Gastric lavage in vigorous neonates born with meconium stained amniotic fluid. [Indian J Pediatr. 2013]
2. CRETIQUE –Role of gastric lavage in vigorous neonates born with meconium stained amniotic fluid.

Sr Component Criteria Content Evaluation analysis Comment for


Strength Weakness
No improvement
1 Title of the study What is the title of Role of gastric lavage It is a most Should have to
the study? in vigorous neonates common and fatal clearly define the
born with meconium problem in problem
stained amniotic fluid. neonates so it’s a
good selection of
topic or problem
statement
What does the title Gastric lavage in It is the very
lead you to explore meconium stained important topic
the article/eye amniotic fluid for research on
catching. order to prevent
the mortality of
new born
Is the title based on Yes it is current
current scenario? based scenario

Is the title is precise No it is not


yet comprehensive. precise
Does the article cover Comprehensively
the topic over veiwed
comprehensively,
partially, or is it
overview?
2 Abstract Is the abstract It is very short
understandable? should explained
little bit more
about abstract
Is it reflecting the Yes it reflecting
overview of the the overview of
study? the study
3 Research question Question the study What is the Role of
designed is to be gastric lavage in
answer? vigorous neonates
born with meconium
stained amniotic fluid.
Is the research Yes
question frame
correctly?
4 Objectives What is the purpose To identify the Role of
of the research? gastric lavage in
vigorous neonates
born with meconium
stained amniotic fluid.
Is the objective stated Yes objectives are
clearly? clearly stated
Does the author No
define the research
problem?
Does it the build on Yes
past research?
5 Literature review What is already Death and infection
known about this occur due to
area of the meconium stained
knowledge? amniotic fluid.
Does the literature Yes it is adequate
revive provide the
rationale and
direction?
Is the literature Yes
review organizing to
demonstrate the
progressive
development of ideas
through previous
research?
6 Ethical consideration Is the research study It is not Should explain in
approved by the mentioned in this the article as it
ethical committee article clear the idea
what ethical
clearance he took
to do research
Is the study is not No it is not
harmful to the subject harmful but it is
little bit risky
Is name of the Not mentioned
subjects are not
disclosed.
7 Theoretical Is the framework Yes he cleared the Can be give in
framework present with clarity procedure detailed as to
understand
properly
Is the framework Yes
most appropriate in
the present context?
8 Methodology Is the study design RCT study took by Good choice of
was appropriate? researcher study
Is the hypothesis Gastric lavage is There will be
linked dependent and depended on changes occurs
independent meconium stained after gastric
variable? amniotic fluid lavage
Is the dependent and Yes stated clearly
independent
hypothesis stated
clearly.
How the study sample The study sample is
is selected and is the selected by
sample size was computerized
representative? generated random
number
How the sample size There are two group
was calculated? 1.gastric lavage
group(n-124)
2.No lavage group (n-
120)
Is the research tool He can take other Purposive
was selected sampling grouping or can
appropriate? technique take convenient
sampling
Is the tool was Yes he did
validated and the demonstration of
reliability was gastric lavage by
established? normal saline water
Which method was Not mentioned
applied to measure properly in this
the reliability? study
Are the methods for Yes it is clearly
measuring results explained first
appropriate and there were
clearly explained? allocation than
there follow up
,analysis.
9 Pilot study Does the pilot study Pilot study is not
explores and test the mentioned in this
practicability and abstract
feasibility of the main ,pilot study
study? interferential
should have been
give
Does the fingers were Not mentioned
interrupted
10 Main study data Does the data He can take take
collection collection was all the neonates
appropriate time it will be more
period effective and
generalize
Does the researcher Yes he took 244
was stick to the data patients which is
collection schedule quite good to
generalize the
results
11 Finding interpretation What are the author’s The author Gastric lavage in
and conclusion
major findings and neonate with
conclusions? MSAF does not
reduce feed
intolerance
,irrespective of
thickness of MSAF
and it confers no
advantages
Have these been Yes it is been
supported by the supported by the
authors analyses, author analysis
argument finding or ,argument .
evidence?
Have s/he overlooked To compare the He saw the side
anything? reduction in incidence effect also of the
Does the author of fed intolerance in babies with MSAF
accomplish his / her neonates born with gastric lavage
objectives? MSAF by use of which is good for
gastric lavage to those the study
who did not receive
lavage
12 Sources of data Is the article Yes he referred
collection
supported with many articles and
authentic references? journals
Are there i-text Yes citation and
citations (or references are
footnotes) and given
references?
Are the references He can refer
recent or more recent
significance? references
from
encyclopedia and
MEDLINE
13 Language Is the language Language is
appropriate for its appropriate and
intendment reader? clear ,easy to
understand
Is the definition clear Not mentioned
and useful? definition has to
mention it would
helpful to
understand more
clearly
Is the choice of words No not like that is
based in any ways ? is appropriate
14 Illustration Is illustration, table or Flow charts are
graph useful? given ,he
Do they complement represent the
the text? data with the help
Are they the best of tables
method to present
data or are they
unnecessary?
15 Discussion What does the He Said that gastric
researcher say about lavage with MSAF
the results? does not reduce free
intolerance
,irrespective of
thickness
16 Organization of the Is the material Yes
content organised and
focused?
Is the argument or Yes
presentation
understandable ?
Is this original Yes
research, a review of
previous research or
an informative piece?

Is the sequence is Yes


logical
Does the appropriate
format was used for
preparation of the
data
sheet?
17 Bibliography Does a bibliography No
exist?
Is the bibliography No
short or long
Is the bibliography is
selective or
comprehensive?
Is the references are Yes primary
primary sources sources used
journal article)or only
secondary sources
(ex. Encyclopaedia)
Is the recourses are Yes
contemporary to the
article or much order
and
Us the citation style is
clear and consistent.
18 Usefulness Does Yes
Add the body of
knowledge to the
nursing profession?
Useful for Yes
community?
Help in planning and
implementation of
the health services?
Support arguments Yes
the findings can be
generalized?
19 Authority Is the author an yes
expert in this field ?
Where the author
employed ?
Where else has yes
he/she won awards
or honours?
20 Citation Does the citation was Not mentioned
appropriate?
3. Ericson, Rimple conducted A study of knowledge, attitude and practice among mothers towards acute respiratory infection
in urban and rural communities of burdwan district,west bengal, india.

The research approach was quantitative and Research Design used is Quasi experimental Non-Equivalent control group design
.Sample was mothers whose children were admitted.
Tool- A self structured questionnaire. Pilot study was conducted on eight mothers. Sampling technique -purposive sample 60 mothers
30 in experimental and 30 in control group. To prevent contamination experimental group was taken from Paediatric Ward and Private
Ward and control group was taken from Pediatric Surgical I.C.U and Postnatal Ward of the hospital. Pre test was taken from both
control and experimental group. Tool-Self structured teaching was given to experimental group with the help of lesson plan and
Audio- Visual aids. After 72 hours of teaching post test was taken from both experimental and control group. The data analyzed by
calculating mean, mean percentage, SD and 't' test. Chi square was calculated to match the variables.
Results- of the study proved that teaching programme was highly effective in enhancing the knowledge of mothers on prevention and
management of pneumonia in children.1

3. Critique – A study of knowledge, attitude and practice. among mothers towards acute respiratory. infection in urban and
rural communities of burdwan district, west bengal, india.
Sr Evaluation analysis Comment for
Component Criteria Strength Weakness
No improvement
1 Title of the study What is the title of the A study of
study? knowledge, attitude
and practice
Among mothers
towards acute
respiratory
Infection in urban
and rural
communities
Of burdwan district,
west bengal, india.
What does the title Its eye catching
lead you to explore the
article/eye catching.
Is the title based on Yes
current scenario?
Is the title is precise yet Yes
comprehensive
Does the article cover Yes it is
the topic comprehensive and
comprehensively, overview of full
partially, or is it research
overview?
2 Abstract Is the abstract Yes
understandable?
Is it reflecting the Yes
overview of the study?
3 Research question Question the study Not mentioned
designed is to be
answer?
Is the research Not mentioned
question frame
correctly?
4 Objectives What is the purpose of To study and assess
the research? the knowledge,
attitude and practice
regarding
the ARI among
mothers in both urban
and rural communities
of Burdwan
district, West Bengal,
India.
Is the objective stated Yes it is clearly stated
clearly?
Does the author define
the research problem?
Does it the build on
past research?
5 Literature review What is already known Not mentioned Need to add Literature
review
about this area of the
In organized manner
knowledge? based on recent review
and
relevant,comprehensive
.
Does the literature Not mentioned
revive provide the
rationale and
direction?
Is the literature review Not mentioned
organising to
demonstrate the
progressive
development of ideas
through previous
research?
6 Ethical consideration Is the research study Not mentioned
approved by the
ethical committee
Is the study is not Yes it is not harmful
harmful to the subject to subject
Is name of the subjects Yes ,confidentiality is
are not disclosed. maintain
7 Theoretical Is the framework Not mentioned
framework present with clarity
Is the framework most Not mentioned
appropriate in the
present context?
8 Methodology Is the study design was Not mentioned
appropriate?
Is the hypothesis linked Not mentioned
dependent and
independent variable?
Is the dependent and How the sample size
was calculated?
independent
hypothesis stated
clearly.
How the study sample Sample size was Sampling technique
is selected and is the representative not mentioned
sample size was
representative?
How the sample size Not mentioned
was calculated?
Is the research tool No Tool should reflect the
was selected what to be collected
appropriate?
Is the tool was Not mentioned
validated and the
reliability was
established?
Which method was Not mentioned
applied to measure the
reliability?
Are the methods for Not mentioned
measuring results
appropriate and clearly
explained?
9 Pilot study Does the pilot study Not mentioned
explores and test the
practicability and
feasibility of the main
study?
Does the fingers were Not mentioned
interrupted
10 Main study data Does the data Time period not
collection collection was mentioned
appropriate time
period
Does the researcher Not mentioned
was stick to the data
collection schedule
Does the appropriate Yes
sample size was
accomplished?
11 Finding What are the author’s
interpretation and
major findings and
conclusion
conclusions?
Have these been
supported by the
authors analyses,
argument finding or
evidence?
Have s/he overlooked
anything?
Does the author
accomplish his / her
objectives?
12 Sources of data Is the article supported No
collection with authentic
references?
Are there i-text No
citations (or footnotes)
and references?
Are the references Yes
recent or significance?
13 Language Is the language Yes
appropriate for its
intendment reader?
Is the definition clear Yes
and useful?
Is the choice of words No
based in any ways ?
14 Illustration Is illustration, table or Graph or table not Illustration should be
mentioned represents with graphs
graph useful?
They were not using and tables to make it
Do they complement best methods to once glance look of
present data. research
the text?
Are they the best
method to present
data or are they
unnecessary?
15 Discussion What does the
researcher say about
the results ?
16 Organization of the Is the material Yes
content organised and
focused?
Is the argument or Yes
presentation
understandable ?
Is this original It is a original
research, a review of research
previous research or an
informative piece?
Is the sequence is
logical
Does the appropriate
format was used for
preparation of the data
sheet?
17 Bibliography Does a bibliography
exist?
Is the bibliography Yes it is selective
short or long
Is the bibliography is
selective or
comprehensive?
Is the references are Yes ,use primary
primary sources source
journal article)or only
secondary sources (ex.
Encyclopaedia)
Is the recourses are Not mentioned
contemporary to the
article or much order
and
Us the citation style is
clear and consistent.
18 Usefulness Does Yes
Add the body of
knowledge to the
nursing profession?
Useful for community? No
Help in planning and
implementation of the
health services?
Support arguments the No
findings can be
generalized?
19 Authority Is the author an expert Yes .
in this field ? Where Authers are project
the author employed ? assistant and head of
dept. of PSM
respectively
Where else has he/she
won awards or
honours?
20 Citation Does the citation was Not mentioned
appropriate?
4.
CRITIQUE FORM THE JOURNAL

REVIEW OF ARTICLES- 04

Title of the research:- “Postnatal depression and infant growth and development in low income countries: a cohort study from
Goa, India”.

Title of the research article:- Arch Disease of Childhood.

Authors Name:- V Patel1, N DeSouza2, M Rodrigues2. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine1, London, UK,
Sangath Centre for Child Development & Family Guidance, Goa 403521, India2

Name of the Journal:- BMJ Journals.

Month and Year:- Accepted August 20, 2002, First published January 1, 2003, Online issue publication  January 01, 2003
COMPONENT CRITERIA STRENGTH WEAKNESS COMMENTS FOR ITS
IMPROVEMENTS
TITLE OF THE STUDY What is the title of the Title of the study is based Has to explain in detail. Can do disseminated
“Post natal study on current scenario based study it will be more
depression and infant on need of the lay person helpful for society
growth and
development in low
income countries: a
cohort study from
Goa, India”
What does the title lead you Good choice of topic by
to explore the article/ eye researcher to do Cohort
catching study title so good eye
catching
Is the title is based on the Yes The research is on
current scenario current topic
Is the title precise yet Took efforts for doing Should be generalize
comprehensive? research on various aspects the title
of Post natal depression
and infant growth and
development
Does the article cover the No this article not
topic comprehensively, covers the topic
partially or is it overview? comprehensively
Is the abstract Yes the abstract is He has to explain about Can include the
ABSTRACT understandable understandable researcher the validity and details of selection
is going to do the Cohort reliability of the of sample
study for developmental instruments and topic
outcomes
Is it reflects the overview of Yes it is overviewed the Not more detail in Can include more
the study study as it is Cohort study abstract about selection detail in abstract
and method of data about selection and
collection method data
collection
Question the study designed No questions included Need to add
is to be answer in article questions in article.

Is the research question Not included. Should include the


framed correctly research questions.
OBJECTIVES What is the purpose of the It is use full for the society
research
Is the objective stated Yes
clearly
Does the author define the Not clearly mentioned Should have to
research problem? in the researcher mention clearly
statement
Does she build on past Yes
research?
LITERATURE OF REVIEW What is already known Literature review
about this area of provide rationale and Review of literature
knowledge? direction for the study related the study can be
*Does the literature added. Articles report
review provide the The literature review is can also be added to
rationale and direction? organized to the review of literature
* Is the literature demonstrate the
review organize to progressive
demonstrate the development of ideas
progressive through previous survey
development of ideas done on iodine
through previous deficiency disorder
research
Total 4 review of
literature was used

Out of those 1 reviews


has been taken from
journals and 3 are
collected from national
report.
ETHICAL *Is the research study Yes from the AIIMS, No
CONSIDERATION approve by the ethical New Delhi
committee No it is not harmful to
*Is the study is not subject
harmful to the subject
THEORETICAL *Is the frame work Cross-sectional study Framework should have
CONSIDERATION presented with clarity design is used for the the clarity of the study
study

The Framework for


study consist of the
interplay of various
factors involved i.e.
Haryana, iodine, iodized
salt nutrition
*Is the framework most Another framework fit
appropriate more logically with the
study can be goal
attainment theory,
health promotion
model etc.
*Is the study design was Qualitative
appropriate Observational
METHODOLOGY Cross sectional study
*Is the hypothesis Yes it is linked with the
linked dependent and variables
independent variables
*Is the dependent and No demographic None of independent Demographic variables
dependent variable variables are present in variables are included in such as age, sex, marital
stated clearly? the study the framework status, occupation,
literacy status
*How is the study Randomly selected and Sample size is big some
selected and the sample sample size is 465 error is less in study
size was representative?
*How the sample size Not mentioned
was calculated?
*Is the tools selected Yes
was appropriate
*Is the tool was Not mentioned
validated and reliability
was established
*Which method is Interview
applied to measure the
reliability
PILOT STUDY Does the pilot study Not mentioned
explore and test
practicability and
feasibility of main
study?
*Does the finding were Yes
interrupted?
MAIN STUDY DATA *Does data collection Yes one year
COLLECTION time period appropriate
*Does the researcher Yes
was stick data collection
schedule?
*Does the appropriate Yes the sample size is
sample size was 465
accomplished
FINDINGS, *What was the author One fourth of
INTERPRETATION, AND major findings and households population
CONCLUSION conclusion? consuming inadequate
iodized salt improved by
strengthening
regulatory monitoring
*Have this been No
supported by the
author analyses,
arguments, findings and
evidence?
*Does the author Yes
accomplish objectives?
SOURCES OF DATA *Is the article supported Yes
with authentic
reference?
*Are the in-text citation Yes
(footnote) and
reference?
*Are the reference Yes
recent or significant?
LANNGUAGE *Is the language No Use simple language
appropriate for reader?
*Are the definition clear
and useful?
*Is the choice of words Yes
biased in any way
ILLUSTRATION *Are illustration, tables or He did not used graph
graphs used? and table show the
prevalence of IDD
*Do the compliment the No
text
*Are they used best Yes, tabular data is
method to present data? presented
DISCUSSION *What does the He told that is very
researcher say about the common in Haryana
result? families
ORGANIZATION OF *Is the material organized Yes it is organized
THE CONTENT and focused?
*Is the argument or Little bit can be explain
presentation in more easy language
understandable?
*Is the original research, a Yes
review of previous
research or an
information piece?
*Is the sequence is Yes
logical?
*Does appropriate format Yes, analysis is done in
was used for preparation states version 11
of data sheet
BIBLIOGRAPHY *Is the bibliography Not mentioned
exists?
*Is the bibliography is No
short or long
*Is the bibliography is No
selective or
comprehensive
*Is the reference are Yes there is primary and
primary sources (Journal) secondary sources he
or only secondary referred
source(encyclopedia)
USEFULLNESS Does it: Yes Need interventions
*Add the body of
knowledge to nursing
profession?
*Useful for the Yes Take big sample size
community
*Help in planning and Yes I support
implementation of health
services
*Support an argument Yes I support
*Is the findings can be Yes
generalized
AUTHORITY *Is the author an expert Not mentioned
in this field?
*Where is the author Not mentioned
employed?
*Has author won award No
or honors?
CITATION Does the citation was Yes
appropriate
CRITIQUE FORM THE JOURNAL

REVIEW OF ARTICLES- 01

Title of the research:- “Postnatal depression and infant growth and development in low income countries: a cohort study from
Goa, India”

Authors Name:- Ajeet Singh Bhadoria1, UmeshKapil2, Rahul Bansal3, R.M.Pandey4, Bhawana Pant5, Amit Mohan6

Name of the Journal:- Family medicine and primary care

Month and Year:- April-June 2017


COMPONENT CRITERIA STRENGTH WEAKNESS COMMENTS FOR ITS
IMPROVEMENTS
TITLE OF THE STUDY What is the title of the Title of the study is based Has to explain in detail Can do disseminated
“Prevalence of study on current scenario based about the different study it will be more
severe acute on need of the lay children intervention for prevent helpful for society
malnutrition malnutrition
associated
sociodemographic
factors among
children aged 6
months-5 years in
rural population of What does the title lead you Good choice of topic by
northern India: A to explore the article/ eye researcher to do cross
population –based catching sectional study title so good
survey” eye catching
Is the title is based on the Yes
current scenario
Is the title precise yet Took efforts for doing No it is not precise, the Should be generalize
comprehensive? research on various aspects different interventions the title
of malnutrition ate not explained in
topic like diet plan
Does the article cover the Yes this article covers the
topic comprehensively, topic comprehensively
partially or is it overview?
*Is the abstract Yes the abstract is He has to explain about Can include the details
ABSTRACT understandable understandable the validity and of selection of sample
researcher is going to reliability of the
do the cross sectional instruments and topic
study on malnutrition of
under five children
*Is it reflects the Yes it is overviewed the Not more detail in Can include more detail
overview of the study study as it is cross abstract about selection in abstract about
sectional study and method of data selection and method
collection data collection
*Question the study Nicely framed the Can also find ask Ws
designed is to be questions which is questions
answer related to the topic
*Is the research Yes
question framed
correctly
OBJECTIVES *What is the purpose of It is use full for the
the research society
*Is the objective stated Yes he stated the
clearly objective properly

*Does the author define Not clearly mentioned


the research problem? in the researcher
statement about
intervention
*Does she build on past Yes
research?
LITERATURE OF REVIEW What is already known Literature review
about this area of provide rationale and
knowledge? direction for the study
*Does the literature
review provide the Malnutrition is an
rationale and direction? disorder resulting from
* Is the literature abnormal in body
review organize to weight and muscle
demonstrate the tone, there were many
progressive reviewed were present
development of ideas Yes it provide rationale
through previous as there is prevalence
research factors are given
ETHICAL *Is the research study Yes it is approved by No
CONSIDERATION approve by the ethical ethical committee
committee No it is not harmful to
subject

*Is the study is not Yes not harmful to


harmful to the subject subject or society
THEORETICAL *Is the frame work Cross-sectional study Framework should have
FRAMEWOR presented with clarity design is used for the the clarity of the study
study

*Is the framework most Yes


appropriate
*Is the study design was Qualitative
appropriate Observational
METHODOLOGY Cross sectional study
*Is the hypothesis Yes it is linked with the
linked dependent and variables
independent variables
*Is the dependent and No not mentioned
dependent variable
stated clearly?
*How is the study Purposive sampling
selected and the sample done age group 6-59
size was representative? months of children
*How the sample size Sample size is 18463
was calculated?
*Is the tools selected Yes
was appropriate
*Is the tool was Yes
validated and reliability
was established
*Which method is Anthropometric
applied to measure the parameter
reliability
PILOT STUDY Does the pilot study Not mentioned
explore and test
practicability and
feasibility of main
study?
*Does the finding were No
interrupted?
MAIN STUDY DATA *Does data collection Yes two year
COLLECTION time period appropriate
*Does the researcher No
was stick data collection
schedule?
*Does the appropriate Yes
sample size was
accomplished
FINDINGS, *What was the author 7.9% prevalence in The prevalence of
INTERPRETATION, AND major findings and nuclear family, poor malnutrition is more in
CONCLUSION conclusion? occupation, lower village, increase in
parental education, nuclear family
nuclear family
*Have this been Yes
supported by the
author analyses,
arguments, findings and
evidence?
*Does the author Yes
accomplish objectives?
SOURCES OF DATA *Is the article supported Yes
with authentic
reference?
*Are the in-text citation No
(footnote) and
reference?
*Are the reference Yes
recent or significant?
LANNGUAGE *Is the language Yes
appropriate for reader?
*Are the definition clear Yes
and useful?
*Is the choice of words No
biased in any way
ILLUSTRATION *Are illustration, tables or Yes it is use full for No used graphs
graphs used? illustration the readings
*Do the compliment the Easy to reading
text
*Are they used best Yes
method to present data?
DISCUSSION *What does the He told that is very
researcher say about the common in children
result?
ORGANIZATION OF *Is the material organized Yes it is organized
THE CONTENT and focused?
*Is the argument or Little bit can be explain
presentation in more easy language
understandable?
*Is the original research, a Yes
review of previous
research or an
information piece?
*Is the sequence is Yes
logical?
*Does appropriate format Yes
was used for preparation
of data sheet
BIBLIOGRAPHY *Is the bibliography Not mentioned
exists?
*Is the bibliography is No
short or long
*Is the bibliography is No
selective or
comprehensive
*Is the reference are Yes there is primary and
primary sources (Journal) secondary sources he
or only secondary referred
source(encyclopedia)
USEFULLNESS Does it: Yes Need interventions
*Add the body of
knowledge to nursing
profession?
*Useful for the Yes
community
*Help in planning and Yes I support
implementation of health
services
*Support an argument Yes
*Is the findings can be Yes
generalized
AUTHORITY *Is the author an expert Not mentioned
in this field?
*Where is the author Not mentioned
employed?
*Has author won award No
or honors?
CITATION Does the citation was Yes
appropriate

You might also like