Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Problems
Dominant expression (RAPD, AFLP)
Low polymorphism (RFLP. allozyme)
Cross Parentage
1 Hokkai100-5z × UC157-50
2 WC-103 × WC-98
3 Gold Schatz-1 × Hokkai100-3
z
Each number after cultivar names indicates the
individual plant number.
Materials and Methods
Methods
DNA extraction with modified CTAB method
PCR amplification
PCR with SSR primer sets
(AG2, AG3, AG7, AG10, TC1 and TC7)
Genotyping
Genotyping by using the capillary sequencer
and GENESCAN
Progeny genotype
SSR Cross Prospected genotype Expected ratio χ2 P
(Number of plants)
AG2 2 151/157×151/157 151/151 151/157 157/157 1: 2: 1 4.235 0.120
(23) (34) (11)
3 151/155×147/157 147/151 147/155 151/157 155/157 1: 1: 1: 1 0.870 0.833
(34) (30) (32) (27)
AG3 2 214/216×214/216 214/214 214/216 216/216 1: 2: 1 0.235 0.889
(18) (32) (18)
3 214/216×214/218 214/214 214/216 214/218 216/218 1: 1: 1: 1 6.138 0.105
AG2 (35) (39) (21) (28)
AG7 1 174/178×178/178 174/178 178/178 1: 1 0.480 0.488
Cross 2 (34) (41)
Segregation of the crossed progenies was not significantly
3 Progeny
174/178×172/174 172/174 genotype
172/178 174/174 174/178 1: 1: 1: 1 0.285 0.963
Prospected genotype (33) (31) (30) Expected ratio χ2
(29) P
different from Mendelian expectation at P=0.05.
AG10 1 (Number
177/183×177/177 177/177 of plants)
177/183 1: 1 0.000 1.000
Each SSR locus was governed by a single locus.
151/157×151/157 151/151 (37) 151/157(38) 157/157 1: 2: 1
0.120 4.235
3 177/183×177/177 177/177 177/183 1: 1 0.293 0.589
(23) (58)(34)(65) (11)
TC1 1 211/213×219/225 211/219 211/225 213/219 213/225 1: 1: 1: 1 3.240 0.356
(15) (21) (15) (24)
2 219/221×219/225 219/219 219/225 219/221 221/225 1: 1: 1: 1 6.824 0.078
(8) (22) (18) (20)
3 219/225×219/225 219/219 219/225 225/225 1: 2: 1 4.366 0.113
(40) (59) (24)
TC7 1 208/218×208/212 208/208 208/212 208/218 212/218 1: 1: 1: 1 1.107 0.775
(20) (19) (21) (15)
2 206/208×208/212 206/208 206/212 208/208 208/212 1: 1: 1: 1 0.824 0.844
(17) (15) (20) (16)
3 208/220×208/208 208/208 208/220 1: 1 0.130 0.718
(64) (59)
Table 3. Linkage tests for independent assortment for jointly
segregating SSR loci.
Gene loci AG2 AG3 AG7 AG10 TC1 TC7 Asp1-T7sp
AG2 N N N N N N
AG3 R N R N R
AG7 N N N N
AG10 R N ―
TC1 N N
TC7 N
Asp1-T7sp
N: No evidence of linkage.
R: Possible linkage pairs in all crosses investigated.
R: Segregation distortion was recognized, but there was no
evidence of the linkage.
―: Not investigated.
Linkage was recognized in ‘Asp1-T7sp, AG3’ with the
recombination fraction of 0.138 at 1% level.
Plant materials
Diploid: ‘Zenyu953’
‘Welcome’ (WC)
Methods
Same as experiment 1
Results
Zenyu953-1 151bp
(151/155)z 155bp
HIG-3f 157bp
(151/157/157) 151bp
PWC-3f (147/149/149/151)
147bp 151bp
149bp
PWC-1m 157bp
(149/157/157/157)
149bp
region.genotypes
Parental
Parental genotypes and genetic
of thepurity
diploidof the diploid cultivars
cultivars
Table 4. SSR genotypes in asparagus cultivars.
TC1 TC7
Individual
211 217 219 221 223 225 227 229 194 196 206 208 212 216 218 228 (bp)
diploid
Zenyu953-1 1z 1 2
Zenyu953-2 1 1 2
Zenyu953-3 2 1 1
Zenyu953-4 2 1 1
Zenyu953-5 1 1 2
WC-1f 1 1 2
WC-2f 1 1 1 1
WC-3f 1 1 1 1
WC-1m 1 1 2
WC-2m 1 1 1 1
triploid
HIG-1f 1 1 1 1 1 1
HIG-2f 2 1 1 1 1
HIG-3f 1 1 1 2 1
HIG-1m 2 1 1 1 1
HIG-2m 1 1 1 2 1
tetraploid
PWC-1f 1 1 2 1 2 1
PWC-2f 2 1 1 3 1
PWC-3f 2 1 1 3 1
PWC-1m 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
PWC-2m 1 1 2 1 2 1
z
Individual gene number in each region.
216bp
AG3 214bp
(214/216/218) 218bp
AG7 174bp
(174/174/178) 178bp
AG10 177bp
(177/177/183)
183bp
TC1
(219/219/225) 219bp
225bp
Number of nuclei
(B)3x
Fluorescent intensity
Figure 3. Flow cytometric histogram patterns of Hokkai 100 (A)
and 07M-61 (a progeny of Gold Schatz × Hokkai100) (B).
Conclusion