III.

Correlation
Correlations

Mean Mean Overall

Delinquency: Strain with
All items Bullying

Mean Delinquency: All Pearson Correlation 1 .426**

items Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 1309 1296

Mean Overall Strain with Pearson Correlation .426** 1

Bullying Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 1296 1304

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

a. With a Pearson correlation coefficient of r=.426, which is significant at p<0.001, the mean delinquency and
mean overall strain with bullying are perfectly correlated. There is also a very low chance of getting a
correlation this big in the sample if the null hypothesis is true. Therefore, there is a significant relationship
between the mean delinquency and mean strain with bullying. Thus, as the mean overall strain with bullying
increases, there will also be an increase with the mean delinquency.
b. The value shows how much of the variability in the mean delinquency is shared by the mean overall strain with
bullying. This means that the mean delinquency is sharing 18% of the variability in the mean overall strain with
bullying. However, though the mean delinquency is highly correlated with the mean overall strain, there is only
18% of variation in mean overall strain with bullying that can be accounted for. Leaving the 82% of the
variability to be accounted to other variables.
r2= 0.18

c.
d. With a Pearson correlation coefficient of r=.426 and the significance value being less than 0.001, mean
delinquency is positively related with mean overall strain with bullying. Having the Pearson correlation
coefficient of r=.388 at p<0.001, the outpout showed that mean delinquency is positively related to mean anger.
Mean anger increases as mean delinquency increases. Finally, mean overall strain with bullying is also
positively related to mean anger with a Pearson correlation coefficient of .r=.539, p<.001. Mean anger increases
as the mean overall strain with bullying increases.
e. In the given data, the correlation between mean delinquency and mean anger remains constant after adding the
controlling variable of mean anger. Both mean delinquency and mean overall strain with bullying are positively
correlated with mean anger.
f.

Correlations

Mean Mean Overall

Delinquency: Strain with Mean Anger:
All items Bullying All items

Mean Delinquency: All Pearson Correlation 1 .426** .338**

items Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000

N 1309 1296 1305

Mean Overall Strain with Pearson Correlation .426** 1 .539**

Bullying Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000
N 1296 1304 1301

Mean Anger: All items Pearson Correlation .338** .539** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000

N 1305 1301 1314

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

IV. T-tests

Group Statistics

Recode
d Age N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Mean Parental Control: All 1 728 2.521 .6311 .0234

items 2 576 2.541 .6144 .0256

a.
 Based on the given data, mean parental control is higher for old adolescents (M= 2.541, SE=
0.0256) than to the young adolescents (M= 2.521, SE= 0.0234). The two tailed value of p=.560,
which is greater than 0.05 therefore has no significant difference between the mean of these two
samples. We can say that the level of parental control for young and old adolescents are the same
and are having no difference.

Group Statistics

Sex N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Mean Parental Control: All items Female 737 2.587 .6453 .0238

Male 566 2.455 .5869 .0247

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for

Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Sig. (2- Mean Std. Error
F Sig. t df tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper

Mean Parental Equal

Control: All variances 6.509 .011 3.822 1301 .000 .1326 .0347 .0645 .2006
items assumed

Equal
1264.46
variances not 3.870 .000 .1326 .0343 .0654 .1998
8
assumed

Based on the given data, there is higher mean parental control on females (M=2.587, SE= 0.0238)
than males (M= 2.455, SE= 0.0247). In this case, the two tailed value of p=.000, which is less
than 0.05 means that there is a statistically significant difference between the mean of these two
samples. We can say that the level of parental control for young and old adolescents are the same

V. Annova
 ANOVA

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Grade Level Between Groups 184.185 65 2.834 2.324 .000

Within Groups 1515.480 1243 1.219

Total 1699.665 1308

District Between Groups 36.648 65 .564 .851 .794

Within Groups 823.320 1243 .662

Total 859.968 1308

a. In the given data, the significance level of mean delinquency based on grade level is 0.000
(p=0.000) which below 0.05. Therefore, there is a statistical significance difference in the mean
delinquency based on grade level. However, the significance of mean delinquency based on the
district is .794 (p=.794) which is above 0.05. Therefore, there is no statistical significance
difference of mean delinquency based on district.