Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Craft Response:
Citizen, by Claudia Rankine
Julianne Henderson
University of San Francisco
Seminar: Further Forms
Professor Soma Mei Sheng Frazier
September 9, 2017
RESPONSE: Citizen by Claudia Rankine 2
In her captivating lyric essay, Citizen, Claudia Rankine exposes the inane logic
that perpetuates racial injustice in our daily lives. Through a series of colorful vignettes,
poetic ruminations, and insightful expositions, Rankine displays how the persistence of
racism in human social interaction, politics, and the media diminishes black identity with
encounter with a racist white man at your local Starbucks or lamenting the distortion of
Mark Duggan’s death, Rankine fully implicates you, the reader, in every racist assault on
humanity that is taking place. In this reflection, I examine the narrative structure, themes,
and accessibility of Rankine’s work. I also address the degree to which this text can be
used as a tool to facilitate critical dialogue about matters of race, implicit bias, and the
verse, prose, graphic design, and photographs to weave the stories and reflections
together. The text is nonlinear, moving from one vignette or exposition to the next in
accordance with lyrical expression and theme rather than chronological order. This tactic
works in Rankine’s favor in that it actually enhances the flow between the seemingly
disjointed images and ideas she presents. The visual images and graphic design
renderings serve the same purpose, at least in part. However, their true purpose seems to
be to disrupt the storyline progression even further and add an element of surprise. One of
the most powerful strategies that Rankine uses in Citizen is to address the reader directly,
which creates a kind of living, hypothetical storyline that allows the reader to co-write the
text. Even in moments when “you” or “your” describe the speaker, the reader is still
somehow implicated and involved in the telling of the story. Narrative structure aside, the
RESPONSE: Citizen by Claudia Rankine 3
Three major themes that Rankine addresses in this text are the visibility of black
identity, control, and memory. Rankine beautifully exposes the irony of black visibility
when she explains that the racist language that was once perceived as being used to
“denigrate and erase” the black community is the very instrument by which the black
community is validated. She notes that, “Language that is hurtful is intended to exploit all
the ways that you are present” (Rankine, 2014). In other moments, Rankine illustrates the
invisibility of black identity, such as when “you are not the guy and still you fit the
description because there is only one guy who is always the guy fitting the description”
visibility by reducing and confining the black community to limited stereotypes. With
regard to the theme of control, Rankine illustrates how there are times when neither the
cause of our suffering nor our reaction to it is within our power to change. Speaking on
the topic of racial injustice and the heavy sighs we let out to decompress, Rankine says,
“truth be told, you could no more control those sighs than that which brings the sighs
humanity’s collective consciousness acts like an involuntary reflex that sadly plagues
society and is a force beyond our control. Finally, Rankine addresses memory, especially
the memory of ancient, stored pain. Rankine explains, “Yes, and the body has memory.
The physical carriage hauls more than its weight,” after which she goes on to describe
could never “erase the moments lived through” (Rankine, 2014). Here, she is describing
hatred and bigotry and shame for being oneself inside of a black body. Her remedy for
this ancient, stored pain is to simply release oneself from it. “Move forward,” she says,
“Let it go. Come on. Come on. Come on” (Rankine, 2014). The text as a whole seems to
ask of the reader that he or she agree to move on and transcend the conditioning that has
given rise to flagrant racism in human social interaction. With these themes in mind, it is
Rankine’s text is arguably accessible to a vast audience that spans young and old
backgrounds, and academic backgrounds. Her writing is timely and topical in that it
addresses pop culture/sports icons like Serena Williams, cultural martyrs like Travyon
Martin, and relatable manifestations of racism in action within the classroom, the
workplace, one’s own home, the media, one’s friendships, and so on. Although the
language that she uses is at times formal and elevated, it is mostly colloquial, which is
especially true of her poetry entries. This has the effect of inviting readers into the space
that Rankine sets up with each segment of the text so that they can safely examine the
underlying force that sustains racial injustice. Despite the fact that she points to white
(male) privilege and dominance as being the primary culprits, I would argue that Rankine
does not isolate or alienate her white readers. Her approach to the themes and ideas she
presents in Citizen more contemplative than it is on the attack. She effectively creates a
space within which each of us can explore our own socialization process and
conditioning and make the conscious decision to change our orientation to—and
understanding of—race.
During the fall semester of my first year in USF’s Writing MFA program, I took a
RESPONSE: Citizen by Claudia Rankine 5
poetry seminar titled, “Outrage” with Professor Doug Powell. In addition to assigning us
Rankine’s text, Doug helped our class organize a kind of political “happening” that took
place at the 24th and Mission Street Bart station here in San Francisco a few days before
the 2016 presidential election. One component of our organized action involved inviting
passersby to read sections of Citizen aloud to an audience that had congregated on the
corner in front of the staircase leading to the station. I was shocked by how many people,
despite having just gotten off of work and being exhausted from the daily grind, opted to
participate in our live reading of Rankine’s text. Even more shocking was the number of
people—both women and men—who cried after reading their chosen passage out loud. I
realized that Rankine’s text is a powerful tool with which to generate crucial discussion
about the dangers of racial injustice, implicit bias, and our divisive social scripts. Each
person who read Rankine’s work aloud was fundamentally changed by the experience.
Her words elicit more than just anger—they evoke a sense of responsibility and
References