You are on page 1of 3

Non-Local

Table 1 The Non-Locals Evaluation on the Proposed Website in terms of Content

The table no. 1 indicates that the question of "The content on the website is relevant to the shoe
industry in Marikina City" (Question no. 4) has the highest weighted mean of 4.8, it is interpreted as
Excellent because of the content of the website is relevant to the shoe industry in Marikina City on the
other hand, "The content meets your need, goals, and interest" (Question no. 5) has the lowest
weighted mean of 4.1, it is interpreted as Good because the website content meet some of need, goals,
and interest. With a grand weighted mean of 4.44 that the Content of the website is interpreted as
Excellent.

Table 2 The Non-Locals Evaluation on the Proposed Website in terms of Design

The table no. 2 presents that the question of "The font color is contrast to the background" (Question
no. 5) has the highest weighted mean of 4.38, it is interpreted as Excellent because of the font color is
contrast to the background on other hand, "The layout of the website is appropriate for the industry"
(Question no. 1) has the lowest weighted mean of 3.9, it is interpreted as Good because of some layout
is not appropriate for the shoes industry. With a grand weighted mean of 4.38 that the Design of the
website is interpreted as Excellent.

Table 3 The Non-Locals Evaluation on the Proposed Website in terms of Functionality

The table no 3 indicates that the question of "The navigation labels are clear and concise" (Question no.
4) and "The site uses a navigation back button" (Question no. 5) has the same highest weighted mean of
4.8, it is interpreted as Excellent because the navigation labels are clear and concise and the site uses a
navigation back button on other hand, "The navigation is easy to manipulate to open other pages"
(Question no. 3) has the lowest weighted mean of 4.1, it is interpreted as Good because some of the
navigation is not easy to manipulate to open other pages. With a grand weighted mean of 4.5 that the
Functionality of the website is interpreted as Excellent.
Local

Table 4 The Local Evaluation on the Proposed Website in terms of Content

The table no 4 presents that the question of "The information of the website is accurate" (Question no.
1) has the highest weighted mean of 4.4, it is interpreted as Excellent because the information of the
website is accurate on other hand, "The information is up to date" (Question no. 2) and "The content
meets your needs, goals, and interest" (Question no. 5) has the same lowest weighted mean of 3.6, it is
interpreted as Good because some of the information is not up to date and some of content not meet
the needs, goals, and interest. With a grand weighted mean of 3.84 that the Content of the website is
interpreted as Good.

Table 5 The Local Evaluation on the Proposed Website in terms of Design

The table no. 5 indicates that the question of "The font size of the text is easy to read" (Question no. 2)
has the highest weighted mean of 4.5, it is interpreted as Excellent because the font size of the text is
easy to read on other hand, "The style is consistent throughout the site" (Question no. 4) has the lowest
weighted mean of 3, it is interpreted as Satifactory because the style is not consistent throughout the
site. With a grand weighted mean of 3.68 that the Design of the website is interpreted as Good.

Table 6 The Local Evaluation on the Proposed Website in terms of Functionality

The table no. 6 presents that the question of "The site uses a navigation back button" (Question no. 5)
has highest weighted mean of 4.3, it is interpreted as Excellent because the site uses a navigation back
button on other hand, "The sites navigation consistently working to the other pages" (Question no. 2)
has the lowest weighted mean of 3.3, it is interpreted as Satifactory because the site navigation is not
constantly working to other pages. With a grand weighted mean of 3.74 that the Functionality of
website is interpreted as Good.
ICT Student

Table 7 The ICT Student Evaluation on the Proposed Website in terms of Content

The table no. 7 indicates that the question of "The information on the website is accurate" (Question no.
1) and "The content of the website is relevant to the shoe industry in Marikina City" (Question no. 4) has
same highest weighted mean of 4.64, it is interpreted as Excellent because the information on the
website is accurate and the content of the website is relevant to the shoe industry in Marikna City on
other hand "The information is sufficient to the intended audience" (Question no. 3) has a lowest of
weighted mean of 4.34, it is interpreted as Excellent because the information is sufficient to the
audience. With a grand weighted mean of 4.52 that the Content of the website is interpreted as
Excellent.

Table 8 The ICT Student Evaluation on the Proposed Website in terms of Design

The table 8 presents that the question of "The font size of the text is easy to read" (Question no. 2) has
the highest weighted mean of 4.66, it is interpreted as Excellent because the font size of the text is easy
to read on other hand, "The colour Combinations are pleasing to the eyes" (Question no. 3) has the
lowest weighted mean of 4.42, it is interpreted as Excellent because the color combination are pleasing
to the eyes. With a grand weighted mean of 4.54 that the Design of the website is interpreted as
Excellent.

Table 9 The ICT Student Evaluation on the Proposed Website in terms of Functionality

The table 9 indicates that the question of "The navigation label are clear and concise" (Question no. 4)
has the highest weighted mean of 4.7, it is interpreted as Excellent because the navigation label are
clear and concise on the other hand, "The site uses a navigation back button" (Question no. 5) has the
lowest weighted mean of 4.44, it is interpreted as Excellent because the site uses a navigation back
button. With a grand weighted mean of 4.59 that the Functionality of the website is interpreted as
Excellent.

You might also like