Professional Documents
Culture Documents
T he focus of the
Chalcedon Report is
the ministry work of the
of His Kingdom. (2) Such miracles don’t
accompany Chalcedon’s work. Therefore,
(3) Chalcedon’s work doesn’t truly
Chalcedon Foundation. advance the Kingdom, but some lesser,
It’s the publication where arguably compromised agenda.
we communicate with The fascinating thing is that this
our supporters about the work we’re pur- critic is right, but not for the reasons
suing to equip the saints for advancing he thinks. The fault doesn’t lie in the
the Kingdom of God. While this article logic, which is impeccable, but in the
is no exception (we’ll be discussing recent definitions, which are weak and beggarly.
past events as well as on-going and future
The God Who Works
projects further down), it would be use-
Before we reach the heart of the
ful, as the year is ending, to take stock of
argument, we would do well to consider
the purpose behind Chalcedon’s work.
the assumptions it comes clothed in. For
This accounts for the title I’ve chosen
example, one point urged by my well-
… a title you’d expect to find in Arise &
meaning critic is the sharp line between
Build but not in the Chalcedon Report.
the mundane (the everyday world) and
In short, it would be valuable to
the supernatural (where the signs of the
get our bearings, to see where we’re
Kingdom’s advance are to be manifested).
positioned in the flow of history and
And the vigor with which he promoted
God’s purpose in it, and what forces
this sharp distinction suggests that it
continue to shape our work. The better
undergirds his critique: if this line were
we understand the Kingdom and how it
Mark Rushdoony addressing the to be blurred, then the objections start to
advances, the more wisely we’ll undertake Future of Christendom conference attendees lose their force.
the task of equipping the saints for the in Reading, PA.
We tend to forget that the mundane,
work before them.
marching orders. In the opinion of the the everyday world we live in, doesn’t
The Advance of Christ’s Kingdom well-meaning critic, we’ve lost faith in just happen to exist as some brute fact.
In a recent on-line dialogue, the view a supernatural God, and this hobbles In a sense, it is being forced to exist—
was put forward that various miraculous and cripples the Kingdom because we continually. Christ is “upholding all
works ought to be accompanying the focus upon the mundane and exclude things by the word of His power” (Heb.
Kingdom as it advances. Miraculous the supernatural. Our faith, as it were, 1:3). Without God’s providence, the
healings, the casting out of demons, etc., is supposedly secularized and thus creation would unravel: He is intimately
were being heralded as essential evidences cramped. The logical conclusion of such involved in its governance. This is why
indicating that the Kingdom of God was reasoning is that God is not working creation and providence are two sides
present and moving forcefully in our through us as He otherwise might to the same coin: they lean upon one
midst. because we’ve ruled out the primary ways another. To the extent we lose sight
The absence of such overt in which He manifests His power to of this fact, we can drift inadvertently
manifestations of the miraculous was advance His Kingdom. into deism and the idea of the Absentee
regarded as evidence that our Kingdom The argument reduces to this: (1) Landlord.
efforts today fall woefully short of God’s Miracles always accompany the advance Warfield used to illustrate this