Professional Documents
Culture Documents
G. BOSSIS
Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2002.16:2576-2582. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
E-mail: bossis@unice.fr
1 Introduction
Magnetorheological fluids (MRF) are non-aqueous suspensions of micron-
sized magnetizable particles. They usually consist of a magnetically soft
solid phase material. Iron has been a popular choice since it is the element
with the highest saturation magnetization. Furthermore, it is easily obtained
from iron pentacarbonyl through a relatively inexpensive chemical vapor
deposition (CVD) process. Some properties of the magnetic dispersed
phase have been studied: Felt et al [1] studied the effect of particle size on
the magnetorheological effect. Wu and Conrad [2] studied the role of
surface roughness, and Foister [3] studied the effect of particle size
distribution. Also, other soft magnetic materials have been studied [4].
Due to the increasing use of this kind of systems in many fields [5], it seems
necessary to incorporate novel studies concerning the relation between their
rheological and magnetic properties. The aim of the present work is to
investigate the effect of the existence of a remanent magnetization in the
2576
Magnetic Hysteresis 2577
2 Experimental
Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2002.16:2576-2582. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
66
viscoelastic linear region" is only considered. The fact that the response to
low enough excitations depends on its value has also been reported in the
literature for ERF [8].
Preshear Measurement
ramp
(a)
\
Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2002.16:2576-2582. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
t(s)
by UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN on 03/03/15. For personal use only.
HopqA/ii)
29.'
23:
5.9 4
t(s)
Figure 1. Schematics of the experimental routines in steady-shear (a) and dynamic oscillatory (b) experiments. In
(a), the sequence is: preshear, equilibration, shear ramp, preshear, magnetic field on, equilibration, shear ramp, and
so on. In (b) the steady shear ramps are substituted by an oscillatory shear, with increasing amplitude and frequency
1Hz.
Magnetic Hysteresis 2579
Mn is given by
8r| t
by UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN on 03/03/15. For personal use only.
^" = -^fer c
W
where r\c and \icr are the apparent viscosity and relative permeability of the
continuous phase (silicone oil) respectively, (5 = —— — is the magnetic
contrast factor and iipr is the relative permeability of the particles. The
results, not shown here for brevity, demonstrate a good agreement with the
predictions of non-interacting chain models, no matter the hydrodynamic
interaction considered [9]: a slope close to -1 is found in all cases when
x*/<|> is plotted vs. Mn in a log-log scale. For Mn below = 10"4, a plateau is
found for x*/<|>, suggesting that the suspensions do not exhibit a pure
Bingham behavior, other researchers found similar results [10].
It is also possible to perform a similar analysis in oscillatory measurements,
by studying the viscoelastic behavior during a frequency sweep experiment
analogous to the one described in Fig. lb. for an amplitude stress sweep. In
terms of the dynamic analogues of x* and Mn, the curves properly scale
and have almost identical slopes (-1 ± 5X10"4) (we do not show the results
here for brevity).
However, the most important finding concerns the rheological behavior
obtained for a high enough volume fraction (= 7.5 %), by varying the
external magnetic field in the sequence described in the Sec. 2. In this case,
the curves (x* vs. Mn), both in stationary and dynamic conditions, no
longer collapse although their separation decreases when the volume
fraction decreases (inset in Fig. 2). Fig. 2 is a typical example of the steady
flow curves in the cobalt ferrite suspensions.
Non-negligible thermodynamic forces are not a good explanation for the
lack of scaling since for high fields the typical size of the aggregates must
increase and hence the effect of brownian motion should be less significant.
2580 J. De Vicente et al.
104 —v--23.7
—O- -29.7
Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2002.16:2576-2582. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
iow
by UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN on 03/03/15. For personal use only.
Figure 2. Typical flow curves of 2.5 % volume fraction cobalt ferrite suspensions for different external magnetic
fields. Inset: width of the steady-state T* VS. Mn plots for cobalt ferrite suspensions of different volume fractions.
The possibility that we have two magnetic forces, one coming from the
induced magnetization (at high fields), and the other from the permanent
magnetization of the particles (at low fields) could explain the lack of
scaling at low fields and the trend of the curves to collapse for H 0 >« 20
kA/m.
A stronger evidence of this interpretation comes from the analysis of
the dependence of the yield stress (xy) on the external field. xy was
calculated following the usual procedure of extrapolating the stress towards
zero shear rate in a logaritmic scale. The results are shown in Fig. 3a. In
our opinion, a more precise determination can be done by applying a stress
ramp in the oscillatory regime (Fig. lb). From dynamic measurements it is
possible to obtain a similar behavior (Fig. 3b). We will call "critical stress"
(xc) to the one corresponding to the sharp decrease in the curve G' (storage
modulus) vs. To in an oscillatory amplitude sweep.
The increase in xy under the application of the magnetic field is easily
explainable due to the structuration of the MRF. At high fields the model of
multipolar interactions between polarizable particles is enough to predict
the behavior observed. At medium fields, the chains formed by the
Magnetic Hysteresis 2581
i—•—i—•—i—«—i—•—»—•—i—•—r
0 29.7 23.7 17.8 11.9 5.9 0
H0(kA/m)
Figure 3. a) Yield stress as a function of the external magneticfieldfor different volumefractions,b) Same as a),
but for critical stress.
i • 1 « 1 * 1 « 1 » 1 • r
0 29.7 23.7 17.8 11.9 5.9 0
by UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN on 03/03/15. For personal use only.
H0(kA/m)
Figure 4. Yield stress of suspensions of carbonyl iron particles at 10 % volumenfraction,as afiinctionof the
applied magnetic field.
Acknowledgements
References
1. Felt D. W., Hagenbiichle M., Liu J. and Richard J., J. Intelligent Mater.
Sys. Str. 7(1996)589
2. Wu C. W. and Conrad H., J. Appl Phys. 83 (1998) 3880
3. Foister R., U. S. Patent 5,667,715, 1997
4. Margida A. J., Weiss K. D. and Carlson J. D., in Proc. 5 Int. Conf. on
Electrorheological Fluids, Magnetorheological Suspensions and
Associated Technology, ed by W. A. Bullough, (World Scientific,
Singapore, 1996) 544
5. Ginder J. M., U. S. Patent 5,549,837, 1996
6. Tamura H. and Matijevie E., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 90 (1982) 100
7. de Vicente J., Delgado A. V., Plaza R. C , Duran J. D. G. and
Gonzalez-Caballero F., Langmuir 16 (2000) 7954
8. Otsubo Y. and Edamura K., J. Rheol. 38 (1994) 1721
9. Martin J. E. and Anderson R. E., J. Chem. Phys. 104 (1996) 4814
10. Volkova O., Etude de la Rheologie de Suspensions de Particules
Magnetiques, Ph. D. Thesis, Universite de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, 1998
11. Bossis G., Lemaire E., Volkova O. and Clercx H., J. Rheol. 41 (1997)
687