Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This article examines how organizations integrate the Internet into crisis commu-
nication. Results suggest four findings about Internet usage in crisis. First, a
majority of the organizations studied are turning to the Internet to communicate
with the public and the news media during a crisis. Second, organizational type
does not appear to be a factor in the integration of the Internet in crisis response
with financial organizations, new technology organizations, and consumer prod-
uct organizations as the most frequent adopters. Third, crisis type does not
appear to be a factor in an organization’s decision to use the Internet in its imme-
diate crisis response. Fourth, although most organizations are incorporating
both traditional and new media communication tactics into their responses to cri-
sis, there is a continued preference for traditional tactics. These findings illus-
trate how mediated communication may create new possibilities for crisis
response and are translated into suggestions for how managers can integrate new
media into their mix of communication tactics in crisis management.
straints during crisis (p. 108). Since 1990, the Internet and CMC
have emerged as even more valuable tools. CMC, then, and the use
of the Internet, in particular, may augment organizational crisis
management communication.
Communication managers can also gain valuable insight by
learning how other organizations have integrated CMC into crisis
management. Unfortunately, little evidence exists about the use of
CMC in preparing for and managing crises. Thus, the interest of
this article is in the different ways that crisis may be prepared for
and managed by CMC. Two environmental variables and one out-
put variable were examined through a study of mediated response
to crisis. The environmental variables, industry type and crisis
type, were examined to determine their relationship to an organiza-
tion’s decision to integrate a mediated response to a crisis. A third
variable, the communication tactics used in actual mediated
responses, was also examined to uncover if new tactics are emerg-
ing that provide organizations with innovative ways to manage cri-
sis communication. When examined together, industry type, crisis
type, and communication tactics illustrate different mediated
responses to crisis. To provide a rationale for this article, the first
section examines how organizations can use the Internet to prepare
for and manage crisis. The second section of the article reports the
results of a study that examined the incorporation of the Internet
into organizational crisis response. The final section of the article
provides specific considerations for communication managers on
the ways in which mediated communication may create new possi-
bilities for crisis response.
COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION
AND CRISIS
agement provides some insight into its use as a tool that can aug-
ment current organizational response practices. If organizations are
using their Web sites, then certain tactics may emerge as useful
communication tools. Organizational types with Internet or new
technology expertise may be more likely to incorporate CMC into
their crisis management, whereas organizations that are not
involved in the technology business may not be able to incorporate
quickly a mediated response to a crisis. Different adoption patterns
may emerge across industry types. In addition, the type of crisis
facing an organization may also be related to the decision to use a
mediated response in crisis management. Together, the research
questions and hypotheses attempt to uncover how CMC is incorpo-
rated into crisis response.
METHOD
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
PROCEDURES
TACTICS OPERATIONALIZATION
RESULTS
TABLE 1: (continued)
Time (Date)
1 2 3 Row
(October 1998) (October 1999) (April 2000) Totals
Crises observed 20 16 14 50
Internet use
Did not use 8 2 8 18
Used 12 14 6 32
% of Internet use 60 88 43 M = 64
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
Pauchant, T., & Mitroff, I. (1992). Transforming crisis prone organizations. San
Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A
resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper Row.
Ramsey, S. (1993). Issues management and the use of technologies in public rela-
tions. Public Relations Review, 19, 261-275.
Rice, R. E. (1990). From adversity to diversity: Application of communication
technology to crisis management. In T. Housel (Ed.), Advances in telecommu-
nications management, Vol. 3: Information technology and crisis management
(pp. 91-112). New York: JAI Press.
Seeger, M. W. (1986). CEO performances: Lee Iacocca and the case of Chrysler.
Southern Speech Communication Journal, 52, 52-68.
Seeger, M. W., Sellnow, T. L., & Ulmer, R. R. (2001). Public relations and crisis
communication: Organizing and chaos. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of pub-
lic relations (pp. 155-166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thomsen, S. R. (1995). Using online databases in corporate issues management.
Public Relations Review, 21, 103-122.
Tyler, L. (1997). Liability means never being able to say you’re sorry. Manage-
ment Communication Quarterly, 11, 51-64.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2002). E-commerce report. Available: http://www.cen-
sus.gov/eos/www/ ebusiness614.htm
Walther, J. B. (1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-
mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 23, 342-369.
Witmer, D. F. (2000). Spinning the Web: A handbook for public relations on the
Internet. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.