You are on page 1of 11

Jennifer Alinab

Lalaine Mae Laudato


III. Correlation

Correlations

Mean Mean Overall


Delinquency: All Strain with
items Bullying

Mean Delinquency: All items Pearson Correlation 1 .426**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 1309 1296

Mean Overall Strain with Pearson Correlation .426** 1


Bullying
Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 1296 1304

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).


a. With a Pearson correlation coefficient of r=.426, which is significant at p<0.001, the mean
delinquency and mean overall strain with bullying are perfectly correlated. There is also a
very low chance of getting a correlation this big in the sample if the null hypothesis is true.
Therefore, there is a significant relationship between the mean delinquency and mean strain
with bullying. Thus, as the mean overall strain with bullying increases, there will also be an
increase with the mean delinquency.
b. The value shows how much of the variability in the mean delinquency is shared by the mean
overall strain with bullying. This means that the mean delinquency is sharing 18% of the
variability in the mean overall strain with bullying. However, though the mean delinquency
is highly correlated with the mean overall strain, there is only 18% of variation in mean
overall strain with bullying that can be accounted for. Leaving the 82% of the variability to
be accounted to other variables.
r2= 0.18

c.
d. With a Pearson correlation coefficient of r=.426 and the significance value being less than
0.001, mean delinquency is positively related with mean overall strain with bullying. Having
the Pearson correlation coefficient of r=.388 at p<0.001, the output showed that mean
delinquency is positively related to mean anger. Mean anger increases as mean delinquency
increases. Finally, mean overall strain with bullying is also positively related to mean anger
with a Pearson correlation coefficient of .r=.539, p<.001. Mean anger increases as the mean
overall strain with bullying increases.
e. In the given data, the correlation between mean delinquency and mean anger remains
constant after adding the controlling variable of mean anger. Both mean delinquency and
mean overall strain with bullying are positively correlated with mean anger.

Partial Corr

Correlations

Mean Mean Overall


Delinquency: All Strain with
Control Variables items Bullying

Mean Anger: All items Mean Delinquency: All items Correlation 1.000 .304

Significance (2-tailed) . .000

df 0 1290

Mean Overall Strain with Correlation .304 1.000


Bullying
Significance (2-tailed) .000 .

df 1290 0
IV. T – Test
1.

Group Statistics

Imputed
age for
missing
values N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Mean Parental Control: All 1 728 2.521 .6311 .0234


items
2 576 2.541 .6144 .0256

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for


Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Sig. (2- Mean Std. Error
F Sig. t df tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper

Mean Parental Equal


-.58
Control: All variances 1.864 .172 1302 .561 -.0202 .0348 -.0885 .0480
2
items assumed

Equal
-.58 1.248E
variances not .560 -.0202 .0347 -.0883 .0478
3 3
assumed
Based on the given data, mean parental control is higher for old adolescents (M= 2.541, SE=
0.0256) than to the young adolescents (M= 2.521, SE= 0.0234). The two tailed value of p=.560,
which is greater than 0.05 therefore has no significant difference between the mean of these two
samples. We can say that the level of parental control for young and old adolescents are the same
and are having no difference.
2.

Group Statistics

Sex N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Mean Parental Control: All Female 737 2.587 .6453 .0238


items
Male 566 2.455 .5869 .0247

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for


Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Sig. (2- Mean Std. Error
F Sig. t df tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper

Mean Parental Equal


3.82
Control: All variances 6.509 .011 1301 .000 .1326 .0347 .0645 .2006
2
items assumed

Equal
3.87
variances not 1.264E3 .000 .1326 .0343 .0654 .1998
0
assumed
Based on the given data, there is higher mean parental control on females (M=2.587, SE= 0.0238)
than males (M= 2.455, SE= 0.0247). In this case, the two tailed value of p=.000, which is less
than 0.05 means that there is a statistically significant difference between the mean of these two
samples. We can say that the level of parental control for young and old adolescents are the same
V. ANOVA

ANOVA

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

District Between Groups 36.648 65 .564 .851 .794

Within Groups 823.320 1243 .662

Total 859.968 1308

Grade Level Between Groups 184.185 65 2.834 2.324 .000

Within Groups 1515.480 1243 1.219

Total 1699.665 1308


a. In the given data, the significance level of mean delinquency based on grade level is 0.000
(p=0.000) which below 0.05. Therefore, there is a statistical significance difference in the mean
delinquency based on grade level. However, the significance of mean delinquency based on the
district is .794 (p=.794) which is above 0.05. Therefore, there is no statistical significance
difference of mean delinquency based on district.

VI. Regression
1. A

Variables Entered/Removedb

Variables
Model Variables Entered Removed Method

1 Mean Anger: All


. Enter
itemsa

a. All requested variables entered.

b. Dependent Variable: Mean Delinquency: All items

Model Summary

Std. Error of the


Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Estimate

1 .338a .114 .113 .3644

a. Predictors: (Constant), Mean Anger: All items


ANOVAb

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 22.292 1 22.292 167.917 .000a

Residual 172.978 1303 .133

Total 195.270 1304

a. Predictors: (Constant), Mean Anger: All items

b. Dependent Variable: Mean Delinquency: All items

Coefficientsa

Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients

Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.

1 (Constant) .157 .024 6.486 .000

Mean Anger: All items .201 .015 .338 12.958 .000

a. Dependent Variable: Mean Delinquency: All items

2. A

Variables Entered/Removedb

Variables
Model Variables Entered Removed Method

1 Mean Overall
Strain with
. Enter
Bullying, Mean
Anger: All itemsa

a. All requested variables entered.

b. Dependent Variable: Mean Delinquency: All items


Model Summary

Std. Error of the


Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Estimate

1 .444a .197 .196 .3470

a. Predictors: (Constant), Mean Overall Strain with Bullying, Mean Anger:


All items

ANOVAb

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 38.130 2 19.065 158.308 .000a

Residual 155.355 1290 .120

Total 193.485 1292

a. Predictors: (Constant), Mean Overall Strain with Bullying, Mean Anger: All items

b. Dependent Variable: Mean Delinquency: All items

Coefficientsa

Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients

Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.

1 (Constant) .074 .024 3.047 .002

Mean Anger: All items .094 .018 .158 5.340 .000

Mean Overall Strain with


.291 .025 .339 11.443 .000
Bullying

a. Dependent Variable: Mean Delinquency: All items

VII. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)

1. A
Communalities

Initial Extraction
Done things that bother others 1.000 .519
Pushed and shoved others 1.000 .618
Started a fight over nothing 1.000 .495
Ran away from home 1.000 .322
Had sex with someone of the same sex 1.000 .720
Had sex with someone of the opposite sex 1.000 .776
Extorted money from others 1.000 .491
Gone to night clubs or pubs 1.000 .461
Made vandals on walls, fences, chairs, or any other property owned by others 1.000 .310
Watched/listened to pornographic videos and materials 1.000 .461
Carried a gun/knife and other harmful weapons 1.000 .655
Smoked marijuana 1.000 .668
Reprimanded by police, barangay officials 1.000 .566
Used other types of drugs (e.g. shabu) 1.000 .656
Sniffed glue or rugby 1.000 .659
Smoked cigarettes 1.000 .600
Hit or threatened to hit fellow students at school 1.000 .568
Joined a gang, a fraternity, a “clan” 1.000 .503
Intentionally broken, damaged property belonging to others 1.000 .529
Said mean or nasty things purposely to insult or embarrass others 1.000 .492
Stolen money or other things from your parents or other members of the family 1.000 .596
Took things from other people without asking 1.000 .568
Skipped school without an excuse 1.000 .487
Cheated on school tests 1.000 .453
Avoided paying for tricycles, jeepneys, buses 1.000 .544
Avoided paying the food ordered in the canteen, store 1.000 .666
Gambling activities 1.000 .522
Drank alcoholic drinks (e.g. beers, wine. liquor) 1.000 .645
Disobeyed parents 1.000 .519
Disobeyed teachers 1.000 .511
Lying to authorities such as parents and teachers 1.000 .462

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %

1 7.844 25.303 25.303 7.844 25.303 25.303


2 3.157 10.185 35.488 3.157 10.185 35.488

3 1.410 4.549 40.037 1.410 4.549 40.037

4 1.311 4.230 44.267 1.311 4.230 44.267

5 1.230 3.969 48.237 1.230 3.969 48.237

6 1.052 3.395 51.631 1.052 3.395 51.631

7 1.037 3.344 54.976 1.037 3.344 54.976

8 .946 3.051 58.026

9 .886 2.858 60.884

10 .870 2.807 63.691

11 .796 2.567 66.258

12 .721 2.327 68.586

13 .711 2.293 70.879

14 .693 2.235 73.114

15 .667 2.152 75.266

16 .656 2.115 77.381

17 .625 2.017 79.399

18 .605 1.951 81.350

19 .592 1.910 83.260

20 .564 1.819 85.079

21 .536 1.730 86.809

22 .518 1.672 88.481

23 .499 1.610 90.091

24 .477 1.538 91.628

25 .447 1.441 93.069

26 .430 1.387 94.456

27 .402 1.296 95.752


28 .392 1.265 97.017

29 .377 1.217 98.234

30 .317 1.023 99.258

31 .230 .742 100.000

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Component Matrixa

Component

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Done things that bother others -.07


.362 .449 .164 -.274 .275 .056
9

Pushed and shoved others -.01


.411 .491 .330 -.237 .201 .036
8

Started a fight over nothing .466 .304 .356 .159 -.154 .052 .083

Ran away from home .461 -.178 -.019 .159 -.130 .186 -.037

Had sex with someone of the same sex -.13


.541 -.421 -.031 .156 .443 -.107
1

Had sex with someone of the opposite sex -.10


.552 -.450 -.031 .155 .478 -.074
0

Extorted money from others .627 -.229 .066 .054 .170 .056 -.080

Gone to night clubs or pubs .568 -.191 -.076 .026 .072 .006 -.300

Made vandals on walls, fences, chairs, or any other property owned by others -.22 -.07
.498 .047 -.070 .006 .003
4 3

Watched/listened to pornographic videos and materials -.08


.606 .026 -.245 .057 .035 -.142
9

Carried a gun/knife and other harmful weapons -.14 -.20


.580 -.396 .276 .039 .147
6 4

Smoked marijuana -.24


.602 -.432 .048 .004 -.208 -.117
5

Reprimanded by police, barangay officials -.10


.576 -.356 .201 .153 .030 .182
1

Used other types of drugs (e.g. shabu) -.16 -.10


.524 -.539 .163 -.107 .128
1 8

Sniffed glue or rugby -.23 -.29


.526 -.388 .233 -.126 .143
8 0
Smoked cigarettes -.14
.587 -.177 -.190 .255 -.310 -.077
4

Hit or threatened to hit fellow students at school .412 .274 .460 .299 -.108 .064 .081

Joined a gang, a fraternity, a “clan” -.15


.464 -.101 .072 .443 .096 -.210
0

Intentionally broken, damaged property belonging to others -.01


.377 .235 .283 .345 .351 -.093
6

Said mean or nasty things purposely to insult or embarrass others -.05


.445 .499 .146 .033 .020 -.139
0

Stolen money or other things from your parents or other members of the family -.18 -.14
.421 .348 .030 .423 -.256
1 0

Took things from other people without asking -.02 -.24


.411 .355 .056 .455 -.053
2 3

Skipped school without an excuse -.27


.489 .169 -.240 .173 -.112 .209
7

Cheated on school tests -.26 -.00


.448 .297 -.295 .041 .068
6 8

Avoided paying for tricycles, jeepneys, buses .494 .131 -.261 .074 .224 .071 .392

Avoided paying the food ordered in the canteen, store .384 .049 -.241 .271 .227 .069 .573

Gambling activities .556 .156 -.317 .237 -.103 .129 -.062

Drank alcoholic drinks (e.g. beers, wine. liquor) -.07


.596 .004 -.348 .250 -.245 -.201
1

Disobeyed parents -.30 -.04


.438 .401 -.113 -.161 -.178
7 4

Disobeyed teachers -.25


.551 .265 -.070 -.191 .094 .153
1

Lying to authorities such as parents and teachers -.30 -.14


.445 .384 -.046 -.005 .054
2 4

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

a. 7 components extracted.

You might also like