Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3) ACT, 2019
Centre for Strategic Litigation, Change Tanzania, JamiiForums, HakiElimu, Legal and Human Rights Centre, Policy Forum, Save the Children, Tanzania Human Rights Defenders Coalition,
Tanzania Women Lawyers Association, TIBA, Twaweza
Submitted: 22 June 2019
4
Amendment 10 The Registrar does not need to begin from the position of striking a Amendment 10
(2) Upon receipt of the notice referred to under subsection (1), company off the register based on his/her beliefs or suspicions. Due process (2) Upon receipt of the notice referred to under subsection (1),
the company may, within thirty days provide to the Registrar should be observed. The bill also not describe what amounts to satisfactory the company may, within ninety days provide to the Registrar
reasons in writing as to why the company should not be struck reasons from the company. Excluding other stakeholders in determining information and responses to his/her concerns in writing
off the register. whether the reasons are satisfactory or not may result in an unfair decisions (3) Where the company fails to provide a response under
(3) Where the company fails to provide reasons under subsection being made. subsection (2) within the prescribed time or where the reasons
(2) within the prescribed time or where the reasons provided are provided are not satisfactory, the Registrar shall initiate a full
not satisfactory, the Registrar shall strike the company off investigation with a view to initiating court proceedings in the
register, publish in the Gazette the name of the company which event of discovery of wrong-doing
has been struck off and notify the company accordingly.
5
No. Proposed Amendment Implications, gaps Proposed Revision
Amendment 10 Made redundant by proposed changes above. In addition it does not seem Remove
(4) Where a company, member or creditor is aggrieved by the appropriate to allow recourse to court only once a company has been
decision of the Registrar under subsection (3) shall, within five struck off raises a number of challenges. If the company no longer exists, in
years from the date of publication in the Gazette, apply to the whose name can such a case be filed?
court for restoration of the company in the register: Provided
that, the Registrar shall not, within such period of five years,
register another company with the same name.
(5) Upon receipt of the application for restoration, the court may-
(a) order restoration of the company in the register; and
(b) give such directions and make such provisions as seem just for
placing the company and all other persons in the same position
as nearly as may be as if the name of the company had not been
struck off.
6
Amendment 10 Made redundant by proposed changes above. In addition it is unclear Amendment 10
(6) The company restored under subsection (5) shall be deemed whether a company that is “deemed to have continued in existence” will be (6) The company restored under subsection (5) shall be
to have continued in existence as if its name had not been struck liable to any taxes and fees payable to the Government during its inactive deemed to have continued in existence as if its name had not
off, and the court may, by order, give such directions and make period been struck off, and the court may, by order, give such
such provisions as seem just for placing the company and all directions and make such provisions as seem just for placing
other persons in the same position as nearly as may be as if the the company and all other persons in the same position as
name of the company had not been struck off. nearly as may be as if the name of the company had not been
struck off. There will not be any tax liabilities for the company
7 during its period of inactivity.