Professional Documents
Culture Documents
, 2020
ABSTRACT
Professional learning is now recognized as a vital component of policies and most influential factor of
teaching quality. Science teachers sustained professional learning experience to develop their
professional knowledge and practice in order to progress the quality of teaching and their standards.
To identify the influence of effective professional learning of secondary school science teachers, this
study explored the connection between teachers’ exposure to different kinds of professional learning
engagement and teaching competencies that have recognized that the quality of teaching was greatly
influenced by the quality of training. Descriptive-correlational method of research was utilized and
multiple regression analysis was employed to determine the influence of professional learning
engagement related variables on the teaching competencies. For the purpose of data collection, a
survey questionnaire was administered to the 89 Secondary School Science teachers from the Cluster
III of the Division of Quezon, Philippines which comprises of four (4) municipal districts namely: Lucban
District, Mauban District, Pagbilao District and Sampaloc District. Furthermore, the results revealed
that the singly or in combination of professional learning engagement related variables including the
types of professional learning and their level of acquisition have significantly predicted on teaching
competencies.
This study employed a descriptive method of Table 1 shows that the overall mean
P – ISSN 2651 - 7701 | E – ISSN 2651 – 771X | www.ioer-imrj.com
DIMARANAN, D.M., CHUA, E.N., Professional Learning Engagement of Secondary School Science Teachers
Direction Towards Enhancement of Teaching Competencies, pp. 20- 30
37
22
IOER INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH JOURNAL, VOL. 2, NO. 3, SEPT., 2020
impact of professional learning engagement was Table 2
moderate for the science teachers. . The Content Knowledge of Secondary School Science
Teachers
Indicators Mean SD VI
Table 1
Teacher-Respondents Perceptions on Professional 1. Biology Content 4.17 0.69 Acquired/
Learning Engagement Mastery
Indicators Mean SD VI 2. Chemistry Content 4.18 0.72 Acquired/
Mastery
1. Short – Term 2.87 0.88 High 3. Physics Content 4.12 0.71 Acquired/
Training Programs Impact Mastery
2. School – Based 2.58 0.96 High 4. Earth Science 4.21 0.67 Highly
Training Programs Impact Content Acquired/
3. Long – Term Training 2.28 1.06 Moderate Advanced
Programs Impact Overall 4.17 0.61 Acquired
4. Self – Learning 1.42 1.09 Least /Mastery
Modes Impact
5. Professional 1.32 1.19 Least
Organization Impact As claimed, science teachers have
Overall 2.10 0.81 Moderate acquired content knowledge and demonstrated
Impact the mastery of the subject through different
engagements and active participations.
The results show that most secondary However, the study conducted by UP UNISMED
school science teachers have participated and (2011), it cited that science teachers have
engaged more in training and seminars whether difficulty to teach the subject due to some factors.
school based, cluster based, district based, To this, it can be construed that mastery of the
division based and national based but to an subject needed a lot of focus to deal with the
average effect. The findings of the study signify concepts and theories.
that the professional learning engagement of
secondary school science teachers were 2.2 Level of acquisition in terms of
designed to enhance their professional acquired skills. The data in Table 3 present the
knowledge, skills, and attitudes of educators so summary of mean result of the acquired skills of
that they might, in turn, improve the learning of secondary school science teachers. As reflected,
students. These findings agreed with Rahman’s the teacher-respondents showed agreement that
(2011) that professional training is an important teachers have acquired/skilled.
part of teacher preparation programs, especially
for those aspects of teaching that are more skill- Table 3
like in their conception. Training teachers is more The Acquired Skills of Secondary School Science
Teachers
likely to lead to diversity in practice at all levels of
Indicators Mean SD VI
instruction.
1. Instructional 4.32 0.51 Highly
Capability Acquired/Highly
2. Analysis of the Level of Acquisition of Skilled
Professional Learning Engagement among 2. Process Skills 4.06 0.61 Acquired/Skilled
the Secondary School Science Teachers Overall 4.19 0.54 Acquired/Skilled
2.1 The Level of Acquisition in terms of This means that the science teachers are
Content Knowledge. The data in Table 2 capable in execute their acquired skills in
summarize the results perceived by the teaching science by providing meaningful
secondary school science teachers on that the learning opportunities for students and
teachers have acquired content knowledge and incorporating a variety of learning resources with
described them as with mastery of their subject classroom instruction to increase learning
field. options.
Table 7
Actual Teachers’ Performance of Secondary School Science Teachers
Key Result Areas (KRA) Mean SD VI
1. Teaching – Learning Process 4.37 0.52 Outstanding
2. Students’ Learning Outcome 4.14 0.56 Very Satisfactory
3. Professional Development 3.93 0.73 Very Satisfactory
4. Community Involvement 4.04 0.63 Very Satisfactory
Overall 4.12 0.54 Very Satisfactory
The result denotes that all science the students attain high standard of learning and
teachers work in congruence with all the understanding of the curricular goals and
elements of teaching-learning process to help objectives.
Table 8
Regression of Quality Teaching Effectiveness on Types of Professional Learning Engagement
β
4.1 Quality Teaching Effectiveness Types of Professional Learning Engagement Beta Model Summary
Knowledge of Subject Content Short Term Training Program .316 .451 R square : .203
Adjusted R2 : .194
F – Value : 22.155
Significance : .000
Inquiry Skills Short Term Training Program .324 .404 R square : .163
Adjusted R2 : .154
F – Value : 16.962
Significance : .000
Pedagogical skills Short Term Training Program .304 .445 R square : .198
Adjusted R2 : .189
F – Value : 21.485
Significance: .000
Technology skills Short Term Training Program .250 .337 R square : .113
Adjusted R2 : .103
F – Value : 11.116
Significance: .001
Curriculum Competence Short Term Training Program .286 .419 R square : .176
Adjusted R2 : .166
F – Value : 18.566
Significance: .000
Assessment and Reporting Short Term Training Program .203 .311 R square : .097
Adjusted R2 : .086
F – Value : 9.305
Significance: .003
Totality of Quality Teaching Effectiveness Short Term Training Program .276 .434 R square : .188
Adjusted R2 : .179
F – Value : 20.170
Significance : .000
Table 9
Regression of Quality Teaching Effectiveness on Level of Acquisitions
Quality Teaching Effectiveness Level of Acquisition β Beta Model Summary
Totality of Level of Acquisition .297 .770 R square : .655
Knowledge of Subject Content Adjusted R2 : .643
Professional Growth and Development .364 .792 F – Value : 53.825
Totality of Content knowledge .217 .809 Significance : .000
Assessment and Reporting Totality of Professional Practices .999 .802 R square : .643
Adjusted R2 : .639
F – Value : 156.897
Significance : .000
Totality of Quality Teaching Totality of Professional Practices .756 .875 R square : .815
Effectiveness Totality of Content knowledge .152 .896 Adjusted R2 : .809
F – Value : 125.007
Teaching Methodologies .194 .903 Significance : .000
First was the professional growth and strong connection to the knowledge of the subject
development which have significantly predicted content, technology skills and the totality of
the knowledge of the subject content; second was quality teaching effectiveness; and sixth was the
the collaboration which have significantly totality of the level of acquisition have significant
predicted the inquiry skills and curriculum effects to the knowledge of subject content and
competence; third was the teaching inquiry skills. This can be construed that the
methodologies which has strong connection to professional learning engagement in terms of the
the curriculum competence and totality of the level of acquisition, singly or in combination have
quality teaching effectiveness; fourth was the a great influence to the quality teaching
totality of professional practices which effectiveness. The results revealed that the
considered as the most influential predictors to professional competencies of teachers ensured
the pedagogical skills, curriculum competence, their commitment and dedication to the
technology skills, assessment and reporting and profession at their very best in order to enrich
totality of quality of teaching effectiveness; fifth their knowledge, improve their teaching skills,
was the totality of content knowledge having a enable to acquire new teaching methods and
Student Learning Outcomes Short Term Training Program .221 .345 R square : .119
Adjusted R2 : .109
F – Value : 11.725
Significance : .000
Professional Development Long Term Training Program .155 .226 R square : .294
Adjusted R2 : .278
Short Term Training Program .420 .506 F – Value : 17.914
Significance : .000
Community Involvement Short Term Training Program .335 .468 R square : .219
Adjusted R2 : .210
F – Value : 24.376
Significance : .000
Totality of Teachers’ Performance Short Term Training Program .283 .457 R square : .251
Long Term Training Program .122 .501 Adjusted R2 : .234
F – Value : 14.429
Significance : .000
Results show that there were two program. This means that professional learning
variables related to the types of professional engagement has powerful effect on teaching
learning registered as predictor to the teacher’s competencies.
performance. First was the short-term training
which significantly predicted teachers’ 4.4 Regression of teachers’
performance in terms of student learning performance on the level of acquisition from
outcomes, professional development, their engagement on professional learning.
community involvement and the totality of Table 11 show the regression analysis of
teachers’ performance. Meanwhile, the second teacher’s performance on the level of acquisition.
was the long-term training which significantly The finding reveals that the following
predicted the teacher’s performance in terms of professional learning engagement in terms of
teaching and learning process, student learning level of acquisition registered as predictors on
outcomes, professional development, teachers’ performance. First, instructional
community involvement and the totality of capability which has positive effects and most
teachers’ performance. This means that long- influential predictors to the teaching and learning
term training program and short-term training process, student learning outcomes and totality
have significantly influence to the teachers’ of teachers’ performance. Second, technology
performance. integration has strong connection to the teaching
All in all, the results explained teachers’ – learning process and totality of teachers’
performance as affected by the stated variables performance. Third, teaching preparation which
in types of professional learning in terms of short- was most likely to influence the student learning
term training program and long-term training outcomes. Fourth, totality of professional
Table 11
Regression Analysis of Teachers’ Performance on Level of Acquisition
Teacher’s Performance Level of Acquisition β Beta Model Summary
Instructional Capability .674 .660 R square : .532
Teaching and Learning Process Adjusted R2 : .515
Technology Integration .834 .696 F – Value : 37.203
Significance : .000
Totality of Professional Practices .385 .729
Totality of Teachers’ Performance Totality of Professional Practices .402 .228 R square : .619
Adjusted R2 : .605
Technology Integration F – Value : 45.962
.302 .428 Significance : .000
Akpan, O.E.(2017). The Influence of In-Service Rahman, F.M. (2011). Relationship between training
Training, Seminars and Workshops Attendance by of teachers and effectiveness teaching.
Social Studies Teachers on Academic http://ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No._4_2011/1
Performance of Students in Junior Secondary 8.pdf