You are on page 1of 22

CLUSTER Parameter1 Parameter2 Parameter3 Parameter4 Parameter5 Parameter

6
/METHOD WARD
/MEASURE=SEUCLID
/ID=Car
/PRINT SCHEDULE
/PRINT DISTANCE
/PLOT DENDROGRAM VICICLE.

Cluster
Notes
Output Created 02-Sep-2020 21:25:05
Comments
Input Data C:\Temp\1\CA1.sav
Active Dataset DataSet2
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working 24
Data File
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are
treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on cases with
no missing values for any variable
used.
Syntax CLUSTER Parameter1
Parameter2 Parameter3
Parameter4 Parameter5
Parameter6
/METHOD WARD
/MEASURE=SEUCLID
/ID=Car
/PRINT SCHEDULE
/PRINT DISTANCE
/PLOT DENDROGRAM VICICLE.
Resources Processor Time 0:00:00.156
Elapsed Time 0:00:00.146

[DataSet2] C:\Temp\1\CA1.sav

a
Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
24 100.0 0 .0 24 100.0
a. Ward Linkage

Page 1
Proximity Matrix

Squared Euclidean Distance


3:Mahindra-
2:Renault Renault 4:Mahindra
Case 1:Logan Logan Edge Logan Edge Verito
1:Logan .000 4.000 10.000 7.000
2:Renault Logan Edge 4.000 .000 8.000 3.000
3:Mahindra-Renault 10.000 8.000 .000 11.000
Logan Edge
4:Mahindra Verito 7.000 3.000 11.000 .000
5:Swift Dzire 12.000 6.000 6.000 5.000
6:Maruti Swift Dzire 2.000 4.000 8.000 5.000
7:Chevrolet Beat 7.000 9.000 23.000 8.000
8:Tata Venture 6.000 6.000 10.000 7.000
9:Chevrolet Aveo 16.000 8.000 8.000 7.000
10:Tata Sumo Spacio 14.000 8.000 12.000 5.000
11:Skoda New Fabia 12.000 8.000 20.000 9.000
12:Hyundai i10 7.000 1.000 11.000 2.000
13:Tata Indigo e-CS 12.000 4.000 4.000 7.000
14:Maruti Suzuki Swift 9.000 7.000 7.000 4.000
15:Maruti Suzuki A-Star 26.000 14.000 26.000 11.000
16:Maruti Suzuki Ritz 12.000 8.000 16.000 11.000
Genus
17:Premier Rio 23.000 15.000 7.000 16.000
18:Nissan Micra 10.000 8.000 4.000 13.000
19:Volkswagen Polo 9.000 11.000 15.000 18.000
20:Skoda Fabia 11.000 13.000 11.000 24.000
21:Mahindra-Renault 11.000 5.000 7.000 8.000
Logan
22:Tata Sumo Victa 16.000 10.000 4.000 17.000
23:Tata Sumo Grande 21.000 9.000 9.000 8.000
24:Tata Indigo Marina 20.000 10.000 8.000 17.000
This is a dissimilarity matrix

Page 2
Proximity Matrix

Squared Euclidean Distance


6:Maruti Swift 7:Chevrolet 8:Tata
Case 5:Swift Dzire Dzire Beat Venture
1:Logan 12.000 2.000 7.000 6.000
2:Renault Logan Edge 6.000 4.000 9.000 6.000
3:Mahindra-Renault 6.000 8.000 23.000 10.000
Logan Edge
4:Mahindra Verito 5.000 5.000 8.000 7.000
5:Swift Dzire .000 6.000 13.000 12.000
6:Maruti Swift Dzire 6.000 .000 5.000 6.000
7:Chevrolet Beat 13.000 5.000 .000 17.000
8:Tata Venture 12.000 6.000 17.000 .000
9:Chevrolet Aveo 6.000 12.000 25.000 6.000
10:Tata Sumo Spacio 6.000 12.000 17.000 14.000
11:Skoda New Fabia 18.000 16.000 15.000 22.000
12:Hyundai i10 7.000 7.000 10.000 9.000
13:Tata Indigo e-CS 4.000 10.000 21.000 10.000
14:Maruti Suzuki Swift 7.000 7.000 14.000 11.000
15:Maruti Suzuki A-Star 14.000 24.000 25.000 24.000
16:Maruti Suzuki Ritz 20.000 18.000 25.000 14.000
Genus
17:Premier Rio 7.000 19.000 32.000 23.000
18:Nissan Micra 6.000 8.000 17.000 18.000
19:Volkswagen Polo 23.000 15.000 20.000 23.000
20:Skoda Fabia 21.000 13.000 24.000 21.000
21:Mahindra-Renault 3.000 7.000 12.000 17.000
Logan
22:Tata Sumo Victa 8.000 14.000 27.000 20.000
23:Tata Sumo Grande 3.000 15.000 24.000 17.000
24:Tata Indigo Marina 12.000 18.000 35.000 12.000
This is a dissimilarity matrix

Page 3
Proximity Matrix

Squared Euclidean Distance


9:Chevrolet 10:Tata Sumo 11:Skoda 12:Hyundai
Case Aveo Spacio New Fabia i10
1:Logan 16.000 14.000 12.000 7.000
2:Renault Logan Edge 8.000 8.000 8.000 1.000
3:Mahindra-Renault 8.000 12.000 20.000 11.000
Logan Edge
4:Mahindra Verito 7.000 5.000 9.000 2.000
5:Swift Dzire 6.000 6.000 18.000 7.000
6:Maruti Swift Dzire 12.000 12.000 16.000 7.000
7:Chevrolet Beat 25.000 17.000 15.000 10.000
8:Tata Venture 6.000 14.000 22.000 9.000
9:Chevrolet Aveo .000 8.000 24.000 9.000
10:Tata Sumo Spacio 8.000 .000 12.000 7.000
11:Skoda New Fabia 24.000 12.000 .000 5.000
12:Hyundai i10 9.000 7.000 5.000 .000
13:Tata Indigo e-CS 4.000 6.000 14.000 5.000
14:Maruti Suzuki Swift 11.000 11.000 11.000 6.000
15:Maruti Suzuki A-Star 14.000 4.000 16.000 11.000
16:Maruti Suzuki Ritz 16.000 10.000 6.000 7.000
Genus
17:Premier Rio 11.000 7.000 23.000 16.000
18:Nissan Micra 16.000 12.000 16.000 11.000
19:Volkswagen Polo 31.000 23.000 7.000 12.000
20:Skoda Fabia 29.000 33.000 23.000 18.000
21:Mahindra-Renault 13.000 11.000 13.000 6.000
Logan
22:Tata Sumo Victa 14.000 14.000 20.000 13.000
23:Tata Sumo Grande 5.000 7.000 19.000 8.000
24:Tata Indigo Marina 6.000 18.000 28.000 13.000
This is a dissimilarity matrix

Page 4
Proximity Matrix

Squared Euclidean Distance


16:Maruti
13:Tata Indigo 14:Maruti 15:Maruti Suzuki Ritz
Case e-CS Suzuki Swift Suzuki A-Star Genus
1:Logan 12.000 9.000 26.000 12.000
2:Renault Logan Edge 4.000 7.000 14.000 8.000
3:Mahindra-Renault 4.000 7.000 26.000 16.000
Logan Edge
4:Mahindra Verito 7.000 4.000 11.000 11.000
5:Swift Dzire 4.000 7.000 14.000 20.000
6:Maruti Swift Dzire 10.000 7.000 24.000 18.000
7:Chevrolet Beat 21.000 14.000 25.000 25.000
8:Tata Venture 10.000 11.000 24.000 14.000
9:Chevrolet Aveo 4.000 11.000 14.000 16.000
10:Tata Sumo Spacio 6.000 11.000 4.000 10.000
11:Skoda New Fabia 14.000 11.000 16.000 6.000
12:Hyundai i10 5.000 6.000 11.000 7.000
13:Tata Indigo e-CS .000 9.000 12.000 10.000
14:Maruti Suzuki Swift 9.000 .000 23.000 15.000
15:Maruti Suzuki A-Star 12.000 23.000 .000 14.000
16:Maruti Suzuki Ritz 10.000 15.000 14.000 .000
Genus
17:Premier Rio 5.000 16.000 15.000 19.000
18:Nissan Micra 6.000 11.000 24.000 18.000
19:Volkswagen Polo 17.000 14.000 35.000 11.000
20:Skoda Fabia 17.000 18.000 49.000 25.000
21:Mahindra-Renault 5.000 8.000 19.000 19.000
Logan
22:Tata Sumo Victa 4.000 15.000 24.000 18.000
23:Tata Sumo Grande 3.000 10.000 11.000 19.000
24:Tata Indigo Marina 4.000 19.000 24.000 18.000
This is a dissimilarity matrix

Page 5
Proximity Matrix

Squared Euclidean Distance


19:
17:Premier 18:Nissan Volkswagen 20:Skoda
Case Rio Micra Polo Fabia
1:Logan 23.000 10.000 9.000 11.000
2:Renault Logan Edge 15.000 8.000 11.000 13.000
3:Mahindra-Renault 7.000 4.000 15.000 11.000
Logan Edge
4:Mahindra Verito 16.000 13.000 18.000 24.000
5:Swift Dzire 7.000 6.000 23.000 21.000
6:Maruti Swift Dzire 19.000 8.000 15.000 13.000
7:Chevrolet Beat 32.000 17.000 20.000 24.000
8:Tata Venture 23.000 18.000 23.000 21.000
9:Chevrolet Aveo 11.000 16.000 31.000 29.000
10:Tata Sumo Spacio 7.000 12.000 23.000 33.000
11:Skoda New Fabia 23.000 16.000 7.000 23.000
12:Hyundai i10 16.000 11.000 12.000 18.000
13:Tata Indigo e-CS 5.000 6.000 17.000 17.000
14:Maruti Suzuki Swift 16.000 11.000 14.000 18.000
15:Maruti Suzuki A-Star 15.000 24.000 35.000 49.000
16:Maruti Suzuki Ritz 19.000 18.000 11.000 25.000
Genus
17:Premier Rio .000 7.000 26.000 28.000
18:Nissan Micra 7.000 .000 11.000 9.000
19:Volkswagen Polo 26.000 11.000 .000 8.000
20:Skoda Fabia 28.000 9.000 8.000 .000
21:Mahindra-Renault 10.000 3.000 14.000 12.000
Logan
22:Tata Sumo Victa 5.000 2.000 15.000 11.000
23:Tata Sumo Grande 6.000 11.000 28.000 28.000
24:Tata Indigo Marina 13.000 14.000 27.000 19.000
This is a dissimilarity matrix

Page 6
Proximity Matrix

Squared Euclidean Distance


21:Mahindra-
Renault 22:Tata Sumo 23:Tata Sumo 24:Tata Indigo
Case Logan Victa Grande Marina
1:Logan 11.000 16.000 21.000 20.000
2:Renault Logan Edge 5.000 10.000 9.000 10.000
3:Mahindra-Renault 7.000 4.000 9.000 8.000
Logan Edge
4:Mahindra Verito 8.000 17.000 8.000 17.000
5:Swift Dzire 3.000 8.000 3.000 12.000
6:Maruti Swift Dzire 7.000 14.000 15.000 18.000
7:Chevrolet Beat 12.000 27.000 24.000 35.000
8:Tata Venture 17.000 20.000 17.000 12.000
9:Chevrolet Aveo 13.000 14.000 5.000 6.000
10:Tata Sumo Spacio 11.000 14.000 7.000 18.000
11:Skoda New Fabia 13.000 20.000 19.000 28.000
12:Hyundai i10 6.000 13.000 8.000 13.000
13:Tata Indigo e-CS 5.000 4.000 3.000 4.000
14:Maruti Suzuki Swift 8.000 15.000 10.000 19.000
15:Maruti Suzuki A-Star 19.000 24.000 11.000 24.000
16:Maruti Suzuki Ritz 19.000 18.000 19.000 18.000
Genus
17:Premier Rio 10.000 5.000 6.000 13.000
18:Nissan Micra 3.000 2.000 11.000 14.000
19:Volkswagen Polo 14.000 15.000 28.000 27.000
20:Skoda Fabia 12.000 11.000 28.000 19.000
21:Mahindra-Renault .000 5.000 6.000 13.000
Logan
22:Tata Sumo Victa 5.000 .000 9.000 8.000
23:Tata Sumo Grande 6.000 9.000 .000 9.000
24:Tata Indigo Marina 13.000 8.000 9.000 .000
This is a dissimilarity matrix

Ward Linkage
Agglomeration Schedule

Cluster Combined Stage Cluster First Appears


Stage Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Coefficients Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Next Stage
1 2 12 .500 0 0 6
2 18 22 1.500 0 0 8
3 1 6 2.500 0 0 11
4 13 23 4.000 0 0 9
5 5 21 5.500 0 0 16
6 2 4 7.000 1 0 13
7 10 15 9.000 0 0 19
8 3 18 11.333 0 2 14
9 9 13 13.833 0 4 12

Page 7
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
Number of clusters
Stage

25
20
15
10
5
0
24: Tata Indigo Marina

23: Tata Sumo Grande

Dendrogram
Cluster 1

10
19
11

1
1
1
3
1
1
3
3
2
9
1

13: Tata Indigo e-CS

9: Chevrolet Aveo
Cluster Combined

21: Mahindra-Renault Logan


Cluster 2

10
19
11
20
17
14
24
16

3
9
2
7
5
8

5: Swift Dzire

17: Premier Rio

22: Tata Sumo Victa

18: Nissan Micra


Coefficients

149.875
116.871
94.000
75.550
65.000
54.500
47.250
41.167
35.917
31.917
28.000
24.250
20.500
16.833

3: Mahindra-Renault Logan
Edge
16: Maruti Suzuki Ritz Genus

11: Skoda New Fabia


Agglomeration Schedule

Cluster 1

Case
15: Maruti Suzuki A-Star
22
21
18
16
17
11
14

7
0
8
6
9
3
0

10: Tata Sumo Spacio

20: Skoda Fabia

19: Volkswagen Polo


Cluster 2

14: Maruti Suzuki Swift


Stage Cluster First Appears

20
19
15
12
10
13
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0

4: Mahindra Verito

12: Hyundai i10

2: Renault Logan Edge


23
22
23
22
21
18
20
21
16
18
20
17
19

0
Next Stage

7: Chevrolet Beat

8: Tata Venture

6: Maruti Swift Dzire

1: Logan

Page 8
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * H I E R A R C H I C A L C L U S T E
R A N A L Y S I S * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Dendrogram using Ward Method

Rescaled Distance Cluster Comb


ine

C A S E 0 5 10 15
20 25
Label Num +---------+---------+---------+-------
--+---------+

Renault Logan Edge 2 -+


Hyundai i10 12 -+---+
Mahindra Verito 4 -+ +-----+
Maruti Suzuki Swift 14 -----+ |
Logan 1 -+---+ +---------------+
Maruti Swift Dzire 6 -+ +---+ | |
Tata Venture 8 -----+ +-+ +-------+
Chevrolet Beat 7 ---------+ | |
Volkswagen Polo 19 -----+---------------------+ +-
------------+
Skoda Fabia 20 -----+ |
|
Tata Sumo Spacio 10 ---+-----------+ |
|
Maruti Suzuki A-Star 15 ---+ +-------------------+
|
Skoda New Fabia 11 ---+-----------+
|
Maruti Suzuki Ritz Genus 16 ---+
|
Tata Indigo e-CS 13 -+-+
|
Tata Sumo Grande 23 -+ +-+
|
Chevrolet Aveo 9 ---+ +---------+
|
Tata Indigo Marina 24 -----+ |
|
Swift Dzire 5 -+-----+ +---------------------
------------+
Mahindra-Renault Logan 21 -+ | |
Page 9
Nissan Micra 18 -+-+ +-------+
Tata Sumo Victa 22 -+ +-+ |
Mahindra-Renault Logan Edge 3 ---+ +-+
Premier Rio 17 -----+

QUICK CLUSTER Parameter1 Parameter2 Parameter3 Parameter4 Parameter5 Param


eter6
/MISSING=LISTWISE
/CRITERIA=CLUSTER(4) MXITER(10) CONVERGE(0)
/METHOD=KMEANS(NOUPDATE)
/SAVE CLUSTER DISTANCE
/PRINT ID(Car) INITIAL ANOVA CLUSTER DISTAN.

Quick Cluster
Notes
Output Created 02-Sep-2020 21:27:40
Comments
Input Data C:\Temp\1\CA1.sav
Active Dataset DataSet2
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working 24
Data File
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are
treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on cases with
no missing values for any clustering
variable used.
Syntax QUICK CLUSTER Parameter1
Parameter2 Parameter3
Parameter4 Parameter5
Parameter6
/MISSING=LISTWISE
/CRITERIA=CLUSTER(4) MXITER
(10) CONVERGE(0)
/METHOD=KMEANS(NOUPDATE)
/SAVE CLUSTER DISTANCE
/PRINT ID(Car) INITIAL ANOVA
CLUSTER DISTAN.
Resources Processor Time 0:00:00.015
Elapsed Time 0:00:00.010
Workspace Required 1568 bytes
Variables Created or QCL_1 Cluster Number of Case
Modified
QCL_2 Distance of Case from its
Classification Cluster Center

[DataSet2] C:\Temp\1\CA1.sav

Page 10
Initial Cluster Centers

Cluster
1 2 3 4
The leg space in the car 4 5 4 1
is comfortable.
Car space is big enough 3 2 1 3
to accommodate luggage
during outings
The car is giving the 1 2 5 4
same mileage as
mentioned in the
brochure
Driving is very 4 3 4 2
comfortable
Security feature of the car 2 4 4 3
is good
Accessories provided in 5 2 5 2
the car are of good quality

a
Iteration History

Change in Cluster Centers


Iteration 1 2 3 4
1 1.633 1.908 1.414 1.752
2 .433 .366 .000 .265
3 .000 .000 .000 .000
a. Convergence achieved due to no or small
change in cluster centers. The maximum absolute
coordinate change for any center is .000. The
current iteration is 3. The minimum distance
between initial centers is 4.123.

Cluster Membership

Name of the
Case Number Car Cluster Distance
1 Logan 1 1.299
2 Renault 2 1.134
Logan Edge
3 Mahindra- 4 1.931
Renault
Logan Edge
4 Mahindra 2 1.195
Verito
5 Swift Dzire 4 1.446
6 Maruti Swift 1 1.479
Dzire
7 Chevrolet 1 1.785
Beat
8 Tata Venture 2 2.035
9 Chevrolet 2 2.171
Aveo
10 Tata Sumo 4 2.153
Spacio
11 Skoda New 1 2.681
Fabia
12 Hyundai i10 2 1.195

Page 11
Cluster Membership

Name of the
Case Number Car Cluster Distance
13 Tata Indigo e- 4 .798
CS
14 Maruti Suzuki 2 2.070
Swift
15 Maruti Suzuki 4 3.398
A-Star
16 Maruti Suzuki 2 2.591
Ritz Genus
17 Premier Rio 4 1.809
18 Nissan Micra 4 1.977
19 Volkswagen 3 1.414
Polo
20 Skoda Fabia 3 1.414
21 Mahindra- 4 1.809
Renault
Logan
22 Tata Sumo 4 1.834
Victa
23 Tata Sumo 4 1.595
Grande
24 Tata Indigo 4 2.646
Marina

Final Cluster Centers

Cluster
1 2 3 4
The leg space in the car 4 4 4 3
is comfortable.
Car space is big enough 3 3 2 3
to accommodate luggage
during outings
The car is giving the 2 3 5 4
same mileage as
mentioned in the
brochure
Driving is very 4 3 5 3
comfortable
Security feature of the car 3 4 5 3
is good
Accessories provided in 4 3 5 2
the car are of good quality

Distances between Final Cluster Centers

Cluster 1 2 3 4
1 2.046 3.112 3.090
2 2.046 3.703 2.089
3 3.112 3.703 3.908
4 3.090 2.089 3.908

Page 12
ANOVA

Cluster Error
Mean Square df Mean Square df
The leg space in the car 3.508 3 .499 20
is comfortable.
Car space is big enough 1.081 3 1.086 20
to accommodate luggage
during outings
The car is giving the 4.616 3 .706 20
same mileage as
mentioned in the
brochure
Driving is very 2.797 3 .706 20
comfortable
Security feature of the car 2.271 3 .557 20
is good
Accessories provided in 6.269 3 .860 20
the car are of good quality
The F tests should be used only for descriptive purposes because the clusters have been chosen to
maximize the differences among cases in different clusters. The observed significance levels are not
corrected for this and thus cannot be interpreted as tests of the hypothesis that the cluster means are
equal.

ANOVA

F Sig.
The leg space in the car 7.031 .002
is comfortable.
Car space is big enough .996 .415
to accommodate luggage
during outings
The car is giving the 6.543 .003
same mileage as
mentioned in the
brochure
Driving is very 3.964 .023
comfortable
Security feature of the car 4.075 .021
is good
Accessories provided in 7.294 .002
the car are of good quality
The F tests should be used only for descriptive purposes because the clusters have been chosen to
maximize the differences among cases in different clusters. The observed significance levels are not
corrected for this and thus cannot be interpreted as tests of the hypothesis that the cluster means are
equal.

Number of Cases in each


Cluster
Cluster 1 4.000
2 7.000
3 2.000
4 11.000
Valid 24.000
Missing .000

Page 13
QUICK CLUSTER Parameter1 Parameter2 Parameter3 Parameter4 Parameter5 Param
eter6
/MISSING=LISTWISE
/CRITERIA=CLUSTER(3) MXITER(10) CONVERGE(0)
/METHOD=KMEANS(NOUPDATE)
/SAVE CLUSTER DISTANCE
/PRINT ID(Car) INITIAL ANOVA CLUSTER DISTAN.

Quick Cluster
Notes
Output Created 02-Sep-2020 21:32:14
Comments
Input Data C:\Temp\1\CA1.sav
Active Dataset DataSet2
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working 24
Data File
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are
treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on cases with
no missing values for any clustering
variable used.
Syntax QUICK CLUSTER Parameter1
Parameter2 Parameter3
Parameter4 Parameter5
Parameter6
/MISSING=LISTWISE
/CRITERIA=CLUSTER(3) MXITER
(10) CONVERGE(0)
/METHOD=KMEANS(NOUPDATE)
/SAVE CLUSTER DISTANCE
/PRINT ID(Car) INITIAL ANOVA
CLUSTER DISTAN.
Resources Processor Time 0:00:00.015
Elapsed Time 0:00:00.019
Workspace Required 1320 bytes
Variables Created or QCL_3 Cluster Number of Case
Modified
QCL_4 Distance of Case from its
Classification Cluster Center

[DataSet2] C:\Temp\1\CA1.sav

Initial Cluster Centers

Cluster
1 2 3
The leg space in the car 3 4 2
is comfortable.
Car space is big enough 3 2 5
to accommodate luggage
during outings

Page 14
Initial Cluster Centers

Cluster
1 2 3
The car is giving the 4 5 2
same mileage as
mentioned in the
brochure
Driving is very 5 3 4
comfortable
Security feature of the car 5 3 2
is good
Accessories provided in 5 1 1
the car are of good quality

a
Iteration History

Change in Cluster Centers


Iteration 1 2 3
1 2.174 2.195 2.000
2 .390 .257 .566
3 .586 .305 .419
4 .000 .000 .000
a. Convergence achieved due to no or
small change in cluster centers. The
maximum absolute coordinate change
for any center is .000. The current
iteration is 4. The minimum distance
between initial centers is 4.899.

Cluster Membership

Name of the
Case Number Car Cluster Distance
1 Logan 1 1.046
2 Renault 1 1.358
Logan Edge
3 Mahindra- 2 1.572
Renault
Logan Edge
4 Mahindra 3 1.650
Verito
5 Swift Dzire 2 1.507
6 Maruti Swift 1 1.262
Dzire
7 Chevrolet 1 2.663
Beat
8 Tata Venture 1 2.519
9 Chevrolet 2 2.252
Aveo
10 Tata Sumo 3 1.650
Spacio
11 Skoda New 3 2.095
Fabia
12 Hyundai i10 3 1.312
13 Tata Indigo e- 2 .819
CS

Page 15
Cluster Membership

Name of the
Case Number Car Cluster Distance
14 Maruti Suzuki 1 2.257
Swift
15 Maruti Suzuki 3 2.392
A-Star
16 Maruti Suzuki 3 2.095
Ritz Genus
17 Premier Rio 2 1.967
18 Nissan Micra 2 1.916
19 Volkswagen 1 2.756
Polo
20 Skoda Fabia 1 2.932
21 Mahindra- 2 1.808
Renault
Logan
22 Tata Sumo 2 1.634
Victa
23 Tata Sumo 2 1.694
Grande
24 Tata Indigo 2 2.339
Marina

Final Cluster Centers

Cluster
1 2 3
The leg space in the car 4 3 3
is comfortable.
Car space is big enough 3 3 4
to accommodate luggage
during outings
The car is giving the 3 4 3
same mileage as
mentioned in the
brochure
Driving is very 4 3 4
comfortable
Security feature of the car 4 3 3
is good
Accessories provided in 4 3 3
the car are of good quality

Distances between Final Cluster Centers

Cluster 1 2 3
1 2.690 2.627
2 2.690 2.737
3 2.627 2.737

Page 16
ANOVA

Cluster Error
Mean Square df Mean Square df
The leg space in the car 3.450 2 .648 21
is comfortable.
Car space is big enough 6.763 2 .544 21
to accommodate luggage
during outings
The car is giving the 5.479 2 .810 21
same mileage as
mentioned in the
brochure
Driving is very 5.063 2 .589 21
comfortable
Security feature of the car 1.575 2 .705 21
is good
Accessories provided in 6.000 2 1.143 21
the car are of good quality
The F tests should be used only for descriptive purposes because the clusters have been chosen to
maximize the differences among cases in different clusters. The observed significance levels are not
corrected for this and thus cannot be interpreted as tests of the hypothesis that the cluster means are
equal.

ANOVA

F Sig.
The leg space in the car 5.327 .013
is comfortable.
Car space is big enough 12.421 .000
to accommodate luggage
during outings
The car is giving the 6.768 .005
same mileage as
mentioned in the
brochure
Driving is very 8.591 .002
comfortable
Security feature of the car 2.234 .132
is good
Accessories provided in 5.250 .014
the car are of good quality
The F tests should be used only for descriptive purposes because the clusters have been chosen to
maximize the differences among cases in different clusters. The observed significance levels are not
corrected for this and thus cannot be interpreted as tests of the hypothesis that the cluster means are
equal.

Number of Cases in each


Cluster
Cluster 1 8.000
2 10.000
3 6.000
Valid 24.000
Missing .000

QUICK CLUSTER Parameter1 Parameter2 Parameter3 Parameter4 Parameter5 Param


eter6

Page 17
/MISSING=LISTWISE
/CRITERIA=CLUSTER(2) MXITER(10) CONVERGE(0)
/METHOD=KMEANS(NOUPDATE)
/SAVE CLUSTER DISTANCE
/PRINT ID(Car) INITIAL ANOVA CLUSTER DISTAN.

Quick Cluster
Notes
Output Created 02-Sep-2020 21:32:31
Comments
Input Data C:\Temp\1\CA1.sav
Active Dataset DataSet2
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working 24
Data File
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are
treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on cases with
no missing values for any clustering
variable used.
Syntax QUICK CLUSTER Parameter1
Parameter2 Parameter3
Parameter4 Parameter5
Parameter6
/MISSING=LISTWISE
/CRITERIA=CLUSTER(2) MXITER
(10) CONVERGE(0)
/METHOD=KMEANS(NOUPDATE)
/SAVE CLUSTER DISTANCE
/PRINT ID(Car) INITIAL ANOVA
CLUSTER DISTAN.
Resources Processor Time 0:00:00.015
Elapsed Time 0:00:00.025
Workspace Required 1080 bytes
Variables Created or QCL_5 Cluster Number of Case
Modified
QCL_6 Distance of Case from its
Classification Cluster Center

[DataSet2] C:\Temp\1\CA1.sav

Initial Cluster Centers

Cluster
1 2
The leg space in the car 4 4
is comfortable.
Car space is big enough 3 2
to accommodate luggage
during outings
The car is giving the 1 5
same mileage as
mentioned in the
brochure
Page 18
Initial Cluster Centers

Cluster
1 2
Driving is very 4 3
comfortable
Security feature of the car 2 3
is good
Accessories provided in 5 1
the car are of good quality

a
Iteration History

Change in Cluster…
Iteration 1 2
1 2.528 2.291
2 .610 .630
3 .000 .000
a. Convergence achieved
due to no or small change
in cluster centers. The
maximum absolute
coordinate change for any
center is .000. The current
iteration is 3. The minimum
distance between initial
centers is 5.916.

Cluster Membership

Name of the
Case Number Car Cluster Distance
1 Logan 1 1.419
2 Renault 1 1.007
Logan Edge
3 Mahindra- 2 1.917
Renault
Logan Edge
4 Mahindra 1 1.736
Verito
5 Swift Dzire 2 1.417
6 Maruti Swift 1 1.736
Dzire
7 Chevrolet 1 2.771
Beat
8 Tata Venture 1 2.585
9 Chevrolet 2 2.123
Aveo
10 Tata Sumo 2 2.123
Spacio
11 Skoda New 1 2.452
Fabia
12 Hyundai i10 1 1.359
13 Tata Indigo e- 2 .712
CS
14 Maruti Suzuki 1 2.125
Swift
15 Maruti Suzuki 2 3.368
A-Star

Page 19
Cluster Membership

Name of the
Case Number Car Cluster Distance
16 Maruti Suzuki 1 2.741
Ritz Genus
17 Premier Rio 2 1.873
18 Nissan Micra 2 2.123
19 Volkswagen 1 2.680
Polo
20 Skoda Fabia 1 3.369
21 Mahindra- 2 1.917
Renault
Logan
22 Tata Sumo 2 1.960
Victa
23 Tata Sumo 2 1.530
Grande
24 Tata Indigo 2 2.551
Marina

Final Cluster Centers

Cluster
1 2
The leg space in the car 4 3
is comfortable.
Car space is big enough 3 3
to accommodate luggage
during outings
The car is giving the 3 4
same mileage as
mentioned in the
brochure
Driving is very 4 3
comfortable
Security feature of the car 4 3
is good
Accessories provided in 4 2
the car are of good quality

Distances between Final


Cluster Centers

Cluster 1 2
1 2.487
2 2.487

ANOVA

Cluster Error
Mean Square df Mean Square df
The leg space in the car 8.167 1 .561 22
is comfortable.
The F tests should be used only for descriptive purposes because the clusters have been chosen to
maximize the differences among cases in different clusters. The observed significance levels are not
corrected for this and thus cannot be interpreted as tests of the hypothesis that the cluster means are
equal.

Page 20
ANOVA

F Sig.
The leg space in the car 14.568 .001
is comfortable.
The F tests should be used only for descriptive purposes because the clusters have been chosen to
maximize the differences among cases in different clusters. The observed significance levels are not
corrected for this and thus cannot be interpreted as tests of the hypothesis that the cluster means are
equal.

ANOVA

Cluster Error
Mean Square df Mean Square df
Car space is big enough .042 1 1.133 22
to accommodate luggage
during outings
The car is giving the 5.042 1 1.042 22
same mileage as
mentioned in the
brochure
Driving is very 8.167 1 .652 22
comfortable
Security feature of the car 5.042 1 .587 22
is good
Accessories provided in 10.667 1 1.152 22
the car are of good quality
The F tests should be used only for descriptive purposes because the clusters have been chosen to
maximize the differences among cases in different clusters. The observed significance levels are not
corrected for this and thus cannot be interpreted as tests of the hypothesis that the cluster means are
equal.

ANOVA

F Sig.
Car space is big enough .037 .850
to accommodate luggage
during outings
The car is giving the 4.840 .039
same mileage as
mentioned in the
brochure
Driving is very 12.535 .002
comfortable
Security feature of the car 8.587 .008
is good
Accessories provided in 9.263 .006
the car are of good quality
The F tests should be used only for descriptive purposes because the clusters have been chosen to
maximize the differences among cases in different clusters. The observed significance levels are not
corrected for this and thus cannot be interpreted as tests of the hypothesis that the cluster means are
equal.

Page 21
Number of Cases in each
Cluster
Cluster 1 12.000
2 12.000
Valid 24.000
Missing .000

Page 22

You might also like