Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract. The main objective of this research work is to compute the dynamic response in
terms of natural frequencies and mode shapes of the heavy vehicle truck transmission gearbox
loose mounted casing. The results of this analysis are compared with the zero displacement
constraint condition when casing is full tightly mounted on chassis frame using 37 bolts. The
loose mounted transmission causes torsional vibration that produce rattling and clattering noise.
Reciprocity Principle has used to determine the frequencies and mode shape for loose mounted
transmission casing. The first 20-vibration mode shape and natural frequencies were calculated
using ANSYS 14.5. The study has theoretical and practical reference for the structure
optimization of truck transmission casing. ANSYS 14.5 has good analysis features suited for
analysis of complex objects like transmission casing. The natural frequency for zero
displacement condition varies from 1669 Hz to 3576 Hz and for loose transmission, casing
frequency varies from 1165 Hz to 3467 Hz. This frequency difference is in range of (3-30) %
frequency reduction by changing boundary condition.
1 Introduction
The main objective of this research work is to find the dynamic vibration response
of transmission casing in loose mounting based problem. Truck transmission casing
are subjected to vibration induced by the load fluctuations, gear defects, harmonic
excitation, meshing excitation, varying speed and torque conditions. The transmission
casing vibration is the resultant of internal excitation caused by the gear meshing
process. This internal excitation produces a dynamic mesh force that is transmitted to
the casing through the shafts and bearings. Researchers have done various different
types of studies on gearbox transmission for the past two decades, but it is a highly
complicated and tough to design and modeling of a transmission casing. Jiri Tuma
[1] has studied the noise and vibration of transmission system. The author solved the
gear noise problem by introducing an encloser to reduce radiated noise. Analytical
result is verified using experimental investigation. The extensive noise is produced
during the tooth meshing or at structural resonance frequency.
*aAshwani Kumar,
kumarashwani.geu@gmail.com
a
Himanshu Jaiswal,
jaiswalhimanshu9@gmail.com
*bPravin P Patil,
pravinppatil2004@gmail.com
*a,a,*b
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graphic Era University Dehradun, India 248002
The natural frequency of vibration is varying in between 500 Hz to 3500 Hz at
varying rpm. The severe vibration occurs at the frequency range of (500-2500) Hz.
Mats Åkerblom [2] has performed a literature review and concluded that transmission
error is an important excitation mechanism for gear noise and vibration. In addition to
transmission error, friction and bending moment are another reason responsible for
failure. He has also analyzed the dynamic behaviour of a gearbox. Leila et al. [3] have
studied the heavy gearbox of helicopters. To prevent break down and accident in
helicopters gear fault detection is important. Spectrum analysis and Cepstrum analysis
method is used to identify damage gear. Fourier analysis is used for analytical results.
Timothy J et al. [4] have studied the source of vibration. A Sports Utility Vehicle with
sensor and data acquisition system is used to find the vibration source. This study was
focused on vehicle vibration response from road surface features. Chinmaya at al. [5]
have used motor current signature analysis (MCSA) and discrete wavelet transform
(DWT) for studying the gear vibration. Load fluctuations on the gearbox and gear
defects are two major sources of vibration.
Renping Shao et al. [9] in this paper authors have developed a software based on
virtual instrument technology platform by combining the advantages of MATLAB
and VC + + to check the gear failure pattern. In transmission system all vibration is
caused due to gear meshing excitation, so gear failure analysis study is important.
Marina Franulovic et al. [10] have studied the gear fatigue failures occur mostly
because of gear design errors, manufacturing errors, assembly errors, faulty
maintenance, problems in heat treating. All types of gear failure is grouped in two
category: wear and surface fatigue types of failure. Tooth root fatigue damage, as a
mode of failure initiation is considered within this paper.
The modal analysis simulation is performed for Zero displacement constraint and
loose transmission casing based boundary condition. In Zero displacement constraint
based boundary condition, transmission casing is fixed to the chassis frame using 37
bolts. In simulation all 37 bolts hole are constraint to move in any direction. The
simulation results of 20 natural frequency and corresponding mode shape were
obtained. Table 1 shows the all 20 natural frequency and figure 4 shows the 8 selected
mode shapes. In second part of study, it was investigated that, what happen if the
transmission casing is loose and this problem arises many time, it can be seen as the
vehicle is vibrating very heavily. The simulation is performed for this problem using
ANSYS 14.5. Generally, vehicle transmission casing is fixed to the chassis in five
directional ways using 37 bolts. Figure 3 shows all five directional positions (Back
position, Bottom position, Left & right side positions, Front positions) in which casing
can be fixed using bolts (bolts hole is fixed in simulation) to the chassis frame. This
paper highlights the problem of loose transmission casing and solved it using
simulation method. In simulation all 9 connecting bolts from back part of casing are
loose and simulation is perform for this condition. Table 1 shows the all 20 natural
frequency and figure 5 shows the 8 selected mode shapes.
In first phase of study, Figure 4 shows the 8 selected mode shape of transmission
casing in zero displacement constraint condition. The natural frequencies vary from
(1669.5-3576) Hz. Mode 1, 2 & 10 is torsional vibration. This torsional vibration is
performed at centre and backside on transmission casing. Mode 10 shows heavy
vibration effect in front part of casing. Axial bending vibration is found in 18 & 19
modes. The mode 16 is again torsional vibration.
Figure 4 Eight different Mode shapes (1,2,4,10,14,16,18 & 19) of Zero displacement
constraint boundary condition.
In second phase of study when all 9 bolts of back part of transmission casing were
loosen from chassis frame the natural frequencies reduces by 30 %. Figure 5 shows
the eight selected mode shapes of loose transmission casing. When fixturing bolts
have loosened, the natural frequency varies in range (1165-3467) Hz (Table 1). For
the first mode shape there is a difference of 504 Hz (30%) and for the 20 mode the
difference is 109 Hz (3%). The results shows that loose bolts reduce the natural
frequency by (3-30) % ) in comparison to zero displacement constraint condition and
these lower frequencies are the main reason for the excitation which causes
resonance.
Figure 5 Eight different Mode shapes (2 , 6, 9,11,13,15,17& 20) of back part loose
transmission casing.
S.N. Zero Displacement Condition Frequency (Hz) Loose Condition Frequency (Hz)
1. 1669.5 1165.3
2. 2011.2 1236.3
3. 2227.7 1630.8
4. 2282.8 1668.5
5. 2479.6 1768.7
6. 2599.9 2056.2
7. 2674.3 2179.9
8. 2711.3 2227.7
9. 2762.9 2281.2
10. 2865.5 2409.5
11. 2925.6 2583.4
12. 2957.6 2721.3
13. 2998.7 2764.4
14. 3124.7 2839
15. 3204.6 2864.9
16. 3322.3 2972.9
17. 3389.9 3361.2
18. 3454.7 3404.3
19. 3491.1 3456.5
20. 3576. 3467.1
The back part of casing is unconstraint so maximum effect of vibration can see at
backside of transmission. Mode 2 shows the bending mode only seen in back part.
Mode 9 & 11 is torsional vibration. This torsional vibration is perform at back left and
right side on transmission casing and causes heavy vibration and excess deformation
with noise. Mode 13 & 15 is again torsional vibration. This torsional vibration is
perform at extreme front side on transmission casing. Axial bending vibration has
been find in 6 ,17 and 20 mode.
Figure 6 Natural frequency variation in zero displacement condition (series1) and loose
condition (series2).
5. Conclusion
Loose transmission cause excessive vibration and resonance. The natural frequency
for zero displacement condition when all 37 bolts are constraint varies from 1669 Hz
to 3576 Hz. The back part of heavy vehicle truck transmission casing is connected by
9 bolts to the truck chassis frame and other mountings of truck. When all 9 bolts are
loosened the natural frequency varies from 1165 Hz to 3467 Hz. The looseness of the
casing cause reduction in natural frequency and these lower order frequencies are the
main reason for the excitation, which causes resonance. In resonance the transmission
casing were subjected to heavy vibration leads to failure of transmission For the first
order frequency (f1), there is a difference of 504 Hz (30%) for the zero displacement
and loosened condition and for the 20-order frequency, the difference is 109 Hz (3%).
The simulation shows that the transmission casing is subjected to axial bending
vibration, torsional vibration and axial bending with torsional vibration. Torsional
vibration causes rattling and clattering noise. Reciprocity Principle was used to
evaluate the 20 natural frequencies and corresponding mode shapes using ANSYS
14.5. In conclusion, the numerical simulation of casing has confirmed that bolts
loosening condition leads failure of the transmission system. The frequencies (f 17, f18,
f19, f20) of loose casing (series 2 , figure 6) are overlapped by the same frequency of
zero displacement condition (series 1 figure 6). The mechanical properties of grey
cast iron HT 200 was consider for the realistic approach analysis. The FEA simulation
based analysis provides satisfactory results. This research work deals with only one
position loose condition in future this study can be extended to others position and
bolts loose conditions.
Acknowledgement
The authors are thankful to DST, New Delhi and Management of Graphic Era
University, Dehradun for its necessary funding towards completion of this research
work.
References
1. Jiri Tuma : Gearbox Noise and Vibration Prediction and Control. International
Journal of Acoustics and Vibration 14, 1-11 (2009).
2. Mats Åkerblom : Gear noise and vibration - a literature survey. Report-Volvo
Construction Equipment Components AB. Research Journal of Applied Sciences,
Engineering and Technology 5, 1449-1453 (2013).
3. Leila.Nacib, KomiMidzodzi.Pekpe and SaadiSakhara : Detecting gear tooth cracks
using cepstral analysis in gearbox of helicopters. International Journal of
Advances in Engineering & Technology 5,139-145 (2013).
4. Timothy J. Gordon and ZeviBareket : Vibration Transmission from Road
Surface Features – Vehicle Measurement and Detection. Technical Report for
Nissan Technical Center North America, Inc. 2007; UMTRI-2007-4 (2007).
5. ChinmayaKar and A.R. Mohanty : Monitoring gear vibrations through motor
current signature analysis and wavelet transform. Mechanical Systems and Signal
Processing 20, 158–187 (2006).
6. P. Czech : Diagnosis of industrial gearboxes Condition by vibration and time
frequency, Scale-frequency, frequency-frequency analysis. Metalurgija 51,
521- 524 (2012).
7. R. Singh : Dynamic design of automotive systems-Engine mounts and structural
Joints. Dynamic design of automotive systems 25,319- 330 (2000).
8. J. Wang, R.X. Gao, R. Yan, L. Wang. An integrative computational method for
gearbox diagnosis. CIRP Conference on Intelligent Computation in
Manufacturing Engineering Procedia CIRP 12, 133 – 138 ( 2013 ).
9. Renping Shao, Wentao Hu, Jingming Cao. Gear damage detection and diagnosis
system based on COM Module. Advanced in Control Engineering and
Information Science. Procedia Engineering 2301 – 2307 (2011).
10. Marina Franulovi, Robert Basan, Robert Kunc, Ivan Prebil. Numerical modeling
of life prediction of gears. ICM 11. Procedia Engineering 10, 562–567 (2011).
11. Fujin Yu, Yongxiang Li, Daowen Sun,Wenquan Shen and Weiqiang Xia:
Analysis for the Dynamic Characteristic of the Automobile Transmission
Gearbox. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 5,
1449-1453,(2013).
12. ANSYS R 14.5.Academic, Structural analysis Guide (2013).
13. SOLIDEDGE .Version 19.0 (2006).
14. Pro-E 5.0. Designing guide manual. (2013)