Professional Documents
Culture Documents
THESIS
Submitted to the
MASTER OF SCIENCE
In
AGRICULTURE
(AGRICULTURE EXTENSION)
By
MADHURI VERMA
2017
CERTIFICATE- I
All the assistance and help received during the course of the
investigation has been acknowledged by her.
Thesis is approved by
Place: Jabalpur
I, Madhuri Verma, D/o Shri Basant Kumar Verma, certify the work
embodied in thesis entitled, “Perception of Agriculture students towards Rural
Agricultural Work Experience (RAWE) programme” is my own first hand
bonafide work carried out by me under the guidance of Dr. (Smt.) Seema
Naberia at Department of Extension Education, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi
Vishwa Vidyalaya, College of Agriculture, Jabalpur during 2016-2017.
The matter embodied in the thesis has not been submitted for the
award of any other degree / diploma. Due credit has been made to all the
assistance and help.
I, also abide myself with the decision taken by my advisor for the
publication of material extracted from the thesis work and subsequent
improvement, on mutually beneficial basis, provided the due credit is given,
thereof.
Place: Jabalpur
Copyright Transfer
Date:
Place: Jabalpur
First of all I thank the „Almighty God‟ who has blessed me with the
opportunity and strength to successfully complete this work.
I express my deep sense of gratitude and appreciation towards the
Chairman of thesis Advisory Committee Dr. (Smt.) Seema Naberia, Assistant
Professor of Department of Extension Education, JNKVV, Jabalpur for her
illuminating guidance, valuable and constructive suggestions and generous
encouragement throughout the M.Sc. (Ag.) programme.
I owe sincere regards to the member of my advisory committee Dr.
V.K. Pyasi, Professor, Department of Extension Education & Dean Student
Welfare, Dr. N.K. Raghuwanshi, Professor and Head, Department of
Agricultural Economics and Farm Management, JNKVV, Jabalpur for their
helpful and constant guidance during the course of investigation.
My thanks are also due to Dr. N.K. Khare, Professor and Head,
Department of Extension Education, Dr. S.K. Agrawal, Professor, Dr. A.K.
Pande, Professor, Dr. M.K. Dubey, Professor of Department of Extension
Education, and other members Shri S.G. Tiwari, Shri Sachin Soni, Sukhchain,
Sandeep and Narayan.
I am extremely thankful to Dr. V.S. Tomar, Hon‟ble Vice-Chancellor,
JNKVV, Jabalpur, Dr. P.K. Mishra, Dean, Faculty of Agriculture and Dr. P.K.
Bisen, Director Extension Services and Dr. D. Khare, Director of Research
Services & Director of Instruction JNKVV, Jabalpur and Dr. (Smt) Om Gupta
Dean, College of Agriculture JNKVV, Jabalpur for providing necessary
facilities according to my research.
Words are not enough to express my heartiest feelings towards my
father Shri Basant Kumar Verma and my mother Smt. Kumari Vema and my
sister Annapurna and my brother Pankaj for their appreciation and moral
support.
Thanks are very few words for my senior Varsha Shrivastava and my
close friends Priyanka Pathariya, Tulsi Dhakhariya, Keerti Rajput, Varsha
Upadhyay, Triti Jain for their inspiration, blessings and for their support and
co-operation.
Place: Jabalpur
In the year 2015, she admitted in college of Agriculture, Jabalpur for M.Sc.
(Agri.) Agriculture Extension degree programme in Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa
Vidyalaya, Jabalpur for specialization in Extension Education. She has successfully
completed all the courses requirements for master‟s degree with 8.00 OGPA out of
10.00 point scale.
For the fulfillment of the master‟s degree Programme, she was allotted a
research problem entitled “Perception of Agriculture students towards the Rural
Agriculture Work Experience (RAWE) programme” This is duly completed by her
and presented in the form of this thesis.
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION 1-6
2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE 7 - 17
4. RESULTS 31 - 48
5. DISCUSSION 49 - 55
BIBLIOGRAPHY 61 - 63
APPENDICES I - VI
CURRICULUM VITAE
LIST OF TABLES
1
future agricultural development. Considering the importance of the
knowledge on socio-economic behaviour of the rural farmers under which
agricultural graduates have to work. The Indian Council of Agricultural
Research endeavoring to empower youth with appropriate technologies
formulated a Review Committee on Agricultural Universities (1978),
popularly known as Randhawa Committee Recommendations (1979). This
led to the development of a rigorous field programme with emphasis on
practical reorientation of farm students to the rural agricultural operation
systems and totality of farm life. The students should get exposed to these
existing realities of a typical rural set up through interconnected exercises of
skill development so as to identify the practical possibilities of academic
knowledge in the field. Later, Dean’s Committee formulated by the ICAR in
1980-81 suggested the linkage of agricultural education with actual farming
situations.
The World Bank (1995a) stated that there was little emphasis in the
curricula on preparing the under graduates for career in agriculture or Agri-
business outside government service. However, the opportunities in the
government stream are drying up and private employers often have to invest
considerable time, money and effort on induction and on the job training for
the graduates to make up for educational weaknesses. The graduates from
SAUs exhibit lack of confidence in their ability to apply the skills necessary
for self-employment.
3
Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur on the recommendation
of Fourth Deans’ Committee (ICAR) introduced Rural Agricultural Work
Experience programme as an essential requirement for B.Sc. (Ag.) degree.
In view of globalization and development of new technologies it is essential
that the students meet international quality standards to develop analytical
skill, entrepreneurial qualities and experiential learning for having confidence
to do profitable farming. In the programme, students are placed in the
villages for intensive training and field experience with farm families. During
stay in the villages, they get an opportunity to study the different farm
situations, farm practices adopted by the farmers, interact with the farmers to
identify the problems and suggest the appropriate measures to solve them
for improvement in the existing practices. Students also develop confidence
in applying the knowledge gained during the course of the studies and fine-
tune their skill with the experience and knowledge of host farmers. Under
this programme, RAWE Model-I has been adopted in the Vishwa Vidyalaya
with following objectives:
4
7. To enhance the skill of the farmers for application of various
technological practices.
As RAWE itself is a new concept and a decade has been over after
starting of this programme at JNKVV. So far nearly 4000 students were
gained rural work experience under this programme. At this point, there is
need to take up a study to find out whether this programme is actually
fulfilling the needs of the students, whether the objectives of the programme
have been met or not? Also, it is necessary to know whether the students
who had undergone practical experience during RAWE are benefited or
whether there is evidence of considerable and widespread dissatisfaction
with the programme. Until now a couple of research works on the practical
knowledge gained by the students are done in the university. But they could
not study the programme in view of its implementation. This will be the
pioneer study in the College of Agriculture, Jabalpur. The present study
proposes to meet all these needs with special emphasis on feedback
mechanism from students in operating the programme.
Keeping the above aspects in view, this study in the field of RAWE
was undertaken with the title, “Perception of Agriculture students towards the
Rural Agricultural Work Experience (RAWE) programme”, with the following
objectives:
Specific objectives:
5
Scope of the study:
The results of the present investigation will be useful for the policy
makers and administrators in effective implementation of the RAWE
programme.
The findings will enable to know whether there is any need for re-
structuring RAWE to 'Rural Entrepreneurship and Awareness Development
Yojana' (READY) in the Vishwa Vidyalaya.
6
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Research findings:
2.1 Profile of students:
Sex
Hase and Deshmukh (2012) revealed that there were 72.50 per cent
boys and 27.50 per cent girls in the sample and gender could not show any
statistical significant relationship with perceived utility of graduate level
extension education courses by the undergraduate students.
7
Interestingly the ratio has increased over the period with the constant
increase of girl students at KAU.
Sanjeev and Gowda (2013) found that majority (62%) of the students
belonged to urban background and remaining (32%) were from rural
background. Even the students coming from the rural background had
limited knowledge of rural settings. This demands the necessity of the
programme to provide better rural orientation in general and live situations.
Medium of instruction
Sanjeev and Gowda (2013) reported that medium of instruction had a
positive significant relation with perception. Since, those who studied in local
language could interact better with farmers during RAWE, they had positive
perception regarding objectives.
OGPA
Sanjeev and Gowda (2013) revealed that rural urban background,
aspiration level, OGPA and leadership quality had influenced perception of
students significantly.
8
c. Utility in gaining knowledge on socio-economic aspects
Borthakur and Bortamuly (2013) found that more than half of the
respondents (58.72%) perceived that the RAWEP was ‘useful’ in knowing
about the socio-economic conditions prevailing in rural areas and 35.58%
considered it to be ‘very much useful’.
9
agricultural activities, many participatory approaches involved in PRA, about
farmers, farm women and children, their lifestyle and involvement in various
agricultural operations and experienced the difference between the
theoretical and practical knowledge.
Sanjeev and Gowda (2013) found that RAWE was weak in providing
practical experience in crop production at field and acquaintance with on-
going TOT programmes.
Kotte (2014) found that majority (69.76%) had medium, 30.24 per
cent had high gain in knowledge and skill during the programme.
b. Practical Experience
Reddy (1985) conducted a study on effectiveness of RAWEP in
APAU and found that the extent of experience gained by the students in
different activities was average.
10
Nanwal and Singh (2004) reveal that the Rural Work Experience
Programme (RAWE) is an important tool introduced to provide integrated
understanding of various disciplines and practical training to farm graduates
in agricultural sciences.
Kumar and Sharma (2013) found that 93.33 per cent students
developed their ability of cooperation and team work, 92 per cent known to
establish good rapport with society and 90.67 per cent gained practical
experience by RAWE programme.
Skills gained:
Sanjeev and Gowda (2013) found that RAWE was highly successful
in improving the communication and leadership skills of students along with
providing opportunity to work in agri-based industries.
Kotte (2014) reported more than 52.33 per cent of the RAWE
participants had high, 44.18 per cent had moderate, and 3.49 per cent had
low perception towards RAWE programme.
11
statistical significant relationship with perceived utility of graduate level
extension education courses (including RAWE) by the undergraduate
students.
Leadership quality
Kumar and Sharma (2013) reported that six month stay in village
situation helped to developed personal attributes of students like confidence,
village resource management, leadership quality, communication skill and
rural livelihood security.
12
Kumar and Sharma (2013) found that the proper evaluation, time of
programme and proper facilities of lodging, boarding and transportation also
were found equally important for the success of programme.
Kotte (2014) reported that credit load and monitoring and evaluation
were found non-significant with the perception towards RAWE.
Students Evaluation
Sujatha (2001) observed that majority (55%) of students had
unfavorable attitude, while 33.33% of them had favorable attitude followed
by few (11.67%) of them had moderately favorable attitude about evaluation
pattern.
Aspiration level
Hase and Deshmukh (2012) reported that Majority (83.33 %) of the
respondent students had aspired to earn income more than Rs.
20,000/month and more than the half (56.67%) of the respondent aspired to
develop own family followed by 55.00 per cent respondent that are aspired
to work for development of farmers.
Self confidence
Hase and Deshmukh (2012) found that Majority (65.00 %) of the
respondents showed medium level of self confidence.
Achievement motivation
Ramanjaneyulu (1992) found that majority of the students had
medium achievement motivation, which was positively correlated and highly
significant with the attitude towards RAWE Programme and the extent of
participation and knowledge and experience gained.
13
Sanjeev and Gowda (2013) analyzed that students with high
achievement motivation concentrated well on RAWE and had a positive
perception regarding RAWE objectives.
Extent of participation:
Ramanjaneyulu (1992) critically evaluated RAWEP under Agriculture
college, Bapatla found that extent of participation in extension activities was
significantly related to the extent of communication skills gained by the
student and feedback operating in the programme.
14
Impact of the programme:
Shareef and Rambabu (1999) reported that 66.67 per cent of the
respondents expressed satisfaction for the cooperation received from their
host farmer.
Singh and Tyagi (2012) observed that RAWEP in the villages gives
significant impact on the farmers basically on enhancement of knowledge of
crops and enterprises and also on skill development in value added product.
Singh and Tyagi (2012) found that 59.09 per cent contact farmers
said that the RAWEP is useful followed by 27.27 per cent, 10.91 per cent as
more useful and useful to some extent respectively.
15
2.5 Problems and suggestions:
a. Problems faced
Reddy (1985) found that the students in RAWE Programme were
facing problems like lack of minimum facilities in the selected villages,
stipulated guidelines not followed in the selection of host farmers, insufficient
stipend etc. he also reported that the advisory committee faced problems
due to lack of conveyance facilities and lack of co-operation in the village.
Kapri et al. (2016) reported that 85 per cent of the student faced
communication problem problems due to unaware of language used in the
villages and less response of villagers as they are involved in agriculture
work during day time.
16
b. Suggestions
Reddy (1985) suggested that villages with adequate facilities and
farmers who are more cooperative must be selected for the programme.
Conveyance facilities may be provided for the advisory committee members
and incentives may be given for the host farmers. The students should not
be allowed to take backlog examinations during the programme period.
Sanjeev and Gowda (2013) said that most of the students suggested
that time for each module in the RAWE should be increased, RAWE should
be for one entire cropping season rather than for one semester, a mini
RAWE of 1-2 weeks to be done before actual RAWE to understand farmers’
problems and plan for the original RAWE.
17
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This chapter deals with the methods and procedures used for
planning and conducting the present study. It consists of the following sub-
parts:
3.1 Location of the study
3.2 Research design
3.3 Sampling techniques used
3.4 Variables, their operationalization and measurement
3.5 Instruments of data collection
3.6 Validity and reliability of instrument
3.7 Statistical tests applied
3.8 Derivation of hypothesis
18
An ex-post-facto research design is employed as RAWE was already
implemented and data was collected from students based on their
experience.
19
Operationalization of variables:
a. Independent variables:
1. Sex:
It refers to physical or physiological differences between males and
females, including both primary sex characteristics and secondary
characteristics such as height and muscularity. The categories of sex were
formulated as follows:
2. Family background:
It refers to the information of individual respondent family area to
which they belong, which may be rural or urban. The categories of family
background were formulated as follows:
3. Medium of instruction:
The medium of instruction refers to the language that is used in
teaching. It may or may not be official language. The categories of medium
of instruction were formulated as follows:
4. OGPA:
It refers to overall grade point average; it is representing the average
value of the accumulated final grades earned in courses over the time by the
student. The categories of medium of instruction were formulated as follows:
20
S. No. Categories Score
1. Low 1
2. Medium 2
3. High 3
5. Leadership quality:
It refers to the quality of respondent that shows degree to which an
individual initiates or motivates the action of followers. For this, a self-scoring
questionnaire containing 17 statements was developed. The responses of
the students were obtained on 5 point continuum i.e., strongly agree, agree,
un decided, disagree, strongly disagree and were given 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1
scores, respectively for positive statements. The respondent can obtain a
minimum of 17 score and a maximum of 85. On the basis of range of scores,
following categories were formulated.
21
S. No. Categories Score
1. Low Up to 6
2. Moderate 7 to 12
3. High Above 12
8. Aspiration level:
It refers to as the orientation towards the goal concerning the future
level of achievement of respondents. For this, a self-scoring questionnaire
with 1 statement was developed and measured by considering one ladder
that has 12 steps, upper steps shows higher aspiration level and lower
shows low aspiration level. The respondent can obtain a minimum of 0 score
and a maximum of 12. On the basis of range of scores, following categories
were formulated.
22
9. Self confidence:
It refers to the feelings or respondent‟s ability, initiatives and zeal to
achieve the goal or aim. For this, a self-scoring questionnaire with 10
statements was developed. The responses of the students were obtained on
2 point continuum i.e., yes or no and were given 1 and 0 scores, respectively
for positive statement. Reverse scoring was used in computation of
statement which was considered to be negative direction. The respondent
can obtained a minimum of 0 scores and maximum of 10. On the basis of
range of scores, following categories were formulated.
23
11. Utility of RAWE programme:
(a). utility in terms of ‘communication skill’:
It refers to the utility of RAWE programme in terms of communication
skill gained by the participant in conducting group discussion, meetings,
demonstration, in the preparation and use of Audio-visual aids during entire
period of RAWE programme. For this, a self-scoring questionnaire with 7
statements was developed. The responses of the students were obtained on
3 point continuum i.e., very much useful, useful, not at all useful and were
given 2, 1 and 0 scores, respectively for positive statement. The respondent
can obtain a minimum of 0 score and a maximum of 14. On the basis of
range of scores, following categories were formulated.
24
(c) Utility in terms of ‘socio economic aspects’:
It refers to the usefulness of the RAWE programme in terms of
gaining knowledge on various socio economic aspects during entire period
of RAWE programme. For this, a self-scoring questionnaire with 11
statements was developed. The responses of the students were obtained on
3 point continuum i.e., very much useful, useful, not at all useful and were
given 2, 1 and 0 scores, respectively for positive statement. The respondent
can obtain a minimum of 0 score and a maximum of 22. On the basis of
range of scores, following categories were formulated.
25
(e) Overall utility of RAWE programme:
It refers to the usefulness of the RAWE programme in terms of
knowledge and skills gained by participants in all activities perform during
entire period of RAWE programme. For this, a self-scoring questionnaire
with 49 statements was developed. The responses of the students were
obtained on 3 point continuum i.e., very much useful, useful, not at all useful
and were given 2, 1 and 0 scores, respectively for positive statement. The
respondent can obtain a minimum of 0 score and a maximum of 98. On the
basis of range of scores, following categories were formulated.
b. Dependent Variable:
Perception towards RAWE:
It refers to the impression and interpretation of the students based on
their practical and personal experience during RAWE programme. For this, a
self-scoring questionnaire with 14 statements was developed. The
responses of the students were obtained on 3 point continuum i.e., fully
agree, somewhat agree, not agree and were given 2, 1 and 0 scores,
respectively for positive statement.
26
3.5 Instruments of data collection:
A well structured questionnaire was used as an instrument of data
collection, which was developed incorporating all the items, keeping the
objectives and variables in view. It comprises of 2 parts.
1. First part consisted of personal data and indicators of the independent
variables.
2. Second part included indicators on perception towards RAWE.
The needed secondary data was collected from the research journals,
thesis, reports of State Agricultural Universities and Indian Council of
Agricultural Research.
27
method as described earlier. The following statistical techniques were used
in the study.
1. Percentage
2. Mean
3. Rank order
4. Chi –square test
5. Correlation coefficient
1. Percentage
The term „Percentage‟ means a fraction whose denominator is 100
and the numerator of the fraction is called percentage.
X
P = -------------- x 100
N
Where,
P = Percentage
X = Frequency of respondents
N = Total number of respondents
2. Mean
Mean was obtained by dividing the sum of the scores by the total
number of cases involved according to formula.
n
X i
X i 1
( 1, 2, 3.........n)
N
where,
X = Mean
∑Xi = Sum of all the scores in a distribution
n = Number of respondents
N = Total number of respondents.
(O-E) 2
2=Σ E
With d.f. (r-1) x(c-1)
28
Where,
2 = Chi Square
O = Observed frequency of cell
E = Expected frequency of cell
Σ = Summation
c = no. of columns
r = no. of rows
Ri Ci
Ei = ------------------
N
Where,
Note - In case of 2X3 or more than 2X2 contingency table, if any cell
frequency was less than 5, then that row or column has been merged
with subsidiary row or column maintaining degree of freedom one or
more than one, then the calculated value of chi square was compared
with table value at 0.05 level of probability to know the significance.
4. Correlation coefficient:
In order to ascertain the association between two variables, Inter-
correlation was applied. This test is widely used in social science, genetics,
medical sciences and many other situations where the investigator wishes to
test whether there is any correlation exists between the independent
variables and dependent variable.
29
by “r” and is a measure of relationship between two variables. The range of
correlation coefficient is between -1 to +1. It means that if the values are
negative the variables are negatively correlated and if values are positive,
they are positively correlated.
N xy ( x)( y)
r
[ N x 2 ( x) 2 [ N y 2 ( y ) 2 ]
Where,
N = number of pairs of scores
xy = sum of the products of paired scores
x = sum of x scores
y = sum of y scores
x2 = sum of squared x scores
y2 = sum of squared y score
When more than two variables are there, their correlation with each
other may be drawn using correlation coefficient formula and their correlation
with each other may be conveniently arranged in the form of a matrix known
as correlation matrix.
Null hypothesis:
There is no significant relationship between the selected independent
variables and perception of respondents towards RAWE programme.
30
RESULTS
This chapter deals with the analysis and interpretation of the collected
data. The data was processed and analyzed in line with the objectives of the
study.
Independent variables
The variables selected and studied as independent variables were
sex, family background, medium of instruction, OGPA, leadership quality,
mass media use, monitoring and evaluation, aspiration level, self confidence,
achievement motivation, utility of RAWE in terms of knowledge and skill.
1. Profile of the students
Sex:
Table 4.1 Distribution of RAWE participants according to their sex
31
Family background
Table 4.2 Distribution of RAWE participants according to their family
background
Medium of instruction
32
OGPA
Table 4.4 Distribution of RAWE participants according to their
OGPA
S. No. Categories Frequency Percentage
1. Low 62 52.54
2. Medium 54 45.76
3. High 02 01.70
Total 118 100.00
It is observed from the table 4.4 that maximum number of students i.e.
52.54 per cent, obtained low OGPA followed by medium (45.76%). It is
noticeable that only 1.70 per cent of students obtained high OGPA during
their graduation.
Leadership quality
33
Mass media use
It is cleared from the table 4.6 that maximum number of students i.e.
61.02 per cent had moderate use of mass media followed by 25.42 per cent
low and only 13.56 per cent had high mass media use respectively.
The data of the table 4.7 showed that 52.54 per cent participants had
medium satisfaction from present system of monitoring and evaluation,
followed by 44.92 per cent had high and only 2.54 per cent had low
satisfaction from the present system of monitoring and evaluation of the
RAWE programme. It is concluded that more than half (52.54%) of the
respondents had medium satisfaction from the present system of monitoring
and evaluation.
34
Table 4.8 Distribution of RAWE participants according to their
aspiration level
The data of the table 4.8 indicated that 6.78 per cent participants had
low aspiration level, 57.62 per cent had medium level of aspiration and 35.60
per cent of participants had high aspiration level. Thus, it is cleared that
more than half (57.62%) of the participants of RAWE programme had
medium level of aspiration.
Self confidence
Table 4.9 Distribution of RAWE participants according to their self
confidence
35
Achievement motivation
It is observed from the table 4.10 that only 3.39 per cent participants
had low achievement motivation, whereas 44.07 per cent had medium and
52.54 per cent of students had high level of achievement motivation. Thus, it
can be concluded that more than half (52.54%) of the respondents had
medium level of achievement motivation during the RAWE programme.
36
b. Utility in terms of ‘crop production and protection practices’.
Table 4.11.b Distribution of participants according to perceive utility of
RAWE in terms of ‘crop production and protection
practices’
37
of participants perceived high utility of RAWE programme. Therefore, it can
be concluded that majority (71.19%) of the participants perceived moderate
utility of the RAWE programme in terms of socio economic aspects.
38
revealed that none of the participants perceived low utility, 61.86 per cent
had moderate and 38.14 per cent of participants perceived high utility. Thus,
it can be concluded that majority (61.86%) of the participants perceived
moderate utility of RAWE programme in terms of knowledge and skill gained
by them in performing all the activity during entire period of RAWE
programme.
39
Table 4.13 Perception of participants towards the RAWE programme
INDEX
S. No. Role of RAWE programme Mean Rank
score
1. To get familiar with rural life 1.94 I
2. To understand village situations 1.88 II
3. To understand rural institutions 1.78 III
4. To understand the socio economic condition 1.50 X
of farmers
5. To understand cropping pattern of 1.66 VI
community
6. To understand adoption pattern and 1.61 VIII
adoption gap
7. To improve diagnostic skills 1.65 VII
8. To provide practical training in crop 1.71 IV
production
9. It improves communication skill 1.69 V
10. It provides opportunities to meet role model 1.46 XI
in agriculture to increase confidence
11. It has improved leadership qualities 1.54 IX
12. It provided opportunity to work with various 1.44 XII
agriculture institutions
13. To get acquainted with ongoing TOT 1.37 XIV
programme of agriculture
14. It developed confidence and professional 1.40 XIII
competence to solve field problem
Table 4.13 indicates that, the rank first was allotted to get familiar with
rural people and mean score was recorded as high as 1.94 indicating that
most of the participants got familiar with rural people through RAWE
programme. Rank II was allotted to understand village situations with mean
score 1.88 subsequently rank III was allotted to understand rural institutions
with mean score of 1.78. Rank IV was allotted to provide practical training in
crop production with mean score as 1.71. Rank V was allotted to improve
communication skills with mean score of 1.69. Rank VI was allotted to
understand cropping pattern of community with mean score 1.66.
Rank VII was allotted to improve diagnostic skills as mean score was
1.65. Rank VIII was allotted to understand adoption pattern and adoption
40
gap with mean score 1.61. To improve leadership qualities was given rank IX
as mean score was 1.54. Rank X was allotted to understand the socio
economic conditions of farmers with mean score 1.50. RAWE provides
opportunities to meet role model in agriculture to increase confidence given
rank XI as mean score was 1.46. It provides opportunity to work with various
agriculture institutions, it developed confidence and professional
competence to solve field problems and to get acquaint with ongoing TOT
programme of agriculture gained ranks XII, XIII and XIV, respectively with
the respective mean scores of 1.44, 1.40, and 1.37.
The data of table 4.14 showed that out of the total male respondent,
none of the male respondent had low perception, 16.95 per cent had
medium perception and 38.98 per cent had high perception towards the
RAWE programme.
41
Since, some of the cell frequency was less than five, therefore the
data were merged to satisfy the criteria of chi square distribution. The
merged data is as follows:-
Perception of students
Sex Low + medium High Total
f f
Male 20 46 66
Female 12 40 52
Total 32 86 118
2cal = 0.768, non significant at 5% level with 1d.f, table value = 3.84
The data of table 4.15 showed that, out of the total respondent having
rural background, none of the respondent had low perception, while 22.03
per cent had medium and 44.07 per cent had high perception towards the
RAWE programme.
42
perception and 28.81 per cent had high perception towards the RAWE
programme.
Since, some of the cell frequency was less than five, therefore the
data were merged to satisfy the criteria of chi square distribution. The
merged data is as follows:-
Perception of students
Family Low + medium High Total
background
f f
Rural 26 52 78
Urban 06 34 40
Total 32 86 118
Perception of students
Medium of
instruction Low Medium High Total
(up to 9) (10 to 19) (above 19)
f % f % f %
English 00 00 05 04.24 34 28.81 39
43
The data of table 4.16 showed that out of the total English medium
respondent, none of the respondent had low perception, only 4.24 per cent
respondents had medium perception and 28.81 per cent had high perception
towards the RAWE programme.
Since, some of the cell frequency was less than five, therefore the
data were merged to satisfy the criteria of chi square distribution. The
merged data is as follows:-
f f
English 05 34 39
Hindi 27 52 79
Total 32 86 118
44
Table 4.17 Relation between respondents OGPA and their perception
towards the RAWE programme
Perception of students
OGPA
Category Low Medium High Total
(up to 9) (10 to 19) (above 19)
f % f % f %
Low (6.0-7.4) 00 00 12 10.17 50 42.37 62
The data of table 4.17 showed that, out of the total respondent who
obtained OGPA under low category, none of the respondent had low
perception, only 10.17 per cent had medium and 42.37 per cent respondents
had high perception towards the RAWE programme.
Since, some of the cell frequency was less than five, therefore the
data were merged to satisfy the criteria of chi square distribution. The
merged data is as follows:-
45
OGPA Perception of student
Category Low + High Total
medium
f f
Low (6.0-7.4) 12 50 62
Medium (7.5-8.4) + High (above 8.4) 20 36 56
Total 32 86 118
46
production and protection practices, socio economic aspects, agricultural
extension activity and overall utility of RAWE programme).
Form the table 4.19, it is inferred that one of the problem that is
ranked first is, unable to cover all the activities in given time due to lack of
expert advice in villages. Rank II was allotted to improper orientation at
KVK/Research station and don’t know what to do and how to do in the initial
days of RAWE programme, rank III was allotted to problems in getting
secondary data of village required for socio-economic survey. Rank IV was
allotted commonly to the problem in conducting participatory rural appraisal
(PRA) in village and unsatisfactory accommodation facility.
47
Rank V is allotted to the problem that lack of interest by some of the
host farmer. Rank VI was allotted to the problem in understanding specific
reasons for the gap in adoption of recommended practices by the farmers.
Rank VII was allotted to the problem that more than 80 per cent attendance
is required, only some students are sincerely attend the programme. Finally
rank VIII was allotted to both the problem unable to build rapport with
farmers initially and unable to organize social awareness camp in village.
Table 4.20 showed a few suggestions that were given by the students to
be included in the RAWE schedule. They were,
1. RAWE staff should always be available for continuous guidance.
2. Orientation should be done properly at respective KVK/Research
station.
3. There should be more frequent monitoring and evaluation for smooth
running of the programme.
4. A trial or mini RAWE programme of 1-2 weeks to be done before
commencement of actual RAWE to understand farmers’ problems
and planning of original RAWE.
5. More exposure is required for transfer of technology programme.
48
DISCUSSION
49
5.1.4 OGPA
Maximum number of students i.e., 52.54 per cent obtained low OGPA
followed by medium (45.76%) and only 1.70 per cent obtained high OGPA
during their graduation. It is clear that maximum number of respondents
obtained low OGPA.
50
high aspiration level for goal concerning to future level of achievement. The
findings are quite similar to as Sanjeev and Gowda (2013).
51
entire period of RAWE programme. The results are similar with the results of
Bordoloi et al. (2013), Sanjeev and Gowda (2013), and Kotte (2014).
52
(i) The results indicated that there was no significant association
between sex of respondents and their perception towards RAWE
programme. The findings are in conformity with Hase and Deshmukh
(2012) and Sanjeev and Gowda (2013).
(iv) The study shows that there was significant association between
OGPA of respondents and their perception towards RAWE
programme. The findings of Sanjeev and Gowda (2013) supported
the present work.
(v) The study point out that leadership quality of respondents was found
to be positively significant with perception towards the RAWE
programme. This is due to the fact that those students, who showed
more leadership qualities, naturally lead their group in all activities of
RAWE. This created a positive perception in them towards the RAWE
programme. The finding finds support with the work of Kumar and
Sharma (2013), Sanjeev and Gowda (2013) and Antwal et al. (2016).
(vi) Mass media use shows a positive significant relation with the
perception of respondents. It is indicating that an increase in mass
media use makes students more exposed to the present situation in
agriculture and made them more active in RAWE, which can help
53
them in checking the ground realities on their own. The results are in
close proximation to that of Sanjeev and Gowda (2013).
54
economic aspects and in performing different agricultural extension
activities. So due to diverse utility of RAWE programme, students had
a positive perception. This study finds the support from the work of
Borthakur and Bortamuly (2013), Bordoloi et al. (2013) and Kotte
(2014).
55
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR
FURTHER WORK
6.1 Summary:
56
selected as respondents for the study. There were 118 students including 52
girls and 66 boys’ students. The dependent variable studied is perception of
students towards RAWE programme. Whereas the variables like sex, family
background, medium of instruction, OGPA, leadership quality, mass media
use, monitoring and evaluation, aspiration level, self confidence,
achievement motivation and utility of RAWE in terms of knowledge and skill
as independent variables.
The measurement was carried out with the help of well structured and
pre-tested questionnaire. The students were supplied with the
questionnaires and requested to respond. The data thus obtained was
processed with the help of frequencies, percentage, mean, rank order, chi-
square test and correlation coefficient.
6.2 Conclusions:
The conclusions of the present study are presented here on the basis
of objective:
57
7. More than half (52.54%) of the respondent had medium satisfaction
from the present system of monitoring and evaluation of the RAWE
programme.
10. More than half (52.54%) of the respondents had high level of
achievement motivation.
58
3. Perception of students towards the RAWE programme
Majority of the respondents had high perception towards the RAWE
programme. Hence, it can be concluded that the designed RAWE
programme had met almost all the needs of the students.
59
conducting PRA in village, unsatisfactory accommodation facility, lack of
interest by some of host farmers, problem in understanding the specific
reasons for gap in adoption of recommended practices are some of the
major constraints.
60
BIBILOGRAPHY
61
Hase RS and Deshmukh PR. 2012. Utility perception about extension education
courses by the undergraduates studies. Agriculture Update 7(3 & 4):
410-413.
Kapri Anju, Kurbetta NC and Hiremath US. 2016. Perception of RAWE
Programme by students of UAS, Dharwad (Karnataka). Journal of
Agroecology and Natural Resource Management 3(1): 121-124.
Khare NK and Pyasi VK. 2013. Manual for Rural Agricultural Work Experience.
DFA/JNKVV/Manual RAWE/UG/2013/24. Jawaharlal Nehru krishi Vishwa
Vidyalaya, Jabalpur, 55p.
Kumar S and Sharma RC. 2013. Outlook of Agriculture Undergraduates of
JNKVV towards RAWE programme. Technoframe-A Journal of
Multidisciplinary Advance Research 2 (1): 40-43.
Kotte S. 2014. A study on perception among participants of RAWE programme
at J.N.K.V.V., Jabalpur. M.Sc. Unpublished thesis, JNKVV, Jabalpur.
49p.
Mahadik RP, Mehta PG and Sawant PA. 2011. Attitude of Students towards
Rural Work Experience Programme (RWEP). Rajasthan Journal of
Extension Education 19: 148-151.
Nanwal RK and Singh KP. 2004. On-farm studies under Rural Agriculture Work
Experience (RAWE) Education Programme in India – some results. CCS
Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar.
Oloruntoba Abayomi. 2008. Agricultural Students’ Perceptions of Farm Practical
Year Programme at University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus 7 ( 4 ): 245-252.
Ramanjaneyulu. 1992. A critical evaluation of Rural Agriculture Work Experience
Programme (RAWEP) under Agriculture College, Bapatla. M.Sc. (Ag.)
unpublished thesis, APAU.
Reddy DS. 1985. A study on effectiveness of Rural Agricultural Work
Experience Programme of Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University. M. Sc.
(Ag.) Unpublished Thesis, ANGRAU, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad.
Reiling BA, Marshall TT, Brendemuhl JH, McQuagge JA, and Umphrey JE.
2003. Experiential learning in the animal sciences: Development of a
multispecies large-animal management and production practicum Journal
of Animal Science 2003 81: 3202–3210
Sanjeev MV and Gowda KN. 2013. Perceptions on Experiential Learning: A
Study of Agricultural Students. Indian Research Journal of Extension
Education 13(1): 48-55.
Singh RK and Tyagi SK. 2012. Observation of Contact Farmers on Rural
Agricultural Work Experience Programme.Indian Research Journal of
Extension Education 12(3): 136-139.
Shareef SM and Rambabu P. 1999. Reactions of students towards RAWE
programme. Maharashtra journal of Extension Education 18: 279-282.
Sujatha 2001. Students perception about academic environment in Home
Science Faculty of Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, Andhra
Pradesh. M. Sc. Thesis Unpublished, ANGRAU, Hyderabad.
Wankhade Abhay and Verma VK. 2007. Opinion of students towards Rural
Agricultural Work Experience (RAWE) Programme. JNKVV Research
journal 41 (1): 147-150.
62
World Bank Report. 1995. Document of the World Bank Report No. 13517- IN
staff Appraisal Report of India, AHRD, March 9, 1995. South Asia Deptt.
Of Agriculture Operations Division.
Yadav VV, Ganvir BN and Shaikh AM. 2003. A study of practical experience
gained by RAWE students. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural
Universities 28: 66-69.
63
JAWAHARLAL NEHRU KRISHI VISHWA VIDYALAYA
COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, JABALPUR (M.P.)
DEPARTMENT OF EXTENSION EDUCATION
Interview schedule
2. FAMILY BACKGROUND:
a. Rural
b. Urban
3. MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTION:
S.No. Medium of instruction English Hindi
4. OGPA:
S.No. OGPA Category
1. 6.0-7.4
2. 7.5-8.4
3. 8.5 – above
I
S.No. Statements SA A UD DA SDA
10. I used to accept willingly any responsibility assign to
me by my leader
11. I used to address the members of my group
respectfully
12. I used to appreciate any member of my group who did
work
13. I used to act as link between my group members and
farmers
14. I used to take extra responsibility for my group
15. I encouraged all the group members to take up duties
and responsibilities without hesitation
16. I used to plan the daily activities in RAWE programme
on behalf of my group
17. I volunteered to solve farmer / farm women specific
problem
Code: 1.SA- Strongly Agree, 2.A-Agree, 3.UD- Un Decided, 4.DA –Disagree, 5.SDA-Strongly Disagree.
II
9. SELF CONFIDENCE OF STUDENT DURING RAWE:
S.No. Statements Yes No
1. I adjusted readily to new situations during RAWE programme
2. I faced difficult situations during RAWE without worry
3. I was hesitant in taking decision during RAWE programme
4. I had fear of failing in anything during RAWE programme
5. I felt secure within myself during RAWE programme
6. I frequently felt unworthy of myself during RAWE programme
7. I normally felt discouraged when my opinions different from that of
others during RAWE programme
8. I have enough faith in myself to do any work during RAWE
programme
9. I gave up several times doing up a thing during RAWE programme
because I felt too little of my abilities
10. I found it easy to keep my mind on any task during RAWE
programme
Code: 1.SA- Strongly Agree, 2.A-Agree, 3.UD- Un Decided, 4.DA –Disagree, 5.SDA-Strongly
Disagree.
III
b. Utility of RAWE in terms of gaining knowledge and skill in ‘Crop production
and protection practices
S.No. Utility areas Very much Useful Not at all
useful useful
1. To understand critical stages of different crops
2. To understand reasons behind existing
practices
3. To understand systems of planting and
spacing
4. To know practiced irrigation methods of
farmers
5. To identify nutritional and physiological
disorders
6. To know the methods and doses of fertilizers
Used by farmers
7. To know the insect- pest infestation and their
control measures in different crops
8. To know the dosage calculations of fungicide
for seed treatment and insecticide for spraying
9. To know the weed control measures practiced
by farmers
10. To understand input supply agencies of
different agriculture inputs
11. Type of equipments used by farmer
12. Developed skill in handling of farm implements
and machinery
13. To observe symptoms of crop maturity
14. To understand harvesting and threshing
methods
15. To compare estimated yield with actual yield
16. To understand Cost calculations and labour
utilized
IV
d. Utility of RAWE in terms of gaining knowledge and skill with respect to
‘Agricultural extension activity’
S.No. Utility areas Very much Useful Not at
useful all
useful
1. Identifying problems of farmers
2. Understanding the adoption of innovative /
improved / recommended farm technology
3. Understanding the gaps in adoption of the
practices
4. Understanding the reasons behind adoption
gaps
5. Developing extension strategies for the gap
observed
6. Organizing method / result demonstrations of
improved technology
7. Organizing farmers training camp, field visits
and agricultural exhibitions
8. Studying on-going central/state sponsored
rural programmes and extension work
9. In studying the role of village institutions in
extension work
10. To know the mandates and functions of KVK
11. Understanding the activities of KVK / Research
station
12. Visit to line departments viz. Agriculture,
Horticulture, Dairy, Poultry etc.
13. To know the concept of crop cafeteria
14. Teaching farmers regarding their village
resources, problems and solutions using PRA
15. Documentation of ITK used by farmers
V
Constraints experienced by student
S. Constraints Yes No
No.
1. Problems in getting secondary data of village required for socio
economic survey
2. Problems in conducting PRA in village
3. Problem in understanding the specific reasons for gap in
adoption of recommended practices
4. Mention other problems
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI