You are on page 1of 5

Experiment 1: Measurements and Error Analysis

Laboratory Report

Sang Keon Park, Kyla Nicole Ponce, Charisse Mae Pondoc,


Zyd Puga, Margritte Chloe Ritumalta

Department of Biological Sciences


College of Science, University of Santo Tomas
España, Manila Philippines

Abstract establishing significant relationships. Not


Statistical measures are used in organizing limited to the field of science and physics,
data and carrying out processes that are statistical tools assist in carrying out the
important in drawing out conclusions, mechanisms or processes crucial in
showing relationships, or producing desired producing the desired outcomes. Descriptive
outcomes. In this experiment, descriptive statistics quantitatively summarizes or
statistics, graphical and error analysis, and describes the characteristics and relationships
standard measurement were used to describe between the variables being studied[1], such
the calamansi and coin samples and the include mean (Measures of Central
thumb of five randomly selected family Tendency), frequency (Measures of
members. Results of the experiment show Frequency), variance (Measures of
that measures of central tendency and Variation), and percentile ranks (Measures of
variability may be unique but are affected by Position). Graphical and error analysis are
outliers, but the low variance and standard often utilized in research discussions to better
deviation indicates almost uniformity in understand their collected data and to
diameter for the calamansi samples. The accurately measure and document errors in
graphical and error analysis, having a percent the data. These statistical tools measure out a
error of 0.003%, shows high accuracy, and variety of data ranging from sensory
this error may be caused by systematic and/or characterization of ultra-pasteurized milk[4] ,
random factors. Results in using ancient sensory evaluation of strawberry fruit [11] , to
standard measurement, such as the rule of the exploring consumer product profiling
thumb, affects the accuracy of the techniques[10]. In this experiment, students
measurement, shown by having an average of aim to describe data by means of obtaining
0.74 inches which is distant from the standard measures of mean, variance, and standard
measurement of an inch. variation, and to utilize graphical and error
analysis in order to describe their coin and
1. Introduction calamansi samples.

In the pursue of research, statistical measures


are often utilized to organize raw data when
drawing out accurate conclusions or
2. Theory

Hypothetically, when utilizing statistical


tools, it is ideal that the set of data is close to
the “true value” or the mean. Additionally,
Figure 1: Experimental set-up for Descriptive
the best set of data are those that are closely
Statistics using 10 calamansi measured with
clustered together around the mean value and string, then by ruler in cm
yields a 0% error. In this experiment, the
following equations were used: Graphical and Error Analysis. Diameter of
each five Philippine coins with different
• Circumference: perimeter of a denominations were measured using a ruler.
geometric figure Given the acquired measurements of their
𝐶 = 𝜋𝑑 diameters, circumference, and area as well as
• Variance: measures how spread out the squared diameter were calculated.
the data values are from the average Diameter versus circumference and area of
value the coin vs square diameter were plotted in a
2
∑(𝑑 − 𝑑)2 graph (separately) including the equation of
𝜎 =
10 the best-fit line where the slope of the line
• Percent (%) Error: describes represents the value of the p. Percent error for
discrepancy between experimental each were also determined.
value and the theoretical value

𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 − 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒


%𝐸 =
𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒

3. Methodology

Descriptive Statistics. Ten calamansi was


prepared by one student. A piece of string
was used to measure the circumference of
each calamansi. The length of the string
encircled around the calamansi was then
measured by means of a ruler. Given the
length measurement of each calamansi, the
diameter was computed. Out of the 10
Figure2: Experimental set-up for Graphical
measurements the range of the diameters of
and Error Analysis using coins with different
the calamansi samples was determined as
denominations measured in Inch by a ruler.
well as the mean diameter. Variance and
standard deviation were also determined. Standard. Five family members were
randomly selected and had their thumbs
measured in inches using a ruler. Data
gathered was tabulated.
4. Results and Discussion positive and further value from the
scientifically accepted value[5].
Descriptive statistics have been widely used
Furthermore, rule of thumb has been widely
in correlating variables which involve
used as an ancient standard measurement for
measures of central tendency and variability
an inch is a very practical yet inaccurate way
which are conjoined to identify distribution
of measuring given that the size and shape of
of sample values and feasible estimates[6].
the hand varies per gender, age and height[7]
With this, circumference of calamansi was
thus, affects the certainty of measurement,
measured which has an average diameter of
which is vividly seen in Appendix C, wherein
2.61cm and has a diameter range- the
discrepancies between the measured thumb
difference between the lowest and highest
width yielded an average of 0.74 inches
sample value- of 0.45cm (Appendix A)
which is considerably distant from the
which denotes a minimal variability in the
standard measurement of an inch.
sample values of calamansi and its mean
(s=0.14cm, s²=0.02cm). Furthermore, values 5. Conclusion
acquired from the measures of central
tendency and variability may be unique yet This experiment aims to utilize graphical and
may also be affected by outliers- values error analysis with coin and calamansi and
which are extremely high or low[6]. describe given data through mean, variance
and standard deviation. In the first
Consequently, graphical and error analysis
experiment using calamansi, the average
were done using the diameter of available
diameter measurement of the calamansi was
coins (Appendix B) which is being compared
2.61 cm, with a variance of 0.02 cm and a
to its circumference and area, as seen in
standard deviation of 0.14 cm. These low
figure 1 (y= 3.1417x - 1.82x10⁻⁴) and figure
variances and standard deviations show that
2 (y= 0.7854x - 3.22x10⁻⁵), respectively and
the obtained diameter values are not far from
both have a percent error 0.003% which
each other, indicating that the average
shows high accuracy with respect to the
diameter of calamansi is close to uniformity.
accepted diameter values given by the
From the experiment using the coin,
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP).
calculated experimental p values and the
These errors may be due to systematic factors accepted p values from both graph of
which involve calibration of instrument[9] and circumference versus diameter and the area
random factors such as the instrument being versus square of diameter have 0.003% error.
used, the environment or human errors as Result exhibits that the error between the
well as the consideration of the number of accepted and the experimental value is very
significant figures to be used implies the small, therefore measurement accuracy is
uncertainty of measurements[9] and is one of high.
the reason why an equal percent error for both
data sets were observed which is in contrast Modern people mostly use tools to measure
with initial hypothesis of having a higher something. Measurements based on body
percent error with the data sets comparing parts are no longer used as a standard of
area of the coin with its squared diameter due measurement. Measuring methods using
to the nature of squaring which yields a body parts are practical but strongly
influenced by various factors compared to [2]Astin, A.V. (1968). Standards of
precise instruments. To discover accurate Measurement. Scientific American, 218(6),
measurements of length rather than an 50-63. doi: 10.2307/24926255
estimation, it is more accurate to use accepted
properties of standard such as meter, inch, [3]Bacig, T. (n.d.) Rule of Thumb. Retrieved
feet or mile than a measurement method from
using a body part. https://www.d.umn.edu/~tbacig/mindmath/
mathles1b.html#:~:text=1.,the%20length%2
6. Applications 0of%20your%20thumb

In interpreting the results of your statistical [4]Chapman, K. W., Lawless, H. T., & Boor,
analysis, it is crucial to understand what those K. J. (2001). Quantitative Descriptive
values mean. For example, variance refers to Analysis and Principal Component Analysis
the spread of a data set, it is a measurement for Sensory Characterization of
used to identify how far each number in the Ultrapasteurized Milk. Journal of Dairy
data set is from the mean. A small variance Science, 84(1), 12–20.
indicates that the data points are very close to doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(01)74446-3
the each other and are clustered around the
mean. On the other hand, a zero variance [5]Chemistry LibreText Library. (2020).
indicates that all the data values are identical. Propagation of Error. Retrieved from
Percent (%) error defines the discrepancy https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Ana
between the experimental value and the lytical_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_(
theoretical value. It was found that the Analytical_Chemistry)/Quantifying_Nature/
Experimental Value of pi in both activity A Significant_Digits/Propagation_of_Error
and B are 3.1417 and 3.14162, respectively.
Yielding a 0% error, indicating that the [6] Ennos, R. & Johnson, M. L. (2018).
accepted and experimental p values are Statistical and Data handling Skills in
identical, thus a high measurement accuracy. Biology. Pearson Education Limited.
There is an existing set of accepted standard
measurements, as set by the U.S. National [7]Frothingham, S. (2019, August 7). What’s
Bureau of Standards. These relevant the Average Hand Size for Men, Women, and
measurements (few examples include Meter, Children? Healthline; Healthline Media.
Kilogram, Kelvin, Celsius) are identified by https://www.healthline.com/health/average-
properties which include accuracy, precision, hand-size#hand-size-vs-height
error of measurement, magnitude, identity,
equal intervals, etc. [8]Griggs, J.A. (2017). Factors Affecting
Accuracy and Precision in Measuring
7. References Material Surfaces, Fractal Analysis -
Applications in Physics, Engineering and
[1]Ali, Z., & Bhaskar, Sb. (2016). Basic Technology, Fernando Brambila,
statistical tools in research and data analysis. IntechOpen, DOI:
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 60(9), 662. 10.5772/intechopen.68189.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.190623
[9]Lumen Learning. (n.d.). Accuracy, Mean 2.61 cm
Precision, and Significant Figures. Retrieved Variance 0.02 cm
from Standard Deviation 0.14 cm
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/physics/c
hapter/1-3-accuracy-precision-and- Appendix B
significant-figures/ Circumference Diameter Area
(cm) (cm) (cm2)
[10]Moussaoui, K. A., & Varela, P. (2010). Coin 2.0106
Exploring consumer product profiling 5.0265 cm 1.6 cm
1 cm2
techniques and their linkage to a quantitative Coin 3.1416
6.2831 cm 2.0 cm
descriptive analysis. Food Quality and 2 cm2
Preference, 21(8), 1088–1099. Coin 4.1548
7.2257 cm 2.3 cm
doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.09.005 3 cm2
Coin 4.9087
7.8540 cm 2.5 cm
[11]Shamaila, M., Powrie, W. D., & Skura, 4 cm2
B. J. (1992). Sensory Evaluation of Coin 5.7256
8.4823 cm 2.7 cm
Strawberry Fruit Stored under Modified 5 cm2
Atmosphere Packaging (MAP) by Experimental Value
Quantitative Descriptive Analysis. Journal of of  from graph of
3.1417
Food Science, 57(5), 1168–1184. circumference versus
diameter
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1992.tb11290.x
Accepted value of  3.1416
[12]Sharp, D. B. (1999). Measurement % error 0.003%
standards. The Measurement, Experimental Value
of  from graph of
Instrumentation, and Sensors Handbook, JG 3.14162
Area versus square of
Webster, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 5-1.
diameter
Retrieved from
Accepted value of  3.1416
http://www.autex.spb.su/download/wavelet/
% error 0.003%
books/sensor/CH05.PDF
Appendix C
Appendix A
Participant Width of Thumb
Sample Circumference Diameter (Inches)
1 8.4 cm 2.67 cm 1 0.9
2 7.4 cm 2.36 cm 2 0.4
3 7.5 cm 2.39 cm 3 0.9
4 8.4 cm 2.67 cm 4 0.8
5 7.8 cm 2.48 cm 5 0.7
6 9.0 cm 2.86 cm
7 8.1 cm 2.58 cm
8 8.4 cm 2.67 cm
9 8.3 cm 2.64 cm
10 8.7 cm 2.77cm
Range 0.5 cm

You might also like