Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I
By Geraint Catley and N AN environment of increasing bioreactors (MBRs) can deliver effluent
Wesley Jones water costs and legislative pressure of sufficient high quality and with the
through IPPC (Integrated Pollution reliability required to make water
Prevention and Control), the Water recycling a reality. In addition, MBRs can
Framework Directive and the Landfill achieve this in a fraction of the footprint
Directive, the manufacturing industry in area compared to a traditional system.
the UK is being urged to look closely at Aquabio, a UK-based company, have
their water use and where possible, designed and installed ‘turnkey’
consider recycling. In Asia, where wastewater treatment and re-use plants at
industrial water users face long term Kanes Foods, in Worcestershire and
supply constraints and tighter regulatory Bourne Salads (Geest) in Lincolnshire.
initiatives, plants with the requisite Both projects were developed in the face
volumes may find proven effluent of increasing demand for water re-use,
recycling technologies a viable driven by high costs for potable water
consideration. supply and high disposal costs when
Unlike more traditional wastewater discharging waste-water to sewer. With
treatment processes such as conventional the installation of MBRs and tertiary
Figure 1: Basic Process Flow activated sludge (AS) systems, membrane reverse osmosis (RO) plants, Kanes Foods
Diagram for AMBR Process
and Bourne Salads can
now cost effectively
treat their wastewater to
the high standards nece-
ssary for potable re-use.
‘Closing the loop’
within their operating
units brings revenue
savings, strategic
control over their own
water resources and
significant flexibility for
factory growth and
production without
external dependence on
the Water Companies.
This article looks at
both projects high-
lighting the problems faced by each Table 1: Comparison of design basis for
company and how these were solved Kanes Foods and Bourne Salads
using MBR technology.
Parameter Kanes Foods Bourne Salads
The Aquabio AMBR process
Volume to screening/ balancing 1,200 m3/day 1,200 m3/day
The Advanced Membrane Bioreactor
Process (AMBR) is a high performance COD concentration (average) 1,000 mg/l 400 mg/l
and robust biological process, utilising a Volume to AMBR process 3
815 m /day 1,200 m3/day
small footprint and yielding treated water
COD Load to AMBR process 815 kg COD/day 480 kg COD/day
suitable for direct feed to a reverse osmosis
process to allow water re-use. This MBR Volume to RO system 815 m3/day 600 m3/day
configuration comprises the use of jet Volume of potable quality 650 m3/day 450 m3/day
aeration within the bioreactor and external water for re-use
‘cross-flow’ type ultrafiltration (UF)
membranes for biomass separation. (see flux rates then submerged ‘gravity’ type volumetric discharge to sewer. The
Figure 1 on pg. 13). mem-branes. External membranes are company was faced with either
The use of the JETOX system (jet also much easier to clean and maintain. contributing to a significant upgrade of
aeration) within the bioreactor delivers The use of a true ultrafiltration membrane the local sewage facility or developing an
high oxygen transfer rates via easily with a low molecular cut off allows direct ‘in house’effluent strategy involving both
accessible and low maintenance application of the UF permeate to reverse treatment and re-use of water.
equipment. This system also allows osmosis treatment without the need for For both sites Aquabio were
separate control of air injection and reactor intermediate processes. commissioned to survey the existing
mixing functions, resul-ting in effluent treatment facilities and develop a
significantly reduced power use for Case studies: Kanes Foods and full scale design which would provide full
processes with high fluctuations in reactor Bourne Salads biological treatment in a MBR system
feed load, typical of industrial effluents. Kanes Foods is a major fresh followed by RO and UV disinfection
The use of UF membranes for vegetable and salads processor based in allowing re-use into the factory.
biomass separation allows the operating the Midlands, UK. Hydraulic limitations To provide full confidence in the
biomass concentrations in the treatment solution, pilot studies
bioreactor to be increased to a range were carried out using Aquabio’s
of 10,000-30,000 mg/l (MLSS). AMBR and RO Pilot Plants. It was
Hence in comparison with proven that sufficient treatment
conventional AS units the could be achieved on a reliable
bioreactor tank can be 3-10 times basis and that the final RO treated
smaller in volume. This, coupled water was fully compliant with the
with the fact that the UF parameters set out in the UK Water
membranes take up far less space Supply (Water Quality)
than a traditional final settlement Regulations 2000.
tank, means that theAMBR process Table 1 shows some of the
has a very small footprint. design parameters for both projects.
Furthermore, as biomass is At Kanes Foods the AMBR
separated by UF membranes, the Figure 2: UF Membrane Banks at Kanes Foods process takes the form of two No.
inherent problems associated with 250m3 bio-reactors. These are
settlement tanks e.g. sludge bulking, are on discharge to the sewer, increasing aerated and mixed by 2 No. Jetox aeration
removed leading to easier operation and pressure on incoming water use, systems providing a total of 1,980 kg O2/
a greater degree of process control. increasing discharge costs and the need day. The contents of the bioreactor are
Both clients selected the ‘cross flow’ for factory expansion highlighted the pumped continuously through four banks
UF membrane AMBR system due to a potential benefits of water recycling. of UF cross-flow membranes (see Figure
number of reasons. The prices for the UF Bourne Salads, part of Geest PLC, 2).
membranes were lower than the found themselves in a similar position. The biologically treated water is
equivalent ‘submerged type’membranes. Since the factory was built in 1997, removed as permeate from the UF
In addition the external cross-flow dynamic growth has lead to considerable membranes. At this stage the water is
membranes offer much greater permeate expansion and a resultant increase in solids and bacteria free, containing only