Professional Documents
Culture Documents
, 2020
ABSTRACT
The Philippines has been regarded as one of the top destinations in the world because of its top
sceneries and agritourism activities. This study concerns the Agri-tourism programs in Quezon
province as basis for sustainable development program. This intended to achieve the following
objectives: describe the profile of respondents; determine the impact of programs; evaluate the
residents' level of satisfaction; test the significant difference on the impact; and propose a plan of
action to attain sustainable development on Agri-tourism of Quezon province. To gather the data,
descriptive research method was used. There were 403 computed sample size of residents involved
in the study using power of analysis to obtain the necessary data through a purposive random
sampling. Moreover, survey questionnaire served as the data-gathering tool and the reliability of the
instrument was checked using Cronbach Alpha Reliability Coefficient of 0.763 and 0.986 respectively.
The data gathered were treated using frequency distribution, weighted mean, and ANOVA. Results
revealed that Agri-tourism programs in Quezon Province were implemented in a great extent as
perceived by the respondents. Agri-tourism has great impacts in social, cultural, economic, and
environmental aspects. Additionally, respondents were satisfied in the program development,
training, and facilities. To strengthen and continually develop the Agri-tourism in Quezon province, a
sustainable development plan was conceptualized.
Table 1 shows that there were social Table 2 above illustrates the observed
impacts of Agri-tourism programs as observed cultural impact of agri-tourism to the residents.
by the residents as presented in the table Overall, the cultural impact garnered a
showing the composite mean of 3.27 and composite mean of 2.94 and can be interpreted
verbally interpreted as Agree. It can also be as agree. This is supported with the study of
inferred from the data above that Agri-tourism
P – ISSN 2651 - 7701 | E – ISSN 2651 – 771X | www.ioer-imrj.com
ATIJON, G.G. A., MERCADO, J.N.L., Implementation of Agri – Tourism Programs in Quezon Province: Basis for
Sustainable Action Plan, pp.182 -191
184
IOER INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH JOURNAL, VOL. 2, NO. 3, SEPT., 2020
Katarzyna (2010) stating that tourism economy Agri-tourism related to small enterprises
and ecology will basically help in developing can be started by locals as it ranked first from
rural areas focused on the natural, local, the table with a weighted mean of 3.53 and
cultural, and social resources. verbally interpreted as Agree. The result can be
From data gathered, Agri-tourism gives supported with idea of Ristiš (2014) explaining
more opportunity to absorb positive foreign the importance of sustainable agriculture in
cultural values which ranked first from the table maintaining the primary sources of food which
having a weighted mean of 3.25 and could be involves harmonization between economic,
verbally interpreted as agree. On the other social, and environmental aspects of
hand, Agri-tourism may disturb the community’s sustainability.
peace and harmony which was indicated as the However, agri-tourism brings more
last item on the rank with a weighted mean of investment opportunities and can get a higher
2.40 and a verbal interpretation of disagree. This price for the goods and services sell by locals
result is linked to the study of Tew and Barbieri tied on the last rank with a weighted mean of
(2012) stating that agro tourism is continuously 3.37 and a verbal interpretation of agree. It only
progressing and developing as a new way of showed that, Agri-tourism allows to promote a
promoting agriculture in rural communities. friendly interaction with the possible investors to
expand their businesses. This can be supported
2.3 Economic Impact with the study of Balagot (2015) stating that it is
recommended that employees explore the
Table 3 possibility of regularizing employees.
Economic Impact of Agri-tourism Programs as Observed
by the Residents
Indicators WM VI
2.4 Environmental Impact
1. Agri-tourism provides new
3.47 Table 4
employment opportunities A
2. Agri-tourism brings more Environmental Impact of Agri-tourism Programs as
investment opportunities 3.37 Observed by the Residents
A Indicators WM VI
3. Agri-tourism related small 1. Agri-tourism development in the
enterprises can be started by 3.53 A community protects wildlife and
locals natural habitats 3.40 A
4. Local government will use 2. Community’s natural environment
the earned income for is protected for the benefits of the
3.43 present and future generations
community development A
activities 3.28 A
5. Can get a higher price for the 3. Agri-tourism development in the
goods and services sell by 3.37 A community promotes positive
locals environmental ethics 3.31 A
6. Local areas will be 4. Agri-tourism in the community
developed rapidly through 3.47 A developed harmony with the
agri-tourism natural environment 3.34 A
Composite Mean 3.44 Agree 5. Agri-tourism aids in restoring
historical and cultural buildings
and natural resources
Table 3 presents the economic impact of 3.31 A
Agri-tourism programs as observed by the 6. Agri-tourism improves community
residents. In totality, the economic impact got a appearance 3.46 A
composite mean of 3.44 and a verbal Composite Mean 3.35 Agree
interpretation of agree. It can be related to the
study of Bhandari & Bhattarai (2018) discussing Based on the table above, it presented
that Agri-tourism has a significant role in making the data concerning the environmental impact of
the economy of a country sustain its needs. agri-tourism programs as observed by the
residents. Generally, the said aspect got a
P – ISSN 2651 - 7701 | E – ISSN 2651 – 771X | www.ioer-imrj.com
ATIJON, G.G. A., MERCADO, J.N.L., Implementation of Agri – Tourism Programs in Quezon Province: Basis for
Sustainable Action Plan, pp.182 -191
185
IOER INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH JOURNAL, VOL. 2, NO. 3, SEPT., 2020
composite mean a 3.35 and a verbal must be emphasized and it has a potentiality to
interpretation of agree. Based from the results, establish itself as a successful business for the
it can be said that as perceived by the economic upliftment of nation as well as in
respondents, Agri-tourism can help the attainment of sustainable development goals.
environment by allowing farmers to have a
source of income which can avoid excessive 3. Level of Satisfaction in the Implementation
farming on marginal land (Carter, 2016). of Agri-tourism Programs
As indicated from the result, it can be
said that Agri-tourism improves community 3.1 Program Development
appearance which ranked first having a
weighted mean of 3.46 and a verbal The level of satisfaction in the
interpretation of agree. It only implies that it implementation of Agri-tourism programs in
contributed to provide advancement and terms of program development is presented. As
changes in the community appearance of the a whole, the residents were satisfied with the
given locality. This can be supported by the idea implementation of these programs in terms of
from Tourdefarm (2017) explaining that most program development as it gained a composite
Agri-tourism centers in the country promote the mean of 3.37 based on the data gathered.
judicious use of natural resources, be it water or As indicated from the data, Agri-tourism
fuel. program has an adequate importance in the
community since it ranked first among data
2.5 Summary of the Impact of Agri-tourism above having a weighted mean of 3.69 and
Programs verbally interpreted as highly satisfied. It has
basically been considered important in the
Table 5 overall status of a certain locality. This is
Summary Table on the Impact of Agri-tourism Programs as
Observed by the Residents
supported by the idea of Tourdefarm (2017)
Indicators WM VI
explaining that Agri-tourism centers on
1. Social
preventing the degradation of agricultural lands.
3.27 A
2. Cultural A
On the other hand, Agri-tourism program
2.94
3. Economic A
has adequate allocated funds in its
3.44
4. Environmental A
implementation which ranked last on the listed
3.35
items having a mean of 3.09 and verbal
Composite Mean 3.25 Agree
interpreted as satisfied. This can be related to
the idea of Balagot (2015) that the three main
Table 5 shows a general summary on the impact businesses in agritourism are lack of training
of Agri-tourism programs as observed by the opportunities, low wages, and the existence of
residents. The residents agreed that these gender roles.
programs have impacts on the social, cultural,
economic, and environmental status of the 3.2 Training Program
community with a composite mean of 3.25. It
was also found out that Agri-tourism has a great The level of satisfaction in the
impact on the economic status of an area as it implementation of Agri-tourism program in terms
got the highest weighted mean of 3.44 and a of training program is shown. Generally, in the
verbal interpretation of agree makes it on the Agri-tourism training program, the respondents
first rank. It was followed by environmental, were satisfied as it got a composite mean of
social and cultural aspects, which got 3.35, 3.27 3.25. It is supported by the ideas of Tiraieyari
and 2.94 weighted means respectively and and Hamzah (2012) discussing the role of agro
receiving verbal interpretation of agree. It can be tourism in lessening the poverty rate and
supported with the study of Bhandari and improving the livelihood sources of the local
Bhattarai (2018) revealing that Agri-tourism citizens.
P – ISSN 2651 - 7701 | E – ISSN 2651 – 771X | www.ioer-imrj.com
ATIJON, G.G. A., MERCADO, J.N.L., Implementation of Agri – Tourism Programs in Quezon Province: Basis for
Sustainable Action Plan, pp.182 -191
186
IOER INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH JOURNAL, VOL. 2, NO. 3, SEPT., 2020
Based on the data, Agri-tourism program In Table 6, it can be reflected that for the
can provide skills, norms, technical knowledge, level of satisfaction in the implementation of
and values needed on work ranked first having agri-tourism programs, it garnered a composite
a mean of 3.43 and a verbal interpretation of mean of 3.25 with a verbal interpretation
satisfied. However, it can be inferred that the satisfied. The respondents were most satisfied
program is of sufficient duration is on the last with its program development followed by the
rank having a weighted mean of 3.07 and training program and lastly the program facility
verbally interpreted as satisfied. It means that it and evaluation. The weighted means are 3.37,
takes time to start an Agri-tourism business. 3.25 and 3.14 respectively with a verbal
interpretation of satisfied. It can be gleaned from
3.3 Program Facility and Evaluation the data provided by Henderson (2009)
discussing that since the government double its
This part deals with the level of effort to provide to the residents what they need
satisfaction in the implementation of Agri- to develop in the Agri-tourism.
tourism programs in terms of program facility
and evaluation. Overall, the respondents were 4. Significant difference on the impact of
satisfied in the implementation of these Agri-tourism programs when grouped
programs in terms of program facility and according to profile variable
evaluation having a composite mean of 3.14.
This is directly supported with the idea of 4.1 in terms of Social impact
Mahaliyanaarachchi (2015) stated that Agri-
tourism can offer possible sources of income Table 7
which will allow for a large financial leverage of Difference of responses on the social impact of Agri-
the capital expenditure. tourism Programs as observed by the residents when
grouped according to profile
As shown from the data above, Agri- Profile Variables F- p- VI
tourism programs are exposed in a work value value
environment where learned skills can be applied Age 21.546 0.000 HS
which ranked first having a weighted mean of Sex 2.204 0.028 S
3.31 and a verbal interpretation of satisfied. It is Civil Status 1.076 0.283 NS
supported by the ideas of Tiraieyari and Education 29.319 0.000 HS
Hamzah (2012) discussing the role of agro Occupation 14.535 0.000 HS
tourism in lessening the poverty rate and Monthly Income 3.625 0.013 Significant
improving the livelihood sources of the local
citizens.
The table presents the comparison of
3.4 Summary on the Level of Satisfaction of responses on the social impact of agri-tourism
the Agri-tourism Programs programs when grouped according to profile. It
was observed that, in terms of age, it was found
Table 6 out that there was a significant difference having
Summary Table on the Level of Satisfaction in the a p-value of 0.000 which is less than 0.05
Implementation of Agri-tourism Programs considering it as highly significant.
Indicators WM VI On the other hand, in terms of the social
1. Program Development impact of Agri-tourism programs when grouped
3.37 S according to sex, it can be interpreted that there
2. Training Program 3.25 S
is a significant difference having a p-value of
3. Program Facility and S 0.028 which is less than 0.05 considering it as
3.14
Evaluation significant. Furthermore, in terms of education,
Composite Mean
3.25 Satisfied it can also be said that there is a significant
difference having a p-value of 0.000 which is