You are on page 1of 3

Schizophrenia Research 76 (2005) 127 – 129

www.elsevier.com/locate/schres

Letter to the Editors

Efficacy of clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and The NOSIE version we used consists of 30 items,
haloperidol in schizophrenia and schizoaffective each rated according to its frequency of occurrence: (0)
disorder assessed with nurses observation scale for never; (1) occasionally; (2) sometimes; (3) often, and
inpatient evaluation (4) always. The items cluster into six factors: Social
competence, Social interest, Personal neatness, Irrita-
bility, Manifest psychosis, and Retardation (Honigfeld,
Dear Editors,
1974).
In our study, the NOSIE was usually administered
Studies to determine the efficacy of antipsychotics by a research nurse who read the NOSIE items and the
have relied primarily on scales assessing psychotic choice of answers to the ward nurse or the therapy
symptoms, e.g. the Positive and Negative Syndrome aide who knew the patient well and observed his or
Scale (PANSS) (Kay et al., 1987). These ratings are her behavior. The behavior that was captured by the
typically completed by highly trained professional NOSIE was limited to the three days preceding the
researchers whose contact with the patient may be interview. Minimal training was provided in the
limited. administration of the NOSIE. The PANSS was usually
However, treatment outcome includes not only administered on the same day as the NOSIE. The
reductions in symptoms, but also changes in func- NOSIE and the PANSS were not administered by the
tional ability. The Nurses Observational Scale for same people. The results of the NOSIE were not
Inpatient Evaluation (NOSIE) (Honigfeld, 1974) is a known by the person administering the PANSS, and
ward behavior rating scale complementing the more vice versa. Statistical analyses were analogous to
widely used psychiatric scales, and is easier to those described elsewhere (Volavka et al., 2002).
administer and score than instruments such as the The results are summarized in Table 1. Statistically
PANSS. We implemented a study that used both significant improvements in comparison with baseline
PANSS (the primary measure of efficacy) and NOSIE were detected for clozapine and olanzapine for the
(a secondary outcome measure). The PANSS results NOSIE total score as well as for three subscales (Social
have been published (Volavka et al., 2002). In this competence, Social interest, and Manifest psychosis).
letter we report the NOSIE results and compare them Clozapine was the only treatment that was associated
with the PANSS. with a significant improvement of Irritability. Neither
The subjects were 157 treatment-resistant patients risperidone nor haloperidol were associated with a
diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective dis- significant improvement on any NOSIE measure.
order. The patients were randomly assigned to treat- Clozapine and olanzapine showed significant supe-
ment with clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, or riority over haloperidol on NOSIE total score and
haloperidol in a 14-week, double-blind prospective manifest psychosis; clozapine was also superior to
study. Written informed consent and institutional haloperidol on social interest. Risperidone was not
review board approvals were obtained. The interrater significantly superior to haloperidol on any measure.
reliability, estimated by intraclass correlation coeffi- Clozapine, olanzapine, and risperidone showed no
cient (ICC) for the PANSS total score for paired significant differences from each other on pairwise
ratings ranged between 0.93 and 0.98 (Volavka et al., tests. The correlation coefficients between the total
2002). scores of the NOSIE and the PANSS at baseline and at
0920-9964/$ - see front matter D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.schres.2004.11.007
128 Letter to the Editors

Table 1
NOSIE baseline scores (expressed as points per item) and analyses of change with clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol treatment
NOSIE measure and drug Baseline Changea Analyses
b
Mean SD Mean 95% CI Change from baseline Superiority over haloperidol
t (df=838) pc t (df=838) pc
Total
Clozapine 1.37 0.50 0.23 0.41 to 0.05 2.57 0.0105 2.01 0.0443
Olanzapine 1.00 0.49 0.22 0.37 to 0.06 2.73 0.0065 2.01 0.0443
Risperidone 1.19 0.51 0.10 0.27 to 0.06
Haloperidol 1.22 0.47 0.02 0.15 to 0.18

Social competence
Clozapine 1.06 0.76 0.24 0.45 to 0.03 2.28 0.0231
Olanzapine 0.70 0.67 0.27 0.45 to 0.08 2.77 0.0057
Risperidone 0.94 0.69 0.15 0.35 to 0.05
Haloperidol 0.86 0.59 0.07 0.27 to 0.13

Social interest
Clozapine 2.61 0.88 0.45 0.72 to 0.18 3.28 0.0011 1.76 0.0789
Olanzapine 2.17 0.82 0.43 0.70 to 0.16 3.08 0.0021
Risperidone 2.41 0.96 0.10 0.38 to 0.17
Haloperidol 2.48 0.76 0.11 0.38 to 0.15

Personal neatness
Clozapine 1.65 0.98 0.08 0.25 to 0.40
Olanzapine 0.99 0.83 0.19 0.49 to 0.12
Risperidone 1.47 1.12 0.04 0.35 to 0.28
Haloperidol 1.39 0.90 0.01 0.33 to 0.30

Irritability
Clozapine 1.08 1.12 0.45 0.77 to 0.13 2.78 0.0055
Olanzapine 0.74 0.83 0.12 0.38 to 0.15
Risperidone 0.94 0.91 0.12 0.42 to 0.17
Haloperidol 1.05 0.99 0.12 0.41 to 0.17

Manifest psychosis
Clozapine 1.29 1.00 0.52 0.82 to 0.21 3.33 0.0005 3.42 0.0007
Olanzapine 0.92 0.98 0.27 0.54 to 0.00 1.94 0.0527 2.39 0.0170
Risperidone 0.77 0.85 0.12 0.41 to 0.17
Haloperidol 0.97 0.81 0.22 0.07 to 0.51

Retardation
Clozapine 1.20 1.04 0.12 0.15 to 0.39
Olanzapine 0.90 0.69 0.02 0.28 to 0.25
Risperidone 1.22 0.94 0.18 0.45 to 0.10
Haloperidol 1.08 1.06 0.05 0.22 to 0.33
a
Change per one NOSIE item at study end point estimated on the basis of Hierarchical Linear Model (HLM) analysis. (For details on HLM,
see Volavka et al., 2002).
b
Confidence interval.
c
p values b 0.10 are listed.

endpoint were, respectively, 0.420 ( pb0.0001) and usually nurses who had minimal training in the
0.615 ( pb0.0001). administration of the scale, achieved very similar
Overall, the NOSIE results were remarkably results as the PANSS raters, usually scientists at a
consistent with the PANSS. The NOSIE raters, doctoral level, who had received rigorous training
Letter to the Editors 129

reflected by a very high interrater reliability. The Volavka, J., Czobor, P., Sheitman, B., Lindenmayer, J.-P., Citrome,
results underscore the value of the information that L., McEvoy, J., Cooper, T.B., Chakos, M., Lieberman, J.A.,
2002. Clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol in
can be obtained from ward personnel and research treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffec-
nurses. The NOSIE can add a measure of functioning tive disorder. Am. J. Psychiatry 159, 255 – 262.
and validate outcomes assessed by the PANSS.
Jan Volavka*
Karen A. Nolan
Acknowledgements Linda Kline
Pal Czobor
NIMH grant (R10 MH53550) provided the Leslie Citrome
principal support for this project. Additional support Nathan Kline Institute, 140 Old Orangeburg Road,
was provided by the UNC-Mental Health and Orangeburg, NY 10962, United States
Neuroscience Clinical Research Center (MH E-mail address: volavka@nki.rfmh.org.
MH33127) and the Foundation of Hope, Raleigh *Corresponding author. Tel.: +845 398 6567;
North Carolina. We thank Janssen Pharmaceutica fax: 845 398 6566.
Research Foundation, Eli Lilly and Company,
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, and Merck Brian Sheitman
and Co. for their generous gifts of medications. Eli Dorothea Dix Hospital, 809 Ruggles Road, Raleigh,
Lilly and Company contributed supplemental fund- NC 27603, United States
ing that covered approximately 18% of the total
cost of the study. However, overall experimental Jean-Pierre Lindenmayer
design, data acquisition, statistical analyses, and Manhattan Psychiatric Center, Wards Island,
interpretation of the results were implemented NY 10035, United States
without any input from any of the pharmaceutical
companies. Joseph McEvoy
John Umstead Hospital, 1003 12th Street, Butner,
NC 27509, United States
References
Jeffrey A. Lieberman
Honigfeld, G., 1974. Nosie-30: history and current status of its use University of North Carolina Medical School, Wing B,
in pharmacopsychiatric research. Mod. Probl. Pharmacopsy- University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill,
chiatry 7, 238 – 263.
Kay, S.R., Fiszbein, A., Opler, L.A., 1987. The positive and NC 27599, United States
negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr.
Bull. 13, 261 – 276. 26 May 2004

You might also like