You are on page 1of 21

Kent's twelve

observation

www.similima.com 1
first observation:-
A prolonged aggravation
and final decline of the patient.
medicine
amel

agg

www.similima.com 2
Inference:-
The antipsoric was too deep, it has
established destruction.
The vital reaction is impossible in this state.
The case was an incurable one.
High potency.

What to do?
Medicine should be antidoted.
Lesson:-
In incurable cases and cases with organic
changes go for low potency.
www.similima.com 3
Second observation:-
long aggravation but final &slow
improvement.
medicine
amel

agg

www.similima.com 4
Inference:-
• Shows the beginning of some marked tissue
change in some organ.

• The state of the tissue can be understood.

• We can make out the prognosis of the case.

What to do?
Do not disturb the action of the dose.
www.similima.com 5
Third observation:-
the aggravation is quick, short and
strong with rapid improvement of the
patient.

medicine
amel

agg
www.similima.com 6
Inference:-
The reaction of the economy is vigorous.
No tendency to structural changes in the vital
organs.
The improvement will be marked.
What to do?
Do not disturb the action of the dose.
Lesson:-
In the case of perfect similimum slight agg of the
symptoms occurs in the 1st hrs after the remedy in
an acute sickness or 1st few days in chronic case.
www.similima.com 7
Fourth observation:-
no aggravation with recovery of the
patient.

medicine
amel

agg

www.similima.com 8
Inference:-
No organic diseases.
No tendency for organic diseases.
Right selection of potency.
Perfect similimum.

Lesson:-
It is the highest order of cure in acute affection.

www.similima.com 9
Fifth observation:-
the amelioration comes first and the
aggravation comes afterwards.

medicine
amel

agg
www.similima.com 10
Inference:-
Superficial remedy acted as a palliative.
Patient was incurable and the remedy was some
what suitable.

What to do?
Retake the case.

www.similima.com 11
Sixth observation:-
too short relief of the symptoms.

medicine
amel

agg

www.similima.com 12
Inference:-
 Make sure that pt did not do any thing to spoil
the case.
 In acute cases high grade inflammmatory
condition.
 In chronic cases presence of structural changes.
What to do?
In acute cases medicine to be repeated often.
In chronic cases a more similar medicine to be
selected.

www.similima.com 13
Seventh observation:-
full time amelioration of the symptoms,
yet no special relief of the patient.

medicine

amel

agg
www.similima.com 14
• Inference:-
• Latent conditions or organic changes.

• Lesson:-
• Only palliation possible in such condition.

www.similima.com 15
Eight observation:-
some patients prove every remedy
they get.

Medicine-1 Medicine-2 Medicine-3

Medicine-1 Medicine-2 Medicine-3

www.similima.com 16
Inference:-
• Pt may be hysterical or oversensitive to all
things.
• Idiosyncratic patients.

What to do?
• Go for low potencies.

www.similima.com 17
Ninth observation:-
action of medicines on provers.

www.similima.com 18
Tenth observation:-
appearance of new symptoms after
the remedy.

Inference:-
Greater the array of new symptoms more doubt it
throws upon the correctness of prescription.

What to do?
Retake the case and try to find the similimum.

www.similima.com 19
Eleventh observation:-
old symptoms reappear.

Inference:-
Pt is on the road to recovery
Cure from center to periphery.
What to do?
If the symptoms comes and goes then no need to
disturb if symptoms remain then repeat the dose.

www.similima.com 20
Twelfth observation:-
symptoms take wrong direction.
Inference:-
Incurable state of patient.
Wrong prescription.
Not following Herings law of cure.

What to do?
Antidote the medicine

www.similima.com 21

You might also like