Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Numerical study of thermal control system for rapid heat cycle injection molding process
Moez Hammami, Fatma Kria and Mounir Baccar
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering published
online 14 April 2014
DOI: 10.1177/0954408914527917
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
Additional services and information for Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical
Engineering can be found at:
Subscriptions: http://pie.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations: http://pie.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/04/11/0954408914527917.refs.html
What is This?
Original Article
Abstract
This paper studies heat transfer during rapid heat cycle injection molding process. Actually, the mold is heated and
cooled with channels in which steam or water circulates. The purpose of this numerical study is to improve the design of
heating/cooling system to ameliorate the quality of the polymer part and the cycle productivity. Transfers in mold,
translating thermal phenomena are predicted by the finite volume method and the fractional area volume obstacle
representation in cyclic transient regime. It was found that the steady cycle is obtained rapidly (after two or three
cycles) for the rapid heat cycle molding process when compared to conventional injection molding. The mathematical
modeling was developed to explore the effect of control temperature system characteristics on temperature uniformity
of the cavity surface and thermal response efficiency. The three-dimensional simulation results show the limitations of the
conventional system when compared to the conformal configuration. This research study also compares three conformal
thermal control systems, and shows that the heating energy consumption can be greatly decreased (about 27%) with the
amelioration of the temperature distribution by means of the improvement of the channel layout.
Keywords
Rapid heat cycle molding, thermal control, conformal heating/cooling, numerical analysis
Recently, Li et al.7 have developed a new configur- (RHCM) is suggested. For this purpose, Chen
ation space method to automate the configuration of et al.14 and Chang and Hwang15 have characterized
cooling system for injection mold in 3D with the cap- numerically the heating performance of the electro-
ability to manipulate user-defined constraints. The magnetic induction and the infrared heating.
main function of the C-space used in this work, is to Li et al.16 have investigated in 2D the heat transfer
determine all the possible geometry of the cooling in RHCM equipped with heating channels for produ-
system design with the possibility of exploring both cing rectangular part. To optimize the temperature
topology and geometry. The authors have used their distribution uniformity, the authors have used the
method to investigate the optimal layout cooling variance between the temperatures of the tracking
system for injection mold with multi-cavity. points and their average temperature as an objective
Aiming at the amelioration of the cooling channel function. Actually, the authors have noted that the
performance, many authors8–10 have proposed a con- optimization of the distances between the neighbor
formal cooling method. Xu et al.8 in their study have heating channels can greatly ameliorate the uniform-
searched the optimal location and size of the cooling ity of the mold temperature.
channels to obtain the steady state within one injec- Wang et al.17,18 have proposed a 2D study to opti-
tion cycle. Nevertheless, for the complex shapes case, mize the heating/cooling system design for rapid heat
the surface of a part must be decomposed and then, cycle injection molding. Two heating/cooling media
the cooling systems are generated for each zone one (electric heating/steam heating) were compared. The
by one. Lin9 has modeled and optimized the cooling effect of nature, layout, and structure of the tempera-
channel diameters, cooling channel spacing, and cool- ture control system and mold design on cycle efficiency
ing line equations. He has also predicted the product and part quality were studied by determination of the
performance (warpage) by the developed abductive thermal responses in different cases.
network model. Lam et al.10 have reported a In the aforementioned research works, a conven-
method that uses a genetic algorithm to optimize the tional regulation system with aligned heating channels
cooling channel design (location and size of the cool- is adopted. Recently, Wang et al.19 have carried out
ing channels) and process condition selection. 2D numerical simulations for heat transfer and fati-
Also, Wang et al.11 have used a cooling system that gue analysis to investigate the effect of the conformal
is conformal to the shape of the product to reduce the regulation system on cycle efficiency, structural
cycle time and optimize the temperature uniformity strength, and mold fatigue life. For the optimized
and the volumetric shrinkage. Besides, they studied system, the numerical results have demonstrated
two cases of the cooling efficiency: a helmet and a that the productivity increased by 61.70% and the
cell phone. They have demonstrated that the new temperature uniformity at the cavity surface improved
types of cooling circuit remove heat from the plastic by 80.97%, and the cavity structural strength slightly
parts more uniformly and much faster compared to ameliorated. Nevertheless, the previously mentioned
the conventional straight channels. Moreover, it has RHCM studies provide results only for the first
been found that the channels generated by their cycle without taking into account the temperature dis-
method allow the obtaining of the final product with tribution variation through the injection cycles.
less shrinkage than with conventional cooling circuit. As can be seen, the conformal thermal regulation
On the other hand, Au and Yu12 have proposed a system in RHCM process has not been sufficiently
conformal cooling system with multi-connected investigated in the previous numerical studies. That
porous characteristics based on the duality principle. is why, this paper presents a 3D numerical modeling
Their study has shown that the presented conformal of the RHCM thermal response. The thermal control
cooling passageway can ensure more uniform heat of mold is made with heating/ cooling channels. The
extraction from the mold plate than other configur- aim of this research work is to investigate the effect of
ations. In addition, the authors have found that the channels layout on temperature uniformity of mold
hot spots and the warpages can be eliminated with the cavity surface and heating/ cooling efficiency over a
multi-connected porous passageway. certain number of cycles. For this objective, the heat
Recently, based on morphological concepts, transfer equations translating transfer phenomena
Agazzi et al.13 have introduced the idea of regulation developed in the process are solved using a finite
of the temperatures of the polymer and the mold by a volume method and the fractional area volume obs-
cooling surface enveloping the plastic part. The tacle representation (FAVOR).
authors have also modified the design of the obtained
surface to search the optimal design of the discrete Mathematical formulation and
cooling channels. However, this transition decreases
numerical method
the performance of the cooling system.
On the other hand, to improve the quality of the In RHCM, the mold cavity should be rapidly heated
product, many authors have proposed the increase of to a temperature higher than the polymer glass tran-
the mold temperature before the filling stage. So, a sition temperature, before melt injection. Then the
novel technology called rapid heat cycle molding mold should be cooled rapidly after the filling stage
Hammami et al. 3
Thermal
Calorific conductivity
Temperature ( C) Density (kg/m3) capacity (J/(kg K)) (W/(m K))
In this study, the mold was assumed to be sym- layout. Our objective is to rapidly achieve uniform
metric and then it is sufficient to consider only the temperature distribution on the cavity functional sur-
quarter of the mold (Figure 2). Also, we considered face not only to obtain a panel with high-quality sur-
only the cavity/core blocks since there are insulation face but also to improve the cycle efficiency.
layers between this part and the corresponding retai-
ner plates (heat losses to retainer plates are
neglected).
On the other hand, the resistance to heat and the
transfer between the different parts of mold was neg-
lected (perfect thermal contact). Since, for RHCM
process the heating and cooling phases are the most
important, only the conduction heat fluxes for the
polymer are considered. In order to determine the
heat transfer at the interface channel mold, two over-
all heat transfer coefficients are used:18
For the heating phase, with the presence of liquid
film at the channel surface following the vapor
condensation:
3 0:25
w w w s gHL
hcc ¼ 0:555
DT
where g is the gravity acceleration, D, the channel
diameter, HL, the liquefaction latent heat, w, the
thermal conductivity of the liquefied water, ,
the dynamic viscosity of the liquefied water, w, s,
the densities of the liquefied water and saturated
steam density, and T, the difference between the
temperatures of the liquefied water layer and the
channel surface.
For the cooling phase, a fixed overall heat transfer
coefficient is adopted:
hcr ¼ 3500 W= m2 K
Hammami et al. 5
Initially, the mold has ambient uniform tempera- assumptions of tool opening negligible time, and part
ture of 30 C. The required heating time is determined ejection and tool closing stages in hidden time (with
when the temperature at the cavity functional surface heating phase), a cyclic process was modeled.
exceed 120 C, which represents the heat distortion Subsequently, the mold temperature distribution at
temperature of the used polymer ABS XR 404 the cooling end of the previous cycle was used as
(Table 1). In this study, the filling stage was neglected the initial condition for the next cycle.
because the heating and cooling stages represent more To rapidly heat and cool the mold, insulation
than 90% of the RHCM time. Therefore, we suppose layers were used to limit heat losses at mold plates.
that the cooling stage begins just after the heating The results are given for three configuration systems
phase and the cavity is filled with polymer at injection and fixed channel diameter (6 mm), heating saturated
temperature (230 C). On the other hand, the required steam temperature (180 C), and cooling water tem-
cooling time is determined when the polymer in the perature (30 C).
whole cavity is cooled until 95 C: the temperature To obtain a precise determination of the thermal
must be lower than the glass transition temperature response, the influence of mesh and time on the
because the considered polymer is amorphous. Thus, results was studied. Thus, a computational domain
the plastic part can resist the action of the ejectors and consisting of 102 102 77 cells in X, Y, and Z dir-
its form is preserved after ejection. Therefore, with the ections, respectively with uniform spacing and a time
145 Cycle 2 -P2 (57.57 s) Cycle 3 -P1 (97.18 s) Cycle 3 -P2 (97.18 s)
140
Temperature (°C)
135
130
125
120
A-A* B-B* C-C* D-D*
Cavity surface
Figure 4. Temperature profiles in P1 and P2 for conventional case at the end of the heating phases of the first three cycles.
Figure 5. Temperature distribution in P1, P2, and P3 for conventional case (57.57 s): (a) temperature distribution in P1; (b)
temperature distribution in P2; (c) temperature distribution in P3.
step 10-3s were found to be satisfactory for obtaining heating phase). It was found that there is an import-
accurate results at acceptable computed time. Three ant heating rate in the corner of the LCD panel due
planes P1, P2, and P3, characterized by the point to the contribution of three channels in the tempera-
groups (A, B, C, D); (A*, B*, C*, D*), and (E, F, ture elevation of this zone. On the other hand, the
G), respectively, were selected to study the cavity central part of the mold slowed down the heating of
temperature distribution (Figure 1). the point A. Indeed, heat dissipated quickly to the
central part of the mold and then the lateral areas
were heated more rapidly. Thus, the temperature gap
Conventional temperature control system decrease for the second cycle can be explained by the
Figure 3 shows the 3D model of ¼ RHCM with con- energy preserved in the central part of the mold.
ventional temperature control system. The channels
are distributed directly along the mold bearing in
mind ejector pin and hot runner positions.
Figure 4 represents temperature profiles in two
planes P1 and P2 at the end of the heating phase of
the first, second, and third cycles after 17.64 s, 57.57 s,
and 97.18 s, respectively. It was found that the tem-
perature gap at the cavity surface after heating was
the largest for the first cycle, and reached a constant
value after the second cycle. As shown in Figure 4,
it is obvious that there is a great difference between
the planes P1 and P2, which can be explained by the
channel layout. In fact, compared with the other
points, the heat rate is quite important for point B.
Additionally, Figure 5 shows the temperature dis-
tribution in P1, P2, and P3 at t ¼ 57.57 s. It is found
that the point D* is poorly heated in this system and
the temperature is distributed unevenly. The conven-
tional temperature control system cannot reach the
required temperature distribution uniformity, and
then, the product may contain several defects, such
as bad surface quality, distortion, thermal stress and
others.
Hammami et al. 7
Actually, in this zone, the temperature at the end of distribution obtained with the second conformal
the cooling phase (Figure 8) is far from the ambient system without channel 4 is away from the required
temperature considered for the first cycle. uniformity. But for the steady regime, it is found that
there is a slight difference in temperature values and
cycle duration between the two configurations. On the
Second conformal temperature control system
other hand, a comparison between the two configur-
To ameliorate the temperature control system, we ations of the second conformal system leads to the
must look for a configuration that shortens the heat- deduction that the configuration without channel 4
ing time and provide more uniform temperature dis- facilitates the mold manufacturability by reducing
tribution to improve the part quality. Then after the total number of drilling operations. In addition,
many attempts, we proposed a second conformal tem- if these configurations contribute to a weak increase in
perature control system described in Figure 9. the cycle period, it is noteworthy that the second con-
Figure 10 presents a comparison between two con- formal temperature control system reduces the tem-
figurations of the second conformal system with and perature gap compared to the previous systems. In
without channel 4. For the first cycle, the temperature fact, this system attenuates the excessive temperature
140
Temperature (°C)
135
130
125
120
A-A* B-B* C-C* D-D*
Cavity surface
Figure 7. Temperature profiles in P1 for the first conformal system at the end of the heating phases of the first three cycles.
Figure 8. Temperature distribution in P1 and P3 at t ¼ 73.03 s (end of cooling phase) and 81.46 s (end of heating phase): (a) tem-
perature distribution in P1 (t ¼ 73.03 s); (b) temperature distribution in P3 (t ¼ 73.03 s); (c) temperature distribution in P1 (t ¼ 81.46 s);
(d) temperature distribution in P3 (t ¼ 81.46 s).
125
120
A-A* B-B* C-C* D-D*
Cavity surface
Figure 10. Temperature profiles in P1 for the second conformal system at the end of the heating phases of the first three cycles.
Hammami et al. 9
Figure 11. Temperature distribution in P1 and P3 for the second conformal case without channel 4 (87.85 s): (a) temperature
distribution in P1; (b) temperature distribution in P3.
125
Temperature (°C)
120
t = 87.85 s t = 88 s t = 89 s
115
A-A* B-B* C-C* DD-D*
Cavity surface
Figure 12. Temperature evolution at the cavity surface after the end of the heating stage.
160
140
120
Temperature (°C)
100
80
60
Conventional system
40 First conformal system
Second conformal system with channel 4
20
Second conformal system without channel 4
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Time (s)
the required heating/cooling time, consumed energy two cycles. Reciprocally, the necessary cooling time
and maximal temperature gap at the exterior cavity has not been changed significantly for the different
surface for the first three cycles. It is found that there cycles.
is a considerable difference in the temperature distri- However, as it can be seen in Figure 14, if the first
butions and required heating time between the first conformal system has a substantial effect on the
Cycle number
11.23 28.4
9.27 25.13
8.87 2 24.66
2 861 2329
11.21 28.38
18.03 26.26
15.94 1 24.93
1 16.42 24.71
17.64 28.72
0 5 10 15 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time (s) Time (s)
Cycle number
129.82
Cycle number
5.76
95.32 4.31
2 99.43 2 14.73
10631 18.43
129.46
10.44
213.05 5.58
1 208.05 1 27.28
221.91 21.43
235.5
Figure 14. Comparison of different systems: (a) required heating time [s]; (b) required cooling time [s]; (c) consumed energy [kJ];
(d) maximal temperature gap [K].
Validation
To prove the validity of our developed numerical Table 2. Thermal properties of the retainer plate, insulation
model, we have reproduced the 2D results reported layer, and cavity/core.18
earlier by Wang et al.18 pertaining to the heating
Heat Thermal
phase of RHCM for a rectangular part (Figure 15).
Density capacity conductivity
Two cavity materials are considered: AISI P20 and Material (kg/m3) (J /(kg K)) (W/(m K))
AMPCO 940 (Table 2). Furthermore, the mold is sup-
posed to be heated with channels (D ¼ 6 mm) and con- Retainer plate AISI 1045 7850 486 49.8
stant saturated steam temperature (180 C). Insulation layer Bakelite 1400 1420 0.4
Giving the temperature evolutions of the point ‘B’ Cavity AISI P20 7850 460 34
for the two cavity materials in heating phase, AMPCO 940 8710 380 208
Figure 16 shows a good agreement between our
Hammami et al. 11
180
150
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (s)
Figure 16. Temperature responses of the point ‘B’ on the cavity surface in heating stage.
simulation results and those of Wang et al.18 It is control temperature system have demonstrated
found that the mold with AISI P20 material has improvements in both production rate and part qual-
higher heating speed than the copper alloy mold. ity as compared with conventional production tools:
This is mainly because the AMPCO 940 absorbs this configuration reduces the cycle time by 13.7%,
more heat. the temperature gap by 70.45% and the consumed
energy by 27.37%. In our future studies, to improve
this work, we will take into account the structural
Conclusion analysis to provide stress distribution and then the
A 3D numerical model has been built to study the heat- fatigue life of the RHCM.
ing and cooling of RHCM for LCD panel production
and determine the thermal control temperature system
Funding
efficiency. The proposed numerical model is proven to
be a useful tool for optimizing the thermal control This research received no specific grant from any funding
agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
system enabling a greater efficiency of the RHCM pro-
cess. Three configurations of the thermal control
system were studied and multiple cycles were modeled Conflict of interest
to allow the system to be stabilized. It has been demon- None declared.
strated that a cyclic ‘steady state’ is reached after two to
three cycles and there is a big difference between tem-
References
perature distributions at the first cycle and at the steady
state. In fact, it was found that the consumed energy for 1. Yu CJ and Sunderland JE. Determination of ejection
temperature and cooling time in injection molding.
the mold heating in the steady state decrease by about
Polym Eng Sci 1992; 32(3): 191–197.
50% compared with the first cycle because of the energy 2. Zarkadas DM, Xanthos M and York OH.
preserved in the central part of the mold after cooling. Prediction of cooling time in injection molding by a sim-
On the other hand, it has been proven that the 2D simu- plified equation. In: Antec Plast: Conf Proc 2004; 1:
lation can mask the increase of the temperature in the 655–659.
corner of the panel. Thus, it has been noted that the 3D 3. Sobotka V, Agazzi A, Boyard N, et al. Parametric model
simulation is obligatory to optimize the temperature for the analytical determination of the solidification and
control system performance. cooling times of semi-crystalline polymers. Appl Therm
Also, the limit of the conventional temperature Eng 2013; 50: 416–421.
control system has been put into evidence. In fact, it 4. Tang LQ, Chassapis C and Manoochehri ES. Optimal
has been revealed that there is a great difference cooling system design for multi-cavity injection molding.
Finite Elem Anal Des 1997; 26: 229–251.
between the temperature distributions in the parallel
5. Qiao H. A systematic computer-aided approach to cool-
and perpendicular planes to the channel directions, ing system optimal design in plastic injection molding.
and in this case the gap obtained was 18.41 C at Int J Mech Sci 2006; 48: 430–439.
the end of the heating phase. In fact, it was found 6. Hassan H, Regnier N, Pujos C, et al. Modeling the effect
that the temperature was distributed unevenly: the of cooling system on the shrinkage and temperature of
panel inferior extremity is poorly heated. It was also the polymer by injection molding. Appl Therm Eng 2010;
found that the tools with the second conformal 30: 1547–1557.
7. Li CG, Li CL, Liu Y, et al. A new C-space method to 16. Li XP, Zhao GQ, Guan YJ, et al. Optimal design of
automate the layout design of injection mould cooling heating channels for rapid heating cycle injection mold
system. Comput-Aid Des 2012; 44: 811–823. based on response surface and genetic algorithm. Mater
8. Xu X, Sachs E and Allen S. The design of conformal Des 2009; 30: 4317–4323.
cooling channels in injection molding tooling. Polym 17. Wang G, Zhao GQ, Li H, et al. Research of thermal
Eng Sci 2001; 41(7): 1265–1279. response simulation and mold structure optimization
9. Lin JC. Optimum cooling system design of a free-form for rapid heat cycle molding processes, respectively,
injection mold using an abductive network. J Mater with steam heating and electric heating. Mater Des
Process Technol 2002; 120: 226–236. 2010; 31: 382–395.
10. Lam YC, Zhai LY, Tai K, et al. An evolutionary 18. Wang G, Zhao GQ, Li H, et al. Analysis of thermal
approach for cooling system optimization in plastic cycling efficiency and optimal design of heating/cooling
injection moulding. Int J Product Res 2004; 42(10): systems for rapid heat cycle injection molding process.
2047–2061. Mater Des 2010; 31: 3426–3441.
11. Wang Y, Yua KM, Wang CCL, et al. Automatic design 19. Wang G, Zhao GQ, Li H, et al. Multi-objective opti-
of conformal cooling circuits for rapid tooling. Comput- mization design of the heating/cooling channels of the
Aid Des 2011; 43: 1001–1010. steam-heating rapid thermal response mold using par-
12. Au KM and Yu KM. Modeling of multi-connected ticle swarm optimization. Int J Therm Sci 2011; 50:
porous passageway for mould cooling. Comput-Aid 790–802.
Des 2011; 43: 989–1000. 20. Patankar SV. Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow,
13. Agazzi A, Sobotka V, LeGoff R, et al. Optimal cooling Series in computational methods in mechanics and ther-
design in injection moulding process - A new approach mal sciences. New York: McGraw Hill, 1980.
based on morphological surfaces. Appl Therm Eng 2013; 21. Hirt C and Sicilian J. A porosity technique for the def-
52: 170–178. inition of obstacles in rectangular cell meshes. In:
14. Chen SC, Jong WR and Chang JA. Dynamic mold sur- Fourth international conference on numerical ship hydro-
face temperature control using induction heating and its dynamics, Washington, DC, 1985.
effects on the surface appearance of weld line. J Appl 22. Douglass JE and Gunn J. A general formulation of
Polym Sci 2006; 101(2): 1174–1180. alternating-direction implicit methods. Numer Math
15. Chang PC and Hwang S. Simulation of infrared rapid 1964; 6: 428.
surface heating for injection molding. Int Commun Heat 23. Moldflow plastic insight release 5.0, 2002.
Mass Transf 2006; 49: 3846–3854.