Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Consultant:
1.0 INTRODUCTION:..............................................................................................................4
2.1 DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING AND COMPONENTS:......................................................5
2.2 Balconies Including 2-Story Penthouse Units:............................................................5
2.3 Common Areas (Lobby Level):...................................................................................6
2.4 Guardrails:................................................................................................................. 6
2.5 Sliding Glass Doors:...................................................................................................6
2.6 Membrane and Sealants:...........................................................................................6
2.5 Aluminum Architectural Vertical Mullion:....................................................................7
3.0 CONDITION SURVEY FINDINGS:....................................................................................7
3.1 Balconies Including 2-Story Penthouse Units:............................................................7
3.2 Common Areas and Walkways (Lobby Level):...........................................................8
3.3 Guardrails:................................................................................................................. 8
3.4 Sliding Glass Doors:..................................................................................................8
3.5 Sealants, Finishes and Coatings:...............................................................................9
4.1 RECOMMENDATIONS:....................................................................................................9
4.2 Balconies Including 2-Story Penthouse Units:............................................................9
4.3 Common Areas and Walkways (Lobby Level):.........................................................10
4.4 Guardrails:............................................................................................................... 10
4.5 Sealants, Finishes and Coatings:.............................................................................11
5.0 PRIORITY OF REPAIRS.............................................................................................12
6.0 FORWARD PLANNING...............................................................................................12
7.0 CLOSING:................................................................................................................... 13
8.0 FINDINGS SUMMARY TABLE.......................................................................................15
6.1 Sliding Glass Doors / Balconies.................................................................................15
6.2 Wall & Columns / Slab Edges, Ceilings & Undersides...............................................22
9.0 PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG...................................................................................................28
Report of Findings
December 12, 2014
1.1 INTRODUCTION:
A Limited Condition Survey of the balconies, sliding glass doors and other selected exterior
building envelope elements at the twenty-one (21) story, one hundred twenty (120) unit Aliki
Condominium, located in Daytona Beach, Volusia County, Florida was performed between the
period of November 3, 2014 and November 13, 2014 by KWA Engineers, LLC (KWA).
The condition survey involved visual observations, physical inspections and, where applicable,
soundings of the following elements:
balcony slab surfaces and edges of all units including two-story Penthouse decks
slab undersides (balcony ceilings)
stucco finished vertical columns, beams and wall surfaces
sliding glass door frames, headers, and threshold tracks
balcony kneewalls and railing system
paints and coatings present on the stuccoed surfaces
stucco covered building walls at the ground level entrance
expansion joints
The condition survey also involved the use of a four (4) foot level to assist in determining the
direction of slope and potential ponding water locations on the balcony decks.
Attachments to this report include the Findings Summary Table that compiles deficiencies noted
and observed, and a Photographic Log of typical conditions observed during the survey.
Page 4
2.1 DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING AND COMPONENTS:
General Description: The individual units of the residential tower are accessed from two
common central elevators. The building contains a total of one hundred twenty (120) units, with
six (6) residential units present per floor. The building is constructed of conventionally
reinforced cast in place floor slabs and concrete masonry unit walls with filled and reinforced
corners, columns, and beams.
KWA utilized the following guidelines in the assessment of the building components:
•ASCE Standard SEI/ASCE 30-00; Guideline for Condition Assessment of the Building
Envelope
• ICRI Strengthening and Stabilization of Concrete and Masonry Structures
• Concrete Repair Manual - Published jointly by ACI, ICRI and BRE
• ACI 201R; Guide for Making a Condition Survey of Concrete in Service
It is the understanding of KWA that the Association is planning a building repair project in the
near future and has requested this professional evaluation of the exterior building envelope as a
portion of that process.
A general description and the condition survey findings for the balconies and other building
components observed are briefly described as follows:
There are two types of balconies present, with smaller balconies located at the 03 and 04 unit
stacks. The larger balconies are located at the building corner 01, 02, 05, and 06 units. The
smaller balconies are 48’ long and vary from 4’-2” to 6’-2” wide (±237 square feet). The larger
corner balconies are L shaped with the long side measuring approximately 50’-4” long and
varying from 4’-2” to 5’-6” in width, and the short side measuring 26’-6” long and varying from 4’-
2” to 5’-6” wide (±372 square feet).
There are two types of balconies present at the 2 nd floor of the 21st floor units. Unit #2103 is the
smaller sized 2nd floor balcony, and the larger balconies are located on the 01, 02, 05, and 06
corner units. The smaller 2nd floor balcony at Unit #2103 measures 15’ x 47’ (±705 square feet),
and the larger “L” shaped corner unit balconies measures 28’ x 20’ at the long side, and 20’ x
20’ at the short side (totaling ±960 square feet). Each balcony has a concrete masonry unit
(block) partition wall at each end. A reinforced concrete column is present between each sliding
glass door at each unit balcony. The exterior perimeter shape of the balconies can generally be
described as a “saw tooth” design.
The balcony slabs of all units have a waterproofing membrane system applied to them. All
building surfaces adjacent to the balconies and walk up locations were visually observed as well
as physically sounded to determine and document the locations and quantities of concrete
spalls, dis-bonded paints, delaminated stucco and cracking of mortar joints (if applicable).
2.4 Guardrails:
Guardrails are located on every balcony and are part of the concrete knee wall system. The
guardrail system consists of a ±27½” tall reinforced concrete knee wall with a ±14¼” aluminum
railing installed into the top of the knee wall with a finished height of ±41¾”. The guardrail
system consists of knee wall sections which are ±11’-7” in length. The concrete kneewall/railing
assembly is separated by a vertical, architectural, 4” x 8” aluminum mullion that is located at the
inset of the “saw tooth” angle and is present throughout the perimeter of the building. The
concrete and aluminum guardrail system is present at the entire outside edge of all balconies.
The aluminum rails are secured into the concrete knee wall with various methods, and the
attachment method seems to depend on whether the knee wall has been previously repaired.
The aluminum railing appears to originally have been an anodized bronze finish, but most
appear to have since been painted. The knee walls of the guardrail system were visually
observed as well as physically sounded to determine and document the locations and quantities
of concrete spalls, dis-bonded paints and delaminated stucco.
slab cracks
slab edge spalls
spalled concrete (with and without exposed reinforcing steel)
peeling paint
delaminated and/or failing deck coating
ponding water location on balcony slabs
areas of exposed metal and rust spots (typically unit owner installed hooks, hangers and
miscellaneous fasteners)
deteriorated guardrails (peeling paint, missing screws, cracked/missing welds)
deteriorated or open guardrail post pockets and loose rail posts
storm shutter components (unsealed fasteners, rusting washers, nuts, fasteners)
delaminated and cracked stucco at slab edges, ceilings, and wall surfaces
block joint cracks in masonry walls on 21st floor
blistered, deteriorated and delaminated sealants
deteriorated sliding glass door flashing, tracks and bumpers
The specific quantities of each of the individual categories are summarized by balcony and are
totaled on the Findings Summary Table which is included as an attachment to this report. A
general summary of quantities of the deficiencies observed and recorded on the balconies are:
slab cracks
peeling paint
delaminated/spalled concrete
delaminated and cracked stucco at columns, walls, and ceilings
areas of exposed metal and rust spots
corroded door jambs
a portion of the walkway was noted to be settling
Quantities of each of the individual categories are summarized and totaled on the Findings
Summary Table. A general summary of the common areas and walkway deficiencies observed
during the condition survey include:
3.4 Guardrails:
The aluminum guardrails at the balconies can be described as being in poor condition. The
railings are mounted into the reinforced concrete knee walls with a cementitious grout and/or
epoxy grout. Most of the post pockets can be described as failing. The rails themselves have
peeling paint, missing screws and failed welds. The current configuration of the railings does
not conform to the requirement of the existing Florida Building Code (FBC) for height (42”) and
picket spacing (less than 4”) requirements. Approximately 80% of the railing system requires
repairs outside of the building code issues.
The majority of sealants present at sliding glass door perimeter and wall penetrations were
documented as being in this condition. Additionally, a lack of sealants was noted at wall
penetrations, sliding glass door thresholds, and screw caps, all of which can allow for moisture
intrusion into the concrete slabs and wall cavities throughout the building.
The finish systems (paint/coatings) throughout the building are in varying stages of aging and/or
weathering. The existing condition of the finish system is highly dependent on location. The
stucco and coatings present at areas of ocean front exposed balcony sections and exposed wall
areas are more deteriorated and blistered than those within protected and dry areas. The
typical deficiencies observed and recorded can be classified as cracked reinforced masonry as
a result of corrosion and delaminated stucco due to water intrusion from failing coatings.
The elevated balcony slabs have what is referred to as a “Standard Pedestrian” urethane
waterproofing membrane system applied. It has been reported to KWA that this waterproofing
membrane, for the most part, was installed approximately ±10 years ago. The aggregate
installed in the top wearing coat is becoming dislodged and the coating is worn and weathered
due to lack of re-coating and maintenance within the recommended 5-year period. 40% of the
membrane on the balcony decks was found to be faded, ripped, peeling, torn or blistered.
The cove bead sealants (sealants located at vertical wall to horizontal slab transitions) at
balconies and walkways were documented as peeling and blistering, and the waterproofing
membrane system is delaminating from the sealants.
4.1 RECOMMENDATIONS:
In addition to repairing all the damaged concrete, all cracks should also be repaired, either by
epoxy methods (gravity feed or pressure injection) or sealant application dependent upon the
orientation and location of the crack. It is suspected additional cracking and potential spalling
may be occurring on the balcony slabs beneath the existing failed membrane which can trap
moisture and atmospheric chlorides due to the type of construction, and the age and proximity
of the structure to the ocean. The intended goal is to provide long term protection against
chemical attack from chloride ions and carbonic acid pollutants. Unforeseen or hidden
conditions beneath the existing membrane has manifested in the form of concrete deterioration,
spalling, cracking, rust staining and abnormal concrete surface movements (delamination). All
of these conditions were observed and documented to varying degrees at balcony slabs and
edges and at guardrail post bases during the condition survey.
Chloride ion concentration in the concrete balcony slabs would usually expect to increase over
time. With the existing coating being approximately ±10 years of age and the condition of the
balcony slab edges observed, it is suspected additional hidden damage would be present to a
certain extent on the balcony slabs beneath the existing membrane system.
It is also recommended as a portion of this work that a surface applied corrosion inhibitor be
applied to all deficiencies at reinforced columns and beams, and a water repellant coating/paint
system be applied after stucco patches are completed. Again, these recommendations are
made to repair and protect the masonry, concrete and stucco finished elements by helping to
prohibit further moisture intrusion thus reducing the potential of corrosion of the reinforcing steel
and the build-up of contaminates in the masonry and concrete.
4.4 Guardrails:
Since the majority of guardrails require repair and restoration, it is KWA’s recommendation that
the aluminum guardrails present on the knee walls be removed and replaced. Several options
are available to the Board and Association for this item. KWA feels that a properly fabricated
and protected code compliant aluminum system would provide greater security and be more
architecturally pleasing. It is KWA’s recommendation that options be included in the future
Project Manual bid scope items, and if the Board elects, repairs to the existing system could be
performed, although this approach is not recommended by KWA.
4.5 Sliding Glass Doors:
Complete removal and replacement of all exterior sliding glass door perimeter sealants is
recommended to be performed with the exterior building coating work. KWA also recommends
the removal of all corroded non-stainless steel frame fasteners, including header, jambs and
thresholds and replacement with new AISI stainless steel 316 fasteners. Typically this work
would include mechanically removing corroded exterior exposure screws, filling hole with a
urethane sealant and replacing all screws with new stainless steel 316 screws. New screw
heads should then be sealed or capped depending on the fastener type used.
Additionally, it is the recommendation of KWA that all floor mounted storm shutter fasteners be
cleaned and sealed to prevent moisture penetration at these connections. Embed and seal all
fasteners with a high quality, commercial grade sealant (compatible with the deck coating
system) and replace all non-stainless steel fasteners with AISI 316 stainless steel fasteners,
washers, and nuts, and a protective vinyl cap be installed with an adhesive sealant over top of
the fasteners.
It is the recommendation of KWA to completely remove and replace the existing waterproofing
membrane present on the balconies. This recommendation is made in order to expose the
horizontal reinforced concrete elements, identify all damage and deterioration, and implement
properly specified and performed repairs. A completely new waterproofing membrane system
will also provide the Association with a comprehensive waterproofing warranty from the product
manufacturer and selected contractor.
It is KWA's recommendation that the above described deficiencies be addressed in the following
Order of Priority:
2. Replace the existing guardrail system mounted on the kneewalls with a properly
designed new system. In conjunction with the railing work, perform repairs to the vertical
architectural mullion, and the connections of the mullion to the building slab edges.
3. Remove and replace all delaminated stucco and/or cementitious finishes found to be
delaminated or deteriorated.
4. Perform joint sealant replacements to include storm shutter fasteners and other exposed
fasteners and through wall penetrations throughout the structure. All corroded fasteners
should be replaced with new AISI stainless steel 316 fasteners. All new screw caps
should then be sealed with compatible sealants.
5. Perform all necessary surface preparation, repairs, primer application and paint
applications to exterior walls and ceilings.
6. Work at the lobby level should be included in the above described repairs as they are
identified and these items are being performed throughout other portions of the
structure.
KWA recommends an Engineer’s Project Manual be produced that includes an adequate level
of detail describing comprehensive repair and preventative maintenance as needed to address
the surveyed components as described. The most efficient approach would be to include as
much of the priority list as can be funded. KWA recommends that all priority repairs be
addressed as single restoration project. Our experience with other similar projects has proven
this to be the most cost effective, timely and manageable approach. The ability to have a single
General Contractor perform one comprehensive repair project will reduce mobilization and
permitting fees, potential costs of redoing work, and inconvenience to the unit owners.
The Project Manual will contain necessary bid documents, repair specifications and drawings to
allow the solicitation of competitive bids from qualified General Contractors. It will also provide
adequate levels of detail for repair to all deficiencies documented. The bid schedule included in
the Project Manual will provide for line item costs of each component of repair to allow KWA and
the Board to review all repair costs and, if necessary, make adjustments to the Scope of Work
to meet budgetary allowances prior to the Association entering into a repair contract with a
General Contractor. The Project Manual will include the repair recommendations made in this
report.
7.0 CLOSING:
As previously stated, the purpose of this report is to provide documentation concerning
significant defects and / or deficiencies with respect to exterior building envelope.
These observations and resulting opinions are based upon construction standards and methods
that are considered normal and customary as of the time of this report. The staff of KWA
Engineers, LLC (KWA) conducted site inspections and made observations on the dates
indicated within this report. The observations that were made were visual in nature and
therefore were non-destructive unless otherwise described. KWA did not provide direction for
removal of walls, ceilings or other interior or exterior cladding components so that hidden,
covered or concealed conditions could be observed.
KWA has performed these services and prepared this report in accordance with generally
accepted construction and engineering consulting practices, and makes no warranties, either
expressed or implied as to the character and nature of such services. This report is not to be
construed as a guarantee or warranty of future building conditions. KWA used its best
engineering judgment and ability to inspect and report the items presented herein, but KWA
cannot guarantee that all past, present or potential deficiencies or defective conditions have
been found during its inspections.
This report does not include a representation of active or past termite infestation and/or
treatments. Additionally, this report does not indicate nor include any investigation of
environmental conditions at the subject property structures and grounds. This report does not
make any representation as to the property being free of hazardous or toxic materials.
This report has been prepared for The Aliki Management Association, Inc. in conformance with
KWA’s proposal dated October 14, 2013, and authorized on October 23, 2013. Personal
responsibilities of KWA, or any individual or company working on behalf of KWA, do not extend
to a third party, other than as defined above, under any circumstances. An original copy of this
report remains on file at the office of KWA, and no changes may be made to this report without
the prior written permission of KWA. KWA reserves the right to modify this report upon
discovery of additional information, and charge an additional copying fee for release of this
report to an additional party if requested.
If there are any questions or more information is required, please do not hesitate to contact our
Branch Manager, Heather Hamilton, at kwa@cfl.rr.com or by phone at 386-334-5042.
Aliki Condominium
Condition Survey Report December 12, 2014
Page 15
Sliding Glass Doors /Shutters Balconies
Post
Unit Missing Storm Floor Bad Rust
OPP CR SPL Fasteners DLS
Number Bumpers Shutters Missing Ponding Sealant Spots
# #/fasteners # (ft) (sq ft) (#) sq ft sq ft ft #
401 6/96 4 LEGEND:
402 8 1 5
403 2
OPP Open post pockets
404 8 15 6 CR Crack
405 7 4.5 SPL Spall
406 27 1 2 2 DLS Delaminated Stucco
501 2 1
502 5.5
503 4/32 3 6
504 1 10 1.5 6
505
506 10 1.5
601 5.5
602 1.5 1 2 2
603 7
604 5
605 1
606 10 0.5 1
701 1
702 2 1
703 2 3
704 8 7.5 9.5
705 4 1 1
Sliding Glass Doors /Shutters Balconies
Post Rust
Unit Missing Storm Floor Bad
OPP CR SPL Fasteners DLS Spots
Number Bumpers Shutters Missing Ponding Sealant
LEGEND:
# #/fasteners # (ft) (sq ft) (#) sq ft sq ft ft #
706 4 1 1
801 OPP Open post pockets
CR Crack
802 2.5
SPL Spall
803 2 DLS Delaminated Stucco
804 6 15
805 5
806 1 15 2.5 2
901 4 4
902 1 2
903 3 7 1 3
904 4
905 1
906 7 1 10
1001 8.5
1002 3 6/0 4
1003 8
1004 11
1005 3 4 1.5 2
1006 14 1
1101 6/96 1 72 3
1102 6/96 1 2
1103 3
1104 3
Aliki Condominium
Condition Survey Report December 12, 2014
Valet OH
East
Ext East
Ext West
Sliding Glass Doors /Shutters Balconies
Post
Unit Missing Storm Floor Bad Rust
OPP CR SPL Fasteners DLS
Number Bumpers Shutters Ponding Sealant Spots
Missing
# #/fasteners # (ft) (sq ft) (#) sq ft sq ft ft #
Ext South
Ext North
LEGEND:
Valet OH
East 6 2 1.5
Ext East 3 1 3 1 2 2
Ext West 1 3 16 3 2 8 14 2.5
Ext South 14.5 3 1 3 3 1 1
Ext North 1 1 20.5 1 4 1
Totals 513 524.75 16.75 336.5 116 71 33 399.5 465.3 510 489.75 106 94.75
Aliki Condominium
Condition Survey Report December 12, 2014
Page 28
Photo #3 – Typical North Elevation Balcony Configuration