Professional Documents
Culture Documents
26
PARASCHIV LIZICA-SIMONA
ABSTRACT
In this paper an analytical study has performed to determined variation of the terminal settling velocities, of the
spherical particles in water. Settling of particles has governed by density of fluid, size, shape and density of particles.
For a spherical particle settling in a Newtonian fluid in the laminar flow regime, the settling velocity is given by Stokes
equation.
43
Constanta Maritime University Annals Year XVII, Vol.26
In the region of higher Reynolds numbers (2 < Re < When the Reynolds number is greater than 200000
500), CD becomes: the drag forces decreases substantially and CD
becomes 0.1. No settling occurs at this condition.
24 3
CD 0,34 . (5)
Re Re T = 1000(1 - (T+288.9414)/
,.(7)
/(508929.2*(T+68.12963))*(T-3.9863)^2)
In the turbulent flow region (500<Re<200000) the
CD , remains approximately constant at 0.44. The T = density as a function of temperature,
velocity of settling particles results in Newton’s [kg/m3],
equation:
T = temperature, [K].
u 1, 74
p T gD . (6)
-3
x 10
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
Particles diameter [m]
0.6
Tw =4 C
0.5
Tw =20 C
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14
Settling velocity [m/s]
0.9
0.8
0.7
Particles diameter [m]
0.6
0.5
0.4
Tw =4 C
0.3
Tw =20 C
0.2
0.1
0
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2
Settling velocity [m/s]
Figure 2 Relationship between settling velocity and iron oxide particles diameter
44
Constanta Maritime University Annals Year XVII, Vol.26
-3
x 10
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.3 Tw =4 C
0.2
0.1
0
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18
Settling velocity [m/s]
Figure 3 Settling velocity for sand and iron oxide particles diameter
-3
x 10
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
Particles diameter [m]
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2 Tw =20 C
0.1
0
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2
Settling velocity [m/s]
Figure 4 Settling velocity for sand and iron oxide particles diameter
The graphics show the fall speed, or settling velocity in this case is higher because of influence of
velocity, as function of particle size for particles of sands particle density which are higher too.
and iron oxide. We can notice that dust particles with diameters less
Figure 1 show the relationship between settling than 0.2 mm fall at a speed of about 10 mm/s. Particles
velocity and sand particles diameter, for different water larger than 0.2 mm in diameter fall disproportionately
temperatures, 4C and respectively 20C. faster: 0.5 mm particles fall at about 48 mm/s. Particles
In Figure 2 was determined the relationship smaller than 0.2 mm settle very slowly. 0.10 mm
between settling velocity and iron oxide particles particles fall at only 3 mm/second while 0.05 mm
diameter, for different water temperatures, 4C and particles fall at only 0.8 mm/s, so the finest particles
respectively 20C. We can notice that the settling settle so slowly that they has transported across settler
without settling.
45
Constanta Maritime University Annals Year XVII, Vol.26
In Figures 3 and 4 has compared the settling tanks for water purification, Journal of Environmental
velocity for those two types of particle. Management 189, 22-28
[2] HRIBERSEK, M., ZAJDELA, B., HRIBERNIK, A.,
3. CONCLUSIONS ZADRAVEC, M., Experimental and numerical
investigations of sedimentation of porous wastewater
Knowledge of the terminal settling velocity of sludge flocs, Water Research 4 5, 2011
solids in liquids has required in many industrial [3] GUTIÉRREZ, R., FERRER, I., UGGETTI, E.,
applications. The fall velocity depends on the density, ARNABAT, C., SALVADÓ, H., GARCÍA, J., Settling
viscosity of the fluid, and the density, size, shape, and velocity distribution of microalgal biomass from urban
surface texture of the particle. wastewater treatment high rate algal ponds, Algal
For particles smaller than 0.2 mm we can see that Research 16 (2016,) 409–417
influence of water temperature, respectively influence of [4] CHEREMISINOFF Nicholas P., Handbook of water
water density is smaller but as the diameter of particles and wastewater treatment technologies, 2002,
increase the influence are getting higher. Butterworth-Heinemann
[5] WEINER E. R., MATTHEWS A. R., Environmental
4. REFERENCES engineering, 2003, Butterworth-Heineman.
[6] WILSON E. Thomas, CLARIFIER DESIGN, 2005,
[1] OCHOWIAK, M., MATUSZAK, M., Water Environment Federation
WŁODARCZAK, S., ANCUKIEWICZ, M., [7] SHUN D. L., Water and Wastewater, Calculations
KRUPINSKA A., The modified swirl sedimentation Manual, 2001, McGraw-Hill Companies.
46
Copyright of Analele Universitatii Maritime Constanta is the property of Analele Universitatii
Maritime Constanta and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to
a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may
print, download, or email articles for individual use.