Water Science

ScienceDirect
Water Science 32 (2018) 32–43

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/wsj

Natural diatomite as an effective adsorbent for heavy metals in water

and wastewater treatment (a batch study)

ElSayed ElBastamy ElSayed

Technical Office of Deputy Director, Central Lab for Environmental Quality Monitoring (CLEQM), National Water Research Center (NWRC),
Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation (MWRI), Egypt
Received 13 February 2017; received in revised form 31 January 2018; accepted 12 February 2018
Available online 18 May 2018

Abstract
This study presents an evaluation of Egyptian diatomite as a low cost adsorbent for the removal of heavy metal under different
conditions (pH, weight of diatomite and contact time). The adsorption of heavy metals was investigated under various pH values
ranged from 2 to 8 at 25 ◦ C. The obtained results indicate that at low pH (2–4), the removal efficiency of diatomite for heavy metal
increased slightly as the pH, adsorbent dose and contact time increased, while at pH > 4, the percentage of metal ions adsorbed
decreased with increasing pH due to precipitation of heavy metals. At pH equal 4, with using 2 g L−1 of diatomite and 75 min as
contact time, the maximum adsorption capacity of diatomite was obtained. The high adsorption capacity of diatomite makes it a
suitable low cost material for the removal of different heavy metals from aqueous solutions.
© 2018 National Water Research Center. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC
BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Keywords: Diatomite clay; Heavy metals treatment; Adsorption; Removal efficiency

1. Introduction

The removal of heavy metals ions from the environment is a big concern due to their association with health hazards
for all living organisms due to its toxicity and non-biodegradable nature (El-Bayaa et al., 2009; Xue et al., 2009). The
municipal and industrial solid wastes are another important source of pollution, which are considered a main source
of the heavy metals like Hg, Cd, Fe, Mn, Pb and the treatment of these wastes must be agreed with the environmental
standard before it is reused or returned to surface water (Ali and El-Sayed, 2017). There are many techniques have been
developed such as chemical precipitation, reverse osmosis, ion exchange, and adsorption to remove heavy metals and
other hazard materials from wastewaters (Shi et al., 2009). Among all of the previous techniques, the adsorption on

E-mail addresses: teta707@yahoo.com, teta707@hotmail.com

Peer review under responsibility of National Water Research Center.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsj.2018.02.001
1110-4929/© 2018 National Water Research Center. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND
license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
 E.E. ElSayed / Water Science 32 (2018) 32–43 33

clay and other chemical substances is considered to be a particularly more effective process specially by using low cost
and environment friendly martial for the removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewaters and aqueous solutions
(Lin and Juang, 2002; Swayampakula et al., 2009).
The most common sorption methods are using of natural clay minerals and activated carbon which has high metal
adsorption capacity (Ayala et al., 2008). Although activated carbon is effective in the removal of metal ions from
wastewater, it is expensive and requires chelating agents to enhance its performance, thus increasing treatment cost
(Oliveira et al., 2005). Some researchers have focused on using low cost, highly efficient sorbents for pollutants, and
the sorption behavior of several natural materials and chemical products has also been studied (Ijagbemi et al., 2009).
Some of these materials are clay minerals (Solener et al., 2008), agricultural bi-products, some aquatic plants, and
microorganisms (Ijagbemi et al., 2009). Most of these investigations have shown that natural materials can act as
good sorbents for hazard materials including heavy metals (Ali and El-Sayed, 2017), while the types and availability
of clay minerals also are important, because they are involved in choosing which pollutants will be treated. Egypt
has huge reserves of diatomite deposits in Gebel Elow El Masakheet at south west El-Fayoum Governorate. These
deposits vary in the quality grade from high, moderate to low (Ibrahim and Selim, 2011). The diatomite deposits
of the El-Fayoum area are fine and regular in lamination developed through seasonal fluctuation of sedimentation.
The deposits are overlain in some parts by detrital materials such as blown sands and semi-consolidated sandy clay.
Because diatomaceous deposits occur in the form of several disconnected outcrops extending over about 30 km from
Qasr Elsagha to Kom Oshim in the east, some authors concluded that they were formed in separate lakes.
Diatomite is a siliceous sedimentary rock composed of an amorphous form of silica (SiO2 ·nH2 O) containing a
small amount of microcrystalline material. It has a unique combination of physical and chemical properties such as
high porosity, high permeability, small particle size, large surface area, and low thermal conductivity. Due to these
properties the diatomite has been successfully used for cleaning drinking water or industrial and sewage waste water.
Sometimes it is blended with aluminum chloride or ferric chloride to enhance the filtration processes (Marquez et al.,
2004; Qdais and Moussa, 2004).
The removal of hazardous contaminants from wastewater using natural zeolite was performed by Ali et al. (2017).
Their results indicate that, the uptake of clinoptilolite for ammonium was ranged from 70 to 92%, while it ranged from
70 to 99% for heavy metals at various conditions. The removal efficiency of zinc from aqueous solution with different
adsorbents was investigated by Bhattacharya et al. (2006), the obtained results showed that the adsorption percentage
of zinc increased by increasing the concentration of the adsorbents to reach maximum uptake at 98% and pH between
5 and 7.
This study aims to investigate and evaluate the removal capacities of diatomite for some metal ions such as aluminum
(Al+3 ), barium (Ba+2 ), cadmium (Cd+2 ), chromium (Cr+3 ), copper (Cu+2 ), iron (Fe+2 ), lead (Pd+2 ), manganese (Mn+2 ),
nickel (Ni+2 ), and zinc (Zn+2 ). The adsorption experiments were performed in laboratory, using metal ions initial
concentration, pH of solution, and contact time as variables.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Identification of clay

Diatomite sample was obtained by the Egyptian Mineral Resources Authority from Kom Oshim in the east of
El-Fayoum Governorate (Fig. 1). The diatomite sample was crushed using roller mills and the small sizes were
selected to be prepared for the batch study, while the large size was used for physical and chemical identification. The
characterizations of diatomite were performed using X-ray (model X Pert PRO). All the previous analysis were done
including electroscaning microscope (ESM) at the Laboratories of The Egyptian Mineral Resources Authority.

2.2. Diatomite preparation for the study

A representative sample of diatomite was prepared for the batch experiment by washing with distilled water to
remove any non-adhesive impurities and then, dried in oven at 80 ◦ C for 24 h to remove any moisture. The diatomite
sample was grinded to 0.25–0.5 mm size to be used for the batch study (Reddy and Dastgheibi, 2014).
34 E.E. ElSayed / Water Science 32 (2018) 32–43

Fig. 1. The diatomite deposits in ElFayoum Depression (Kom Oshim), Egypt.

2.3. Heavy metals preparation

Metals stock standard of multi element (Al, Ba, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Ni and Zn, 1000 mg L−1 Merck Brand,
product ID: 1.11355.0100-100 mL), has been used to prepare various concentrations of heavy metals (0.5, 1, and
l0 mg L−1 ) with deionized water (APHA, 2012). The desired pH varying from 2 to 8 were obtained by adding negligible
drops of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or hydrochloric acid (HCl) to the solution.

2.4. Batch study

The experiments were performed in duplicate, while the blank and other concentrations of heavy metals (1.0, and
10 mg L−1 ) were measured as the quality control samples.
The equilibrium state for removing of heavy metals by diatomite clay was obtained by adding the constant weight
of absorbent (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 g) to 100 mL of initial concentrations of prepared aqueous solution of heavy metals (0.5,
1, and 10 mg L−1 ), with constant agitation shaking at100 rpm and 25 ◦ C to enhance the interaction of the diatomite
particles and heavy metals solution (Lasheen et al., 2017). It was observed that the equilibrium between absorbed
heavy metals ions and adsorbent was after 2 h (the heavy metals concentrations were measured for all samples after
every 15 min until reach to equilibrium state at which the heavy metals uptake is constant with insignificant changes).
However, to ensure that the absorption process reached to complete equilibrium the experiment was kept for 4 h. After
that the samples were filtered using filter paper and the concentration of different heavy metals ions were measured by
ICP-MS (model NexIon 300D), and the removal was calculated using Eq. (1):
(C0 − Ce )
Removal efficiency (%) = × 100 (1)
C0
where C0 is the initial concentration of heavy metals ions (mg L−1 ) and Ce is the equilibrium concentration of the
metal ions (mg L−1 ).

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Characterizations of Egyptian diatomite

The chemical composition of diatomite plays an important role in metals removal. In this study, the physical
properties of the Egyptian diatomite is presented in Table 1, while the X-ray diffraction analysis indicates that diatomite
 E.E. ElSayed / Water Science 32 (2018) 32–43 35

Table 1
The physicochemical properties of Kom Oshim diatomite at El Fayoum Governorate.
Parameters Value

Moisture content, % 81.5

Specific gravity, g mL−1 1.94
pH 8.34

Fig. 2. XRD pattern of diatomite (C = calcite and Q = quartarz).

Table 2
The chemical characteristics of the natural sorbent.
Ref. code Mineral name Chemical formula

96-900-1298 Calcite Ca5.62 Mg0.38 C6.00 O18.00

96-901-3322 Quartz Si3.00 O6.00
96-100-8758 Anorhtitesodian Na1.92 Ca2.08 Si10.00 Al6.00 O32.00

contains calcite, quartz and clay minerals as shown in Fig. 2 and Table 2. Fig. 3 presents the electroscaning microscope
(ESM) for the studied diatomite particles.
The presence of calcite gives an advantage to diatomite as adsorbent because, it is widely used as sorbent material
by formation of metal hydroxide or metal carbonate as reported by Al-Wakeel (2009), and also quartz is one of the
most common minerals found in the earth’s crust. Its structure shows unique physicochemical characteristics therefore
it can be used as sorbent substance (Ibrahim and Selim, 2011). In this study, it was found that the formation of metal
hydroxide and silicone dioxide due to presence of calcite and quartz respectively leads to increase the metals uptake
properties of diatomite.

3.2. Effect of pH

The adsorption capacity of heavy metals on the adsorbents surface is controlled by the pH of aqueous solution.
Therefore, the effect of various pH values at 25 ◦ C was investigated in the current study. The batch experiment
was conducted in acidic conditions (pH = 2) to ensure adsorption between diatomite particles and pollutants, due to in
alkaline media heavy metals start to precipitate (forming metal oxides and hydroxides), and also in higher pH conditions
the diatomite particles is slightly unstable as a results of presence of silica that can be precipitate or dissolve in alkaline
condition. So the batch experiments were conducted at pH equal to 2, to keep and preserves the chemical stability of
36 E.E. ElSayed / Water Science 32 (2018) 32–43

Fig. 3. Diatomite under electron microscope (ESM).

Fig. 4. Effect of pH for the removal of Al using 2 g of adsorbent.

the diatomite. The pH of the solution influence the chemical groups on to the adsorbent surfaces, where the following
equations describe the process (Sud et al., 2008):

M2+ + nH2 O → M(H2 O)2+

n (2)
n−1
n → M(H2 O)
M(H2 O)2+ + H+ (3)

nM2+ + mH2 O → M(OH)(2n−m)

m + mH+ (4)

In the current study, the removal of metal ions as a function of pH is illustrated in Figs. 4–13 and Tables 3–5.
The figures displayed a general trend of increasing heavy metals removal with increasing pH values until maximized
at pH = 4. The results indicate that the slow metal uptake shown by diatomite at low pH values (pH = 2), which can
be explained by increasing the positive charge (protons) density on the surface sites and thus, electrostatic repulsion
occurred between the heavy metal ions (M2+ ) and the edge groups with positive charge (Si–OH2+ ) on the surface of
diatomite, which is agreed with by Johnson and Hallberg (2005), while when pH of the solution varies from 2.0 to
4.0, the adsorption efficiency is increased, because the heavy metals solution is exposed to the negative charges on the
surface of diatomite and strongly attracting the metal ions. The highest adsorption percentage for heavy metal ions was
observed at pH equal to 4. According to the obtained data, diatomite is the efficient clay with the selectivity sequence
given as Pb > Mn > Ni > Zn > Cr > Fe > Cu > Cd > Ba > Al, due to the correlation between the ionic radii of heavy metals
with external and internal pore diameters of diatomite. The obtained results were agreed with the study performed by
Yusan et al. (2012) for using diatomite as adsorbent for heavy metals.
Table 3
Removal efficiency of different heavy metals concentrations using diatomite clay (2 g L−1 ).
No. Element Removal efficiency (%) at different initial concentrations and contact times

Time and conc. 1h 2h 3h 4h

0.5 1.0 10.0 0.5 1.0 10.0 0.5 1.0 10.0 0.5 1.0 10.0
(mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 )
1 Aluminum (Al+3 ) 80.6 78.8 80.2 95.8 95.4 95.1 91.5 90.8 90.2 91.0 90.1 90.2
2 Barium (Ba+2 ) 99.1 90.9 92.8 99.5 97.2 98.5 99.5 90.3 92.2 99.2 90.1 91.7
3 Cadmium (Cd+2 ) 99.1 98.9 96.1 99.5 99.3 99.1 99.0 98.7 98.0 99.0 97.2 95.1
4 Chromium (Cr+3 ) 98.0 95.3 95.2 99.7 99.5 99.2 99.23 97.3 98.3 99.0 97.1 97.3

E.E. ElSayed / Water Science 32 (2018) 32–43

5 Copper (Cu+2 ) 98.5 95.3 98.1 99.5 99.2 99.0 99.1 98.2 98.5 99.0 96.2 98.1
6 Iron (Fe+2 ) 96.3 93.4 93.2 99.0 95.3 97.8 97.5 95.1 95.4 96.0 94.4 95.0
7 Lead (Pb+2 ) 99.7 95.5 99.2 99.7 99.5 99.3 99.0 98.4 98.2 99.0 98.2 98.0
8 Manganese (Mn+2 ) 99.5 99.0 99.0 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.3 98.5 98.0 99.2 97.3 97.0
9 Nickel (Ni+2 ) 99.4 94.1 93.2 99.5 98.2 98.0 99.3 98.0 97.6 99.0 96.2 96.0
10 Zinc (Zn+2 ) 99.0 95.0 95.0 99.7 99.0 99.0 99.2 90.4 90.2 99.0 90.1 90.0

Table 4
Removal efficiency of different heavy metals concentrations using diatomite clay (1 g L−1 ).
No. Element Removal efficiency (%) at different initial concentrations and contact times

Time and conc. 1h 2h 3h 4h

0.5 1.0 10.0 0.5 1.0 10.0 0.5 1.0 10.0 0.5 1.0 10.0
(mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 )
1 Aluminum (Al+3 ) 79.2 76.0 80.0 85.1 94.2 92.2 83.1 90.3 90.0 89.1 90.0 90.0
2 Barium (Ba+2 ) 86.0 90.1 911 99.2 95.2 90.5 99.5 90.1 90.0 99.0 90.0 90.0
3 Cadmium (Cd+2 ) 99.0 97.2 96.9 98.9 99.0 99.0 99.0 98.2 97.4 89.1 95.0 94.8
4 Chromium (Cr+3 ) 98.1 89.1 94.0 99.1 99.0 98.2 99.1 96.5 98.0 98.3 97.0 97.0
5 Copper (Cu+2 ) 98.2 94.1 96.4 99.1 99.0 98.2 99.0 98.10 98.0 98.5 98.0 96.2
6 Iron (Fe+2 ) 81.3 90.1 92.1 86.8 91.1 90.3 79.0 90.0 90.0 78.6 89.3 89.1
7 Lead (Pb+2 ) 99.2 95.0 95.5 99.3 99.1 98.2 99.0 98.2 98.0 99.0 98.0 98.0
8 Manganese (Mn+2 ) 99.2 98.2 99.1 99.3 99.1 99.2 99.1 98.0 97.6 98.6 97.0 97.0
9 Nickel (Ni+2 ) 99.2 93.2 92.5 99.3 98.0 98.0 99.0 98.0 98.0 99.0 96.0 96.0
10 Zinc (Zn+2 ) 98.2 94.7 94.3 99.4 99.0 98.2 99.1 93.0 90.1 98.4 90.0 90.0

37
 38
Table 5
Removal efficiency of different heavy metals concentrations using diatomite clay (0.5 g L−1 ).

E.E. ElSayed / Water Science 32 (2018) 32–43

No. Element Removal efficiency (%) at different initial concentrations and contact times

Time and conc. 1h 2h 3h 4h

0.5 1.0 10.0 0.5 1.0 10.0 0.5 1.0 10.0 0.5 1.0 10.0
(mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 ) (mg L−1 )

1 Aluminum (Al+3 ) 55.2 78.2 74.3 78.1 94.0 92.0 78.4 90.0 88.2 80.0 82.0 86.2
2 Barium (Ba+2 ) 78.1 90.0 89.1 99.1 95.1 90.0 99.2 90.0 84.1 95.0 89.2 84.0
3 Cadmium (Cd+2 ) 93.9 96.1 95.9 98.2 99.0 98.9 98.6 96.1 96.5 99.9 94.3 92.2
4 Chromium (Cr+3 ) 98.0 93.4 88.0 89.8 89.4 98.0 99.0 96.0 97.0 98.9 96.2 96.4
5 Copper (Cu+2 ) 93.6 93.6 94.1 97.4 99.0 98.0 97.0 97.2 97.3 94.9 97.0 96.0
6 Iron (Fe+2 ) 72.0 89.4 89.2 82.1 90.5 89.1 90.0 89.3 89.8 72.5 89.0 87.3
7 Lead (Pb+2 ) 99.1 93.1 94.1 99.0 98.5 98.0 99.0 97.1 97.0 99.0 96.0 97.0
8 Manganese (Mn+2 ) 99.0 98.0 98.0 99.1 99.0 99.0 99.0 98.1 97.2 98.0 96.8 96.0
9 Nickel (Ni+2 ) 99.0 90.0 92.1 99.0 97.0 97.0 99.0 97.0 97.0 99.0 96.0 96.0
10 Zinc (Zn+2 ) 98.2 94.1 94.0 99.0 99.0 98.0 99.0 92.2 90.0 98.2 87.3 90.0
 E.E. ElSayed / Water Science 32 (2018) 32–43 39

Fig. 5. Effect of pH for the removal of Ba using 2 g of adsorbent.

Fig. 6. Effect of pH for the removal of Cd using 2 g of adsorbent.

Fig. 7. Effect of pH for the removal of Cr using 2 g of adsorbent.

3.3. Effect of adsorbent dosage

Adsorbent dosage is an important parameter because of its strong effect on the capacity of the diatomite at a given
initial concentration of the pollutants. The effect of various doses of diatomite (0.5, 1.0 and 2 g L−1 ) on heavy metals
removal was studied in the current study at 25 ◦ C and the results are listed in Tables 3–5. The obtained data regarding
removal efficiency of heavy metals is increased from 55.2% to 99.7% by increasing the amount of the adsorbent
between 0.5 and 2 g L−1 , this is because at low diatomite content, all surface sites are exposed for metal ions and the
surface reaches saturation faster, which means that the adsorption of metals had the highest values using 2 g L−1 of
40 E.E. ElSayed / Water Science 32 (2018) 32–43

Fig. 8. Effect of pH for the removal of Cu using 2 g of adsorbent.

Fig. 9. Effect of pH for the removal of Fe using 2 g of adsorbent.

Fig. 10. Effect of pH for the removal of Pb using 2 g of adsorbent.

the diatomite. Regarding the data, the removal efficiency was recorded 99.7% for Cr, Pb and Zn, while the lowest
value was recorded for Fe 99% using 2 g L−1 of the adsorbent. Therefore, the amount of 2 g L−1 was selected as the
optimum dosage of the used diatomite under study. Bilgin and Tulun (2015) studied the removal of lead ions from
wastewater using diatomite. The maximum obtained removal efficiency was 98.09% by using 1.5 g L−1 diatomite for
20 min, which is close to the results of the current study.
 E.E. ElSayed / Water Science 32 (2018) 32–43 41

Fig. 11. Effect of pH for the removal of Mn using 2 g of adsorbent.

Fig. 12. Effect of pH for the removal of Ni using 2 g of adsorbent.

Fig. 13. Effect of pH for the removal of Zn using 2 g of adsorbent.

3.4. Effect of contact time

The contact time is important factor that influence the adsorption of heavy metal ions onto diatomite. During the
current study, the batch experiment investigate the effect of contact time on interaction between diatomite particles and
metal ions at 25 ◦ C. The results are presented in Tables 3–5. The obtained results indicate that the removal percentage
started rapid and then became slower which can be explained by, at the beginning of the batch experiment, the large
surface area of diatomite is ready to interact with heavy metals (the adsorption capacity was high because all sites on
the adsorbent were vacant and heavy metals concentration was high) however with time the uptake rate was slowed due
to reduction in sorption sites. As soon as the surface of adsorption sites became filled with metal ions, the uptake rate
42 E.E. ElSayed / Water Science 32 (2018) 32–43

slightly decreased and controlled by the ability of metal ions can moved from outside to inside sites of the diatomite
particles (Yu et al., 2000).
In this study, removal efficiency for Ba, Cd, Pb, Mn, Ni and Zn indicates that it remained almost unchanged during
the experiment when the time increased from 15 to 70 min and recorded (99%–99.7%). The results revealed that the
optimum contact time for heavy metals removal is at 75 min, after that the adsorption percentage of metal ions gradually
decreased with increase in contact time. The obtained results are agreed with that found by Riza et al. (2010); Sheng
et al. (2009) and Varank et al. (2014) which investigate the removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions by
natural adsorbant.

4. Conclusions

Natural diatomite collected from El-Fayoum area has been investigated for the removal of different metal ions from
aqueous solutions. The batch study was preformed at various conditions such as pH, adsorbent dose and contact time.
The maximum percent removal of many heavy metal ions were observed at pH 4 and significantly decreased at higher
pH values, while metal ions removal is positively influenced by an increase in the adsorbent dosage and contact time.

5. Recommendation

Diatomite rocks are already found in governorate of El-Fayoum, South West of Cairo with large amount, while
the present study give an evidence that using of diatomite as low cost adsorbents for hazard material uptake from
wastewater is efficient, so it is recommended to use diatomite particles on large scale as a single unit in a treatment
plant for industrial wastewater, and then the treated water must be compared with the international guidelines to check
its ability to be reused.

Acknowledgements

This research was performed through using of ICP-MS (model NexIon 300D) funded by Science & Technology
Development Fund (STDF), project code 5186/2013.
Special appreciation and thanks to Dr. Mohamed Ramadan (The Egyptian Mineral Resources Authority) who bring
the diatomite from El-Fayoum Governorate and helped me well to prepare it for this study. I would especially like to
thank Prof. Dr. Maha Ali (Deputy Director and Operation Manager of CLEQM) you have been a tremendous mentor
for me.

References

Ali, M.M., El-Sayed, E.E., Kamel, M.Z., 2017. Removal of hazardous contaminants from wastewater using natural zeolite. J. Water Res. Photon
138, 333–347.
Ali, M.M., El-Sayed, E.E., 2017. Capability of natural bentonite for removing organic and inorganic pollutants from wastewater. J. Water Res.
Photon 138, 361–370.
Al-Wakeel, M.I., 2009. Characterization and process development of the Nile diatomaceous sediment. Int. J. Miner. Process. 92, 128–136.
APHA (American Public Health Association) 2012: Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22th ed. Washington, D.C.
3125–B.
Ayala, J., Vega, J.L., Alvarez, R., Loredo, J., 2008. Retention of heavy metal ions in bentonites from Grau Region (Northern Peru). Environ. Geol.
53, 1323–1330.
Bhattacharya, A., Mandal, S., Das, S., 2006. Adsorption of Zn (II) from aqueous solution by using different adsorbents. Chem. Eng. J. 123 (1),
43–51.
Bilgin, M., Tulun, S., 2015. Use of diatomite for the removal of lead ions from water: thermodynamics and kinetics. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip.
29 (4), 696–704.
El-Bayaa, A., Badawy, N., AlKhalik, E.A., 2009. Effect of ionic strength on the adsorption of copper and chromium ions by vermiculite pure clay
mineral. J. Hazard. Mater. 170 (2), 1204–1209.
Ibrahim, S.S., Selim, A.Q., 2011. Evaluation of Egyptian diatomite for filter aid applications. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 47 (2011),
113–122.
Ijagbemi, C.O., Baek, M.H., Kim, D.S., 2009. Montmorillonite surface properties and sorption characteristics for heavy metal removal from aqueous
solutions. J. Hazard. Mater. 166 (1), 538–546.
Johnson, D.B., Hallberg, K.B., 2005. Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review. Sci. Total Environ. 338, 3–14.
 E.E. ElSayed / Water Science 32 (2018) 32–43 43

Lasheen, M.R., El-Sherif, I.Y., El-Wakeel, S.T., Sabry, D.Y., El-Shahat, M.F., 2017. Heavy metals removal from aqueous solution using magnetite
Dowex 50WX4 resin nanocomposite. JMES 8 (2), 503–511.
Lin, S.H., Juang, R.S., 2002. Heavy metal removal from water by sorption using surfactant-modified montmorillonite. J. Hazard. Mater 92 (3),
315–326.
Marquez, G., Ribeiro, M., Ventura, J., Labrincha, J., 2004. Removal of nickel from aqueous solutions by clay-based beds. Ceram. Int. 30 (1),
111–119.
Oliveira, E., Montanher, S., Andrade, A., Nobrega, J., Rollemberg, M., 2005. Equilibrium studies for the sorption of chromium and nickel from
aqueous solutions using raw rice bran. Process Biochem. 40 (11), 3485–3490.
Qdais, H.A., Moussa, H., 2004. Removal of heavy metals from wastewater by membrane processes: a comparative study. Desalination 164 (2),
105–110.
Reddy, K.R., Dastgheibi, T.X.S., 2014. Removal of heavy metals from urban stormwater runoff using different filter materials. J. Environ. Chem.
Eng. 2, 282–292.
Riza, A.K., Alacabet, I., Kilic, N.C., 2010. Removal of metal ions from aqueous solution by diatomite. Hacettepe J. Biol. Chem. 38 (2), 85–93.
Sheng, G., Wang, S., Hu, J., Lu, Y., Li, J., Dong, Y., Wang, X., 2009. Adsorption of Pb(II) on diatomite as affected via aqueous solution chemistry
and temperature. Colloid Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 339 (1), 159–166.
Shi, W.Y., Shao, H.B., Li, H., Shao, M.A., Du, S., 2009. Progress in the remediation of hazardous heavy metal-polluted soils by natural zeolite. J.
Hazard. Mater. 170 (1), 1–6.
Solener, M., Tunali, S., Ozcan, A.S., Ozcan, A., Gedikbey, T., 2008. Adsorption characteristics of lead(II) ions onto the
clay/poly(methoxyethyl)acrylamide (PMEA) composite from aqueous solutions. Desalination 223 (1), 308–322.
Sud, D., Mahajan, G., Kaur, M., 2008. Agricultural waste material as potential adsorbent for sequestering heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions—a
review. Bioresour. Technol. 99 (14), 6017–6027.
Swayampakula, K., Boddu, V.M., Nadavala, S.K., Abburi, K., 2009. Competitive adsorption of Cu(II), Co(II) and Ni(II) from their binary and
tertiary aqueous solutions using chitosan-coated perlite beads as biosorbent. J. Hazard. Mater. 170 (2), 680–689.
Varank, G., Demir, A., Bilgili, M.S., Top, S., Sekman, E., Yazici, S., Erkan, H.S., 2014. Equilibrium and kinetic studies on the removal of heavy
metal ions with natural low-cost adsorbents. Environ. Protect. Eng. 40 (3), 43–61.
Xue, Y., Hou, H., Zhu, S., 2009. Competitive adsorption of copper(II), cadmium(II), lead(II) and zinc(II) onto basic oxygen furnace slag. J. Hazard.
Mater. 162 (1), 391–401.
Yu, B., Zhang, Y., Shukla, A., Shukla, S.S., Dorris, K.L., 2000. The removal of heavy metal from aqueous solutions by sawdust adsorption—removal
of copper. J. Hazard. Mater. 80 (1), 33–42.
Yusan, S., Gok, C., Erenturk, S., Aytas, S., 2012. Adsorptive removal of thorium(IV) using calcined and flux calcined diatomite from Turkey:
evaluation of equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic data. Appl. Clay Sci. 67, 106–116.