Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Effect of NAFTA in The Acculturation in English-Speaking Mexicans Living in Nuevo León
The Effect of NAFTA in The Acculturation in English-Speaking Mexicans Living in Nuevo León
A01039947
The effect of NAFTA in the acculturation in English-speaking Mexicans living in Nuevo León
Abstract
Acculturation can be defined as the process of cultural contact and exchange through which a
person or group from one culture comes to adopt the practices and values of another culture,
while still retaining their own distinct culture. The present paper focuses on the effect NAFTA
has had on the acculturation of English-speaking Mexicans living in the northern state of Nuevo
León, considering those who were born after the signing of NAFTA in 1994 are more
acculturated than those who were born before it. Results showed that there were bigger
differences between the two comparison groups in questions that dealt with the respondents´
immersion in American media such as movies, magazines, and music. Moderate and strong
negative correlations were showed between a respondent´s age and his or her acculturation. The
research concluded that there has been a significant increase in acculturation among English-
speaking Mexicans living in the northern state of Nuevo León that were born after the signing of
NAFTA, in comparison to those who were born before the start of the trade agreement.
1
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
I. Introduction
In recent history, different ideological, political, economic and social changes have been
generated, which in some way have influenced the culture of the world´s countries. Because of
this, the culture and identity of the individuals of a given country may be altered. Mexico is not
an exception to this rule. The 20th century transformed completely the country. It started the
century with a revolution to overthrow a dictator and finished it with a full entrance to
neoliberalism. The signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1994
between Mexico, the United States, and Canada meant a higher exchange of goods between these
three countries. Even though NAFTA only dealt with economic trade, goods come with soft
power, which according to political scientists Pau Viotti and Mark Kauppi can be defined as
“non-material capabilities such as reputation, culture, and value appeal that can aid the
attainment of a state’s objectives” [ CITATION Vio13 \l 2058 ]. One of the soft power´s main
channels is media. If individuals get immersed in foreign goods and media, they indirectly are
being immersed in the foreign country´s culture. If that happens for a sustained period,
Author Nicki Lisa Cole defined acculturation as “the process of cultural contact and exchange
through which a person or group from one culture comes to adopt the practices and values of
another culture, while still retaining their own distinct culture” [ CITATION Col18 \l 2058 ] . Jorge
Larraín in his article Modernidad e Identidad en América Latina complemented Cole´s definition
by stating that acculturation “can happen at both group and individual levels and can occur as a
result of in-person contact or contact through art, literature, or media” [ CITATION Jor97 \l 2058 ].
2
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
Larraín explained in his article that, at the group level, acculturation requires “the widespread
adoption of the values, practices, forms of art, and technologies of another culture; as well as the
cultural exchange of clothing, fashion, and language” [ CITATION Jor97 \l 2058 ]. An example
of group level acculturation can be the embrace of Chinese cuisine within the United States, or
when certain phrases and words from a foreign language make their way into common usage
within a language due to cultural contact. On the other hand, at individual level, acculturation
may involve the same things as at group level, but the motives and circumstances may be
different. An example Larraín gave is that of people who study abroad in a country where the
culture differs from their own and are likely to engage in the country´s values and practices to
“reduce the social friction that can arise from cultural differences” [ CITATION Jor97 \l 2058 ].
Considering the above, especially group acculturation, reminds of the capitalism and
globalization that have permeated in Mexico, especially in the north of the country. Author
Patricia Martín argued in her article National Fragments and Post-national Cultures: Mexican
National Identity in Transition? that these global phenomena tend to “subtract the identity and
consumerism that induces people to insert themselves in the economic model so that they can be
II. Objective
The objective of this research paper is to explore the relation between the age of an English-
speaking Mexican living in the state of Nuevo León and the acculturation that he or she presents.
3
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
This objective will be achieved by analyzing two groups of different ages and measuring the
To what extent do English-speaking Mexicans living in the state of Nuevo León that were born
after the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994 are more acculturated
than those who were born before the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement in
1994?
IV. Hypothesis
English-speaking Mexicans living in the state of Nuevo León who were born after the signing of
the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1994 are more acculturated than those
who were born before the signing of the NAFTA. This is because of the exchange of media and
goods that this trade agreement has caused in Mexico, especially in the north of the country.
V. Variables
4
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
be over 15 years. The second question of the
in years.
Acculturation Dependent Acculturation is measured through a likert
5
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
the questionnaire is “Do you speak
discarded.
Table 1. Control of Variables
VI. Questionnaire
The questionnaire is divided into three sections. The first section collects general information on
the respondent and makes sure he or she meets all the requirements for taking his or her response
into account. This section goes from question 1 to question 4. The second part of the
questionnaire includes questions 5 through 17 and deals with the respondent´s relationship with
Mexican culture. The third and last section of the questionnaire ranges from question 18 to
question 28. The goal of this section is to know about the respondent´s relationship with
American culture.
Questions 1 through 4 have either an open or a yes / no answer format. Nevertheless, from
question 5 to question 28, respondents find a statement in each question and are expected to
6
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
select the number to which they most agree with the statement, being 0 “not agree at all” and 5
Due to its extension, the full questionnaire could not be fit into this paper´s body. However, it
VII. Methodology
The questionnaire was put into a Google Forms, which is an online platform powered by Google
Mexicans living in Nuevo León ages 15 and over through online platforms. A minimum number
of 20 responses per comparison group are required. However, if more responses are given, the
data analysis will continue as planned. If a person who is not a Mexican or is under 15 years old
responds the questionnaire, his or her answer will immediately be discarded. For an answered
Thank you for accepting to answer this questionnaire. Its objective is to measure acculturation of
Mexican people towards American culture. In other words, we want to know to what extent
American culture has influenced your habits. The reason why we believe this is important is
because globalization has taken a huge part in society, and we want to find out if it has inclined
7
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
Mexican people to the United States and its culture. It is important for you to know that the
answers to this questionnaire are confidential and will only be used for academic purposes at
Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Monterrey. If you do not wish your responses to be used in
this way, please don´t answer it and close this Google Forms. Thanks!
VIII. Results
Using Microsoft Excel, the raw data is processed for it to be easier to analyze and interpret. The
first things that are gotten are the mean of each of the answers per question, as well as their
variance, standard deviation, and confidence interval. Variance is “the average of the squared
differences from the mean”, while the standard deviation is “a statistic that tell you how tightly
all the various examples are clustered around the mean in a set of data” (Niles, 2015). On the
other hand, the confidence interval “gives an estimated range of values which is likely to include
an unknown population parameter” (Easton & McHoll, 1997). The standard deviation is
calculated using the Microsoft Excel formula =STDEV (range), as well as the variance with the
formula =VAR.S. The confidence interval is calculated with the formula: =CONFIDENCE
(alpha, stdev, size), where the value for alpha is 0.05. This means that the confidence interval is
of 95%. The value for size is 20 for Group 1, because twenty samples were included, while for
Group 2 the value for size was 30. The results were the following:
8
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
2 44.75 19.45 38.20 1.19 6.18 1.31 2.71 0.47
5 4.95 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.10 0.00
6 4.90 4.97 0.09 0.03 0.31 0.22 0.13 0.08
7 4.90 4.94 0.09 0.06 0.31 0.31 0.13 0.11
8 5.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
9 4.90 5.00 0.09 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.13 0.00
10 4.21 4.16 0.62 1.01 0.79 1.00 0.35 0.36
11 3.80 4.00 0.91 0.93 0.95 0.97 0.42 0.35
12 3.60 4.06 0.67 0.66 0.82 0.81 0.36 0.29
13 4.74 4.57 0.43 0.32 0.65 0.57 0.29 0.20
14 4.20 4.80 0.80 0.23 0.89 0.48 0.39 0.17
15 4.05 3.39 1.42 1.98 1.19 1.41 0.52 0.50
16 3.70 3.16 0.64 2.34 0.80 1.53 0.35 0.55
17 4.55 4.19 0.37 0.83 0.60 0.91 0.27 0.33
18 0.60 1.26 1.09 2.06 1.05 1.44 0.46 0.51
19 2.35 2.84 0.66 1.54 0.81 1.24 0.36 0.44
20 0.75 1.97 0.93 1.83 0.97 1.35 0.42 0.48
21 0.65 2.45 0.98 1.86 0.99 1.36 0.43 0.49
22 2.30 3.45 2.22 1.59 1.49 1.26 0.65 0.45
23 1.25 2.58 1.67 1.65 1.29 1.29 0.57 0.46
24 2.15 3.23 1.61 0.71 1.27 0.84 0.56 0.30
25 3.65 3.87 0.66 1.05 0.81 1.02 0.36 0.37
26 0.70 2.74 1.27 2.13 1.13 1.46 0.49 0.52
27 2.30 4.52 1.91 0.46 1.38 0.68 0.60 0.24
28 1.55 4.42 2.16 0.52 1.47 0.72 0.64 0.26
Table 2. Raw Data Analysis
By comparing the mean answers to Group 1 and Group 2, it can be observed that those related to
the exposure of English-speaking Mexicans living in Nuevo León to American media (questions
26, 27, and 28) are the ones that have the highest mean differences between Group 1 and Group
2. Therefore, those three questions are the ones that will further be analyzed in this paper.
The Pearson Correlation Coefficient (r) is “a measure of the strength of the linear relationship
between two variables” (Lane, n.d.). It must be in a range between -1 and 1, representing the
values closest to -1 or 1 a very strong correlation, while the values that are closest to 0 mean that
there is a very weak or no correlation. In this case, the desired r coefficient is calculated between
the ages of both comparison groups and their corresponding responses in questions 26, 27, and
9
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
28. It is obtained using the Microsoft Excel formula: =CORREL (range 1, range 2). The results
Now that is clear that there is a correlation between the age of a person and its consumption of
American media, which can be considered acculturation, it is possible to present this data in a
Group
Figure 2 shows the average responses to Question 27 for each of the two comparison groups. The
error bars in the graph represent the confidence interval for each of the values. As it can be seen,
Group 2, made up of English-speaking Mexicans living in Nuevo León that were born after the
10
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
signing of NAFTA in 1994, has a significantly higher mean than Group 1. This means that, those
who were born after 1994 relate a lot to the statement “I watch American movies”. In contrast,
those in Group 1 relate moderately, considering their low mean response. This case also applies
to questions 26 and 28, where Group 2 has a considerably higher mean response than Group 1 in
It is important to note that there was no significant difference between the means of the two
comparison groups in questions related to the relationship between the individual and Mexican
culture. Both groups had almost the same answers. Also, there was a difference between the
means of the two comparison groups in questions regarding the relationship between the
individual and American culture. However, the most significant differences were in American
media-related questions.
IX. Conclusion
This investigation gives an answer to its research question and supports its hypothesis. As it can
be shown in Figure 2, English-speaking Mexicans living in Nuevo León who were born after the
signing of NAFTA in 1994 have a tendency to be more immersed into American culture,
especially its media. This immersion can be considered as group acculturation. Another evidence
that shows that the hypothesis is supported is the resulting value of the r coefficients for
moderate and strong negative correlations between the age of the respondents and their
11
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
It is important to remember the initial objective of the investigation, which was to explore the
relationship between the age of an English-speaking Mexican living in the state of Nuevo León
and the acculturation that he or she presents. If Table 2 is taken under consideration, it can be
said that as the age of a person increases, his or her acculturation decreases. This is based on the
Even though the investigation was done in the most exact way as possible, taking into
consideration all of the factors that may affect it and trying to keep them under control, it is
impossible to completely avoid uncertainties. One of the uncertainties of this research may have
occurred because of distributing the questionnaire through the internet. This evidently excludes
all English-speaking Mexicans who do not have access to it. In order for the reader to be aware
of all of the uncertainties the investigation may have had, error bars representing a 95%
One improvement that can be done to this investigation regarding the weakness mentioned in the
living in Nuevo León is excluded from it. It would also be better to have access to English
schools´ databases to randomly select the respondents. This way, the research is not biased by
same research in another state of Mexico in order to see if Nuevo León-based English-speaking
Mexicans, because of the state´s geographical location, are more prone to acculturation than
X. Bibliography
12
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
Calabasa, L. (2003). Measuring acculturation: Where we are and where we need to go. Hispanic
Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 127-146. Retrieved from:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297410928_Measuring_acculturation_Where_
we_are_and_where_we_need_to_go
Cano-Urbina, J. (2016). Acculturation and the labor market in Mexico. IZA Journal of Labor
Policy, 5-21. Retrieved from: https://izajolp.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s40173-
016-0077-6
Easton, V., & McHoll, J. (1997, September). Confidence intervals. Retrieved from Statistics
Glossary:
http://www.stats.gla.ac.uk/steps/glossary/confidence_intervals.html#confinterval
Lane, D. M. (n.d.). Values of the Pearson Correlation. Retrieved from Online Statbook:
http://onlinestatbook.com/2/describing_bivariate_data/pearson.html
Martin, P. (2009). National Fragments and Post-national Cultures: Mexican National Identity in
Transition? Space and Polity, 233-252. Retrieved from:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1356257090345431
13
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
Pérez-Brignoli, H. (2017). Aculturación, transculturación, mestizaje: metáforas y espejos en la
historiografía latinoamericana. Cuadernos de Literatura, 96-113. Retrieved from:
https://0search.proquest.com.millenium.itesm.mx/docview/1944212483/fulltextPDF/F89
79791702142C6PQ/1?accountid=11643
Viotti, P., & Kauppi, M. (2013). International Relations and World Politics. New York: Pearson.
14
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
Annex 1. Acculturation Questionnaire
1. Gender
Male Female Other
2. Age
__________
3. Nationality
Mexican Not Mexican Dual Mexican / Other Country
6. I like to Spanish
Not at all O O O O O O A lot
0 1 2 3 4 5
15
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
13. I think in Spanish
Not at all O O O O O O A lot
0 1 2 3 4 5
16
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
Group 1 Group 2
2. Age
Group
3. Nationality
Nationality
35
30
25
F re q u e n c y
20
15
10
0
Yes No
Nationality
Group 1 Group 2
18
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
4. Do you speak English?
30
25
F re q u e n c y
20
15
10
0
Yes No
Group 1 Group 2
4.99
4.98
4.97
4.96
4.95
4.94
4.93
4.92
1 2
Group
4.96
4.94
4.92
4.90
4.88
4.86
1 2
Group
19
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
7. I speak Spanish with my Mexican friends and acquaintances
Mean answers to "I speak Spanish with my Mexican friends and
acquaintances"
4.94
4.93
4.92
4.91
4.90
4.89
4.88
1 2
Group
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
1 2
Group
5.00
4.98
4.96
4.94
4.92
4.90
4.88
4.86
4.84
1 2
Group
20
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
4.21
4.20
4.19
4.18
4.17
4.16
4.15
4.14
4.13
1 2
Group
4.00
3.95
3.90
3.85
3.80
3.75
3.70
3.65
1 2
Group
4.10
4.00
3.90
3.80
3.70
3.60
3.50
3.40
3.30
1 2
Group
21
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
4.75
4.70
4.65
4.60
4.55
4.50
4.45
1 2
Group
Group
3.8
3.6
3.4
3.2
3
1 2
Group
22
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
Group
4.5
4.4
4.3
4.2
4.1
4
1 2
Group
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
1 2
Group
23
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
1 2
Group
1.5
0.5
0
1 2
Group
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
1 2
Group
24
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
22. I feel comfortable with American people
Mean answers to "I feel comfortable with American people"
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
1 2
Group
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
1 2
Group
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
1 2
Group
25
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
3.85
3.8
3.75
3.7
3.65
3.6
3.55
3.5
1 2
Group
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
1 2
Group
Group
26
Mónica Medellín Estrada
A01039947
Group
27