Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
The main objective of this paper is to understand and analyse the significance of
sustainability and resilience in the recent development of Pakistan’s Energy Sector. In
addition to this, the paper aims to analyze what role the energy sector is playing in the
economic development of the country. In contrast to quantitative research approach which
mainly focuses on numbers and facts, this paper applies a qualitative research design on the
said matter. Based on a proposed conceptual thematic framework, underlying the concept of
climate change and adaptability (resilience), the contributions of the energy sector is
explored. This included understanding the perception of some key stakeholders and how they
expect global and national developments to the sector. More than fifteen stakeholders
belonging to private investors, Government and Public were interviewed in the context of this
study. Each of them represented senior management opinion and perspective on the issues
faced by the sector and the future plans for them.
Introduction
On the economic development front, since 2010 till to date, Pakistan has
demonstrated some fair results. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) defined as the
monetary value of final goods and services that are bought by the final user –
*
Ms. Tatheer Fatima is a research scholar at SZABIST, Islamabad, Dr. Shazia Hassan is Assistant Professor at
Department of Leadership & Management Studies, National Defence University, Islamabad and Ms.Wajeeha Ghias is
lecturer at Department of Leadership & Management Studies, National Defence University, Islamabad.
Keeping the actions of other countries aside, Pakistan’s role however, remains
unclear. Even after signing up for the agenda points of the COP21 and its mission,
Pakistan, yet has to give itself a target. The consumers comprising of general public
and industries carrying out commercial activities, are faced with an even more
The alarming issue of climate change and its global impact is catching up
pace and putting pressure on each country to review its current strength and plan to
combat it and mitigate its impact. Alongside, this dilemma of climate change is the
extreme pressure on economies to demonstrate growth. Either maintain its position as
a developed country or attain one. These two major national agendas, however,
demonstrates two conflicting courses of action. Economic growth, means more
economic activity, employment, profits, increasing yields on investment and
utilization of natural resources. These when deliberated, in fact come forth as the
direct causes of climate change leading to negative externalities.
In Pakistan, all aspects of economic activity along with their impact on the
environment are now expected to be scrutinized. Discussions regarding the role of
government, private businesses, industrialists, general public, customers, financial
institutions and other stakeholders is widening interest and driving for more effective
and transparent solutions. Pakistan, in particular is estimated to have raised carbon
emissions from 76 million tons in 1990 to 200 million tons in 2006 7. It is estimated
that CO2 emissions with an average increase of 6.5% annually will grow to 482 million
tons by 2020 8. A mix of sectors contributes towards this rapid increase in CO2
emissions, with the energy sector making up to 38% of the overall percentage. The
CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita) stood at 0.9 metric ton in Pakistan.
Over the last decade, several efforts have been made to ascertain the
severity of the energy crisis in Pakistan. Each stakeholder draws its own conclusion,
but unanimously expects the energy sector to become aggressively efficient.
Alongwith this, at the international front researches on the same pattern are also
taking place, emphasizing every business, company, private or public to take
ownership and play its part through executing responsible corporate social
responsibility and working greener initiatives.
Fossil fuels make 80% of the sources to produce energy 13. The composition
says true for Pakistan as well, where energy source remains backed up majorly by oil
and natural gas. Import of oil places invariable burden on our import bill as well.
Many projects are underway but the issue catching attention is providing energy
through coal. Although new technology by the name of Carbon Capture and
Sequestration (CCS) reduced the impact of coal making it environmentally less
harmful, but it’s still not fully developed14. If the emissions lifecycles of coal are
compared with nuclear and natural gas, it is astonishing to find that coal generates 30
times more emissions than nuclear and 15 times more than natural gas 15. Hence the
feasibility of the most talked about and sought after coal projects remain shady on the
sustainable front but may be government has better reasoning for pursuing this.
Thematic Factors
The challenges and performance of the energy sector of Pakistan depicts the
overall economic development scenario of Pakistan quite well. Hence, to understand
whether the economic development taking place is sustainable, the underlying factors
need to be studied. The drivers of the energy sector in Pakistan, its key stakeholders
and their impact locally and world-wide play a crucial role in transforming the current
scenario. Hence, a theme of the study has been deliberated, to analyze key factors in
shaping the economic scenario in the context of sustainability and resilience.
be divided into categories, on the basis of their interests and influence. They comprise
of:
The Government
International Governments
International Organizations (International Monetary Fund and World Bank
etc.)
Private Sector (Investors)
General Public
Other Government Bodies (like Federal Board of Revenue)
Financial Institutions
The private sector investor i.e. companies, public and government will be
addressed as key stakeholders in this paper, as they represent a key segment in the
sector and economy of Pakistan, in terms of influencing demand, supply, incentive
and innovations.
Stakeholder Perspective
The role and responsibilities of the public, has expanded in various ways over
the years. For individuals striving in a democracy, the expectation is even more but
the challenges in terms of accountability, enforcement and influence are crucial in
determining the impact.
Table: 1.1
Strengths Weaknesses
Pool of professionals and academics Reporting on sustainability issues
Not a high Co2 emitter Conflicts of interest
Opportunities Threats
Empower youth to bring innovative Poor governance
solutions and make small scale Lack of objectivity
projects Loss of initial investment
Technological advancement Lack of support from government
Abundance of natural resources Political uncertainty
hence lower costs of production
The issue of sustainability and how to curtail the energy crisis of Pakistan
provides an excellent opportunity to develop and bring innovation. Approaching of
government officials at official forums and various climate and sustainability
initiatives should never be ruled out. Good and experienced private investors are
globally seeing this as a new sector of employment, which will remain unsaturated
even for the longest time. As economies will keep on growing the need for energy will
also, hence, climate change can now be viewed as an industry of its own, providing
opportunities for advancement, employment, education and learning and so on
technological lines as well. As said by Sean Penrith, executive director of Oregon-
based conservation finance non-profit the Climate Trust. "States are very concerned
that, depending on the approach they take and who they link up with, will they create an
impetus for businesses to move away’’17. In light of the above the private sector investor
should after following routine protocols, engage in dialogue with the government to
provide good financial advice. They should continue research and development, to
utilize the opportunity of addressing climate change as an economic activity.
Strengths Weaknesses
Pool of professionals and academics Lack of information due to poor
Influence demand environmental reporting
Joint ventures with third parties Un-unified efforts
Opportunities Threats
Empower youth to bring innovative Poor governance
solutions and make small scale Political uncertainty
projects Expensive and limited alternative
Technological advancement and use choices
of media
The Environment Protection Act of 1997, gave a lot of power and authority to
the provinces to look after their environmental issues and cater to the arising needs of
the people. Similar to other government initiatives, however, little could be achieved
with this independence given to the provinces, to uplift their situation. The needs of
the people remain unattended as the public feels quite helpless, in front the
government and commercial giants. The strength of the common man, however, lies
in their united efforts to express their dismay over unsustainable energy solutions
provided to them. The youth, through education and innovative ideas can contribute
by entering into commercial ventures with organizations willing to invest.
For all these public efforts to materialize, the public needs to demand
availability of accurate and complete statistics on energy, and its impact on society.
They need to educate themselves on how economic decisions are taken and success is
derived through the production and consumption of energy. Due to poor governance
and accountability issues, provision of the desired information and results may be
difficult to achieve. With the help of pressure groups, however, much can still be
done. The public needs to react to the alternatives of energy provided to them and
demand them to be at affordable rates if it is for the betterment of the country in the
long run.
The Government
In order to integrate and manage the various functions and stakeholders of
an economy, the administrative laws of government, have multifold dimensions. To
keep the system running and efficient, however, there is a need to make a transition to
an approach in line with the trends of globalization. 18
Table-1.3
Strengths Weaknesses
Pool of professionals and academics Poor monitoring and evaluation
Abundance of natural resources No accurate data bases
Not a high CO2 emitter Poor prioritization of finds
Opportunities Threats
Can trade unused carbon credits Poor governance
Make attractive investor policy Lack of objectivity
Empower youth to bring innovative Loss of initial investment
solutions
Technological advancement
Incentivizing for small scale energy
production projects to sustain local
areas
Government Failures
Bureaucracy, corruption and nepotism, is viewed as a vicious cycle, which
wastes resources and hampers the effectiveness of economic progress. The feedback
received, describes the present operational and structure outlay of the government of
Pakistan as unreliable. Experiences of some of the countries of working with the
Government have been much to their dismay. Countries like Canada, who are
pioneers and leaders in the field of sustainable energy today, do not see Pakistan as
country to invest in or do any business with. Hardly less than 3 projects where
involvement from Canada’s British Columbia province can be observed. Efforts from
the United Nations only can be appreciated to work closely with the government and
some local organizations to augment sustainability efforts.
will be required. Even if the economic feasibility of producing energy through coal is
achieved, the second and more basic question lies how we expect to transport the
imported coals to areas where there is less than minimal infrastructure. Thar at the
moment is experiencing daily loss of life due to the absence of basic living necessities.
How does the government, plan to launch and achieve a good return, without
providing a basic infrastructure first, let alone railway tracks to transport coal, which
is the only economically feasible way to transport coal.
The coal project will eventually also be left unused with so many funds just
mis-allocated. It would only serve as a short-term fix, since carbon footprints
boundaries and limits are only getting stricter by the day. Hence, the government
needs to make sound assessments on the needs of Pakistan, rather than being led by
the economic targets or aims of other countries, specifically, China in the context of
generating power from coal, government should:
Conclusion
In shaping a country’s economic and sustainable outlook, alignment of
private, public and government goals needs to be ensured. A government’s pro-
activeness maximizes benefits for all. In the case of Pakistan’s government, measures
are being taken but the question arises are they enough? The role of the Government
is unclear at the moment but hope lies, as Pakistan could transform as a resource
plentiful country, if alternatives are thoroughly explored and capitalized.
Alignment of goals and needs, also help in dealing with supply and demand
issues. The example of the state of California in USA, tells that the population of the
whole state grew by almost 25% in the past 4-5 years. The total amount of energy
producing plants, however, remained unchanged. This points towards the concept of
adaptation and further along with this judicious use of our resources. In California, as
shared by the CEO of Zaheen Machines, in a conference on climate innovation, held
in Islamabad, on 17 May 2016, that the 25% increase as mentioned above not being met
by new plants was catered, because the state approached local residents and asked
them to install solar panels on their roofs. The energy captured through solar
radiation there is send back to the grid, as the house continues to get supply from the
main station. At every month end at the time of utility bills, the units of energy send
back to the grid stations are netted against the energy used and the differential is
asked to be paid. Hence, the government of Pakistan can explore the idea to
collaborate with major estate builders in Pakistan like Gulberg housing authorities,
Bahria Town, Defense Housing Authority etc.
NOTES
1
Callen, Tim. "What Is Gross Domestic Product?." Finance & Development (2008), 1
2
The World Bank.(n.d.).World Bank. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/country/pakistan
3
Callen, Tim. "What Is Gross Domestic Product?." Finance & Development (2008), 1
4
The World Bank.(n.d.).World Bank. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/country/pakistan
5
Carson, Carol S. "Foreign direct investment trends and statistics." International Monetary Fund (2003): 1
6
The World Bank.(n.d.).World Bank. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/country/pakistan
7
Folland, C. K., T. R. Karl, J. R. Christy, R. Clarke, G. Gruza, J. Jouzel, M. Mann, J. Oerlermans, M. Salinger, and S.
Wang, "Climate change 2001: the scientific basis." Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Houghton JT et al.), Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, UK (2001)
8
Ledley, Tamara S., Eric T. Sundquist, Stephen E. Schwartz, Dorothy K. Hall, Jack D. Fellows, and Timothy L.
Killeen, "Climate change and greenhouse gases." Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 80, no. 39 (1999),
453-458.
9
Kreft, Sönke, David Eckstein, and Inga Melchior. Global Climate Risk Index 2017: Who suffers most from extreme
weather events? Weather-related loss events in 2015 and 1996 to 2015.Germanwatch Nord-Süd Initiative eV, 2016, 28.
10
Wajeeha Malik, 1. S. (2011). Role of Pakistan in Global Climate Change through Greenhouse Gas Emissions
(GHGs). Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences
11
Qudrat-Ullah, Hassan, and Mustafa Karakul, "Modelling for policy assessment in the electricity supply sector of
Pakistan." International Journal of Energy Sector Management 1, no. 3 (2007), 240-256
12
Malyshev, Teresa, "Looking ahead: energy, climate change and pro-poor responses." foresight 11, no. 4 (2009), 33-
50
13
Malyshev, Teresa, "Looking ahead: energy, climate change and pro-poor responses." foresight 11, no. 4 (2009), 33-
50
14
World Nuclear Association, "Comparison of lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of various electricity generation
sources." WNA Report, London (2011)
15
World Nuclear Association, "Comparison of lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of various electricity generation
sources." WNA Report, London (2011)
16
Kaplan, Robert S., and David P. Norton, "Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to
strategic management: Part I." Accounting horizons 15, no. 1 (2001)
17
Lauren Hepler, “Fight over future carbon pricing has arrived’’ article GreenBiz dated 25 January, 2016
18
Aman, Alfred C. "The limits of globalization and the future of administrative law: from government to
governance." Indiana journal of global legal studies (2001): 379-400.
19
Higgins, Karen L. "Economic growth and sustainability-are they mutually exclusive." Striking a Balance between
Unbounded Economic Growth and Sustainability Requires a New Mind Set. Available online: http://www.
elsevier.com/connect/economic-growth-and-sustainability-are-they-mutually-exclusive#(accessed on 17 November
2015) (2013).
20
Garrón Bozo, Mauricio, "Energy policies in Latin America and the Caribbean and the evolution of
sustainability." International Journal of Energy Sector Management 2, no. 1 (2008), 8-35.
21
Lovell, Heather, and Donald MacKenzie, "Accounting for carbon: the role of accounting professional organisations
in governing climate change." Antipode 43, no. 3 (2011)