Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Rubric Reflective Portfolio 2020

    Uploaded by

    api-479717740
    4 views3 pages

    Original Title

    rubric reflective portfolio 2020

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views3 pages

    Rubric Reflective Portfolio 2020

    Uploaded by

    api-479717740

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    CHIR13009- Professional Chiropractic Practice -2

    ASSESSMENT 1- PORTFOLIO MARKING


    SUBMISSION DETAILS (student to complete)
    Name: Kristen French - 12082574 Due date: 18/9/20
    SID: https://kristenfrenchs12082574.weebly.com
    Submission for unit/course: CHIR13009
    First marker: Second marker:

    ASSESSMENT 1- PORTFOLIO MARKING RUBRIC & FEEDBACK

    MARKING EXCELLENT VERY GOOD ABOVE AVERAGE PASS BORDERLINE FAIL


    DOMAIN (100-85%) (84-75%) (74-65%) (64-50%) (49-45%) (< 45%)

    COMPLETION
    OF  Some minor omissions were noted  Some considerable omissions were  Some significant omissions were  A majority of elements in the
     All assessment preparation tasks
    in the assessment preparation task noted in the assessment preparation noted in the assessment assessment preparation task were  Assessment preparation tasks were
    ASSESSMENT were fully completed and accurately
    but were submitted in a timely task but were submitted in a timely preparation task but was submitted missing and submitted after due not completed or submitted
    TASKS submitted in a timely manner
    manner manner after due date date

    (5 MARKS)

     Language used almost always  In a majority of instances, the language  The language used sometimes  Language used almost never
     Language used always supported  Rarely did the language support the
    supported the self-reflective used supported the self-reflective supported the self-reflective supported the self-reflective
    the self-reflective learning process self-reflective learning process
    learning process learning process learning process learning process
    GRAMMAR &  The language used always  Rarely did the language used
     The language used almost always  In a majority of instances, the language  The language used sometimes  The language used almost never
    demonstrated candour and demonstrate candour and
    LANGUAGE demonstrated candour and used always demonstrated candour demonstrated candour and demonstrated candour and
    intellectual honesty with respect to intellectual honesty with respect to
    intellectual honesty with respect to and intellectual honesty with respect to intellectual honesty with respect to intellectual honesty with respect to
    the chosen topics the chosen topics
    (5 MARKS) the chosen topics the chosen topics the chosen topics the chosen topics
     All portfolio topics were written  Only elements of the portfolio
     Most portfolio topics were written  The majority of portfolio topics were  Only some of the portfolio topics  All of the portfolio topics included
    without any grammatical or spelling topics were written without any
    without any grammatical or spelling written without any grammatical or were written without any significant grammatical or spelling
    errors grammatical or spelling errors
    errors spelling errors grammatical or spelling errors errors

    CRITICAL SELF-  The level of knowledge was always  There were demonstrations of  There were demonstrations of  There were demonstrations of  There were infrequent  There was no evidence of exemplary
    REFLECTION appropriate for the year of study exemplary levels of critical self- exemplary levels of critical self- exemplary levels of critical self- demonstrations of exemplary levels levels of critical self-reflection in the
    engaged. The reflective process, as reflection in almost all parts of the reflection throughout a most part of reflection in some parts of the of critical self-reflection in the portfolio
    AND LOGIC
    a vehicle for change, was always portfolio the portfolio. portfolio portfolio  The level of reflection was not
    apparent throughout the portfolio  always appropriate for the year of  The level of reflection was usually  The level of reflection was  The level of reflection was rarely appropriate for the year of study
    (15 MARKS)  The student clearly demonstrated study engaged. The reflective appropriate for the year of study occasionally appropriate for the appropriate for the year of study engaged. The reflective process, as
    an appreciation of the nuances process, as a vehicle for change, engaged. The reflective process, as a year of study engaged. The engaged. The reflective process, as a vehicle for change, was not
    reflective process, as a vehicle for
    was almost always apparent a vehicle for change, was
    vehicle for change, was mostly change, was occasionally apparent
    throughout the portfolio infrequently apparent throughout apparent throughout the portfolio
    apparent throughout the portfolio throughout the portfolio
     The student mostly demonstrated the portfolio  The student clearly demonstrated a
    relating to their chosen  The student somewhat demonstrated  The student somewhat
    an appreciation of the nuances  The student generally failed to lack of understanding of the
    clinical/professional topics and an appreciation of the nuances relating demonstrated an appreciation of
    relating to their chosen demonstrate an appreciation of the nuances relating to their chosen
    clearly embedded their newly to their chosen clinical/professional the nuances relating to their chosen
    clinical/professional topics and in nuances relating to their chosen clinical/professional topics and
    discovered understanding. topics and in the majority of cases clinical/professional topics and on
    most occasions embedded their clinical/professional topics, but failed to embed their newly
     The student was always successful embedded their newly discovered occasion embedded their newly
    newly discovered understanding attempted to embed their discovered understanding within
    in putting forward an argument that understanding within their written discovered understanding within
    within their written reflections understanding within their written their written reflections
    was logical, underpinned by good reflections their written reflections
     The student was in most cases reflections  The student did not put forward an
    evidence, and well-reasoned  The student was successful in putting  The student was occasionally
    successful in putting forward an  The student was seldom successful argument that was logical and/or
    forward an argument that was logical successful in putting forward an
    argument that was logical and well- in putting forward an argument that well-reasoned
    or well-reasoned in a majority of cases argument that was logical and/or
    reasoned was logical and/or well-reasoned
    well-reasoned

     There were ample references, or  There were ample references, or  There were ample references, or  There were very few references, or  There were not any references, or
    external resources, to support most external resources, to support the slight external resources, to support some external resources, to support the external resources that supported
     There were ample references, or
    of the portfolio majority of the portfolio of the portfolio portfolio the portfolio
    REFERENCING external resources, to support the
     Most references fully adhered to  The majority of references fully adhered  Some of the references adhered to  Only a few references adhered to  None of the references adhered to
    & THE USE OF entire portfolio
    the prescribed style guide to the prescribed style guide the prescribed style guide the prescribed style guide the prescribed style guide
    ADDITIONAL  All references fully adhered to the
     Most references were from  The majority of references were from  Only some references were from  Only a few references were from  None of the references were from
    prescribed style guide
    EXTERNAL recognised and well-respected recognised and well-respected journals recognised and well-respected recognised and well-respected recognised and well-respected
     All references were from recognised
    REFERENCES journals and were PubMed indexed and were PubMed indexed journals and were PubMed indexed journals and were PubMed indexed journals or PubMed indexed
    and well-respected journals and
    OR RESOURCES  The supporting material almost  The supporting material in the majority  The supporting material on  The supporting material rarely  The supporting material failed to
    were PubMed indexed
    always strengthened the points of times some-what strengthened the occasion strengthened the points strengthened the points being add much to the points being made
     The supporting material was always
    being made in the portfolio points being made in the portfolio being made in the portfolio made in the portfolio in the portfolio
    (15 MARKS) well referenced and followed the
     The supporting material was almost  In the majority of times, the supporting  The supporting material was  The supporting material was rarely  The supporting material was not
    prescribed style guide
    always well referenced and followed material was well referenced and occasionally well referenced and well referenced and did not follow well referenced and did not follow
    the prescribed style guide followed the prescribed style guide followed the prescribed style guide the prescribed style guide the prescribed style guide

     Overall the portfolio was developed  Overall the portfolio was developed  Overall the portfolio was developed to  Overall the portfolio was developed  Overall the portfolio was developed  Overall the portfolio was very poorly
    GENERAL to an exemplary level and was very to an exemplary level and was an above average level and was to an adequate level and was on to a below average level and was developed and was very difficult to
    COMPOSITION easy to navigate through and use somewhat easy to navigate through somewhat easy to navigate through occasion easy to navigate through difficult to navigate through and use navigate through and use
    & OVERALL  The hyperlinks (if used) were all and use and use and use  The hyperlinks (if used) were rarely  The hyperlinks (if used) were never
    WRITTEN functional and/or relevant to the  The hyperlinks (if used) were mostly  The hyperlinks (if used) were all  The hyperlinks (if used) were functional and/or relevant to the functional and/or relevant to the
    PRESENTATIO topic at hand functional and/or relevant to the functional and/or relevant to the topic occasionally functional and/or topic at hand topic at hand
     The learner has demonstrated a topic at hand at hand in a majority of instances relevant to the topic at hand  The learner has demonstrated a  The learner has demonstrated a very
    N
    commendable sense of ownership  The learner has demonstrated a  The learner has demonstrated an above  The learner has demonstrated a below average sense of ownership poor sense of ownership with
    with respect to the material notable sense of ownership with average sense of ownership with satisfactory sense of ownership with with respect to the material respect to the material presented
    presented respect to the material presented respect to the material presented respect to the material presented presented
    (10 MARKS)
    ADDITIONAL
    FOCUSED
    FEEDBACK

    Markers to FIRST SECOND FINAL


    DOMAINS MARKE MARKE AGREED
    complete R R MARK

    1. COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT TASKS (5)

    2. GRAMMAR & LANGUAGE (5)

    3. CRITICAL SELF-REFLECTION AND LOGIC (15)

    4. REFERENCING & THE USE OF ADDITIONAL EXTERNAL REFERENCES OR RESOURCES (15)

    5. GENERAL COMPOSITION & OVERALL WRITTEN PRESENTATION (10)

    TOTAL ( /50)

    You might also like