You are on page 1of 3

CHIR13009- Professional Chiropractic Practice -2

SUBMISSION DETAILS (student to complete)


Name: Due date:
SID: Submission for unit/course: CHIR13008
First marker: Second marker:

ASSESSMENT 1- PORTFOLIO MARKING


SUBMISSION DETAILS (student to complete)
Name: Due date:
SID: Submission for unit/course: CHIR13009
First marker: Second marker:

ASSESSMENT 1- PORTFOLIO MARKING RUBRIC & FEEDBACK

MARKING EXCELLENT VERY GOOD ABOVE AVERAGE PASS BORDERLINE FAIL


DOMAIN (100-85%) (84-75%) (74-65%) (64-50%) (49-45%) (< 45%)

COMPLETION
OF  Some minor omissions were noted  Some considerable omissions were  Some significant omissions were  A majority of elements in the
 All assessment preparation tasks
in the assessment preparation task noted in the assessment preparation noted in the assessment assessment preparation task were  Assessment preparation tasks were
ASSESSMENT were fully completed and accurately
but were submitted in a timely task but were submitted in a timely preparation task but was submitted missing and submitted after due not completed or submitted
TASKS submitted in a timely manner
manner manner after due date date

(5 MARKS)

 Language used almost always  In a majority of instances, the language  The language used sometimes  Language used almost never
 Language used always supported  Rarely did the language support the
supported the self-reflective used supported the self-reflective supported the self-reflective supported the self-reflective
the self-reflective learning process self-reflective learning process
learning process learning process learning process learning process
GRAMMAR &  The language used always  Rarely did the language used
 The language used almost always  In a majority of instances, the language  The language used sometimes  The language used almost never
demonstrated candour and demonstrate candour and
LANGUAGE demonstrated candour and used always demonstrated candour demonstrated candour and demonstrated candour and
intellectual honesty with respect to intellectual honesty with respect to
intellectual honesty with respect to and intellectual honesty with respect to intellectual honesty with respect to intellectual honesty with respect to
the chosen topics the chosen topics
(5 MARKS) the chosen topics the chosen topics the chosen topics the chosen topics
 All portfolio topics were written  Only elements of the portfolio
 Most portfolio topics were written  The majority of portfolio topics were  Only some of the portfolio topics  All of the portfolio topics included
without any grammatical or spelling topics were written without any
without any grammatical or spelling written without any grammatical or were written without any significant grammatical or spelling
errors grammatical or spelling errors
errors spelling errors grammatical or spelling errors errors

CRITICAL SELF-  The level of knowledge was always  There were demonstrations of  There were demonstrations of  There were demonstrations of  There were infrequent  There was no evidence of exemplary
REFLECTION appropriate for the year of study exemplary levels of critical self- exemplary levels of critical self- exemplary levels of critical self- demonstrations of exemplary levels levels of critical self-reflection in the
engaged. The reflective process, as reflection in almost all parts of the reflection throughout a most part of reflection in some parts of the of critical self-reflection in the
portfolio
portfolio portfolio
the portfolio.  The level of reflection was portfolio
 always appropriate for the year of  The level of reflection was rarely
 The level of reflection was usually occasionally appropriate for the  The level of reflection was not
study engaged. The reflective appropriate for the year of study
a vehicle for change, was always appropriate for the year of study year of study engaged. The appropriate for the year of study
process, as a vehicle for change, engaged. The reflective process, as
apparent throughout the portfolio engaged. The reflective process, as a reflective process, as a vehicle for engaged. The reflective process, as
was almost always apparent a vehicle for change, was
 The student clearly demonstrated vehicle for change, was mostly change, was occasionally apparent a vehicle for change, was not
throughout the portfolio infrequently apparent throughout
an appreciation of the nuances apparent throughout the portfolio throughout the portfolio apparent throughout the portfolio
 The student mostly demonstrated the portfolio
relating to their chosen  The student somewhat demonstrated  The student somewhat  The student clearly demonstrated a
AND LOGIC an appreciation of the nuances  The student generally failed to
clinical/professional topics and an appreciation of the nuances relating demonstrated an appreciation of lack of understanding of the
relating to their chosen demonstrate an appreciation of the
clearly embedded their newly to their chosen clinical/professional the nuances relating to their chosen nuances relating to their chosen
(15 MARKS) clinical/professional topics and in nuances relating to their chosen
discovered understanding. topics and in the majority of cases clinical/professional topics and on clinical/professional topics and
most occasions embedded their clinical/professional topics, but
 The student was always successful embedded their newly discovered occasion embedded their newly failed to embed their newly
newly discovered understanding attempted to embed their
in putting forward an argument that understanding within their written discovered understanding within discovered understanding within
within their written reflections understanding within their written
was logical, underpinned by good reflections their written reflections their written reflections
 The student was in most cases reflections
evidence, and well-reasoned  The student was successful in putting  The student was occasionally  The student did not put forward an
successful in putting forward an  The student was seldom successful
forward an argument that was logical successful in putting forward an argument that was logical and/or
argument that was logical and well- in putting forward an argument that
or well-reasoned in a majority of cases argument that was logical and/or well-reasoned
reasoned was logical and/or well-reasoned
well-reasoned

 There were ample references, or  There were ample references, or  There were ample references, or  There were very few references, or  There were not any references, or
external resources, to support most external resources, to support the slight external resources, to support some external resources, to support the external resources that supported
 There were ample references, or
of the portfolio majority of the portfolio of the portfolio portfolio the portfolio
REFERENCING external resources, to support the
 Most references fully adhered to  The majority of references fully adhered  Some of the references adhered to  Only a few references adhered to  None of the references adhered to
& THE USE OF entire portfolio
the prescribed style guide to the prescribed style guide the prescribed style guide the prescribed style guide the prescribed style guide
ADDITIONAL  All references fully adhered to the
 Most references were from  The majority of references were from  Only some references were from  Only a few references were from  None of the references were from
prescribed style guide
EXTERNAL recognised and well-respected recognised and well-respected journals recognised and well-respected recognised and well-respected recognised and well-respected
 All references were from recognised
REFERENCES journals and were PubMed indexed and were PubMed indexed journals and were PubMed indexed journals and were PubMed indexed journals or PubMed indexed
and well-respected journals and
OR RESOURCES  The supporting material almost  The supporting material in the majority  The supporting material on  The supporting material rarely  The supporting material failed to
were PubMed indexed
always strengthened the points of times some-what strengthened the occasion strengthened the points strengthened the points being add much to the points being made
 The supporting material was always
being made in the portfolio points being made in the portfolio being made in the portfolio made in the portfolio in the portfolio
(15 MARKS) well referenced and followed the
 The supporting material was almost  In the majority of times, the supporting  The supporting material was  The supporting material was rarely  The supporting material was not
prescribed style guide
always well referenced and followed material was well referenced and occasionally well referenced and well referenced and did not follow well referenced and did not follow
the prescribed style guide followed the prescribed style guide followed the prescribed style guide the prescribed style guide the prescribed style guide

 Overall the portfolio was developed  Overall the portfolio was developed  Overall the portfolio was developed to  Overall the portfolio was developed  Overall the portfolio was developed  Overall the portfolio was very poorly
GENERAL to an exemplary level and was very to an exemplary level and was an above average level and was to an adequate level and was on to a below average level and was developed and was very difficult to
COMPOSITION easy to navigate through and use somewhat easy to navigate through somewhat easy to navigate through occasion easy to navigate through difficult to navigate through and use navigate through and use
& OVERALL  The hyperlinks (if used) were all and use and use and use  The hyperlinks (if used) were rarely  The hyperlinks (if used) were never
WRITTEN functional and/or relevant to the  The hyperlinks (if used) were mostly  The hyperlinks (if used) were all  The hyperlinks (if used) were functional and/or relevant to the functional and/or relevant to the
PRESENTATIO topic at hand functional and/or relevant to the functional and/or relevant to the topic occasionally functional and/or topic at hand topic at hand
 The learner has demonstrated a topic at hand at hand in a majority of instances relevant to the topic at hand  The learner has demonstrated a  The learner has demonstrated a very
N
commendable sense of ownership  The learner has demonstrated a  The learner has demonstrated an above  The learner has demonstrated a below average sense of ownership poor sense of ownership with
with respect to the material notable sense of ownership with average sense of ownership with satisfactory sense of ownership with with respect to the material respect to the material presented
presented respect to the material presented respect to the material presented respect to the material presented presented
(10 MARKS)
ADDITIONAL
FOCUSED
FEEDBACK

Markers to FIRST SECOND FINAL


DOMAINS MARKE MARKE AGREED
complete R R MARK

1. COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT TASKS (5)

2. GRAMMAR & LANGUAGE (5)

3. CRITICAL SELF-REFLECTION AND LOGIC (15)

4. REFERENCING & THE USE OF ADDITIONAL EXTERNAL REFERENCES OR RESOURCES (15)

5. GENERAL COMPOSITION & OVERALL WRITTEN PRESENTATION (10)

TOTAL ( /50)

You might also like